Study on the regional evapotranspiration over different surface conditions of the Longzici spring drainage

SHEN Haoyong; LIANG Yongping; CHENG Yang; HUANG Chunling

doi:10.11932/karst20170211

Volume 36 Issue 2

Apr. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CARSOLOGICA SINICA > 2017 > 36(2): 234-241

SHEN Haoyong, LIANG Yongping, CHENG Yang, HUANG Chunling. Study on the regional evapotranspiration over different surface conditions of the Longzici spring drainage[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(2): 234-241. doi: 10.11932/karst20170211

Citation:

SHEN Haoyong, LIANG Yongping, CHENG Yang, HUANG Chunling. Study on the regional evapotranspiration over different surface conditions of the Longzici spring drainage[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(2): 234-241. doi: 10.11932/karst20170211

Citation:

PDF( 5409 KB)

Study on the regional evapotranspiration over different surface conditions of the Longzici spring drainage

doi: 10.11932/karst20170211

Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics,MLR&GZAR

Publish Date: 2017-04-25

Abstract

Abstract

The Longzici spring system, one of the largest karst spring in North China, is located in the western margin of the Linfen basin, covering an area of 2,250 km2. The springs discharge at an annually average rate of 4.81 m3/s derived from the records from 1955 to 2013. The karst water has been an important source for local water supply. But now the spring flow dramatically degrades because of climate change and human activities. Precipitation is the main source of the spring water recharge. This recharge occurs in two ways, namely the infiltration of precipitation over the carbonate rock areas and linear leakage of stream and river water. So it is very important to evaluate the recharge of karst water through an afforestation project. Based on NOAA/AVHRR data, the daily and monthly evapotranspiration (ET) of the Longzici spring are estimated during the period of 2014.4-2014.10, using surface energy balance system (SEBS) and the data of meteorological stations in Linfen. The ET has a monthly average value of 99.21 mm, with the maximum monthly value of 197.26 mm in June and the minimum one of 40.49 mm in April. In addition, the regional ET over different lithology and vegetation coverage rates are analyzed through spatial overlay. The results indicate that the ET increases with the increasing vegetation coverage rates in the carbonate rock outcrop regions, while it is the lowest in the medium vegetation coverage rate of clastic rock regions. Overall, the ET in the clastic rock regions is higher than that in the carbonate rock outcrop regions. If only ET is taken into consideration, keeping the medium vegetation coverage rate in clastic rocks will be favorable to increasing of recharge of karst water and afforestation in carbonate rock areas will enhance ET but not favorable to recharge from rainfall infiltration.
- surface energy balance system(SEBS),
- evapotranspiration,
- surface condition,
- karst water supply,
- Longzici spring

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	梁永平，王维泰，赵春红，等.中国北方岩溶水变化特征及其环境问题［J］.中国岩溶，2013，32（1）：34-42.
[2]	梁永平，韩行瑞.中国北方岩溶地下水环境问题与保护［M］.北京：地质出版社，2013.
[3]	高波.煤炭资源整合对临汾市城市水源地影响及保护对策［J］.中国水利，2014（7）：35-37.
[4]	陈军锋，李秀彬.森林植被变化对流域水文影响的争论［J］.自然资源学报，2001，16（5）：475-478.
[5]	周晓峰，赵惠勋，孙慧珍.正确评价森林水文效应［J］.自然资源学报，2001，16（5）：420-426.
[6]	李慧赟，张永强，王本德.基于遥感叶面积指数的水文模型定量评价植被和气候变化对径流的影响［J］.中国科学：技术科学，2012，42（8）：963-971.
[7]	李玉山.黄土高原森林植被对陆地水循环影响的研究［J］.自然资源学报，2001，16（5）：426-430.
[8]	高洋洋，左其亭.植被覆盖变化对流域总蒸散发量的影响研究［J］.水资源与水工程学报，2009，20（2）：26-31.
[9]	金晓媚，郭任宏，夏薇.基于MODIS数据的柴达木盆地区域蒸散量的变化特征［J］.水文地质工程地质，2013，40（6）：8-12.
[10]	章程，袁道先.IGCP448岩溶生态系统全球对比研究进展［J］.中国岩溶，2005，24(1):83-88.
[11]	梁永平，潘军峰.山西省岩溶泉域水资源保护［M］.北京：中国水利水电出版社，2008.
[12]	Su Z. Remote sensing of land use and vegetation for mesoscale hydrological studies ［J］.International Journal of Remote Sensing，2000，21(2):213-233．
[13]	Su Z. The Surface Energy Balance System(SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes［J］.Hydrology and Earth System Sciences，2002，6(1):85-89.
[14]	郭晓寅，程国栋.遥感技术应用于地表面蒸散发的研究进展［J］.地球科学进展，2004，19（1）：107-114.
[15]	卢娜，万力.基于RS的鄂尔多斯北部盆地地表蒸发量的计算［J］.地质通报，2008，27（8）：1165-1167.
[16]	王黎明，周云轩，王钦军.吉林省西部地表蒸散与土地利用/覆盖变化关系［J］.吉林大学学报：地球科学版，2009，39（5）：907-911.
[17]	崔亚莉，徐映雪，邵景力，等.应用遥感方法研究黄河三角洲地表蒸发及其与下垫面关系［J］.地学前缘，2005，12（S1）：159-165.
[18]	陈云浩，李晓兵，史培军.中国西北地区蒸发散量计算的遥感研究［J］.地理学报，2001，56（3）：261-268.
[19]	吴炳方，邵建华.遥感估算蒸腾蒸发量的时空尺度推演方法及应用［J］.水利学报，2006，37（3）：286-292.
[20]	金晓媚，万力，梁继运.水均衡法验证蒸散量计算的可靠性：以张掖盆地为例［J］.现代地质，2008，22（2）：299-303.
[21]	庞冬辉，沈丽娜，蒋忠诚，等.广西弄拉峰丛洼地灌丛岩生优势种光合生理生态特征日变化研究［J］.中国岩溶，2010，29(3):293-300.
[22]	杨劼，高清竹，乌力吉，等.库布齐沙地油蒿蒸腾作用特征及其与环境因子的关系［J］.内蒙古大学学报（自然科学版），1999，30(3):372-376.
[23]	梁钊雄，王兮之，魏兴琥，等.基于TM影像的广西河池市岩溶地区植被覆盖度的动态变化研究［J］.中国岩溶，2014，33(2):208-215.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHAO Chunhong, SHEN Haoyong, LU Haiping, WANG Zhiheng, LIANG Yongping, TANG Chunlei. Vulnerability assessment of karst groundwater in the Jinci spring area and the zoning of protected areas for water quality[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 822-830. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y034
[2]	WANG Jia, LI Sheng, ZHENG Yanhong, PAN Wen, SUN Yan. Daily dynamics effects of microclimate of two underlying surfaces in rocky desertification areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(4): 810-821, 853. doi: 10.11932/karst2024y023
[3]	LI Changsuo, GAO Shuai, YIN Yanwei, PANG Wei, SUN Bin, LIU Haoran, CHEN Huanliang, GANG Shenting, XING Liting, GENG Fuqiang. Research on recharge paths and recharge ratios near the four major spring groups in Jinan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(5): 875-886. doi: 10.11932/karst20230501
[4]	WANG Dawei, QIAO Xiaojuan, GAO Bo, JIA Xiaojun. Dynamic characteristics and influence factors of discharge of the Longzici karst spring in Shanxi Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40(3): 420-429.
[5]	HAN Kai, LIANG Yongping, YAN Liangjun, LIANG Donghui, SHEN Haoyong, TANG Chunlei. Control of the Jinci fault on karst water in the Jinci spring basin revealed by integrated geophysical surveys[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 745-752. doi: 10.11932/karst20200511
[6]	LU Shuaishuai, ZHENG Xiuqing, LI Xuqiang, CHEN Junfeng, ZHANG Yongbo, ZANG Hongfei. Health assessment of karst groundwater ecosystem of Jinci spring area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(1): 34-41. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y18
[7]	LIANG Tengfei, CHENG Jianmei, ZHANG Naiyan, SHI Wen, KAISAERJIANG·Aihemaiti. Numerical study on surface water leakage replenishment of the Fenhe 2nd reservoir into the Jinci spring system[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 147-153. doi: 10.11932/karst2020022
[8]	GAO Xubo, XIANG Xuanli, HOU Baojun, GAO Liebo, ZHANG Jianyou, ZHANG Songtao, LI Chengcheng, JIANG Chunfang. Application of hydrochemistry coupled with stable isotopes in the study of karst water hydrogeology[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(5): 629-636. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y26
[9]	WANG Kai, ZHENG Xiuqing, JIA Zhenxing, ZANG Hongfei. Analysis on temporal and spatial variation characteristics of karst groundwater hydrochemistry in Jinci spring area based on EOF and M-K Models[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2018, 37(5): 690-697. doi: 10.11932/karst20180506
[10]	WANG Xian-guo, QIU Jin-bo, GE Yan. Characteristics of the Longjian spring karst water system[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(4): 432-440. doi: 10.11932/karst20140407
[11]	HUANG Si-jing, CHENG Xin-yi, ZHAO jie, ZHANG Wen-zheng. Test on the dolomite dissolution under subaerial temperature and pressure[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(4): 349-359. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.04.002
[12]	ZHOU Xiao-ping, SHEN Li-cheng, WANG Peng, XU Shang-quan, LIN Ming-zhu. Degasification of the outcropped epikarst water：A case study on the Baishuwan Spring in Nanchuan，Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(4): 432-436. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.013
[13]	Luo Jian, Jiang Yong-jun, Hu Yi-jun, Li Lin-li, LIU Wen. Seasonal changes of soil dissolution rate and estimations on carbon sequestration in the subalpine epikarst spring zone：A case study in the Shuifang Spring in Jinfoshan, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(4): 443-448. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.04.015
[14]	LONG Yu-qiao, LI Wei, LI Yan-ge, YANG Zhong-ping. Tank model of the Jinci Karst Groundwater system under the conditions of simultaneous draining in mining[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(1): 27-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.01.005
[15]	HAO Yong-hong, HUANG Deng-yu, LIU jie, WANG Xue-meng. STUDY ON THE TIME-LAG BETWEEN PRECIPITATION AND DISCHARGE IN NIANGZIGUAN SPRING BASIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2003, 22(2): 92-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2003.02.003
[16]	WANG Zai-gao, LIANG Hong. ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF GROUND FACTORS TO THE CHARACTERISTICSOF LOW FLOW IN KARST DRAINAGE BASINS BASED ON GIS —Case Study of the Rivers in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2002, 21(1): 55-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.01.011
[17]	SUN Cai-zhi, WANG Jin-sheng, LIN Xue-yu. RESEARCH ON THE JINCI SPRING'S RECOVERY AFTER THE USE OF WATER FROM THE YELLOWRIVER ASMUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(1): 11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.01.003
[18]	Chen Honghan, Zhang Yongxiang, Ren Zhongyu, Liu Wenjun, Liu Benhua. THE STUDY OF CONJUNCTIVE ALLOCATION MODEL OF SURFACE WATER RESERVOIR AND UNDERGROUND KARST WATER RESERVOIR IN THE KARST AREAS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1995, 14(1): 61-70.
[19]	Cai Wutian, Dai Aide, Yuan Gangkun, Zhao Caozhu, Pascal Bidaux. STUDYING THE RECHARGE BOUNDARY OF A KARST SPRING SYSTEM BY MEANS OF TRACERS[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1988, 7(4): 378-383.
[20]	Fang Yuxian. INVESTIGATON AND BLOCKING OF KARST WATER ENTRANCE IN YANMA-ZHUANG COAK MINE, JIAOZUO[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 1985, 4(Z1): 109-116.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	岑鑫雨，钟金先，邓国仕，许模. 基于迟滞排泄水箱模型模拟岩溶断流泉水文过程. 中国岩溶. 2023(04): 711-721 . 本站查看
2.	申豪勇，李佳，王志恒，谢浩，梁永平，Yongxin Xu，韩双宝，任建会，潘尧云，赵春红，赵一. 黄河支流汾河流域水资源开发利用现状及生态环境问题. 中国地质. 2022(04): 1127-1138 .
3.	邢立亭，于苗，宿庆伟，赵振华，高扬，张云峰. 地下工程建设对岩溶水流场的影响及其修复. 地质科技通报. 2022(05): 242-254 .
4.	郭清海，张晓博. 高温热泉中稀土元素的地球化学行为及其指示意义:以西藏搭格架水热区为例. 地质科技通报. 2022(05): 172-180 .
5.	谢浩，梁永平，李军，邹胜章，申豪勇，赵春红，王志恒. 龙子祠泉域地下水金属元素分布特征及健康风险评价. 环境科学. 2021(09): 4257-4266 .
6.	梁永平，申豪勇，赵春红，王志恒，唐春雷，赵一，谢浩，石维芝. 对中国北方岩溶水研究方向的思考与实践. 中国岩溶. 2021(03): 363-380 . 本站查看
7.	王志恒，梁永平，唐春雷，申豪勇，赵春红，郭芳芳，谢浩，赵一. 北方断流岩溶大泉复流的生态修复模式与复流措施效果的定量评价——以山西太原晋祠泉为例. 中国地质. 2020(06): 1726-1738 .
8.	申豪勇，梁永平，徐永新，张发旺. 中国北方岩溶地下水补给研究进展. 水文. 2019(03): 15-21 .
9.	丁杰，陈鹤，魏征，张宝忠，许小燕. 改进SEBS模型在大兴地区农田蒸散发反演中的应用. 灌溉排水学报. 2018(S2): 121-126 .
10.	赵春红，梁永平，王维泰，唐春雷，申豪勇. 北京西山泉域岩溶水系统特征探讨. 中国岩溶. 2017(05): 641-647 . 本站查看

Other cited types(1)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF(5409.0KB)

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (1459) PDF downloads(1273)