The effect of dry density and soil water content on yellow soils hearing strength in karst area
-
摘要: 选择广泛分布于岩溶地区的黄壤,通过对室内三轴剪切试验,测定含水率和干密度交互作用对土壤抗剪强度指标的影响。试验表明:(1)在相同干密度情况下,黄壤粘聚力c随着含水率的增加呈现出先增加后减小的趋势,在相同土壤含水率水平下,粘聚力c随干密度增大而增大;黄壤内摩擦角φ在各干密度条件下均随着含水率增加呈明显减小的趋势,衰减速率基本一致;同一含水率水平下,内摩擦角φ随干密度变化不明显,土壤干密度为1.6g/cm3内摩擦角相对较大。(2)含水率和干密度的交互作用对黄壤粘聚力c有显著影响,粘聚力c在1.3~1.7g/cm3范围内随着干密度的增大而增大,且每一个干密度都有一个特定含水率与之对应,在这样一个交互作用下粘聚力c达到最大。(3)含水率和干密度的交互作用对内摩擦角φ影响相对较小,同一干密度下,其φ值差异不大,随干密度的增大缓慢增大,相对而言,含水率对内摩擦角φ的影响更明显,黄壤内摩擦角φ随含水率的增大呈非线性下降。Abstract: Based on the triaxial shearing test in laboratory, the effect of soil water content and dry density on yellow soil shearing strength was determined. Experimental data indicated that: (1)the soil cohesive force firstly increase and then decrease with the increase of soil water content under the same soil dry density, and it increase with the increase of soil dry density under the same soil water content. The internal frictional angle of yellow soil fleetly decrease with the increase of soil water content under the same soil dry density, and it do not change obviously with the increase of dry density under the same soil water content. (2) The interaction of soil water content and dry density has significant impact on soil cohesive force, and the soil cohesive force reached to the maximum under the interaction of soil water content and dry density that each soil dry density matched the specifically soil water content. (3) The interaction of soil water content and dry density is small relatively on the internal frictional angle, and the internal frictional angle tardily increase with the increasing of soil dry density. Soil water content have relatively more obvious impact on the internal frictional angle, and the internal frictional angle of yellow soil nonlinearly decrease with the increasing of soil water content.
-
Key words:
- soil water content /
- soil dry density /
- soil shearing strength /
- yellow soil /
- karst area
-
[1] 袁道先.全球岩溶生态系统对比:科学目标和执行计划［J］.地球科学进展,2001,16(4):461-466. [2] 吴秀芹,蔡运龙.我国亚热带喀斯特生态环境演变研究进展［J］.自然科学进展,2006,16(3):267-272. [3] 王世杰,李阳兵,李瑞玲,等.喀斯特石漠化的形成背景、演化与治理模式［J］.第四纪研究,2003,23(6):657-666. [4] 倪九派,袁道先,谢德体,等.基于GIS的岩溶槽谷区小流域土壤侵蚀量估算［J］.应用基础与工程科学学报,2010,18(2):1-9. [5] 倪九派,高明,魏朝富,等.土壤含水率对浅层滑坡体不同层次土壤抗剪强度的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2009,23(6):48-50. [6] 陈红星,李法虎,郝仕玲,等.土壤含水率与土壤碱度对土壤抗剪强度的影响［J］.农业工程学报,2007,23(2):21-25. [7] 孙树林,王利丰.饱和、非饱和有机质粉土抗剪强度的对比［J］.岩土工程学报,2006,28(11):1932-1935. [8] 姚军,吴发启,宋娟丽,等.黄土高原沟壑区坡耕地表层土壤抗剪强度影响因素分析［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(3):236-239. [9] Cokca E, Erol O, Armangil F. Effects of compaction moisture content on the shear strength of an unsaturatedclay［J］. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2004,22:285-297. [10] 王中文,洪宝宁,刘鑫红,等.粘土抗剪强度的水敏性研究［J］.四川大学学报(工程科学版),2011,43(1):17-22. [11] 王建平,程声通,贾海峰.水质模型参数优化的遗传算法实现及控制参数分析［J］.环境科学,2005,26(3):61-65. [12] 史洪宇,贺前华,魏晓慧.基于遗传-拟牛顿混合算法的到达时间差定位［J］.计算机工程,2011,37(11):220-222. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2211
- HTML浏览量: 369
- PDF下载量: 2258
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
