Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 37 Issue 2
Apr.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2018  >  37(2): 294-299
JIANG Fuwei, LI Liang, CHEN Hang. Critical conditions for karst collapses in the Yongwen Middle School, Guiyang, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(2): 294-299. doi: 10.11932/karst20180217
Citation: JIANG Fuwei, LI Liang, CHEN Hang. Critical conditions for karst collapses in the Yongwen Middle School, Guiyang, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(2): 294-299. doi: 10.11932/karst20180217
shu

Critical conditions for karst collapses in the Yongwen Middle School, Guiyang, China

doi: 10.11932/karst20180217

  • Guizhou Institute of Technology

  • Publish Date: 2018-04-25
    Abstract
  • There are 7 karst collapses happened and 1 potential collapse site in the Yongwen Middle School of Guiyang city, which pose a serious threat on the safety of teachers and students and property there. This site is characterized by highly soluble bedrock, thin covering clay layer and strong groundwater erosion;these have caused the site to be a high-risk karst collapse in this area. Through laboratory simulation test,it is realized that the karst collapse hazard follpwed a fissure-seepage-disintegration model. The results also show that the soil water content is critical in the disintegration and the formation of karst collapses. Furthermore, 8 sets of undisturbed samples with different water content are used to conduct disintegration tests. They demonstrate that the water content of 26.8% is the critical value to trigger karst collapse, while 0~26.8% is the condition for generation of such a risk at the site.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    姜伏伟.大藤峡水利枢纽工程防护区岩溶塌陷灾害防治综合研究［D］.北京：中国地质大学(北京),2015.
    [2]
    石树静,张勤军,康志强.南宁市坛洛镇岩溶塌陷群成因机制分析［J］.中国岩溶, 2015, 34(5): 507-514.
    [3]
    王延岭,陈伟清,蒋小珍,等.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷发育特征及形成机理［J］.中国岩溶, 2015, 34(5): 495-506.
    [4]
    魏永耀,孙树林,黄敬军,等.徐州岩溶塌陷时空分布规律及成因分析［J］.中国岩溶, 2015, 34(1): 52-57.
    [5]
    王飞,柴波,徐贵来,等. 武汉市岩溶塌陷的演化机理研究［J］.工程地质学报, 2017, 25(3): 824-832.
    [6]
    万志清,秦四清,李志刚,等.土洞形成的机理及起始条件［J］.岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(8): 1377-1382.
    [7]
    谢忠球,万志清,钱海涛.人工抽水引起土洞扩展条件的分析［J］.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007, 37(4): 778-782.
    [8]
    蒋小珍,雷明堂,管振德.单层土体结构岩溶土洞的形成机理［J］.中国岩溶, 2012, 31(4): 426-432.
    [9]
    Waltham T, Bell F,Culshaw. Sinkholes and subsidence ［M］. Karst and cavernous rocks in engineering and construction. Springer, Chichester, 2005．
    [10]
    White W B. Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains ［M］. Oxford University Press: New York, 1988: 464.
    [11]
    Ford D C, Williams P F. Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology ［M］. Unwin Hyman: London, 1989: 601．
    [12]
    Sowers G F. Building on sinkholes［M］. ASCE, NewYork, 1996: 202.
    [13]
    Beck B F. Environmental and engineering effects of sinkholes: The processes behind the problems［J］. Environ mental Geology Water Science, 1988, 12(2):71-78.
    [14]
    余业雄,欧阳振华.地下水位下降引起地表塌陷的作用机理研究［J］.露天采矿技术, 2005(3):20-22.
    [15]
    蒙彦,殷坤龙,雷明堂.水位波动诱发岩溶塌陷的概率分析［J］.中国岩溶, 2006, 25(3): 239-241, 245.
    [16]
    袁杰,高宗军,马海会.论岩溶地下水位对岩溶塌陷形成的控制作用以山东枣庄市岩溶地面塌陷区为例［J］.中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2010, 21(4): 95-98.
    [17]
    冯克印,郑庭明,董强,等.基于水动力场控制的岩溶塌陷预警预报研究［J］.工程勘察, 2006(10):29-31, 37.
    [18]
    蒋小珍,雷明堂,管振德.岩溶塌陷灾害的水动力条件危险性评价指标:以广西贵港青云村为例［J］. 地下空间与工程学报, 2012, 8(6): 1316-1321.
    [19]
    陈冬琴,唐仲华.岩溶塌陷水动力-力学耦合过程数值模拟-以武汉市青菱乡为例［J］.中国农村水利水电, 2016(2):139-144.
    [20]
    Fuwei Jiang. Experimental study on the critical triggering condition of soil failure in subsidence sinkholes. Environmental earth science. 2015,74(1): 693-701.
    [21]
    Fuwei Jiang. A new method to test the antipermeability strength of clay failure under high water pressure. Acta geotechnica slovenica,2015,12（2）:37-43.
    [22]
    姜伏伟.广西武宣土洞发育水动力条件评价［J］.水文地质工程地质,2017, 45(2):90-95.
    [23]
    张鑫,崔可锐,査甫生.覆盖型岩溶塌陷临界水位降幅模型试验研究［J］.科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(12): 195-199.
    [24]
    王滨,贺可强,孙建敏.岩溶塌陷临界土洞高度的确定：以唐山市体育场岩溶塌陷为例［J］.工程地质学报, 2005, 13(3): 320-324.
    [25]
    王滨,贺可强.岩溶塌陷临界土洞的极限平衡高度公式［J］.岩土力学, 2006, 27(3): 458-462.
    [26]
    肖武权.岩溶土洞稳定临界深度的初步研究［J］.中国岩溶, 2016, 35(2): 197-201.
    [27]
    刘晓明,张旺林,吴从义.塌陷土洞的地面安全警戒距离研究［J］.自然灾害学报, 2015, 24(1): 158-163.
    [28]
    姜伏伟.岩溶塌陷发育机理模式研究［J］.中国岩溶,2017，36（6）：759-763.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]FENG Yawei, MAO Ningli, LI Weili. Zoning of early warning for karst collapses in the Jingquan area of Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(2): 421-431. doi: 10.11932/karst20240207
    [2]PAN Zongyuan, DAI Jianling, WEN Rihai, MENG Yan, JIANG Xiaozhen, MA Xiao, BAI Bing, WU Yuanbin, ZHANG Xin. Experiment on monitoring and early warning of karst collapses based on acoustic emission technology[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(5): 1166-1178. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y020
    [3]JIANG Xiaozhen, FENG Tao, ZHENG Zhiwen, LEI Mingtang, ZHANG Wei, MA Xiao, YI Xiaojuan. A review of karst collapse mechanisms[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(3): 517-527. doi: 10.11932/karst20230304
    [4]WANG Youzhi, YANG Ning, YU Linhong, LV Lingfeng. Development characteristics and prevention countermeasures of karst collapse in Zhongqiao of Yantai[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(6): 1007-1015. doi: 10.11932/karst20220612
    [5]FENG Yawei. Distribution and genesis of karst collapse in Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 205-214. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y01
    [6]LI Zhuojun, MENG Yan, DONG Zhiming, JIA Long, PAN Zongyuan, GUAN Zhende, ZHOU Fubiao. Experimental study of gas tracer simulation of karst collapse development process: An example of Jinshazhou, Guangzhou[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(2): 238-245. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y18
    [7]MENG Yan, LEI Mingtang. Analysis of situation and trend of sinkhole collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 411-417. doi: 10.11932/karst20190311
    [8]JIANG Xiaozhen, LEI Mingtang. Monitoring technique and its application of karst groundwater-air pressure in karst collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(5): 786-791. doi: 10.11932/karst20180517
    [9]WANG Qingjiu, YE Xiaohua, MENG Meng, LUO Jiao, LYU Chuanzhong. Characteristics of caprock-karst combination in typical karst collapsearea along the Yangtze River in Anhui Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 859-866. doi: 10.11932/karst20170609
    [10]GAO Peide, WANG Linfeng. Analysis of collapse mechanism for mantled karst collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 770-776. doi: 10.11932/karst20170602
    [11]JIA Long, MENG Yan, DAI Jianling. Analysis of karst collapse susceptibility in Guang-Fo-Zhao regions[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 819-829. doi: 10.11932/karst20170604
    [12]JIANG Fuwei. Study on the developing model of karst collapse[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(6): 759-763. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y37
    [13]JIA Long, WU Yuan-bin, PAN Zong-yuan, YIN Ren-chao, MENG Yan, GUAN Zhen-de. A review of the research on karst and sinkhole of red beds in China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(1): 67-73. doi: 10.11932/karst20160110
    [14]LI Yan-gui, LIU Zi-long, YU Xiao-min, LUO Shui-yu, YONG Fan, JIANG Zheng-zhong. Formation conditions and mechanisms of karst subsidence: A case study of Huangzhuang village in Tangshan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(3): 299-307.
    [15]CHEN Yixiang, GAN Fuping, LU Chengjie, WEI Jiyi. The self-potential method and its application in karst collapses[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2013, 32(4): 480-486.
    [16]GUAN Zhen-de, JIANG Xiao-zhen, GAO Ming. A calibration test on optical fiber sensing device for karst collapse monitoring[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(2): 173-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.010
    [17]WAN Zhi-bo, WU Xiong, XU Sheng, LI Yuan-zhong, YANG Rui-ying, CHEN Hong-han, GAO Ming-xian, ZHANG Shun-feng. ANALYSIS ON THE CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSES OF THE KARST COLLAPSE IN ZAOZHUANG[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(2): 146-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.02.010
    [18]MENG Yan, YIN Kun-long, LEI Ming-tang. PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS ON KARST COLLAPSE INDUCED BY WATER TABLE FLUCTUATION[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(3): 239-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.03.009
    [19]LI Yu, LEI Ming-tang, JIANG Xiao-zhen. KARST COLLAPSE MONITORING IN LITANG, GUANGXI[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(4): 341-346. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.04.015
    [20]LI Yu, ZHU Ping, LEI Ming-tang, JIANG Xiao-zhen, DAI Jian-ling, MENG Yan. MONITORING TECHNIQUE AND METHODS OF THE KARST COLLAPSES[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2005, 24(2): 103-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.02.003
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 谢丽辉. 富水砂卵石地层盾构隧道与地面下伏空洞安全距离计算模型. 城市轨道交通研究. 2024(12): 46-54 .
    2. 刘荣. 铁路隧道穿越岩溶区施工引起地表变形预测. 市政技术. 2023(06): 129-136 .
    3. 王平，张彦文，俞栋华，程爱平，乔宇. 不同土层结构下覆盖型岩溶塌陷试验研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2023(10): 100-109 .
    4. 胡志新，徐光黎，张艺凡，熊启华，王芮琼，曾嘉. 基于正交分析法的覆盖型岩溶塌陷影响因素敏感性分析. 中国锰业. 2020(04): 81-85 .
    5. 柳林，姜伏伟，张发旺，刘伟，栾崧. 岩溶地下工程施工抽水诱发黏土层地面塌陷机理及临界条件探讨. 中国岩溶. 2019(05): 752-758 . 本站查看
    6. 何忠明，杨煜，曾新发，刘森峙. 土洞演化过程中路基变形的响应分析. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(12): 3068-3076 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-0505101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 27.1 %FULLTEXT: 27.1 %META: 69.8 %META: 69.8 %PDF: 3.2 %PDF: 3.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.8 %其他: 11.8 %China: 6.3 %China: 6.3 %上海: 15.3 %上海: 15.3 %中卫: 0.2 %中卫: 0.2 %中山: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %北京: 1.4 %北京: 1.4 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %崇左: 0.9 %崇左: 0.9 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %广州: 0.0 %德宏: 0.0 %德宏: 0.0 %德阳: 0.0 %德阳: 0.0 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %河池: 0.0 %河池: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海西: 0.0 %海西: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %珠海: 0.7 %珠海: 0.7 %纽约: 1.6 %纽约: 1.6 %芒廷维尤: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.0 %萍乡: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %西宁: 2.3 %西宁: 2.3 %贵港: 0.0 %贵港: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %邢台: 0.0 %邢台: 0.0 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %驻马店: 56.8 %驻马店: 56.8 %其他China上海中卫中山临汾六安北京南昌南阳咸宁哥伦布嘉兴天津安康崇左巴黎常州广州德宏德阳昆明桂林武汉沈阳河池洛阳济宁海西温州湖州珠海纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥荆州萍乡蚌埠衡水西宁贵港贵阳遵义邢台重庆金华长春驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(2010.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2459) PDF downloads(755) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return