Contrast study of Ca2+ and HCO3- concentration in karst-water samples between field test and laboratory test values

ZHOU Changsong; ZOU Shengzhang; ZHU Danni; XIE Hao; CHEN Hongfeng; YU Jianguo

doi:10.11932/karst2017y33

Volume 36 Issue 5

Oct. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CARSOLOGICA SINICA > 2017 > 36(5): 684-690

ZHOU Changsong, ZOU Shengzhang, ZHU Danni, XIE Hao, CHEN Hongfeng, YU Jianguo. Contrast study of Ca2+ and HCO3- concentration in karst-water samples between field test and laboratory test values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 684-690. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y33

Citation:

ZHOU Changsong, ZOU Shengzhang, ZHU Danni, XIE Hao, CHEN Hongfeng, YU Jianguo. Contrast study of Ca2+ and HCO3- concentration in karst-water samples between field test and laboratory test values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 684-690. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y33

Citation:

ZHOU Changsong, ZOU Shengzhang, ZHU Danni, XIE Hao, CHEN Hongfeng, YU Jianguo. Contrast study of Ca2+ and HCO3- concentration in karst-water samples between field test and laboratory test values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 684-690. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y33

PDF( 1729 KB)

Contrast study of Ca2+ and HCO3- concentration in karst-water samples between field test and laboratory test values

doi: 10.11932/karst2017y33

1.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MLR & GZAR/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification
2.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MLR & GZAR/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification/China University of Geosciences (Beijing)

Publish Date: 2017-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

In order to grasp the differences of Ca2+and HCO3- concentration in karst water between field test and laboratory test values, 85 groundwater samples collected from Zunyi, Hechi and Loudi City were analyzed. The results show that 88.2% of the sample sites of Ca2+ have field values greater than the experimental values, while 64.7% of the sample sites of HCO3- have field values greater than the experimental values. Using the ratio method, (CaY/CaS) is of an average value of 1.11, mainly concentrating between 1.0 and 1.2, accounting for 70% of the total, and (HCO3Y/HCO3S) with a average value of 1.02, mainly concentrated in between 0.95 and 1.1, accounting for 75% of the total. Under certain conditions of the laboratory test error, artificial random error has some impact on the result of the test. The results provide basic data to improve the quality of field surveys of underground water.
- groundwater,
- karst area,
- ratio method,
- Ca,
- HCO3-

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	李小牛,周长松,周孝德,等.污灌区浅层地下水污染风险评价研究［J］.水利学报,2014,45(3):326-334,342.
[2]	袁忠玉,彭淑惠.近年昆明市茨坝—岗头村富水块段地下水位持续下降原因分析［J］.中国岩溶,2013,32(3):313-317.
[3]	李大秋,高焰,王志国,等.济南泉域岩溶地下水水质变化分析［J］.中国岩溶,2002,21(3):202-205.
[4]	罗军刚,解建仓,阮本清.基于熵权的水资源短缺风险模糊综合评价模型及应用［J］.水利学报,2008,39(9):1092-1097,1104.
[5]	江思珉，王佩，施小清,等.地下水污染源反演的Hooke_Jeeves吸引扩散粒子群混合算法［J］.吉林大学学报（地球科学版）,2012,42(6):1866-1872.
[6]	罗炳佳.贵阳市某岩溶地区地下汽油污染物运移特征分析［J］.中国岩溶,2011,30(1):113-118.
[7]	邹胜章, 李录娟, 卢海平,等.岩溶地下水系统防污性能评价方法［J］.地球学报,2014,35(2):262-268.
[8]	Short R T, Fries D P, Kerr M L, et al. Underwater mass spectrometers for in situ chemical analysis of the hydrosphere［J］.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry,2001,12(6) : 676-682.
[9]	晃怀京,郑海涛,崔卫华,等.地下水中有机氯农药的半透膜采样方法野外实验［J］.岩矿试,2007,26(2):121-125.
[10]	Harry F. Hemond, Amy V. Mueller, Michael Hemond. Field testing of lake water chemistry with a portable and an AUV-based mass spectrometer［J］.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2008,19(10):1403-1410.
[11]	李敬杰,蔡五田,耿婷婷,等.野外测量条件对石油污染地下水常规水化学参数的影响［J］.环境工程,2015,33(4):70-74.
[12]	尹明.我国地质分析测试技术发展现状及趋势［J］.岩矿测试,2009,28(1):37-52.
[13]	刘晓雯.地下水污染调查中水样无机组分检测质量控制体系的建立和应用［J］.岩矿测试,2010,29(5):580-584.
[14]	Kot A, Zabiegal A B, Namiesnik J. Passive sampling for long-term monitoring of organic pollutants in water ［J］.Trends in Analytical Chemistry,2000,19(7):446-459.
[15]	Солодов И Н. 原位测量地下水性质的必要性［J］.水文地质工程地质技术方法动态,2006(2) : 34-37.
[16]	郭秀红,饶竹,徐建明,等.地下水水质检测中质量异议问题的原因分析［J］.岩矿测试,2006,25(2):1770-180.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Weiwei, JIA Long, LIU Chang, ZHOU Fubiao. Sources and pathways of arsenic pollution in the karst water source area in the west of Jinchengjiang district, Hechi City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 854-862, 875. doi: 10.11932/karst20240405
[2]	JIANG Feng, JIQIN Kebuzi, CAO Jianwen, WANG Ruofan, ZHAO Liangjie. Source characteristics and influencing factors of groundwater hydrochemistry in the karst areas of central Guizhou[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 889-899. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y028
[3]	ZHANG Wenqiang, TENG Yue, TANG Fei, WANG Jinxiao, XU Qingyu, ZHANG Hailin. Groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and evolution of the karst water system in the Feicheng fault block in Shandong Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1047-1060, 1084. doi: 10.11932/karst20230515
[4]	LIU Zhizheng, LI Shuang, LIU Baihan, ZHANG Xuesong, LIU Huafeng, PENG Junfeng, LIU Yunde. Source-tracing of sulfate in groundwater of Xizhang Well Group in the Liuzheng water source area of Zibo City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 1074-1084. doi: 10.11932/karst20230517
[5]	DING Guantao, LI Changsuo, WEI Shanming, WANG Shaojuan, LI Yan, LU Qianqian, SUN Bin, Liu Haoran. Study on the influence of external recharge of Yufu river on karst groundwater[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 907-916. doi: 10.11932/karst20230504
[6]	LIN Yongsheng, DU Yuchao, ZOU Shengzhang, FAN Lianjie, QUAN Xiqiang. Structural characteristics of karst groundwater system beneath Jinfoshan, Nanchuan district, Chongqing City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 658-664. doi: 10.11932/karst20200502
[7]	LIANG Donghui, GAN Fuping, ZHANG Wei, HAN Kai. Study on the effectiveness of the microtremor HVSR method in detecting underground river pipelines and caves in karst areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(1): 95-100. doi: 10.11932/karst20200104
[8]	WANG Yu. Study on watershed boundary division for unified evaluation of surface water and groundwater resources and environment in karst areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(6): 823-830. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y08
[9]	QUAN Xiqiang, TAO Xin, QIN Suni, DU Wenyue, YU Jianguo, GUO Yongli. Determination of 36 volatile organic compounds in landfill leachate in karst area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(6): 925-931.
[10]	LUO Fei, SU Chuntian, PAN Xiaodong, YANG Yang, ZHAO Guangshuai. Hydrochemical characteristics and geochemical sensitivity of groundwater in typical karst hilly regions:A case study of Eastern Wugang[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(2): 211-217. doi: 10.11932/karst20180207
[11]	WANG Yu. Vertical zoning of groundwater runoff system in karst plateau[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11932/karst20180101
[12]	XU Zhongping, ZHOU Xun, CUI Xiangfei, TA Mingming, WANG Xinyun, ZHANG Ying. Research advances of numerical simulation of groundwater in karst areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(4): 475-483. doi: 10.11932/karst20180401
[13]	YU Cuicui. Numerical simulation of karst groundwater and dynamic prediction of spring water level in the Mingshui spring area , Ji’nan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(4): 533-540. doi: 10.11932/karst20170415
[14]	QIN Xiaoqun, SONG Kaiben, HUANG Qibo, LAN Funing, HUANG Chunyang, HUANG Hui. Groundwater occurrence characteristics and drilling well models in karst peak forest areas, Guangxi, China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 618-625. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y28
[15]	WEI Xinghu, LEI Li, LIU Shujuan, GUAN Gongcou. Analysis on the absorbing, transfer, restoration and adaptation mechanism of calcium in different peak forest plants in northern Guangdong Province，China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(3): 368-376. doi: 10.11932/karst20170311
[16]	ZHENG Xiaozhan, GUO Yu, DAI Jianling, CHEN Xiaoyue, HUANG Jianmin. Groundwater monitoring and numerical simulation under the influence of linear engineering in karst areas: A case study of the Jinshazhou area, Guangzhou City [J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 657-666. doi: 10.11932/karst20160607
[17]	WANG Yu, WANG Zi-wei. Patterns of karst geomorphologic combinations in areas with rich groundwater[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(4): 314-324. doi: 10.11932/karst20150402
[18]	YU Le, WANG Li-heng, WANG Ju-ping. Study of karst groundwater flow characteristics of a mine in Pingnan county, Guangxi through connection test[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(1): 31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2014.01.005
[19]	GUO Fang, JIANG Guang-hui, X IA Qing, LI Ke. Hydro-chemical variation of karst groundwater under the impact of land use in Donghe catchment, Hunan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(3): 212-218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2007.03.005
[20]	Ha Chengyou, Tang Bangyi, Lu Rongan. CHARACTERISTICS OF FISSURE KARST IN THE MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN LIME AND GROUNDWATER NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE WEST MOUNTAIN OF TAIYUAN, SHANXI PROVINCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1989, 8(1): 41-46.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	黄江浔，李清光，安丽，杜双雪，郭兴强. 喀斯特小流域地表水碳酸盐系统化学平衡对酸性矿山废水的缓冲作用. 中国岩溶. 2023(01): 19-28 . 本站查看
2.	李永林，冯源强，周会东，胡亚燕，杜建军，次卓嘎，柳诚. 样品采取和保存对地热水样水化学分析影响. 广州化工. 2022(02): 84-86 .
3.	王晤岩，李清光. 淡水碳酸盐湖泊中CaCO_3-CO2_3-HCO_3-CO_2化学平衡对CO_2的缓冲作用——以贵州百花湖为例. 中国岩溶. 2021(04): 572-579 . 本站查看
4.	周长松，邹胜章，谢浩，朱丹尼，陈宏峰，俞建国. 测试滞后对岩溶水样性质的影响研究. 岩矿测试. 2019(01): 92-101 .

Other cited types(1)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF(1729.0KB)

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (1632) PDF downloads(1015)