• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 35 Issue 6
Dec.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XING Deke, WU Yanyou, WU Yansheng, YU Rui, LI Minghong, YAO Xiangping. Photosynthetic physiological response of Jatropha carcas and Pterocarya stenoptera seedlings to five simulated karst adversities[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 649-656. doi: 10.11932/karst20160606
Citation: XING Deke, WU Yanyou, WU Yansheng, YU Rui, LI Minghong, YAO Xiangping. Photosynthetic physiological response of Jatropha carcas and Pterocarya stenoptera seedlings to five simulated karst adversities[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 649-656. doi: 10.11932/karst20160606

Photosynthetic physiological response of Jatropha carcas and Pterocarya stenoptera seedlings to five simulated karst adversities

doi: 10.11932/karst20160606
  • Publish Date: 2016-12-25
  • The karst ecosystem is vulnerable and rocky desertification in karst regions develops rapidly. The situation of karst ecosystem becomes increasingly severe. In order to quickly build a stable forest ecosystem, it is better to select the appropriate plant species to carry out revegetation. Research on photosynthetic response traits can help to quickly identify plant adaptability to karst environment. In this study, 5 different karst adversities including high pH, high bicarbonate, drought, low phosphorus (P) and low nutrient were simulated, and Hoagland solution was taken as control. Jatropha carcas and Pterocarya stenoptera seedlings were cultivated with these treatment solutions synchronously. Photosynthetic response traits of these two plant species to 5 different simulated adversities were analyzed through determining the photosynthetic characteristics and variation of stable carbon isotopic compositions (δ13C). On the 15th day, the net photosynthetic rates (Pn) of J. carcass seedlings under alkalescent, drought, low P, high bicarbonate and low nutrient were 4.39, 0.27, 2.58, 3.08, 6.26 μmol?m-2?s-1, respectively. On the 25th day, the values became 4.09, 0.66, 4.57, 3.83, 4.04 μmol?m-2?s-1, respectively. Pn and water use efficiency (WUE) of P. stenoptera seedlings were all lower than J. carcas seedlings. Pn of P. stenoptera seedlings under alkalescent, low P, high bicarbonate and low nutrient excepted for drought condition all increased on the 25th day compared to the values on the 15thday. On 25 days from the onset of adversity treatment, WUE of J. carcass seedlings under drought stress increased significantly, and was higher than the value under other adversities. However, WUE of P. stenoptera seedlings under drought stress remained the lowest compared to the values of WUEunder other adversities. Initial fluorescence (Fo) and primary conversion of light energy of PSII (Fv/Fm) values in J. carcas seedlings were independent of adversities, there was no significant change. But the value of Fo of P. stenoptera seedlings under drought stress increased significantly and Fv/Fm value decreased significantly, photosynthetic apparatus of P. stenoptera seedlings suffered more serious damage under drought stress than J. carcass seedlings . On the 25th day, δ13C values of J. carcas seedlings under those adversities were more positive compared to that under control, the intracellular bicarbonate use capacity of J. carcas seedlings was higher than P. stenoptera seedlings. The utilization of two different inorganic carbon resources in J. carcass seedlings enhanced its photosynthetic carbon fixation efficiency and growth potential, improved the adaptability of J. carcass seedlings to adversities. Meanwhile, higher WUE under drought stress conditions helped improve the inorganic carbon capture efficiency of J. carcas seedlings . And the damage of drought stress on photosynthetic apparatus of these two plant species was irreversible, but J. carcas seedlings exhibited better photosynthetic capacity under drought stress conditions compared to P. stenoptera seedlings. Therefore, in the water deficit hillside environments, it is better to plant J. carcas, whereas along the river streams dank environments, it is better to plant P. stenoptera.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    罗维均, 王世杰, 刘秀明. 喀斯特洞穴系统碳循环的烟囱效应研究现状及展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12):1333-1340.
    [2]
    苏维词,杨汉奎. 贵州岩溶区生态环境脆弱性类型的初步划分[J]. 环境科学研究,1994,7(6): 35-41.
    [3]
    王德炉,喻理飞. 喀斯特环境生态脆弱性数量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,29(6): 23-26.
    [4]
    Yuan D X. On the karst ecosystem[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2001,75(3): 336-338.
    [5]
    Liu C C,Liu Y G,Fan D Y,et al. Plant drought tolerance assessment for re-vegetation in heterogeneous karst landscapes of southwestern China[J]. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants,2012,207(1): 30-38.
    [6]
    曹建华,袁道先,童立强. 中国西南岩溶生态系统特征与石漠化综合治理对策[J]. 草业科学,2008,25(9): 40-50.
    [7]
    覃星铭,蒋忠诚,何丙辉,等.南洞流域东部重点区石漠化现状及治理对策[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(4): 456-462.
    [8]
    胡阳,邓艳,蒋忠诚,等. 典型岩溶山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2015,35(1): 61-67.
    [9]
    吴沿友. 喀斯特适生植物固碳增汇策略[J]. 中国岩溶,2011,30(4): 461-465.
    [10]
    Pandey V C,Singh K,Singh J S,et al. Jatropha curcas: A potential biofuel plant for sustainable environmental development[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2012,16(5): 2870-2883.
    [11]
    何文淑,肖荣贵,杨晓琼,等. 麻疯树在贫困地区农村发展和生态建设中的开发前景[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志,2002,9(10): 33-36.
    [12]
    王琼,刘伯斌,孔倩倩,等. 能源植物麻疯树分子育种研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2014,(3): 1-8.
    [13]
    Li C X,Wei H,Geng Y H,et al. Effects of submergence on photosynthesis and growth of Pterocarya stenoptera (Chinese wingnut) seedlings in the recently-created Three Gorges Reservoir region of China[J].Wetlands Ecology and Management,2010,18(4): 485-494.
    [14]
    李纪元,饶龙兵,王惠雄,等. 枫杨种源苗期生长及生物量地理变异研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2001,14(1): 60-66.
    [15]
    吴沿友,刘丛强,王世杰. 诸葛菜的喀斯特适生性研究[M]. 贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2004:1-153.
    [16]
    Walters M B,Kruger E L,Reich P B. Relative growth rate in relation to physiological and morphological traits for northern hardwood tree seedlings: species,light environment and ontogenetic considerations[J]. Oecologia,1993,96(2): 219-231.
    [17]
    Rohá?ek K,Barták M. Technique of the modulated chlorophyll fluorescence: basic concepts,useful parameters,and some applications[J].Photosynthetica,1999,37(3): 339-363.
    [18]
    Panda D,Sharma S G,Sarkar R K. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,CO2 photosynthetic rate and regeneration capacity as a result of complete submergence and subsequent reemergence in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Aquatic Botany,2008,88(2): 127-133.
    [19]
    池永宽,熊康宁,张锦华,等.喀斯特石漠化地区三种豆科牧草光合与蒸腾特性的研究[J].中国草地学报,2014,36(4):116-120.
    [20]
    张显强,王世杰,孙敏. 干旱和复水对喀斯特石生反叶扭口藓(Barbula fallax Hedw.)叶绿素荧光特性的影响:以贵阳市花溪区附近严重石漠化区域为例[J]. 中国岩溶,2014,33(1): 77-81.
    [21]
    Schwender J,Goffman F,Ohlrogge J B,et al. Rubisco without the Calvin cycle improves the carbon efficiency of developing green seeds[J].Nature,2004,432(7018): 779-782.
    [22]
    Wu Y Y,Xing D K. Effect of bicarbonate treatment on photosynthetic assimilation of inorganic carbon in two plant species of Moraceae[J].Photosynthetica,2012,50(50): 587-594.
    [23]
    Motomura H,Ueno O,Kagaw A,et al. Carbon isotope ratios and the variation in the diurnal pattern of malate accumulation in aerial roots of CAM species of Phalaenopsi(Orchidaceae)[J]. Photosynthetica,2008,46(4): 531-536.
    [24]
    李瑞,于奭,孙平安,等. 贵州茂兰板寨水城水生植物δ13C特征及光合作用固定HCO3-碳量估算[J]. 中国岩溶,2015,34(1): 9-16.
    [25]
    Xing D K,Wu Y Y. Photosynthetic response of three climber plant species to osmotic stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2012,34(5): 1659-1668.
    [26]
    Hoagland D R,Arnon D I. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil[J]. California Agricultural Experiment Station,1950,347(5406): 357-359.
    [27]
    邢德科,吴沿友,王瑞,等. 贵州山区3种木本植物无机碳利用特性的比较[J]. 西北植物学报,2015,35(3): 579-586.
    [28]
    潘晓华,石庆华,郭进耀,等. 无机磷对植物叶片光合作用的影响及其机理的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,1997,3(3): 201-208.
    [29]
    赵宽,吴沿友. 根系分泌的有机酸及其对喀斯特植物、土壤碳汇的影响[J].中国岩溶,2011,30(4): 466-471.
    [30]
    李强,罗延宏,余东海,等. 低氮胁迫对耐低氮玉米品种苗期光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(5): 1132-1141.
    [31]
    何成新,黄玉清,李先琨,等. 岩溶石漠化地区几种生态修复植物的生理生态学特征[J]. 广西植物,2007,27(1): 53-61.
    [32]
    孙晓方,何家庆,黄训端,等.不同光强对加拿大一枝黄花生长和叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2008,28(4):752-758.
    [33]
    Wu Y Y,Zhao K,Xing D K. Does carbonic anhydrase affect the fractionation of stable carbon isotope[J]. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta,2010,74(11): A1148.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1358) PDF downloads(898) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return