• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 36 Issue 5
Oct.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIAO Youjun, PAN Xiaodong, ZENG Jie, REN Kun. Numerical modeling of the influence of karst-conduit structure on variation of spring flow[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 736-742. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y48
Citation: JIAO Youjun, PAN Xiaodong, ZENG Jie, REN Kun. Numerical modeling of the influence of karst-conduit structure on variation of spring flow[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 736-742. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y48

Numerical modeling of the influence of karst-conduit structure on variation of spring flow

doi: 10.11932/karst2017y48
  • Publish Date: 2017-10-25
  • The spring hydrograph, such as variation of flow, can be used to extract information on the structure of karst conduits, while the complexity of these conduits makes such study not very successful. To solve this problem, this work employs a numerical model of the known karst conduit structure to reveal the relationship between the spring hydrograph and the conduit structure, which will help address this issue for real cases. This conduit flow model is built with MODFLOW-CFP to study the karst aquifer response in a storm period. The basic features of the karst aquifer of this simplified model are taken from a deeply-cut valley of the Liuchong river in Guizhou Province. This karst aquifer consists of a single conduit and a fracture network which is treated as an equivalent continuous porous medium. The valley is regarded as the river boundary of the karst water system, and the water level of the river is higher than the location of the spring outlet, so the conduit can be saturated with water. In the modeling spring hydrograph, the peak flow value is chosen as the dependent variable in the analysis of the karst conduit, and 4 parameters of the conduit structure and the recharge ratio of sinkhole are studied, respectively. The results show that the pipe diameter, wall permeability and the concentrated recharge of the sinkhole are characterized by positive correlation with the spring flow peak, of which the wall permeability has the greatest effect on the flow peak. When pipe bending is smaller, the spring flow becomes bigger, while the growth of the flow peak is limited by the tortuous flow path. The water flow status experiences two abrupt changes at the two critical Reynolds number of conduit-wall roughness, leading to twice of sudden variations of flow peak.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    袁道先, 朱德浩, 翁金桃. 中国岩溶学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1993.
    [2]
    Birk S, Liedl R, Sauter M. Karst Spring Responses Examined by Process-Based Modeling[J]. Ground Water, 2006, 44(6): 832-836.
    [3]
    Dreybrodt W. Processes in karst systems: physics, chemistry, and geology[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
    [4]
    Reimann T, Geyer T, Shoemaker W B, et al. Effects of dynamically variable saturation and matrix-conduit coupling of flow in karst aquifers[J]. Water Resources Research, 2011, 47(11): 1-19.
    [5]
    柯婷婷, 束龙仓. 基于泉流量过程线的管道流与裂隙流识别[J].中国岩溶, 2015, 34(5):460-467.
    [6]
    扈志勇. 不同降雨过程下岩溶水文系统信息的响应研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2010.
    [7]
    孙晨, 束龙仓, 鲁程鹏,等.裂隙—管道介质泉流量衰减过程试验研究及数值模拟[J].水利学报, 2014, 45(1): 50-57.
    [8]
    常勇. 裂隙—管道二元结构的岩溶泉水文过程分析与模拟[D].南京:南京大学, 2015.
    [9]
    Hill M E. An evaluation of conduit conceptualizations and model performance[D]. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2008.
    [10]
    钱家忠,吴剑锋,董洪信,等.徐州市张集水源地裂隙岩溶水三维等参有限元数值模拟[J].水利学报,2003,34(3):37-41.
    [11]
    Reimann T, Rehrl C, Shoemaker W B, et al. The significance of turbulent flow representation in singlecontinuum models[J]. Water Resources Research, 2011, 47(9): 1-15.
    [12]
    Shoemaker W B, Kuniansky E L, Birk S, et al. Documentation of a conduit flow process (CFP) for MODFLOW-2005[M]. Reston, VA: U.S.Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 2008.
    [13]
    吴吉春, 薛禹群, 靳孟贵. 地下水动力学[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2009.
    [14]
    钱家忠,潘国营,吴剑锋,等.焦作矿区裂隙岩溶水优势流形成机理研究[J].水利学报,2003, 34(6):95-99.
    [15]
    易连兴,夏日元,唐建生,等.地下水连通介质结构分析:以寨底地下河系统实验基地示踪试验为例[J].工程勘察,2010,38(11):38-41.
    [16]
    刘丽红,束龙仓,鲁程鹏. 基于管道流模型的岩溶含水系统降雨泉流量响应规律:以贵州后寨典型小流域为例[J]. 吉林大学学报 (地球科学版), 2010, 40(5): 1083-1089.
    [17]
    Kaufmann G. Modelling karst geomorphology on different time scales[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 106(1): 62-77.
    [18]
    毛亮,于青春,王敬霞,等.降雨对裂隙型岩溶含水系统演化影响的数值模拟研究[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(1):42-48.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1971) PDF downloads(1292) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return