The evaluation of soil quality evolution in the process of vegetation degradation in karst mountain area

CHEN Zuyong; LIU Fang; WANG Shijie; LIU Yuansheng; BU Tongda; ZHU Jian

doi:10.11932/karst20160605

Volume 35 Issue 6

Dec. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CARSOLOGICA SINICA > 2016 > 35(6): 639-648

CHEN Zuyong, LIU Fang, WANG Shijie, LIU Yuansheng, BU Tongda, ZHU Jian. The evaluation of soil quality evolution in the process of vegetation degradation in karst mountain area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 639-648. doi: 10.11932/karst20160605

Citation:

CHEN Zuyong, LIU Fang, WANG Shijie, LIU Yuansheng, BU Tongda, ZHU Jian. The evaluation of soil quality evolution in the process of vegetation degradation in karst mountain area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 639-648. doi: 10.11932/karst20160605

Citation:

CHEN Zuyong, LIU Fang, WANG Shijie, LIU Yuansheng, BU Tongda, ZHU Jian. The evaluation of soil quality evolution in the process of vegetation degradation in karst mountain area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(6): 639-648. doi: 10.11932/karst20160605

PDF( 3322 KB)

The evaluation of soil quality evolution in the process of vegetation degradation in karst mountain area

doi: 10.11932/karst20160605

1.
College of Resource and Environmental Engineering of Guizhou University
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3.
Collage of Agriculture

Publish Date: 2016-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

To evaluate karst mountain soil quality due to the degradation of vegetation, this paper selected two representative microhabitat soils, i.e. the surface and rocky gully soils, as evaluation units for the construction of karst mountain soil quality evaluation system. 16 indexes were selected from 29 indexes using the canonical correspondence analysis, and the soil quality was discussed by using the comprehensive evaluation method of factor analysis. The results showed that, in the process of vegetation degradation in karst forest, using weighting calculation with the areas of the said two microhabitats to obtain the soil quality synthesis score can more accurately reflect the changes of soil quality due to the vegetation degradation at various phases; and these changes can be specifically divided into 3 phases. During these phases, the concentrations of soil active organic carbon, available N, available P, available K, available Mn, available S and urease all significantly decreased, while the available Fe, sucrase and clay contents significantly increased. In Phase I with vegetation represented by original-secondary forest, no significant difference was found in soil indicators between the sample plots. In Phase II (as represented by shrub wood), the contents of soil active organic carbon, available N, available P, available K, available S and urease and the content of available Mn respectively decreased by 33.73%, 22.41%, 57.66%, 37.72%, 44.59%, 46.57% and 12.52% in average, compared to those of Phase I; and the sucrase activity and soil clay content respectively increased by 81.38% and 47.69% in average. In Phase III (as scrub-grassland soil), the concentrations of soil available P, urease and alkaline phosphatase and available Mn decreased by 42.82%, 44.42%, 28.45% and 20.55%, respectively, compared to Phase II; the content of soil available Fe and clay content respectively increased by 56.40% and 57.49% in average. In this phase, the contents of soil available P and available K become very scarce, which leads to significant decrease of the soil quality.
- karst mountain area,
- vegetation degradation,
- microhabitat,
- soil quality deterioration,
- canonical correspondence analysis,
- factor analysis,
- evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	周政贤主编．茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集［M］．贵阳:贵州科学技术出版社, 1987, 37-41．
[2]	李阳兵, 谢德体, 魏朝富．岩溶生态系统土壤及表生植被某些特性变异与石漠化的相关性［J］．土壤学报, 2004, 41(2):196-173．
[3]	李阳兵, 王世杰, 王济．岩溶生态系统的土壤特性及其今后研究方向［J］．中国岩溶, 2006, 25(4):283-288．
[4]	龙健, 李娟, 汪境仁, 等．典型喀斯特地区石漠化演变过程对土壤质量性状的影响［J］．水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2):77-82．
[5]	刘方, 王世杰, 刘元生, 等．喀斯特石漠化过程土壤质量变化及生态环境影响评价［J］．生态学报, 2005, 25(3):640-646．
[6]	龙健, 李娟, 江新荣, 等．贵州茂兰喀斯特森林土壤微生物活性的研究［J］．土壤学报, 2004, 41(4):597-602．
[7]	刘玉杰, 王世杰, 刘秀明, 等．茂兰保护区小生境土壤微生物活性研究［J］．地球与环境, 2011, 39(3): 285-291．
[8]	李静鹏, 徐明锋, 苏志尧, 等．不同植被恢复类型的土壤肥力质量评价［J］．生态学报, 2014(9):1-17．
[9]	朱新玉, 胡云川, 芦杰．豫东黄河故道湿地土壤生物学性状及土壤质量评价［J］．水土保持研究, 2014(02):27-32．
[10]	赵娜, 孟平, 张劲松, 等．华北低丘山地不同退耕年限刺槐人工林土壤质量评价［J］．应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 351-358．
[11]	王世杰, 卢红梅, 周运超, 等．茂兰喀斯特原始森林土壤有机碳的空间变异性与代表性土样采集方法［J］．土壤学报, 2007, 44(3):475-483．
[12]	朱守谦主编．喀斯特森林生态研究(Ⅲ) ［M］．贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 2003, 38-42．
[13]	刘玉杰，王世杰，刘秀明，等. 茂兰喀斯特植被演替中土壤微生物量碳氮研究［J］. 地球与环境，2011, 39(2): 188-195．
[14]	刘方, 王世杰, 罗海波, 等. 喀斯特森林生态系统的小生境及其土壤异质性［J］. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(6):1055-1062.
[15]	鲁如坤．土壤农业化学分析法［M］．北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998：12-108．
[16]	关松荫．土壤酶及其研究法［M］．北京:农业出版社, 1986：228-254．
[17]	蔡红, 沈仁芳．改良茚三酮比色法测定土壤蛋白酶活性的研究［J］.土壤学报, 2005, 42(2):307-313．
[18]	郭明, 康蒙, 仲强, 等. 浙江天童森林退化和受损对土壤呼吸的影响［J］. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011，(4):53-60.
[19]	罗海波, 蒲通达, 陈祖拥, 等. 贵州南部喀斯特植被群落变化对小生境土壤养分的影响［J］. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(6): 112-115.
[20]	刘占锋, 傅伯杰, 刘国华, 等. 土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价［J］. 生态学报, 2006, 26(03): 901-913．
[21]	Larson W E, Pierce F J. Conservation and enhancement of soil quality［C］//Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world: proceedings of the International Workshop on Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management, Chiang Rai, Thailand, September 15-21 1991. Bangkok, Thailand: International Board for Soil Research and Management Press, 1991.
[22]	Frankenberger W T, Dick W A. Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil［J］.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1983, 47(5):945-951.

Relative Articles

[1]	CHEN Yanjun, ZHAO Xiaoqing, PU Junwei, SHI Xiaoqian, FENG Yan, ZHOU Shijie. Correlation mechanism between rocky desertification degrees and slope position factors in karst mountainous area of southeast Yunnan[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(2): 379-391. doi: 10.11932/karst20240205
[2]	ZHOU Shiyang, DONG Haogang, LI Lixiang, YUAN Dongfang, LU Li, YAO Feiyan, XIANG Fan, CHEN Lin, WANG Zhenwei, WU Xin. Hydrochemical characteristics and genetic analysis of the Xianju basin in southern Zhejiang Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(3): 527-537. doi: 10.11932/karst20240303
[3]	WU Yue, ZHOU Zhongfa, ZHAO Xin, DAN Yusheng, HUANG Denghong. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation coverage in plateau mountainous areas based on remote sensing cloud computing platform: A case study of Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 39(2): 196-205. doi: 10.11932/karst2020y16
[4]	LUO Lin, ZHOU Yingshu, BI Ning, CHEN Kunhao. Fuzzy evaluation of mitigating soil and water loss by cultivation of medicinal plants in karst mountainous areas[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(6): 896-900. doi: 10.11932/karst20190606
[5]	MA Shibin, YANG Guangbin, AN Yulun, ZHANG Yongrong. Reasons of vegetation degradation in the Southwest China Guizhou Province base on MODIS NDVI data[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(2): 227-232. doi: 10.11932/karst20190207
[6]	YANG Xingyan, ZHAO Yuluan, LI Xiubin. Analysis of land-use changes and socio-economic factors in karst mountainous areas of Guizhou and Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(1): 88-99. doi: 10.11932/karst20190110
[7]	BAO Qingqing, LIU Shengfeng. Dynamic evaluation of ecological security and analysis of obstacle factors in karst tourist destinations：An example of Guilin City[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(3): 407-414. doi: 10.11932/karst20170301
[8]	ZHANG Ying, LIU Chang, SONG Ang, JIN Zhen-jiang, LI Qiang. Relationship between soil physicochemical properties and soil enzyme activities in Huixian karst wetland system based on Canonical Correspondence Analysis[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(1): 11-18. doi: 10.11932/karst20160103
[9]	LI Xue-dong, YANG Guang-bin, ZHANG Xu-ya, LI Bing, WANG Mao-yang. Ecosystem constitute pattern and change evaluation to karst mountain base on RS and GIS: A case study in Bijie, Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(1): 82-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2014.01.013
[10]	LIU Fang, LIU Yuan-sheng, BU Tong-da, CNEN Zu-yong. Impact of vegetation community succession on available N, P and enzyme activity of the soil in karst hill of Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(1): 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.01.006
[11]	LIAO Hong-kai, LONG Jian, LI Juan, YANG Jiang-jiang, FENG Ye-qiang. Preliminary study on spatial heterogeneity of soil mineral composition and organic carbon content at different micro-habitats that under different vegetation types in karst region[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 29(4): 434-439. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2010.04.014
[12]	WEI Yuan, YU Li-fei, ZHANG Jin-chi, YU Yuan-chun. Evaluation on soil ecologic fertility quantity during vegetation succession of degraded karst——A case study in Huajiang valley, Guizhou[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(1).
[13]	YE Yue, ZHOU Yun-chao. Influence of microhabitat to community structure of soil macrofauna in karst rocky desertification[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 28(4): 413-418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2009.04.014
[14]	LI An-ding, LU Yong-fei, WEI Xiao-li, YU Li-fei. Studies on the regime of soil moisture under different microhabitats in Huajiang karst valley[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 27(1): 56-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2008.01.010
[15]	HE Xiang, XIONG Kang-ning, CHEN Hong-yun, HU Shun-guang. Study on the factor effecting erosion-resistance of calcareous soil in karst mountainous area— A case in the Shiqiao catchment of Bijie city, Guizhou province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 26(4): 297-303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2007.04.004
[16]	ZHOU Liang-guang, LIANG Hong. RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENT OF WATER RESOURCE CARRYING CAPACITY IN KSRST AREA— A Case Study in Guizhou Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(1): 23-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.01.005
[17]	CHEN Wei-hai, ZHU Xue-wen, ZHU De-hao, HUANG Bao-jian. EVALUATION ON LANDSCAPE FEATURES AND WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE VALUE OF WULONG KARST IN CHONGQING[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2006, 25(B08): 106-112.
[18]	LI Kai-zhong, PEN Xian-wei, XIONG Kang-ning. EVALUATION TO THE EFFECT OF LAND-USE IN KARST VALLEY OF GUIZHOU PROVINCE— A Case Study in Huajiang Valley[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2005, 24(4): 293-299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.04.007
[19]	TAO Yu-guo, ZHANG Chun-li, YIN Hong-mei, XIONG Kang-ning. STUDY OF TEMPORAL EVALUATION ON KARST TOURISM DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2005, 24(4): 331-337. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.04.013
[20]	SU Wei-chi. SOIL EROSIVE DETERIORATION AND ITS CONTROL IN KARST MOUNTAINOUS REGIONS OF GUIZHOU PROVINCE[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2001, 20(3): 217-223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2001.03.011

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	庞丽，邹琼丽，吴霞，李家鑫，张明豪，张红霞. 不同喀斯特土壤类型下常见蕨类植物氮磷养分策略差异及其与土壤养分供给关系. 广西科学院学报. 2024(02): 162-171 .
2.	赵月兰，李琳，刘吉平，赵丹丹. 向海国家级自然保护区中人工恢复的退化芦苇沼泽的土壤质量评价. 湿地科学. 2023(04): 614-618 .
3.	李素慧，陈金艺，王佳敏，宋海燕，张静，陶建平，刘锦春. 两种一年生草本对喀斯特土壤厚度及供水的生长响应. 植物科学学报. 2021(03): 258-267 .
4.	董茜，尤勇刚，罗为群，刘绍华，王根柱，刘玉国，周金星. 岩溶区不同母岩植物群落物种组成及优势种群生态位差异. 中国岩溶. 2021(05): 849-859 . 本站查看
5.	孙建，刘子琦，朱大运，李渊，李开萍，王进. 石漠化治理区不同生态恢复模式土壤质量评价. 水土保持研究. 2019(05): 222-228 .

Other cited types(6)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF(3322.0KB)

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (1528) PDF downloads(954)