Characteristics of long series data of groundwater quality and level in Kunming basin
-
摘要: 通过对昆明盆地,特别是主城区长序列水质水位监测数据对比分析,采用水文地质法、数据统计法、Piper和Matlab软件建立模型进行水质水位动态特征和变化趋势分析研究。昆明盆地地下化学类型以HCO3-Ca和HCO3-Ca·Mg型为主。孔隙水超标项以Mn、NH$_4^{+}$、NO$_3^{-}$、COD为主;岩溶水超标项以Mn、NH$_4^{+}$、F为主;近年来超标物项目趋于复杂,出现I、${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-}$、As、Cd等有毒有害和有机物超标,水质变化原因为工业和生活污染加剧。对地下水位20年长序列动态变化特征和趋势研究表明,昆明盆地地下水位年际变化主要受工农业生产、开采量和工程活动等影响,孔隙水2002—2009年呈下降趋势,2009年后总体呈上升趋势;岩溶水2002—2012年呈下降趋势,2012年后总体呈上升趋 势;翠湖等5个降落漏斗区地下水位回升趋势较为显著,主要与昆明市限制地下水开采、封填地下水开采井的措施密切相关。基于水质、水位动态分析结果,提出保护建议。Abstract: Kunming basin is a representative of karst faulted basin, with a basin bottom area of 846.19 km2 and a fluctuation of 1-82 m averaging at 19 m. With the city development, Kunming has gradually become one of the megacities in China. However, as the center of intensive human settlements and activities, the contradiction between human and land is prominent, and the problems of resources and environment are serious. Since the 1960s, the dynamic monitoring of groundwater in the urban and suburban areas of Kunming has been carried out in a comprehensive and systematic manner. In this study, hydrogeology method, data statistics method, Piper and Matlab software were used to establish models to analyze the dynamic characteristics and change of water quality and water level, based on the comparative analysis of monitoring data of water quality and level in Kunming basin, especially in the main urban area. The main underground chemical types of Kunming basin are HCO3-Ca and HCO3-Ca·Mg. In recent years, with the gradual increase of Na+ + K+ and ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-} $ +Cl, the hydrochemical types have also gradually been increasing and become more complex. According to the water quality evaluation, the groundwater quality in Kunming basin has generally shown a downward trend in recent 15 years. The pore water quality is mainly of Class IV and Class V, and the proportion of Class V water has increased rapidly, from 30.2% to 62.5%. The bedrock water quality is mainly of Class III and Class IV. The proportion of Class IV water and Class V water has risen rapidly from 11.1% and 8.6% to 33.3% and 26.7%, respectively. Mn, NH$_4^{+}$, ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ and COD are the main items exceeding permitted levels in pore water. Mn, NH$_4^{+}$ and F are the main items exceeding permitted levels in karst water. In recent years, I, ${\rm{SO}}_4^{2-}$, As, Cd and other toxic, harmful and organic substances have exceeded permitted levels, showing a compex tendency. The reason for the change of water quality is the intensification of industrial and domestic pollution. The results show that the interannual variation of groundwater level in Kunming basin is mainly affected by industrial and agricultural production, mining amount and engineering activities, and pore water decreased from 2002 to 2009, but increased after 2009. Karst water showed a downward trend from 2002 to 2012, and an upward one after 2012. The groundwater levels of Puji-Liangjiahe, Beijiaochang, the urban area of Kunming, Jinmasi-Guanshang and other water-rich blocks have risen significantly. The rising trend of groundwater levels in Cuihu, Heilongtan, Beijiaochang, Majie, Heilinpu and other five falling funnel areas is significant, which is closely related to the measures of restricting groundwater exploitation and sealing groundwater exploitation wells in Kunming City. Based on the dynamic analysis of water quality and water level, countermeasures and strategies to protect groundwater should be proposed through enhancing administrative management, strengthening the investigation, evaluation and monitoring of basic groundwater environment, and furthering the research on technology of preventing groundwater pollution.
-
Key words:
- groundwater monitoring /
- water quality /
- water level /
- trend analysis /
- Kunming basin
-
图 7 九龙池泉域水文地质剖面图(据参考文献[10]修编)
1-黏性土孔隙弱含水层 2-砂砾土孔隙较弱含水层 3-玄武岩裂隙弱含水层 4-白云岩岩溶较强含水层 5-碎屑岩弱含水层 6-石灰岩岩溶强含水层 7-监测孔,孔底数据为孔深(m),q为单位涌水量[L·(s·m)−1] 8-上升泉群 9-地下水位线 10-地层界线 11-断层及编号 12-溶洞及充填溶洞 13-地下水流向 14-地层产状
Figure 7. Hydrogeological cross section in the Jiulongchi spring group (Revised according to reference [10])
1. Clay pore with weak aquifer; 2. Sandy gravel soil pore with relatively weak aquifer; 3. Basalt fissure with weak aquifer; 4. Dolomite karst with relatively strong aquifer; 5. Clastic rock with weak aquifer; 6. Limestone karst with strong aquifer; 7. Monitoring hole, and the hole bottom data is hole depth (m); q is unit inflow[L·(s·m)−1]; 8. Ascending spring group; 9. Phreatic line; 10. Stratigraphic boundary; 11. Fault and numbering; 12. Karst caves and filling caves; 13. Groundwater flow direction; 14. Attitude of stratum
表 1 昆明市5个主要降落漏斗中心水位统计表
Table 1. Statistics of central water level of 5 main falling funnels in Kunming City
地段名称 黑龙潭 北教场 马街 翠湖 黑林铺 原始水位/m 1 911.44 1 895.24 1 886.68 1 889.61 1 883.21 2002年水位 1 907.33 1 859.46 1 886.29 1 880.69 1 861.24 2021年水位 1 910.897 1 894.04 1 889.038 1 887.24 1 880.852 -
[1] 王宇, 张华, 张贵, 王波, 彭淑惠, 何绕生, 周翠琼. 喀斯特断陷盆地环境地质分区及功能[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(3):283-295.WANG Yu, ZHANG Hua, ZHANG Gui, WANG Bo, PENG Shuhui, HE Raosheng, ZHOU Cuiqiong. Zoning of environmental geology and functions in karst fault-depression basins[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3):283-295. [2] 张华, 王宇, 柴金龙. 滇池流域石漠化特征分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(2):181-186.ZHANG Hua, WANG Yu, CHAI Jinlong. Analysis on the desert's characteristics in Dianchi watershed[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2011, 30(2):181-186. [3] 王宇. 昆明市区地表水与地下水联合调度系统研究[J]. 水资源研究, 1990, 11(4): 9-15.WANG Yu. Study on the joint regulation system of surface water and groundwater in Kunming City[J]. Water Resource Research, 1990, 11(4): 9-15. [4] 张华, 王波, 王宇, 张贵, 何绕生, 代旭升, 康晓波, 蓝芙宁. 云南泸西岩溶断陷盆地水循环系统及水资源循环利用方案[J]. 地球学报, 2021, 42(3):313-323.ZHANG Hua, WANG Bo, WANG Yu, ZHANG Gui, HE Raosheng, DAI Xusheng, KANG Xiaobo, LAN Funing. The water circulation system and water resources recycling plan of the Luxi karst fault-depression basin in Yunnan[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2021, 42(3):313-323. [5] 王宇, 康晓波, 张华, 王燕. 昆明地热田的成因与外延[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(2): 125-133.WANG Yu, KANG Xiaobo, ZHANG Hua, WANG Yan. The genesis and extension of Kunming geothermal field[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(2): 125-133. [6] 叶许春. 近20年来昆明盆地北端孔隙水化学场演变过程及其驱动因素分析[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2006.YE Xuchun. Evolution process and driving factors of pore water chemical field in the northern end of Kunming basin in recent 20 years[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Technology, 2006. [7] 叶许春, 张奇, 宋学良, 张子雄. 昆明盆地城市化的孔隙水水质响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(4):640-649.YE Xuchun, ZHANG Qi, SONG Xueliang, ZHANG Zixiong. Pore water quality response to urbanization in Kunming basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(4):640-649. [8] 彭淑惠, 王宇, 张贵, 李继红, 李玉辉. 昆明盆地土地利用对岩溶水质的影响[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 36(6):1-7, 14.PENG Shuhui, WANG Yu, ZHANG Gui, LI Jihong, LI Yuhui. Effect of Kunming basin land use on karst water quality[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 36(6):1-7, 14. [9] 姜乃齐, 左小清, 王志红, 游洪, 赵永恒. 基于PS-InSAR和SBAS技术监测昆明市主城区地面沉降[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 37(4):72-78.JIANG Naiqi, ZUO Xiaoqing, WANG Zhihong, YOU Hong, ZHAO Yongheng. Monitoring land settlement in the main urban area of Kunming based on PS-InSAR and SBAS technology[J]. Journal of Guizhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 37(4):72-78. [10] 王宇, 何绕生, 刘海峰, 王梓溦, 晏祥省, 双灵, 彭淑惠. 昆明翠湖九龙池泉群断流原因及恢复措施[J]. 中国岩溶, 2014, 33(3):263-271.WANG Yu, HE Raosheng, LIU Haifeng, WANG Ziwei, YAN Xiangsheng, SHUANG Ling, PENG Shuhui. Drought causes and restoration measures for Jiulongchi spring group within Cuihu lake, Kunming[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2014, 33(3):263-271. [11] 李芸, 张楠. 昆明盆地地下水超采区水资源评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(6):35-38, 44.LI Yun, ZHANG Nan. Assessment of groundwater overdraft zones in Kunming basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2017, 34(6):35-38, 44. [12] 郭艺, 秦大军, 王枫, 甘甫平, 闫柏琨. 基于时间序列分析法的岩溶泉水位预测[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(4): 689-697.GUO Yi, QIN Dajun, WANG Feng, GAN Fuping, YAN Baikun. Prediction of karst spring water level based on the time series analysis method[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(4): 689-697. [13] 殷秀兰, 李圣品. 基于监测数据的全国地下水质动态变化特征[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(5): 1356-1365.YIN Xiulan, LI Shengpin. Research on dynamic characteristics of groundwater quality based on monitoring data in China[J] Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(5): 1356-1365. [14] 李圣品, 李文鹏, 殷秀兰, 金爱芳. 全国地下水质分布及变化特征[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(6): 1-8.LI Shengpin, LI Wenpeng, YIN Xiulan, JIN Aifang. Distribution and evolution characteristics of national groundwater quality from 2013 to 2017[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(6): 1-8. [15] 王雅茹. 基于Piper三线图的矿井水化学特征分析[J]. 山东煤炭科技, 2019(4):145-147, 150.WANG Yaru. AnaIysis of chemical characteristics of mine water based on Piper trilinear diagram[J]. Shandong Coal Science and Technology, 2019(4):145-147, 150. [16] 彭康宁, 张卫, 朱恒华, 周建伟, 万豪杰, 赵骏. 山东招远市地下水水化学特征及水质评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2018, 25(4):106-138.PENG Kangning, ZHANG Wei, ZHU Henghua, ZHOU Jianwei, WAN Haojie, ZHAO Jun. Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality evaluation of groundwater in Zhaoyuan City, Shandong Province[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2018, 25(4):106-138. [17] 刘江涛, 蔡五田, 曹月婷, 蔡月梅, 边超, 吕永高, 陈远铭. 沁河冲洪积扇地下水水化学特征及成因分析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(12): 5428-5439.LIU Jiangtao, CAI Wutian, CAO Yueting, CAI Yuemei, BIAN Chao, LV Yonggao, Chen Yuanming. Hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater and the origin in alluvial-proluvial fan of Qinhe river[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(12): 5428-5439. [18] 中国地质环境监测院. 中国地质环境监测地下水位年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2013-2017. [19] 苏伟杰. 张家口市内陆平原区20年间地下水位变化趋势分析[J]. 河北建筑工程学院学报, 2015, 33(1): 56-59.SU Weijie. Analysis on the change trend of groundwater in plain area of the city for 20 years Zhangjiakou inland[J]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Architecture and Engineering, 2015, 33(1): 56-59. [20] 徐淑波, 徐立荣, 梅泽本. 济南引黄灌区近20年地下水位动态变化及趋势分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2016, (5): 68-71, 76.XU Shubo, XU Lirong, MEI Zeben. The dynamic change and trend of groundwater level in Jinan yellow river irrigation region more than twenty years[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2016, (5): 68-71, 76. [21] 叶许春, 张世涛, 宋学良, 张子雄, 莫美仙, 李长才, 金德山, 和怀中, 孙有国. 昆明盆地浅层地下水氮的分布及污染机理[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(4):185-188, 200. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2007.04.043YE Xuchun, ZHANG Shitao, SONG Xueliang, ZHANG Zixiong, MO Meixian, LI Changcai, JIN Deshan, HE Huaizhong, SUN Youguo. Nitrogen distribution and pollution mechanism of shallow groundwater in Kunming basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(4):185-188, 200. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2007.04.043 [22] Harris J H, Silveira R. Large-scale assessments of river health using an index of biotic integrity with low-diversity fish communities[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2):235-252. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00428.x [23] 文冬光, 何江涛, 孙继朝. DZ/T0290-2015《地下水水质标准》解读[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016.