Advanced Search
  • Included in CSCD
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Included in Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
Volume 34 Issue 2
Apr.  2015
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CARSOLOGICA SINICA  > 2015  >  34(2): 147-153
LI Jing-rui, LIANG Bin, YU Hong-feng, ZHANG Qing-yu, CAO Jian-wen, DAN Yong, HAO Yan-zhen, LI Jie. Genesis relationship between faults and karst reservoirs in the Yingshan formation, Medieval No.8 wellblock[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(2): 147-153. doi: 10.11932/karst20150207
Citation: LI Jing-rui, LIANG Bin, YU Hong-feng, ZHANG Qing-yu, CAO Jian-wen, DAN Yong, HAO Yan-zhen, LI Jie. Genesis relationship between faults and karst reservoirs in the Yingshan formation, Medieval No.8 wellblock[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(2): 147-153. doi: 10.11932/karst20150207
shu

Genesis relationship between faults and karst reservoirs in the Yingshan formation, Medieval No.8 wellblock

doi: 10.11932/karst20150207
  • 1.

    Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS / Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics,MLR&GZAR

  • 2.

    Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Tarim Oilfield Company, PetroChina

  • 3.

    Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS / Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics,MLR&GZAR/School of Environmental Studies，China University of Geosciences

  • 4.

    Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS / Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics,MLR&GZAR/Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology

  • 5.

    No.4 Oil Production Plant of Petochina Changqing Oilfield Company

  • Publish Date: 2015-04-25
    Abstract
  • There are abundant oil and gas resources in the Ordovician carbonate formation of the Tarim basin.The superposition and transformation in many episodes of different types of karst development are the main driving force of Tazhong ancient karst reservoirs. Faults are an important factor affecting karst reservoirs. The Medieval No.8 wellblock is situated in a northwest-southeast trending thrust fault zone of the Caledonian period and a northeast-southwest trending strike-slip fault zone of the Hercynian period, which form a network system. The karst reservoirs developed in the subsurface from the top of Yingshan formation to 120 km depth, which are of hole type, cavity type, fissure type and fissure-hole type. Of these, the fissure-hole type and hole-type are dominant. The multi-episode faults and associated fissure network system of the Caledonian to Hercynian period serve as good migration channels for fluids, which promote the development of the fissure-hole system, burial dissolution and dolomitization, improving the performance of reservoirs to become a complex combination of carbonate holes, cavities and cracks.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(46)
  • [1]
    夏日元,邹胜章,梁彬，等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩缝洞系统模式及成因研究［M］.北京：地质出版社，2011,1-10.
    [2]
    陈景山,李忠,王振宇,等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶作用与储层分布［J］.沉积学报，2007，25( 6):858－868.
    [3]
    陈学时，易万霞，卢文忠.中国油气田古岩溶与油气储层［J］.沉积学报，2004，22（2）：244-254.
    [4]
    张庆玉,秦凤蕊,梁彬,等.塔北隆起轮古7 井区奥陶系岩溶地貌及岩溶储层特征研究［J］.中国岩溶,2014,33(3):18-22.
    [5]
    赵文智,沈安江，胡素云,等.中国碳酸盐岩储集层大型化发育的地质条件与分布特征［J］.油气勘探与开发，2012,39(1):1-12.
    [6]
    Moore H C. Carbonate reservoirs: Porosity evolution and diagenesis in a sequence stratigra-phic frame work ［M］. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 80-122.
    [7]
    赵宗举,王招明,吴兴宁,等.塔里木盆地塔中地区奥陶系储层成因类型及分布预测［J］.石油实验地质,2007,29(1):40-46.
    [8]
    朱光有,张水昌,张斌,等．中国中西部地区海相碳酸盐岩油气藏类型与成藏模式［J］.石油学报，2010，31(6):871-878.
    [9]
    贾承造主编.中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气 ［M］.石油工业出版社，1997.185-200.
    [10]
    夏日元,唐健生,罗伟权,等.油气田古岩溶与深岩溶研究新进展［J］.中国岩溶, 2001, 20 (1):76.
    [11]
    邬光辉，琚岩，杨仓，等.构造对塔中奥陶系礁滩型储集层的控制作用［J］.新疆石油地质，2010，31(5):467-470.
    [12]
    杨海军,韩剑发，孙崇浩，等.塔中北斜坡奥陶系鹰山组岩溶型储层发育模式与油气勘探 ［J］.石油学报,2011,32(2):199-205.
    [13]
    袁道先.中国岩溶学［Ｍ］.北京:地质出版社,1994:1-207.
    [14]
    任美锷,刘振中,王飞燕,等.岩溶学概论［Ｍ］.北京：商务印书馆，1983:1-331.
    [15]
    朱学稳,等.桂林岩溶地貌与洞穴研究［Ｍ］.北京:地质出版社,1988:1-249.
    [16]
    马晓强,侯加根,胡向阳,等.塔里木盆地塔河油田奥陶系断控型大气水岩溶储层结构研究［J］.地质论评, 2013,59(3):521-532.
    [17]
    Smith L B, Davies G R. Structurally controlled hydrothermal alteration of carbonate reservoirs: Introduction ［J］. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(11): 1635-1640.
    [18]
    吕修祥,周新源，杨海军，等.塔中北斜坡碳酸盐岩岩溶储层油气差异富集特征［J］.中国岩溶, 2013, 31(4):441-452.
    [19]
    Davies G R, Smith L B. Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview: Reply ［J］. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(9): 1342-1344.
    [20]
    周新源,吕修祥，杨海军，等.塔中北斜坡走滑断裂对碳酸盐岩油气差异富集的影响［J］.石油学报,2013,34(4):628-637.
    [21]
    黄成毅,邹胜章,潘文庆,等.古潮湿环境下碳酸盐岩缝洞型油气藏结构模式:以塔里木盆地奥陶系为例［J］.中国岩溶,2006,25(3):250-255.
    [22]
    倪兴峰,杨海军，沈安江，等.塔中地区奥陶系灰岩段裂缝特征及其对岩溶储层的控制 ［J］.石油学报,2010,31(6):933-940.
    [23]
    乔占峰,沈安江，邹伟宏，等.断裂控制的非暴露型大气水岩溶作用模式:以塔北英买2构造奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层为例［J］.地质学报,2011,85(12):2070-2083.
    [24]
    夏日元,邹胜章,梁彬，等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩缝洞系统模式及成因研究［M］.北京：地质出版社，2011,1-10.
    [25]
    陈景山,李忠,王振宇,等.塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶作用与储层分布［J］.沉积学报，2007，25( 6):858－868.
    [26]
    陈学时，易万霞，卢文忠.中国油气田古岩溶与油气储层［J］.沉积学报，2004，22（2）：244-254.
    [27]
    张庆玉,秦凤蕊,梁彬,等.塔北隆起轮古7 井区奥陶系岩溶地貌及岩溶储层特征研究［J］.中国岩溶,2014,33(3):18-22.
    [28]
    赵文智,沈安江，胡素云,等.中国碳酸盐岩储集层大型化发育的地质条件与分布特征［J］.油气勘探与开发，2012,39(1):1-12.
    [29]
    Moore H C. Carbonate reservoirs: Porosity evolution and diagenesis in a sequence stratigra-phic frame work ［M］. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 80-122.
    [30]
    赵宗举,王招明,吴兴宁,等.塔里木盆地塔中地区奥陶系储层成因类型及分布预测［J］.石油实验地质,2007,29(1):40-46.
    [31]
    朱光有,张水昌,张斌,等．中国中西部地区海相碳酸盐岩油气藏类型与成藏模式［J］.石油学报，2010，31(6):871-878.
    [32]
    贾承造主编.中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气 ［M］.石油工业出版社，1997.185-200.
    [33]
    夏日元,唐健生,罗伟权,等.油气田古岩溶与深岩溶研究新进展［J］.中国岩溶, 2001, 20 (1):76.
    [34]
    邬光辉，琚岩，杨仓，等.构造对塔中奥陶系礁滩型储集层的控制作用［J］.新疆石油地质，2010，31(5):467-470.
    [35]
    杨海军,韩剑发，孙崇浩，等.塔中北斜坡奥陶系鹰山组岩溶型储层发育模式与油气勘探 ［J］.石油学报,2011,32(2):199-205.
    [36]
    袁道先.中国岩溶学［Ｍ］.北京:地质出版社,1994:1-207.
    [37]
    任美锷,刘振中,王飞燕,等.岩溶学概论［Ｍ］.北京：商务印书馆，1983:1-331.
    [38]
    朱学稳,等.桂林岩溶地貌与洞穴研究［Ｍ］.北京:地质出版社,1988:1-249.
    [39]
    马晓强,侯加根,胡向阳,等.塔里木盆地塔河油田奥陶系断控型大气水岩溶储层结构研究［J］.地质论评, 2013,59(3):521-532.
    [40]
    Smith L B, Davies G R. Structurally controlled hydrothermal alteration of carbonate reservoirs: Introduction ［J］. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(11): 1635-1640.
    [41]
    吕修祥,周新源，杨海军，等.塔中北斜坡碳酸盐岩岩溶储层油气差异富集特征［J］.中国岩溶, 2013, 31(4):441-452.
    [42]
    Davies G R, Smith L B. Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview: Reply ［J］. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(9): 1342-1344.
    [43]
    周新源,吕修祥，杨海军，等.塔中北斜坡走滑断裂对碳酸盐岩油气差异富集的影响［J］.石油学报,2013,34(4):628-637.
    [44]
    黄成毅,邹胜章,潘文庆,等.古潮湿环境下碳酸盐岩缝洞型油气藏结构模式:以塔里木盆地奥陶系为例［J］.中国岩溶,2006,25(3):250-255.
    [45]
    倪兴峰,杨海军，沈安江，等.塔中地区奥陶系灰岩段裂缝特征及其对岩溶储层的控制 ［J］.石油学报,2010,31(6):933-940.
    [46]
    乔占峰,沈安江，邹伟宏，等.断裂控制的非暴露型大气水岩溶作用模式:以塔北英买2构造奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层为例［J］.地质学报,2011,85(12):2070-2083.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]GAO Zhaolong, DAN Yong, ZHANG Xihua, CAO Hua, DENG Min, CHEN Cong, HU Luojia. Differences of carbon and oxygen isotopes in coarse-grained calcite from the Permian Maokou Formation in different regions of Sichuan Basin and their significance in paleokarst environment[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(3): 684-693. doi: 10.11932/karst20240309
    [2]JIN Wenzheng. Characteristics of faults and their controlling effect on geothermal energy in Eryuan county, Yunnan Province[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 43(1): 57-71. doi: 10.11932/karst20240105
    [3]DONG Hongqi, ZHANG Qingyu, LIANG Jiapeng, LIANG Bin, LI Jingrui, DAN Yong, NIE Guoquan, JI Shaocong. Carbon and oxygen isotopic characteristics of karst fracture-cavity fillings and environmental significance: A case study of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Tahe oilfield[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 42(4): 863-874. doi: 10.11932/karst20230417
    [4]ZHANG Yu, ZHAO Lun, LI Changhai, ZHANG Xiangzhong. Research progress of paleokarst oil and gas reservoirs[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 808-824. doi: 10.11932/karst202204y10
    [5]LIANG Chengpeng, DAN Yong, XU Shenglin, LI Fuxiang, PANG Chunyu, WEI Jiaqi. Interlayer karst reservoir characteristics and development controlling factors of Ordovician in the Xinken area，Tarim basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 427-437. doi: 10.11932/karst20190301
    [6]WU Qiqiao, LI Jingrui, CAO Fei, LIANG Bin, ZHU Xiansheng, ZHANG Qingyu, DAN Yong. Characteristics of fault-karst carbonate reservoirs in the Shunbei No.1 well block, Tarim basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2019, 38(3): 444-449. doi: 10.11932/karst20190313
    [7]SUN Ping’an, LI Xiucun, YU Shi, YUAN Yaqiong, HE Shiyi, WANG Yanxue. Study on source-sink effect in the process of carbonate rock dissolved by acid rain：An example of typical karst regions in Guangxi[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 36(1): 101-108. doi: 10.11932/karst20170113
    [8]ZHANG Qing-yu, LIANG Bin, DAN Yong, LI Jing-rui, CAO Jian-wen. Research of karst reservoirs characteristics and paleokarst development pattern of the Ordovician Yingshan formation north-slope of Tazhong, Tarim basin area[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2016, 35(1): 106-113. doi: 10.11932/karst2016y02
    [9]ZHAO Kuan-zhi, DAN Yong, ZHENG Duo-ming, LIANG Bin, ZHANG Qing-yu, LI Jing-rui. Characteristics of karst reservoirs in the Ordovician buried hills of the Halahatang area，northern Tarim basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(2): 171-178. doi: 10.11932/karst20150211
    [10]SU Zhong-tang, LIU Na, YANG Wen-jing, HU Shang-cai, WU Chun-ying, PEI Wen-chao, REN Jun-feng. Types and models of supergene karst of Ordovician and reservoir characteristics in Ordos basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(2): 109-114. doi: 10.11932/karst20150203
    [11]DENG Xing-liang, ZHANG Qing-yu, LIANG Bin, DAN Yong, LI Jing-rui, HAO Yan-zhen. Reconstruction of karst palaeogeomorphology for the Ordovician Yingshan formation in the central Tarim basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2015, 34(2): 154-158. doi: 10.11932/karst20150208
    [12]ZHANG Qing-yu, QIN Feng-rui, LIANG Bin, CAO Jian-wen, DAN Yong, LI Jing-rui. Karst landforms and reservoir characteristics in the Ordovician strata of Lungu 7,Tabei uplift[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2014, 33(3): 373-378.
    [13]YANG Hualin, LI Minglun, LIU Bangxian. Application of fuzzy mathematics in risk evaluation in geothermal resources exploration in karst reservoir: A case in mountain type karst thermal storage in Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2013, 32(4): 384-390.
    [14]Lü Xiu-xiang, ZHOU Xin-yuan, YANG Hai-jun, LAN Xiao-dong, LUO Chun-shu, YU Hong-feng, CAI Jun, HUA Xiao-li. Differential enrichment of oil and gas in carbonate karst reservoir on northern slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(4): 441-452. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.04.014
    [15]SANG Qin, HUANG Jing, CHENG Chao, WEI Yong, Lü Zong-gang, WU Chang-long, PENG Zuo-yuan. Research on the relation between the ancient karst landform and the development features of fissure-cavity system in the Maokou formation in Shunan region[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(2): 212-219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.016
    [16]LIU Wen, ZHANG Qiang, JIA Ya-nan. Karstification under different land-use patterns in summer: A case study in the Qingmuguan karst valley, Chongqing[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.01.001
    [17]CHEN Li-xin, PAN Wen-qing, LIANG Bin, LUO Ri-sheng, ZHANG Qing-yu, GAO Xiang. The distribution characteristics of the epikarst reservoir in Lunnan Ordovician buried hill[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 30(3): 327-333. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2011.03.015
    [18]LUO Wei-qun, JIANG Zhong-cheng, DENG Yan, WU Hua-ying. Contrast experimental study on calcareous soil amelioration and karst processes responseand karst processes response[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 27(3): 221-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2008.03.005
    [20]GONG Fu-hua, LIU Xiao-ping. CONTROLLING EFFECTS OF FAULTS OVER PALAEOKARST IN WEST LUNGU REGION, TARIM BASIN[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2003, 22(4): 313-317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2003.04.011
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-0502.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.0 %FULLTEXT: 28.0 %META: 69.1 %META: 69.1 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.7 %其他: 10.7 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 10.8 %China: 10.8 %上海: 16.1 %上海: 16.1 %北京: 0.5 %北京: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %崇左: 0.3 %崇左: 0.3 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %纽约: 1.8 %纽约: 1.8 %芒廷维尤: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 0.9 %西宁: 4.8 %西宁: 4.8 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %驻马店: 52.3 %驻马店: 52.3 %其他其他China上海北京哥伦布天津崇左成都新乡昆明武汉温州珠海纽约芒廷维尤西宁贵阳长沙驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF(7768.0KB)
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1824) PDF downloads(1166) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Website Copyright © CARSOLOGICA SINICA 桂ICP备05009877号-1

    Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Sponsored by: Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Address: No.50, Qixing Road, Guilin, Guangxi

    Post Code: 541004 Tel: 0773-5812949 7796657 Email: zgyr@mail.cgs.gov.cn; zgyrbjb@163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return