Hydrogeological conditions of karst leakage and locating of leakage channels in Biyun lake, Guizhou
-
摘要: 查找岩溶区湖泊水库渗漏通道是岩溶区湖库建设和渗漏灾害治理的“卡脖子”问题。文章以碧云湖为例，分析湖区周边水文地质条件，结合示踪试验和地球物理探测方法，确定了碧云湖渗漏水文地质条件和渗漏主管道位置，并通过钻探验证。结果表明，碧云湖渗漏主要为岩溶管道型，渗漏点和地下河管道主要发育在靠近八步复式向斜轴的部位，位于物探测线测点540 m处，管道深约40 m，渗漏段相对较窄，灌浆堵漏可行。根据水文地质调查、地形地貌条件和地球物理探测结果，建议在水库下游方向的物探测线开展帷幕灌浆，以测点540 m为中心向两边灌浆。Abstract:
China is a country with the widest distribution area and the most complete karst development type in the world, and its karst area accounts for about one third of China's territorial area. Finding leakage channels of lakes and reservoirs in karst areas has been an urgent problem for the lake and reservoir construction and the control of leakage disasters. In this study, Biyun lake in Zhijin county of Guizhou Province was taken as an example to analyze the hydrogeological conditions around the lake in response to the problem of watershed shrinkage. Furthermore, with the combination of tracer tests and geophysical detection methods, the hydrogeological conditions of leakage in Biyun lake and the location of the main leakage channel were determined and verified by drilling test results. The results of the tracer test show that Moion concentration increased significantly 32 hours after the tracer was put into Biyun lake, and the value peaked 68 hours after the setting of tracer, and then decreased. The tracer results confirm that Biyun lake flows along the karst leakage zone in the north-east direction after seeping through the sinkhole, and is finally discharged at the outlet of the Babu underground river. In the results of high-power charging method, the potential curve and gradient curve show a relatively maximum potential value and a relatively minimum value of potential gradient at the measuring point of 540 m, where the main leakage channel of Biyun lake was inferred to be located and a large-scale karst cave is likely developed in the vicinity. The rest of the anomalous sections of the curves is inferred to be a strong karst development zone, which can provide conditions for the storage and transport of groundwater. A relatively strong reflective surface of electromagnetic wave shown by geological radar exploration at the depth of about 20–28 m is inferred to be a contact surface between mudstone and greystone. A strong reflection surface of relative electromagnetic wave at the depth of 36–48 m is inferred to be a strong karst development zone. These results are basically in line with the location of the strong karst leakage zone detected by high-power charging method. The borehole drilled at the measuring point of 540 m has verified the strong karst leakage zone inferred from the physical exploration. Based on the correction of the data from the borehole, the parameter of geological radar, V, is taken to be 0.060 m·ns−1 which is applicable to the study area. The study results indicate that Biyun lake belongs to the oblique tectonic basin, where leakage points and underground river pipes are mainly developed close to the axis of the Babu compound oblique, along the lithological interface of three sections of greystone and the second section of the mudstone of Jialingjiang Group. The mudstone constitutes a water separating plate of the karst leakage zone. After lake water seeps along the zone, it flows northwest, and is discharged in the end at the outlet of the Babu underground river. In addition, the leakage of Biyun lake is mainly of the karst pipeline type. The karst leakage zone is located at the measuring point of 540 m, with a 40-meter-deep of karst pipeline; therefore, the leakage section is relatively narrow, and it is feasible to plug the leakage by grouting. The drilling test results confirm the reliability of the technical method used in karst areas, which is combined by hydrogeological investigation, tracer test and physical exploration, because this method can well determine the direction of the leakage channel and the location of the leakage zone, and thus providing guidance on the leakage control of lakes or reservoirs in karst areas. -
Key words:
- Biyun lake /
- karst leakage /
- hydrogeology /
- leakage channel /
- geophysical exploration technology
-
图 3 示踪接收点Mo浓度变化曲线图
Figure 3. Varivation curve of Mo concentration at the tracer receiving point
-
[1] 袁道先, 蔡桂鸿. 岩溶环境学[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1988, 20-30. [2] 卢耀如, 张凤娥, 刘长礼, 童国榜, 张云. 中国典型地区岩溶水资源及其生态水文特性[J]. 地球学报, 2006, 27(5):393-402. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2006.05.002LU Yaoru, ZHANG Feng'e, LIU Changli, TONG Guobang, ZHANG Yun. Karst water resources in typical areas of China and their eco-hydrological characteristics[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2006, 27(5): 393-402. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2006.05.002 [3] 邹成杰等编著. 水利水电岩溶工程地质[M]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1994. [4] 杨杰, 郑成成, 江德军, 胡德秀. 病险水库理论分析研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(1):148-154.YANG Jie, ZHENG Chengcheng, JIANG Dejun, HU Dexiu. Research advances in risk assessment and enforcement of unsafe reservoirs[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(1): 148-154. [5] 任爱武, 柯柏荣, 程建设, 孙平, 段庆伟, 邵宇. 岩溶地区水库渗漏原因分析与无损检测验证[J]. 水利学报, 2014, 45(Suppl.2):119-124, 129.REN Aiwu, KE Bairong, CHENG Jianshe, SUN Ping, DUAN Qingwei, SHAO Yu. Analysis of the causes for the leakage of reservoir in karst area and nondestructive testing verification[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 45(Suppl.2): 119-124, 129. [6] 卢耀如. 喀斯特发育机理与发展工程建设效应研究方向[J]. 地球学报, 2016, 37(4):419-432.LU Yaoru. Karst development mechanism and research directions of developing engineering construction effect[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2016, 37(4): 419-432. [7] 李利蓉. 贵州某水库水文地质条件对水库渗漏的影响分析[J]. 河南水利与南水北调, 2019, 48(1):31-32.LI Lirong. Analysis on the influence of hydrogeological condition on reservoir seepage: A case study[J]. Henan Water Resources and South-to-North Water Diversion, 2019, 48(1): 31-32. [8] 杜朋召, 雷春荣, 高平. 东庄水库碳酸盐岩库段岩溶控制因素与发育规律研究[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(3):88-92.DU Pengzhao, LEI Chunrong, GAO Ping. Research on controlling factors and development rules of karst in carbonate rocks of Dongzhuang reservoir[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 39(3): 88-92. [9] 钱海涛, 王思敬, 严福章, 胡波. 黔中水利枢纽一期工程区岩溶发育模式及水库防渗研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2008(4):51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2008.04.013QIAN Haitao, WANG Sijing, YAN Fuzhang, HU Bo. Karst development models and reservoir anti-seepage design in a hydro-junction construction site in Qianzhong district[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2008(4): 51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2008.04.013 [10] 吕路, 杨军耀, 秦嘉楠. 汾河三期蓄水工程人工湖渗漏对太原市浅层地下水影响的数值模拟[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(1):89-92, 208.LYU Lu, YANG Junyao, QIN Jianan. Numerical simulation of impact of artificial lake leakage on shallow groundwater in Taiyuan in third stage of Fenhe river water storage project[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2017, 35(1): 89-92, 208. [11] 王思思, 任朝阳, 苏毅. 基于Visual MODFLOW的景观湖防渗方式评估及优化设计[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(7):70-76.WANG Sisi, REN Zhaoyang, SU Yi. Evaluation and design optimization of landscape lake antiseepage schemes based on Visual MODFLOW[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(7): 70-76. [12] 戴前伟, 程敏波, 雷轶. 伪随机流场法在水库渗漏检测中的异常特征正演分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37(2):810-816.DAI Qianwei, CHENG Minbo, LEI yi. Forward modeling analysis of abnormal characteristics of pseudorandom flow field method in reservoir leakage detection[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37(2): 810-816. [13] 罗锐恒, 刘天云, 胡顺强, 潘晓东, 刘伟. 地球物理技术在岩溶水库渗漏通道识别中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(7):128-134.LUO Ruiheng, LIU Tianyun, HU Shunqiang, PAN Xiaodong, LIU Wei. Application of geophysical technology in leakage channel identification of reservoir in karst area[J]. Yangtze River, 2022, 53(7): 128-134. [14] 韩凯, 陈玉玲, 陈贻祥, 甘伏平, 郑智杰, 张伟. 岩溶病害水库的渗漏通道探测方法:以广西全州县洛潭水库为例[J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(11):116-125.HAN Kai, CHEN Yuling, CHEN Yixiang, GAN Fuping, ZHENG Zhijie, ZHANG Wei. Detection method of leakage passages in karst disease reservoirs: A case study of Luotan reservoir in Quanzhou county of Guangxi[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2015, 34(11): 116-125. [15] 陈建生, 董海洲, 陈亮. 采用环境同位素方法研究北江大堤石角段基岩渗漏通道[J]. 水科学进展, 2003(1):57-61. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6791.2003.01.010CHEN Jiansheng, DONG Haizhou, CHEN Liang. Application of the environment isotope method to study on the leakage passage in foundation of Beijiang Dyke Shijiao section[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2003(1): 57-61. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6791.2003.01.010 [16] 袁瑞强, 宋献方, 王鹏, 张应华, 王仕琴, 唐常源. 白洋淀渗漏对周边地下水的影响[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(6):751-756. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2012.06.017YUAN Ruiqiang, SONG Xianfang, WANG Peng, ZHANG Yinghua, WANG Shiqin, TANG Changyuan. Impacts of percolation in Baiyangdian lake on groundwater[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(6): 751-756. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2012.06.017 [17] 代志宏, 朱银红, 卢鹏, 李正顺, 赵锡荣. 非典型隐伏岩溶发育特征及渗漏研究:以大雪山水库为例[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2021, 41(3):518-524.DAI Zhihong, ZHU Yinhong, LU Peng, LI Zhengshun, ZHAO Xirong. Development characteristics and leakage of atypical concealed karst: Taking Daxueshan reservoir as an example[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2021, 41(3): 518-524. [18] 罗小杰, 吴玉华. 江坪河水库库首右岸梅坪—曲溪河间地块岩溶发育特征与渗漏可能性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1995(3):47-51. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.1995.03.013 [19] 曾荣福, 郑克勋, 王钦权. 岩溶水库渗透破坏型渗漏勘察与评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(1): 119-127.ZENG Rongfu, ZHENG Kexun, WANG Qinquan. Investigation and evaluation of the leakage caused by seepage failure in karst reservoir[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(1): 119-127. [20] 王少丽, 瞿兴业. 防渗渠道顶托渗漏量计算方法的理论探讨[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39(4):476-482, 489.WANG Shaoli, QU Xingye. Analytical method for seepage calculation in canals with lining[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(4): 476-482, 489. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 158
- HTML浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 63
- 被引次数: 0
