• Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 34 Issue 6
Dec.  2015
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Zhen-hua, SU Wei-ci, WU Ke-hua, ZHANG Feng-tai, WANG Wei. An improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water quality in karst aquifer based on level characteristic values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(6): 551-559. doi: 10.11932/karst20150603
Citation: YANG Zhen-hua, SU Wei-ci, WU Ke-hua, ZHANG Feng-tai, WANG Wei. An improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water quality in karst aquifer based on level characteristic values[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(6): 551-559. doi: 10.11932/karst20150603

An improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water quality in karst aquifer based on level characteristic values

doi: 10.11932/karst20150603
  • Publish Date: 2015-12-25
  • The aim of this study is to improve traditional fuzzy logic approach to water quality evaluation, due to some drawbacks such as unrepresentative evaluation indexes for water pollution assessment, indeterminate evaluation results and obscure grade boundaries for fuzzy evaluation. The first layer of karst groundwater in Liuzhi special district Weining-Langdai folding area was selected as the modelling object. Based on the karst water quality analysis, factors for the fuzzy logic process were selected from those analysed constituents which were in excess of relevant water quality regulations, from which establishing the evaluation index system which includes physical, chemical, and microbiological factors, and modifying the method of traditional fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Consequently, results of the new model were assessed and compared with those from the methods of both comprehensive pollution index and traditional fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Results of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation show that water quality reaches class Ⅲ in light of national drinking water standard in Liuzhi special district. However, there are still 71% sampling points where the concentrations of ammonia nitrogen (NH4+), fluoride (F-), permanganate index (CODMn) and total dissolved solids (TDS) exceed the water class; and these points mostly occur in the strata of the middle and the late Triassic. On the other hand, the groundwater of 57.1% sampling points falls in class Ⅰ, resulted from previous method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, which is not in accord with the reality. In addition, through the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation calibrated with level characteristic values, the water quality of 57.1% and 28.6% points fall within class Ⅱ and class Ⅲ, respectively, of which the standard deviation is 0.011 lower than that from the comprehensive index method which stresses much on weight factor for the element with highest concentration. Therefore, current method for comprehensive evaluation of karst water quality can effectively reflect overall water quality level, water chemical anomalies and quantitative quality classification. It is trusted that the evaluation results are reliable.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    国家发展和改革委员会,水利部,建设部,等.《全国城市饮用水安全保障规划(2006-2020)》,发改地区( 2007) [2798] 号.北京:国家发展和改革委员会,2007.
    [2]
    龚艳冰,张继国,梁雪春.基于全排列多边形综合图示法的水质评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(9):26-31.
    [3]
    Van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2008, 9(1) : 2579-2605.
    [4]
    Li P, Wu J, Qian H. Groundwater quality assessment based on entropy weighted osculating value method[J]. International Journal of Environmental Sciences,2010,1 (4) : 621-630.
    [5]
    李连香,许迪,程先军,等.基于分层构权主成分分析的皖北岩溶水水质评价研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(1):61-67.
    [6]
    余勋,梁婕,曾光明,等.基于三角模糊数的贝叶斯水质评价模型[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(3): 904-909.
    [7]
    韩晓刚,黄廷林,陈秀珍.改进的模糊综合评价法及在给水厂原水水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报, 2013,33(5):1513-1518.
    [8]
    Zou Z H,Yun Y,Sun J N. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2006,18(5):1020-1023.
    [9]
    Dshiya S,Singh B,Gaur S,et al. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation [J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2007,147(3):938-946.
    [10]
    李录娟,邹胜章.综合指数法和模糊综合法在地下水质量评价中的对比:以遵义市为例[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(1):22-30.
    [11]
    杨明德.论喀斯特地貌地域结构及其环境效应:以贵州高原为例[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1988:19-28.
    [12]
    马玉杰,郑西来,李永霞,等.岩溶水质量模糊综合评判法的改进与应用[J].中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(5):745-750.
    [13]
    吴运敏,陈求稳,李静.模糊综合评价在小流域河道水质时空变化研究中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(6):1198-1205.
    [14]
    余克林,杨永生,章臣平.模糊综合评判法在判别矿井突水水源中的应用[J].金属矿山,2007,(3):47-50.
    [15]
    孙廷容,黄强,张洪,等.基于粗糙集权重的改进可拓评价方法在灌区干旱评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(4):70-73.
    [16]
    周振民,穆文彬.组合权重可变模糊模型在地表水水质评价中的应用[J].中国农村水利水电, 2011,(10):82-86.
    [17]
    刘子剑,崔斌,张楠.改进的模糊综合评价法在长春市岩溶水水质评价中的运用[J].水资源保护,2014,30(6):40-44.
    [18]
    周林飞,邹飞,顾晓琳,等.石佛寺人工湿地水质综合评价与分析[J].节水灌溉,2015,(1):60-64.
    [19]
    汤国安,杨昕.地理信息系统空间分析实践教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2171) PDF downloads(1105) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return