Karst hydrogeological survey and tracing of Zhangyukeng phosphogypsum repository
-
摘要: 磷石膏是生产磷酸过程中产生的废弃物,对其最有效的处理方法就是采取集中堆填处理。张玉坑磷石膏集中库就是一个典型的磷石膏堆填场所,建造磷石膏集中库对地质环境要求严格,涉及磷石膏堆填体稳定性问题,同时还涉及对地下水可能造成的污染。文章在野外地质调查、钻井岩心观察、地球物理剖面解释的基础上,利用示踪评价技术,对研究区岩溶发育及岩溶水的径流、排泄特征进行评价,得出如下结论:①张玉坑磷石膏集中库所在冲沟与临谷无任何水力联系,不会发生向临谷的地下水渗漏;②NE向岩溶管道的存在控制着张玉坑地区岩溶水的径流和排泄,排泄通道唯一,地质点(D5)是该区存在的接触式下降泉——岩溶地下水的排泄通道;③示踪曲线具有拖尾特征的单峰式曲线,地下岩溶管道类型单一,相对简单,同时也说明试验区地下岩溶较为发育,存在着由地质点(D2)到地质点(D5)的主流径通道,且通道畅通;④磷石膏堆填场地的理想要求就是具有相对独立的地下水文地质单元,与临谷没有水力联系,排泄通道单一清楚,张玉坑磷石膏集中库岩溶水文地质条件基本满足上述要求,满足建库水文地质条件。Abstract: The most effective treatment of phosphogypsum—the waste generated in the production of phosphoric acid—is centralized landfill. Given the stability of phosphogypsum landfill and possible pollution to groundwater, Zhangyukeng phosphogypsum repository, a typical phosphogypsum landfill site, should be established in accordance with strict requirements on the geological environment. In this study, based on the field geological survey, observation of drilling cores and interpretation of geophysical profiles, the tracer evaluation technology was used to evaluate karst development and to analyze characteristics of karst water runoff and discharge in the study area. The following conclusions are drawn as follows. Firstly, the gullies where Zhangyukeng phosphogypsum repository is located have no hydraulic connection with the adjacent valley; therefore, there will be no groundwater leakage to the adjacent valley. Secondly, NE karst pipelines control the runoff and discharge of karst water in Zhangyukeng area. The discharge channel is unique and the geological point (D5) is the contact-type descending spring existing in this area—the discharge channel of karst groundwater. Thirdly, the tracer curve is a unimodal one with trailing characteristics, and the type of underground karst pipeline is single with relatively simple structures, which shows that the underground karst in the experimental area is developed and there is a main path channel with smooth flow between two geological points from D2 to D5. In conclusion, from the perspective of hydrogeological conditions, the building of a phosphogypsum landfill should meet the requirements that there exists a relatively independent underground geological unit without the hydraulic connection with the adjacent valley, and the discharge channel is single and clear. The karst hydrogeological conditions of Zhangyukeng phosphogypsum repository basically satisfy the above requirements and meet the hydrogeological conditions for its construction.
-
表 1 岩溶地下水示踪试验情况一览表
Table 1. List of the tracer test of karst groundwater
投放地点 示踪剂类型 投放量/g 试验时间 接收地点 地质点(D2) 荧光素钠 500 2021年4月24日11点开始,历时62 h,持续降雨20 h 地质点(D5) 表 2 示踪试验主要参数一览表
Table 2. Main parameters of the tracer test
投放点 接收点 直线距
离/m水力梯
度/%初现时
间/h峰值时
间/h最大流
速/m·h−1优势流
速/m·h−1平均流
速/m·h−1回收
率/%地质点(D2) 地质点(D5) 983 7.42 7 12 134 81 16 89.8 表 3 示踪试验估算的水文地质参数
Table 3. Hydrogeological parameters estimated by the tracer test
参数 管道储水
体积/m3管道平均横
截面积/m2管道平均
直径/m弥散系数/
m2·s−1纵向弥散
度/m摩擦系数
(f)雷诺兹数
(NR)舍伍德数
(Nsh)施密特数
(Nsc)数值 1 713 2.5 0.84 0.506 783.6 0.033 9673 841.4 1 140 -
[1] 蒋建亚, 张苏花, 付旭东, 孙浩. 磷化工废渣磷石膏的特性及其资源化利用[J]. 山西建筑, 2021, 47(9): 1-4.JIANG Jianya, ZHANG Suhua, FU Xudong, SUN Hao. Characteristics and resource utilization of phosphogypsum from phosphorus chemical waste[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2021, 47(9): 1-4. [2] 段先前, 韦俊发, 丁坚平. 贵州某磷石膏堆场渗漏污染评价[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2008, 22(2):218-221.DUAN Xianqian, WEI Junfa, DING Jianping. Evaluation on seepage pollution of a phosphogypsum yard in Guizhou Province[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering, 2008, 22(2):218-221. [3] 王萍, 刘静, 朱健, 李筑江, 田茂苑, 张旺. 岩溶山区磷石膏堆场重金属迁移对耕地质量的影响及污染风险管控[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4):294-299.WANG Ping, LIU Jing, ZHU Jian, LI Zhujiang, TIAN Maoyuan, ZHANG Wang. Impacts of heavy metal migration on quality of cultivated land and control of pollution risk in phosphogypsum yard in karst mountain area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(4):294-299. [4] 钟春里. 岩溶管道系统中污染物扩散及地下水自净能力研究:贵州某磷石膏堆场为例[J]. 贵州地质, 2011, 28(2):126-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5943.2011.02.010ZHONG Chunli. Study of pollutant dispersion and underground water self-purification capacity in the karst conduit system: One phosphogypsum gradient in Guizhou as the example[J]. Guizhou Geology, 2011, 28(2):126-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5943.2011.02.010 [5] 陈舟, 赵贵清, 王志光, 陈豪, 张科正. 岩溶区某磷石膏堆放场渗漏特征分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2017, 44(2):144-150. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2017.02.22CHEN Zhou, ZHAO Guiqing, WANG Zhiguang, CHEN Hao, ZHANG Kezheng. Leakage characteristics of a phosphorus gypsum storage site in karst area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(2):144-150. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2017.02.22 [6] 丁坚平, 毛健全, 姜涛. 贵州岩溶地区废渣堆场渗漏污染研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2004(6):16-19.DING Jianping, MAO Jianquan, JIANG Tao. Study on seepage pollution of waste residue disposal sites in karst area of Guizhou[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2004(6):16-19. [7] 邓铭哲. 黄陵背斜及邻区构造建模[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2018.DENG Mingzhe. Structural modeling of the Huangling anticline and its peripheral structural belt[D]. Beijing: China University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2018. [8] 王孔伟, 张帆, 邱殿明. 三峡库区黄陵背斜形成机理及与滑坡群关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4):1142-1154.WANG Kongwei, ZHANG Fan, QIU Dianming. Relation of Huangling anticline and landslide group in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2015, 45(4):1142-1154. [9] 徐政语, 李大成, 卢文忠, 林舸, 刘池阳. 渝东构造样式分析与成因解析[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2004(1):15-22.XU Zhengyu, LI Dacheng, LU Wenzhong, LIN Ge, LIU Chiyang. Pattern analyses and genetic interpretation about the geotectonics of Yudong (East Chongqing)[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenica, 2004(1):15-22. [10] 王军, 褚杨, 林伟, 王清晨. 黄陵背斜的构造几何形态及其成因探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2010, 45(3):615-625.WANG Jun, CHU Yang, LIN Wei, WANG Qingchen. Structural geometry and the origin of the Huangling anticline[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2010, 45(3):615-625. [11] 陈余道, 程亚平, 王恒, 蒋亚萍, 黄月群. 岩溶地下河管道流和管道结构及参数的定量示踪:以桂林寨底地下河为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2013, 40(5):11-15.CHEN Yudao, CHENG Yaping, WANG Heng, JIANG Yaping, HUANG Yuequn. Quantitative tracing study of hydraulic and geometric parameters of a karst underground river: Exemplified by the Zhaidi underground river in Guilin[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2013, 40(5):11-15. [12] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(4):717-721. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.2009.04.004LU Chengpeng, SHU Longcang, YUAN Libo, ZHANG Rongrong, HUANG Bijuan, WANG Binbin. Determination of hydrogeologic parameters of karst aquifer based on tracer test[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2009, 39(4):717-721. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.2009.04.004 [13] 杨立铮, 刘俊业. 试用示踪剂浓度−时间曲线分析岩溶管道的结构特征[J]. 成都地质学院学报, 1979(4):44-49. [14] Field MS. The Qtracer2 program for tracer-breakthrough curve analysis for tracer tests in karstic aquifer and other hydrologic systems[R]. US: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.