• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 35 Issue 2
Apr.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
PAN Wei-zhi, SILA Onesmus Nzung'a, SHEN Tai-ming, LI Wei, WANG Chen-wei, YU Long-jiang. Soil carbonic anhydrase activity, soil organic carbon and their relationships in different geological eco-environments of the Changjiang River basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(2): 173-178. doi: 10.11932/karst20160206
Citation: PAN Wei-zhi, SILA Onesmus Nzung'a, SHEN Tai-ming, LI Wei, WANG Chen-wei, YU Long-jiang. Soil carbonic anhydrase activity, soil organic carbon and their relationships in different geological eco-environments of the Changjiang River basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(2): 173-178. doi: 10.11932/karst20160206

Soil carbonic anhydrase activity, soil organic carbon and their relationships in different geological eco-environments of the Changjiang River basin

doi: 10.11932/karst20160206
  • Publish Date: 2016-04-25
  • Ten sampling plots in different geological eco-environments were selected along the main stream and tributaries of the Changjiang River basin. Carbonic Anhydrase (CA) activity and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) content in surface soils (0~20 cm) were studied and relationships between CA activity and SOC content were discussed. The results were as follows. (1) The CA activities in surface soils of karst areas were higher than those in non-karst areas (P<0.01). Different geological types and vegetation types resulted in different CA activities. (2) The plot GC in karst areas had the highest annual average SOC content (1.09%) while the plot WZ in non-karst area had the lowest annual average SOC content (0.29%). Moreover, the average surface SOC content in winter was significantly higher than that in summer (P<0.01). (3) Correlation analysis showed that CA activities in karst surface soils correlated positively with SOC contents in all seasons. The result of this paper lays a foundation for further studies on the role of soil CA in carbon sequestration in karst ecosystems of river basins.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Malte M, Nicolai M, William H, et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2℃[J]. Nature, 2009,458(7242):1158-1163.
    [2]
    曹建华, 袁道先, 潘根兴. 岩溶生态系统中的土壤[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(1): 37-44.
    [3]
    袁道先. 新形势下我国岩溶研究面临的机遇和挑战[J]. 中国岩溶, 2009, 28(4): 329-331.
    [4]
    Jiang Z C, Yuan D X. CO2 source-sink in karst processes in karst areas of China[J]. Episodes, 1999, 22(1): 33-35.
    [5]
    潘根兴, 曹建华. 表层带岩溶作用:以土壤为媒介的地球表层生态系统过程:以桂林峰丛洼地岩溶系统为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 1999, 18(4): 287-296.
    [6]
    Tripp B C, Smith K, Ferry J G. Carbonic anhydrase: New insights for an ancient enzyme[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001, 276(52):48615-48618.
    [7]
    Li W, Yu L J, He Q F, et al. Effects of microbes and their carbonic anhydrase on Ca2+ and Mg2+migration in column-built leached soil-limestone karst systems [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2005,29(3):274-281.
    [8]
    Li W, Yu L J, Wu Y, et al. Enhancement of Ca2+ release from limestone by microbial extracellular carbonic anhydrase [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(4):950-953.
    [9]
    Li W, Zhou P P, Jia L P, et al. Limestone dissolution induced by fungal mycelia, acidic materials, and carbonic anhydrase from fungi [J]. Mycopathologia,2009,167(1):37-46.
    [10]
    Zhang Z C, Lian B, Hou W G, et al. Bacillus mucilaginosus can capture atmospheric CO2 by carbonic anhydrase [J]. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2011, 5(2): 106-112.
    [11]
    Liu Z H. Role of carbonic anhydrase as an activator in carbonate rock dissolution and its implication for atmospheric CO2 sink [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001,75(3):275-278.
    [12]
    Li W, Yu L J, Yuan D X, et al. A study of the activity and ecological significance of carbonic anhydrase from soil and its microbes from different karst ecosystems of Southwest China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 272(1-2):133-141.
    [13]
    Dean W E. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1974,44(1): 242-248.
    [14]
    关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1986.
    [15]
    Pancholy S K, Rice E L. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1973,37(1):47-50.
    [16]
    张俊华, 李国栋, 南忠仁, 等.黑河中游不同土地利用类型下土壤碳储量及其空间变化[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(8): 982-987.
    [17]
    周莉, 李保国, 周广胜. 土壤有机碳的主导影响因子及其研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(1): 99-105.
    [18]
    靳振江, 李强, 黄静云,等.典型岩溶生态系统土壤酶活性、微生物数量、有机碳含量及其相关性: 以丫吉岩溶试验场为例[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(2): 307-313.
    [19]
    吴沿友, 邢德科, 刘莹. 植物利用碳酸氢根离子的特征分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(2): 273-277.
    [20]
    Liu Y, Liu Z H, Zhang J L, et al. Experimental study on the utilization of DIC by Oocystis solitaria Wittr and its influence on the precipitation of calcium carbonate in karst and non karst waters[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2010,25(1):21-26.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1811) PDF downloads(1033) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return