晋祠泉域岩溶地下水防污性能评价与水质保护区划分

赵春红; 申豪勇; 卢海平; 王志恒; 梁永平; 唐春雷

doi:10.11932/karst2024y034

晋祠泉域岩溶地下水防污性能评价与水质保护区划分

doi: 10.11932/karst2024y034

赵春红^{1, 2, 3,},
申豪勇^{1, 2, 3},
卢海平^{1, 2, 3, ,},
王志恒^{1, 2, 3},
梁永平^{1, 2, 3},
唐春雷^{1, 2, 3}

1.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/广西岩溶资源环境工程技术研究中心, 广西桂林 541004
2.
联合国教科文组织国际岩溶研究中心/岩溶动力系统与全球变化国际联合研究中心, 广西桂林 541004
3.
广西平果喀斯特生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 广西平果 531406

基金项目: 广西重点研发计划项目（桂科AB21220044）；中国地质调查局地质调查项目（DD20230425，DD20160242，DD20190334）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵春红（1986－），女，副研究员，主要从事岩溶水文地质与水资源调查评价。E-mail：chunhong0504@163.com

通讯作者:
卢海平（1987－），男，副研究员，主要从事岩溶水文地质、环境地质调查研究工作。E-mail：luhaiping@mail.cgs.gov.cn。

中图分类号: X523；P641.8
计量
- 文章访问数: 51
- HTML浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-03-31
- 网络出版日期: 2024-11-05
- 刊出日期: 2024-08-25

Vulnerability assessment of karst groundwater in the Jinci spring area and the zoning of protected areas for water quality

ZHAO Chunhong^{1, 2, 3
,},
SHEN Haoyong^{1, 2, 3},
LU Haiping^{1, 2, 3
, ,},
WANG Zhiheng^{1, 2, 3},
LIANG Yongping^{1, 2, 3},
TANG Chunlei^{1, 2, 3}

1.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Guangxi Karst Resources and Environment Research Center of Engineering Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
2.
International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
3.
Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station, Pingguo, Guangxi 531406, China

摘要

摘要: 晋祠泉域岩溶水是太原市生活和工农业生产等重要的水源。文章以新划分的晋祠泉域岩溶水系统为评价对象，在欧洲方法及“水量脆弱性评价”的基础上，选取包气带厚度、入渗补给强度、上覆地层岩性及岩溶含水层的富水性4个指标，进行泉域岩溶水系统防污性能评价及水质保护区划分。结果表明：泉域泉源保护区主要分布在晋祠公园及周边；一级保护区主要分布在汾河主干流、西山山前碳酸盐岩裸露区，屯兰川、天池河及柳林河碳酸盐岩渗漏段等；二级保护区主要分布在泉域北部、汾河北岸等；准保护区主要分布在汾河南岸、东南部的太原盆地地区等。
- 防污性能评价 /
- 水质保护区 /
- 岩溶地下水 /
- 晋祠泉域
Abstract: Jinci spring is a famous karst spring in Shanxi Province, and its backflow is an ecological restoration goal of the Shanxi Provincial government. Composed of Nanlao spring, Shengmu spring, and Shanli spring, Jinci spring is exposed at the foot of Xuanweng mountain in the western mountains of Taiyuan, twenty-five kilometers away from the city center, and it is a concentrated discharge point for karst water in the Jinci spring area. Karst water in the spring area is mainly supplied by atmospheric precipitation infiltration and leakage from rivers and reservoirs. Karst water in the Jinci spring area is an important water source for people's life and industrial and agricultural production in Taiyuan City. In recent years, with the intensification of climate change, large-scale development of karst water, coal mining and other human activities, especially after the construction of the second reservoir of the Fenhe river, the karst hydrogeological conditions in the spring area have undergone fundamental changes, with the spring area expanding from 2,030 km² to 2,713 km², which has affected the evaluation, management and protection of karst water resources in the spring area. The original zoning of protected areas can no longer meet the needs of water resource management and protection. Therefore, it is urgent to re-zone the protected areas and formulate corresponding protection measures. In terms of the problems on water quality and quantity, there exist differences in the causes, regions, and protective measures, and thus LIANG Yongping et al. proposed the concepts of "water quantity vulnerability" and "water quality vulnerability", as well as a method of "first classifying, and then grading" for the zoning of karst aquifer protected areas.This study focuses on the hydrogeological conditions of special recharge, runoff, and discharge in the karst water system of North China, as well as the main influencing factors of the antifouling performance of karst aquifer systems. It combines European methods and "water vulnerability assessment" to evaluate the antifouling performance. Based on infiltration duration of karst water in the unsaturated zone, leakage of rivers and reservoirs, precipitation infiltration in different regions, and replacement of karst aquifer media structure with water abundance, this study selects four factors to evaluate the antifouling performance of karst aquifers in North China, including the thickness of unsaturated zone, the amount of infiltration recharge, the lithology of overlying strata, and the water abundance of karst aquifers. Taking the newly divided karst water system in the Jinci spring area as the evaluation object, this study aims to evaluate the vulnerability of karst water system in the spring area and to zone the protected areas.The results show as follows, (1) The protected areas are mainly distributed in Jinci park and its surrounding areas. (2) The first-class protected areas are mainly distributed in the main stream of the Fenhe river, the exposed areas of carbonate rocks in the front of western mountains of Taiyuan, and the leakage sections of carbonate rocks in Tunlanchuan, the Tianchi river and the Liulin river. (3) The second-class protected areas are mainly distributed in the north of the spring area and the north bank of the Fenhe river. (4) The quasi-protected areas are mainly distributed in the south bank of the Fenhe river and the Taiyuan basin in the southeast. The newly zoned protected areas for spring water quality can provide a basis for the rational protection and scientific utilization of karst water resources in the Jinci spring area.
- vulnerability assessment /
- protected areas for water quality /
- karst groundwater /
- the Jinci spring area

HTML

图 1 晋祠泉域地质简图

Figure 1. Geological map of the Jinci spring basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 隶属级别函数分布图

Figure 2. Distribution of membership level function

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 晋祠泉域岩溶含水层防污性能分级

Figure 3. Grading of karst aquifer vulnerability in the Jinci spring area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 晋祠泉域岩溶水系统水质保护区分布图

Figure 4. Distribution of the protected areas for water quality of karst water system in the Jinci spring area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 包气带厚度及入渗补给强度分级表

Table 1. Grading of thickness of unsaturated zone and infiltration recharge intensity

级别	5~4	4~3	3~2	2~1	1~0
包气带厚度/m	0~37	37~185	185~370	370~740	740~951.33
入渗补给强度/mm·a⁻¹	2 378.80~200	200~150	150~100	100~50	50~0

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 各河流多年平均渗漏量

Table 2. Average annual seepage volume of each river

位置	渗漏长度 /km	多年平均渗漏量/m³·s⁻¹	单位面积上渗漏量/mm·a⁻¹
汾河罗家曲—镇城底段	21.61	0.5000	364.83
汾河寨上—扫石段	18.61	0.4700	398.22
汾河二库（晋祠泉域内）	/	1.4477	2 378.80
天池河	6.04	0.0330	172.30
屯兰川	3.75	0.0400	336.38
柳林河	3.24	0.0570	554.80
其他支流	5.21	0.0230	139.22

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 上覆地层岩性及富水性分级表

Table 3. Grading of lithology of overlying strata and water abundance

级别	4.5	3.5	2.5	1.5	0.5
上覆地层岩性	河床砂砾石区	中奥陶统碳酸盐岩裸露区	中、上寒武及下奥陶统碳酸盐岩裸露区	碳酸盐岩覆盖区	碳酸盐岩埋藏区及非碳酸盐岩区
单位涌水量/m³·d⁻¹ （富水性）	≥5 000 （极强富水性）	3 000~5 000 （强富水性）	1 000~3 000 （中等富水性）	100~1 000 （弱富水性）	<100（贫水性）

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 其余2个指标的级别特征值

Table 4. Level eigenvalues of the other two indicators

指标	级别特征值x_j
指标	1	2	3	4	5	6
包气带厚度/m	951.33	740	370	185	37	0
入渗补给强度/mm·a⁻¹	0	50	100	150	200	525.6

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 评价结果

Table 5. Evaluation results

级别	污染程度	保护区级别	保护区面积/km²	面积占比/%
4~5	极易污染区	泉源保护区	2.06	0.08
3~4	较易污染区	水质一级保护区	89.55	3.30
2~3	稍难污染区	水质二级保护区	975.59	35.96
1~2	较难污染区	水质二级保护区	975.59	35.96
0~1	极难污染区	水质准保护区	1 645.38	60.66

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	邹胜章, 李录娟, 卢海平, 刘芹芹, 苏春田, 朱丹尼. 岩溶地下水系统防污性能评价方法[J]. 地球学报, 2014, 35(2):262-268. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2014.02.20 ZOU Shengzhang, LI Lujuan, LU Haiping, LIU Qinqin, SU Chuntian, ZHU Danni. The vulnerability assessment method of karst groundwater[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2014, 35(2): 262-268. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2014.02.20
[2]	崔亚丰, 何江涛, 王曼丽, 赵阅坤, 王菲. 岩溶地区地下水污染风险评价方法探究:以地苏地下河系流域为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(4):372-383. CUI Yafeng, HE Jiangtao, WANG Manli, ZHAO Yuekun, WANG Fei. Exploration of risk assessment method towards groundwater contamination in karst region: A case study in Disu underground river system basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(4): 372-383.
[3]	彭淑惠, 王宇, 黄成, 李芹, 王裕琴. 昆明大板桥岩溶地下水系统污染边界及其防污性能研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(4):362-368. PENG Shuhui, WANG Yu, HUANG Cheng, LI Qin, WANG Yuqin. A study on the pollution boundary of karst groundwater system and its antifouling performance in Dabanqiao, Kunming[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(4): 362-368.
[4]	Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr J H, Petty R J, Hackett G. Drartic: A standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings[J]. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 1987, 29(1):23-37.
[5]	徐发凯, 何丽, 王一帆, 何昌, 牛毓, 刘文君, 宋伟宏. 2010-2019年黄河干流兰州和白银段水质时空变化特征[J]. 水资源保护, 2021, 37(4):44-50. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2021.04.007 XU Fakai, HE Li, WANG Yifan, HE Chang, NIU Yu, LIU Wenjun, SONG Weihong. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of water quality in Lanzhou and Baiyin section of the Yellow River mainstream from 2010 to 2019[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2021, 37(4): 44-50. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2021.04.007
[6]	李泽君, 黄本胜, 邱静, 蔡宴朋, 杨志峰, 陈思淳. 变化环境下韩江生态流量演变特征分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2021, 37(5):22-29. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2021.05.004 LI Zejun, HUANG Bensheng, QIU Jing, CAI Yanpeng, YANG Zhifeng, CHEN Sichun. Analysis on evolution characteristics of ecological flow of Hanjiang river under changing environment[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2021, 37(5): 22-29. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2021.05.004
[7]	钟佐燊. 地下水防污性能评价方法探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2005, 12(Suppl.1):3-11. ZHONG Zuoshen. A discussion of groundwater vulnerability assessment methods[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(Suppl.1): 3-11.
[8]	严明疆, 张光辉, 王金哲, 聂振龙, 申建梅, 郝明亮. 滹滏平原地下水系统脆弱性最佳地下水水位埋深探讨[J]. 地球学报, 2009, 30(2):243-248. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2009.02.013 YAN Mingjiang, ZHANG Guanghui, WANG Jinzhe, NIE Zhenlong, SHEN Jianmei, HAO Mingliang. Discussion on the groundwater depth of the optimal groundwater system vulnerability in Hufu Plain[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2009, 30(2): 243-248. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2009.02.013
[9]	Francois Z. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers final report[R]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003.
[10]	Vias J M, Andreo B, Perles M J, Carrasco F, Vadillo I, Jimenez P. Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate(karstic) aquifers: the COP method[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2006,14(6):912-925.
[11]	汪莹, 罗朝晖, 吴亚, 李洁, 顾栩. 岩溶地下水脆弱性评价的城镇化因子:以水城盆地为例[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(9):2909-2919. WANG Ying, LUO Zhaohui, WU Ya, LI Jie, GU Xu. Urbanization factors of groundwater vulnerability assessment in karst area: A case study of Shuicheng basin[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(9): 2909-2919.
[12]	晋华, 郝晓燕, 杨瑞芳, 刘虎. 基于COP法的神头泉域岩溶含水层脆弱性评价[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2014, 45(5):669-673. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9432.2014.05.021 JIN Hua, HAO Xiaoyan, YANG Ruifang, LIU Hu. Groundwater vulnerability evaluation in karst aqnifer of Shentou spring region based on COP method[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2014, 45(5): 669-673. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9432.2014.05.021
[13]	王振兴, 李向全, 侯新伟, 张春潮, 桂春雷, 左雪峰. 煤炭开采条件下三姑泉域岩溶含水层保护评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(1):28-39. doi: 10.11932/karst20190104 WANG Zhenxing, LI Xiangquan, HOU Xinwei, ZHANG Chunchao, GUI Chunlei, ZUO Xuefeng. Karst aquifer protection evaluation to the Sangu spring basin under the condition of coal mining[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(1): 28-39. doi: 10.11932/karst20190104
[14]	Goldscheider N. Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: Application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2005, 13(4): 555-564. doi: 10.1007/s10040-003-0291-3
[15]	徐慧珍, 高赞东. 岩溶地区地下水防污性能评价:PI方法[J]. 新疆地质, 2006, 24(3):318-321. XU Huizhen, GAO Zandong. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in karst areas using PI method[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2006, 24(3): 318-321.
[16]	Doerfliger N, Jeannin P Y, Zwahlen F. Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: A new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method)[J]. Environmental Geology, 1999, 39(2): 165-176. doi: 10.1007/s002540050446
[17]	邹胜章, 张文慧, 梁彬, 陈宏峰, 梁小平. 西南岩溶区表层岩溶带水脆弱性评价指标体系的探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2005, 12(Suppl.1): 152-158. ZOU Shengzhang, ZHANG Wenhui, LIANG Bin, CHEN Hongfeng, LIANG Xiaoping. A discussion of the assessment of ground water vulnerability in epikarst zone of the karst area, Southwest China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(Suppl.1): 152-158.
[18]	梁永平, 韩行瑞, 王维泰, 赵春红,贺可强,潘国营,仝长水,石东海,李家田,贾玉跃,赵有美,沈健,刘喜坤,唐春雷 . 中国北方岩溶地下水环境问题与保护[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2013 . LIANG Yongping, HAN Xingrui, WANG Weitai, ZHAO Chunhong, HE Keqiang, PAN Guoying, TONG Changshui, SHI Donghai, LI Jiatian, JIA Yuyue, ZHAO Youmei, SHEN Jian, LIU Xikun, TANG Chunlei. The karst groundwater environmental problems and protection of Northern China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013.
[19]	梁永平, 申豪勇, 高旭波. 中国北方岩溶地下水的研究进展[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(5):199-219. LIANG Yongping, SHEN Haoyong, GAO Xubo. Review of research progress of karst groundwater in Northern China[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 199-219.
[20]	梁永平, 申豪勇, 赵春红, 王志恒, 唐春雷, 赵一, 谢浩, 石维芝. 对中国北方岩溶水研究方向的思考与实践[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(3):363-380. LIANG Yongping, SHEN Haoyong, ZHAO Chunhong, WANG Zhiheng, TANG Chunlei, ZHAO Yi, XIE Hao, SHI Weizhi. Thinking and practice on the research direction of karst water in Northern China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(3): 363-380.
[21]	梁永平, 韩行瑞, 李录秀, 薛凤海,张文忠. 山西省岩溶泉域水资源保护[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2008. LIANG Yongping, HAN Xingrui, LI Luxiu, XUE Fenghai, ZHANG Wenzhong. Water resources protection in karst springs in Shanxi Province[M] . Beijing: China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 2008.
[22]	王志恒, 梁永平, 申豪勇, 赵春红, 唐春雷, 谢浩, 赵一. 自然与人类活动叠加影响下晋祠泉域岩溶地下水动态特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6):1823-1837. WANG Zhiheng, LIANG Yongping, SHEN Haoyong, ZHAO Chunhong, TANG Chunlei, XIE Hao, ZHAO Yi. Dynamic characteristics of karst groundwater in Jinci spring under superinposed influence of natural and human activities[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1823-1837.
[23]	郭芳芳, 梁永平, 王志恒, 申豪勇, 赵春红. 山西太原西山汾河二库的泉域归属及其渗漏量计算[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(4):493-500. GUO Fangfang, LIANG Yongping, WANG Zhiheng, SHEN Haoyong, ZHAO Chunhong. Attribution of spring fields and seepage calculation of Fenhe second reservoir in Xishan, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(4): 493-500.
[24]	陆帅帅, 郑秀清, 李旭强, 陈军锋, 张永波, 臧红飞. 晋祠泉域岩溶水生态系统健康评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(1):34-41. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y18 LU Shuaishuai, ZHENG Xiuqing, LI Xuqiang, CHEN Junfeng, ZHANG Yongbo, ZANG Hongfei. Health assessment of karst groundwater ecosystem of Jinci spring area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(1): 34-41. doi: 10.11932/karst2019y18
[25]	梁永平, 张发旺, 申豪勇, 唐春雷, 赵春红, 王志恒, 侯宏冰, 任建会, 郭芳芳. 山西太原晋祠—兰村泉水复流的岩溶水文地质条件新认识[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(1): 11-18, 34. LIANG Yongping, ZHANG Fawang, SHEN Haoyong, TANG Chunlei, ZHAO Chunhong, WANG Zhiheng, HOU Hongbing, REN Jianhui, GUO Fangfang. Recognition of the critical hydrogeological conditions of the Jinci spring and Lancun spring in Shanxi[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering, 2019, 46(1): 11-18, 34.
[26]	高旭波, 王万洲, 侯保俊, 高列波, 张建友, 张松涛, 李成城, 姜春芳. 中国北方岩溶地下水污染分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(3):287-298. GAO Xubo, WANG Wanzhou, HOU Baojun, GAO Liebo, ZHANG Jianyou, ZHANG Songtao, LI Chengcheng, JIANG Chunfang. Analysis of karst groundwater pollution in Northern China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(3): 287-298.
[27]	殷丹. 山西省晋祠泉复流条件研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2007. YIN Dan. Research on reflowing condition of Jinci spring in Shanxi Province[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2007.
[28]	梁永平, 王维泰. 中国北方岩溶水系统划分与系统特征[J]. 地球学报, 2010, 31(6):860-868. LIANG Yongping, WANG Weitai. The division and characteristics of karst water systems in Northern China[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2010, 31(6): 860-868.
[29]	卢海平, 张发旺, 赵春红, 夏日元, 梁永平, 陈宏峰. 我国南北方岩溶差异[J]. 中国矿业, 2018, 27(Suppl.2):317-319. LU Haiping, ZHANG Fawang, ZHAO Chunhong, XIA Riyuan, LIANG Yongping, CHEN Hongfeng. Differences between southern karst and northern karst besides scientific issues that need attention[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2018, 27(Suppl.2): 317-319.
[30]	赵春红, 梁永平, 卢海平, 王维泰. 娘子关泉域岩溶水脆弱性模糊综合评价[J]. 水文, 2013, 33(5):52-57. ZHAO Chunhong, LIANG Yongping, LU Haiping, WANG Weitai. Fuzzy evaluation of karst water vulnerability in Niangziguan spring area[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2013, 33(5): 52-57.
[31]	山西省娘子关泉域岩溶水研究领导组. 山西省娘子关泉域岩溶水资源评价及其开发利用科研报告[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1986. Shanxi Province Niangziguan Spring Area Karst Water Research Leading Group. Research report on the evaluation and development of karst water resources in the Niangziguan spring area of Shanxi Province[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1986.
[32]	申豪勇, 梁永平, 徐永新, 张发旺. 中国北方岩溶地下水补给研究进展[J]. 水文, 2019, 39(3):15-21. SHEN Haoyong, LIANG Yongping, XU Yongxin, ZHANG Fawang. Research progress of karst groundwater recharge in Northern China[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2019, 39(3): 15-21.