Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 36 Issue 4
Aug.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2017  >  36(4): 454-462
WANG Zhenxing, LI Xiangquan, HOU Xinwei, ZHANG Chunchao, GUI Chunlei, ZUO Xuefeng. Karst aquifer protection evaluation to the Sangu spring basin under the condition of coal mining[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(1): 28-39. doi: 10.11932/karst20190104
Citation: SU Qijiao, AN Yulun, MA Shibin, ZHAO Yong, AN Jiakun, AN Hongfeng. Landscape ecological quality of different lithological regions in karst mountains:A case study in the Luodian county of Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(4): 454-462. doi: 10.11932/karst20170405
shu

Landscape ecological quality of different lithological regions in karst mountains:A case study in the Luodian county of Guizhou Province

doi: 10.11932/karst20170405
  • 1.

    Qingzhen Big Data Development Management Center/School of Geographic and Environmental Science/Guizhou Mountain Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing Application Laboratory

  • 2.

    School of Geographic and Environmental Science/Guizhou Mountain Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing Application Laboratory

  • 3.

    School of Geographic and Environmental Science/Guizhou Mountain Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing Application Laboratory/Department of Journey and Historic Culture, Liupanshui Normal College

  • 4.

    The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Guizhou Province

  • 5.

    Guiyang City, the ninth Middle School

  • 6.

    Environmental Monitoring Center of Guizhou Province

  • Publish Date: 2017-08-25
    Abstract
  • In order to reveal the characteristics of landscape patterns and landscape ecological quality of different lithological partitions in karst mountainous area, this paper takes Luodian county of Guizhou Province as a case through analysing the data of lithologies, landscape patterns and landscape distribution, obtained from the periods of 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015, respectively, with the intention of understanding the influence of human activities on landscape ecological quality. In the meantime, change of the landscape ecological quality was comparatively analyzed for different lithological partitions from the perspective of landscape stability and anthropogenic interference degree, which can be used to reflect the difference of landscape ecological quality in different lithological regions. The study shows that in general the landscape stability of non-karst region is higher than that of semi-karst region, while landscape stability of typical karst region is the lowest. Moreover, artificial disturbance on the landscape in semi-karst region is higher than that of non-karst region, while the disturbance degree in typical karst region is the lowest. As a result, landscape ecological quality of non-karst region is better than that of semi-karst region, whereas this quality in typical karst region is the worst. From 2000 to 2015, the landscape ecological quality tended to declines in different lithological areas. In typical karst region, this 4-period landscape ecological qualities were 0.30, 0.18, -0.24, and -0.18, respectively, which had an obvious decline between 2000 and 2010, but rose from 2010 to 2015. In semi-karst region, these ecological qualities were 0.55, 0.17, 0.32, and -0.51, respectively; they declined during this period except for years from 2005 to 2010 when they slightly rose. In non-karst region, however, the 4period values were 0.66, 0.38, 0.27, and -0.30, respectively, had been declining in the entire period since 2000. The landscape ecological qualities of semi-karst region are more susceptible to the influence of both lithology and human activity. Therefore, for ecological environment governance, measures should be taken as the basis of the differences of lithological regions where more attentions should be paid on the landscape ecological quality of semi-karst.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(27)
  • [1]
    伍光和,王乃昂,胡双熙,等.自然地理学(第四版)［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2008:275-279.
    [2]
    杨明德.贵州喀斯特发育的一些特点.见:喀斯特研究-杨明德论文选集［C］.贵阳：贵州民族出版社,2003:1-20.
    [3]
    杨明德.贵州高原喀斯特地貌结构及演化规律.见:喀斯特研究-杨明德论文选集［C］.贵阳：贵州民族出版社, 2003:20-33.
    [4]
    安裕伦.喀斯特人地关系地域系统的结构与功能刍议［J］.中国岩溶,1994,13(2):153-159.
    [5]
    An Hongfeng, An Yulun, Yuan Shicong, et al. Change and simulation and prediction of the karst rocky desertification sensitivity in Guizhou province［J］. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2010, 11(1112): 155-161.
    [6]
    郭晓娜,苏维词,李强,等.基于GIS和RS的黔南喀斯特地区人居环境自然适应性评价［J］.中国岩溶，2016,35(2):218-225.
    [7]
    马士彬,张勇荣,安裕伦,等.山区城市土地利用动态空间分布特征：以贵州省六盘水为例［J］.自然资源学报,2012,27(3):489-496.
    [8]
    王培彬,安裕伦.2000-2010年贵州喀斯特地区石漠化时空特征分析［J］.贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(3):10-15.
    [9]
    马士彬,张勇荣,安裕伦.基于Logistic-CA-Markov模型的石漠化空间变化规律［J］.中国岩溶,2015,34(6):591-598.
    [10]
    胡锋,安裕伦,许璟.“亚喀斯特”概念与景观特征的初步探讨：以贵州为例［J］.地理研究,2015,34(8):1560-1580.
    [11]
    许璟,安裕伦,胡锋,等. 基于植被覆盖与生产力视角的亚喀斯特区域生态环境特征研究：以黔中部分地区为例［J］.地理研究,2015,34(4):644-654.
    [12]
    殷正宙.编制1∶400万喀斯特分区图的几点意见［J］.水文地质工质,1959, 8(6):15-16.
    [13]
    朱学稳.西藏高原喀斯特的性质及“残余峰林”质疑［J］.中国岩溶,1994,13(3): 220-228.
    [14]
    安裕伦,吕涛,熊康宁,等.“3S”在贵州喀斯特石漠化现状研究中的应用探讨.见:学术研讨会论文集［C］.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001:144-152.
    [15]
    贺中华,杨胜天,梁虹,等.基于GIS和RS的喀斯特流域枯水资源影响因素识别：以贵州省为例［J］.中国岩溶，2004,23(1):48-55.
    [16]
    傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明,等.景观生态学原理及应用(第二版)［M］.北京:科学出版社,2011:211-212.
    [17]
    朱永恒,濮励杰,赵春雨.景观生态质量评价研究：以吴江市为例［J］.地理科学,2007,27(2):182-187.
    [18]
    李猷,王仰麟,彭建,等.基于景观生态的城市土地利用适宜性评价：以丹东市为例［J］.生态学报,2010,30(8):2141-2150.
    [19]
    吴见,张艳,侯兰功.安徽省2000-2010年景观生态质量变化研究［J］.南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）,2015,39(2):84-90.
    [20]
    李大通.碳酸盐岩层的分类原则和确定类型的BASIC程序［J］.中国岩溶,1985,4(4):308-314.
    [21]
    Nusser M. Understanding cultural landscape transformation are photographic surveys in Chitral eastern Hindukush, Pakistan［J］.Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,57(3/4):241-255.
    [22]
    Marull J, Mallarach J M. A new GIS methodology for assessing and predicting landscape and ecological connectivity: applications to the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Catalonia Spain)［J］.Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,71: 243-262.
    [23]
    许洛源,黄义雄,叶功福,等.基于土地利用的景观生态质量评价：以福建省海坛岛为例［J］.水土保持研究，2011,18(2):208-212.
    [24]
    张菊梅.重庆北部绿地系统景观动态分析与格局优化［D］.重庆:西南大学,2009:1-57.
    [25]
    邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级(第二版)［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2007:106-116.
    [26]
    谷晓坤,陈百明.土地整理景观生态评价方法及应用：以江汉平原土地整理项目为例［J］.中国土地科学,2008,22(12):58-62.
    [27]
    邵景安,李阳兵,王世杰,等.岩溶山区不同岩性和地貌类型下的景观斑块分布与多样性分析［J］.自然资源学报,2007,22(3):477-486.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WU Dongqiang, XING Liting, LAN Xiaoxun, MENG Qinghan, HOU Yusong, ZHAO Zhenhua, SUN Bin, YUAN Xuesheng. Pore structure characteristics of karst water-bearing media in Jinan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(4): 680-688.
    [2]QU Qiunan, SONG Xiaoqing, TANG Yujie, YANG Zhenhua. Groundwater occurrence condition and hydrochemical characteristics：A case study of Anlong county map sheet in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 378-387. doi: 10.11932/karst20190307
    [3]LI Fengli, WANG Weiping, HUANG Qiang, LI Jinchao, QU Shisong, DU Juan. Water quantity optimal schemes of the karst aquifer recharge with multi-source water at the Yufuhe river, Ji’nan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(1): 17-26. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y31
    [4]XIE Guowen, YANG Pingheng, LU Bingqing, CHEN Feng, ZHANG Yu, CHI Yanbin, DENG Shujin. Application of high-resolution tracer technique in identifying the source of water gushing and the structure of aquifer medium in karst tunnel[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(6): 892-899.
    [5]Lyu Quanbiao, HU Xiaonong, CAO Jianhua, HUANG Fen, ZHU Hao. Aquifer structure of karst areas derived from borehole pumping and tracer tests[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(5): 727-735. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y29
    [6]YANG Zhen-hua, SU Wei-ci, WU Ke-hua, ZHANG Feng-tai, WANG Wei. An improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water quality in karst aquifer based on level characteristic values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(6): 551-559. doi: 10.11932/karst20150603
    [7]KONG Xiang-sheng, MIAO Ying, LUAN Ri-jian, YANG Qi-yong, QIN Su-ni. Preliminary study on contaminant of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vulnerable karst aquifer in a heavy industry district[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(4): 331-340. doi: 10.11932/karst20150404
    [8]HAO Chun-ming, HE Pei-yong, WANG Yi, HOU Shuang-lin, DONG Jian-fang. Study on the evolutionary process of sulfate concentration in Ordovician karst water after coal mining in Fengfeng mine[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(4): 425-431. doi: 10.11932/karst20140406
    [9]WANG Wei-ping, XU Yu, HE Mao-qiang, CAO Bin. Case of fracture karst aquifer recharge with urban roofwater at home and abroad—Reflection on the relevant issues in Jinan City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(3): 325-330. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.03.016
    [10]Petar Milanovi?. Transboundary karst aquifers of south-eastern dinarides[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(2): 123-134.
    [11]YI Lian-xing, ZHANG Zhi-gan, LI Meng-de, LI xue-zheng. ANALYSIS ON MONOCLINIC KARST AQUIFER AND ITS SEEPAGE CONDITION— A Case in the River Bend of Jiangpinghe Hydropower Station,Loushui River, Hubei Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(1): 29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.01.006
    [12]Chen Weihai, Zhang Zhigan. THE CHARACTERISTICS AND REGULATIVE CAPACITY OFKARST AQUIFERS IN PEAK FOREST-PLAIN AREA[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1999, 18(1): 19-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.1999.01.003
    [13]Li Dongchen. RECOGNIZING HYDROCHEMICAL FEATURES OF BASAL WATER AND WATER GUSH SOURCE IN BAIMIAO COAL MINE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1995, 14(4): 295-304.
    [14]Xiao Xiangfeng. GENERAL OPTIMUM FITTING FOR ANALYSING AQUIFER PARAMETERS ON MICROCOMPUTER[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1990, 9(2): 188-196.
    [15]Zhang Wei. Institvte of Karst Geology, Guilin , China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1990, 9(1): 15-24.
    [16]Han Xingrui, Shi Jian, Tang Jiansheng, Li Qongsong. METHOD OF STUDY ON KARST GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS IN NORTH CHINA --CASE HISTORY OF SANGU SPRING BASIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1990, 9(3): 197-210.
    [17]Lin Min, Chen Chongci. ANALYTIC MODELS OF GROUNDWATER FLOWS TO KARST SPRINGS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1988, 7(3): 247-258.
    [18]Xiao Xiangfeng. APPLICATION OF MICROCOMPUTER IN ANALYSING PARAMETERS OF WATER-BEARING FORMATION --A METHOD OF COMMON STANDARD CURVE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1987, 6(2): 101-110.
    [19]Tian Kaiming. AN INITIAL APPROACH TO THE ORIGINATION MECHANISM OF "DOUBLE-LEVEL FLOW" IN A THICK AQUIFER[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1985, 4(Z1): 124-130.
    [20]Song linhua, A.H.Bath, T.C.Atkinson. A STUDY OF STABLE ISOTOPE HYDROLOGY OF CHALK AND OVERLYING DRIFT IN NORTH NORFOLK,ENGLAND[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1983, 2(1): 61-68.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 于杨，肖一鑫，陈彦美. 基于PLEIK模型的岩溶地下水防污性能评价——以贵阳市汪家大井泉域为例. 资源环境与工程. 2024(01): 55-62 .
    2. 莫美仙，刘燕华，邱文龙，王娜. 盘溪大龙潭岩溶地下河系统防污性能研究. 玉溪师范学院学报. 2024(03): 23-32 .
    3. 赵春红，申豪勇，卢海平，王志恒，梁永平，唐春雷. 晋祠泉域岩溶地下水防污性能评价与水质保护区划分. 中国岩溶. 2024(04): 822-830 . 本站查看
    4. 杨娟娟，钟凯，张海荣，王慧. 关于陕北煤炭开采中水资源保护相关问题探索. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2022(09): 145-147 .
    5. 金艺华，尹振浩. 基于包气带动力学的长白山天然矿泉水水源地土壤吸附能力研究. 能源与环保. 2022(09): 73-78 .
    6. 张春潮，侯新伟，李向全，王振兴，桂春雷，左雪峰. 三姑泉域岩溶地下水水化学特征及形成演化机制. 水文地质工程地质. 2021(03): 62-71 .
    7. ZHANG Chun-chao，HOU Xin-wei，LI Xiang-quan，WANG Zhen-xing，GUI Chun-lei，ZUO Xue-feng，MA Jian-fei，GAO Ming. Numerical simulation and environmental impact prediction of karst groundwater in Sangu Spring Basin, China. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering. 2020(03): 210-222 .
    8. 高旭波，王万洲，侯保俊，高列波，张建友，张松涛，李成城，姜春芳. 中国北方岩溶地下水污染分析. 中国岩溶. 2020(03): 287-298 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 22.9 %FULLTEXT: 22.9 %META: 74.0 %META: 74.0 %PDF: 3.1 %PDF: 3.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.7 %其他: 11.7 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 11.1 %China: 11.1 %上海: 11.1 %上海: 11.1 %中卫: 0.5 %中卫: 0.5 %佳木斯: 0.1 %佳木斯: 0.1 %北京: 3.4 %北京: 3.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %吴忠: 0.1 %吴忠: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %崇左: 0.7 %崇左: 0.7 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %石嘴山: 0.1 %石嘴山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %纽约: 1.4 %纽约: 1.4 %芒廷维尤: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 1.0 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 2.2 %西宁: 2.2 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %郑州: 0.1 %郑州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %阿里: 0.1 %阿里: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %驻马店: 52.8 %驻马店: 52.8 %其他其他China上海中卫佳木斯北京南宁南昌吴忠哈尔滨娄底安康宣城崇左常德平顶山广州成都昆明杭州株洲武汉沈阳洛阳海口渭南湘潭珠海石嘴山石家庄纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁贵阳郑州重庆长春阿里青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(3697.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1786) PDF downloads(1113) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return