烟台中桥岩溶塌陷发育特征及防治对策

王有智; 杨宁; 于林弘; 吕凌峰

doi:10.11932/karst20220612

烟台中桥岩溶塌陷发育特征及防治对策

doi: 10.11932/karst20220612

山东省第三地质矿产勘查院, 山东烟台 264004

基金项目: 栖霞市自然资源和规划局项目（栖霞政采[正平]服务2017012）；烟台市城市地质调查（地质资源调查部分）；山东省自然资源厅项目（鲁地环资（2018）06号）

详细信息

作者简介:
王有智（1981－），男，高级工程师，从事水工环地质方面工作。E-mail：89053146@qq.com

通讯作者:
于林弘（1985－），女，高级工程师，从事水工环地质工作。E-mail： yulinhong305@163.com

中图分类号: P642.25
计量
- 文章访问数: 1426
- HTML浏览量: 937
- PDF下载量: 100
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-23
- 网络出版日期: 2023-01-06
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-25

Development characteristics and prevention countermeasures of karst collapse in Zhongqiao of Yantai

The Third Shandong Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration, Yantai, Shandong 264004, China

摘要

摘要: 中桥灰岩分布区是胶东岩溶地貌的典型代表，近些年岩溶塌陷较为严重，给当地人民生命财产造成严重威胁。文章以力学、构造地质学、水文地质学等理论为依据，宏观微观相结合，对岩溶塌陷发育特征和过程以及岩溶塌陷触发因素进行研究。结果表明：在塌陷诸多因素中，地层岩性是基本条件，地质构造为主导因素，而水动力条件是决定因素；从地貌角度看，距离河流300 m以内区域岩溶发育更强烈，岩溶塌陷均发生于河流与河流夹角V型区域内；从盖层及构造角度看，岩溶塌陷多发育于覆盖层厚度为10~15 m、断裂上盘1 km以内的岩溶区域，为岩溶塌陷脆弱区；在塌陷触发因素方面，在具备岩溶塌陷基本前提下，强降雨、过度采排地下水以及连续干旱，特别是水位在灰岩面上方0~2 m持续波动超过5 d以上更易触发塌陷。在岩溶塌陷防治方面首先要合理规划地下水采排方案，其次在区内建设地下水监测预警网络，在矿山周边建设止水帷幕工程。
- 岩溶塌陷 /
- 发育特征 /
- 触发因素 /
- 防治对策
Abstract: The limestone distribution area of Zhongqiao is a typical representative of the karst landform distribution in Jiaodong Peninsula. With an area of about 30 km², it is located about 25 km southwest of Yantai City, and is the core area of Fushan Economic-Technological Development Zone. In recent years, frequent karst collapse has seriously affected the economic development and local people's life, and even brought some panic to the them. 17 times of karst collapse in the study area occurred in the covered karst area. The collapse began in 2005 (2 times), and then occurred 17 times in 2014-2021. The diameter of the collapse pit varies from 1 m to 10 m, and the depth is mostly 3-5 m. The collapse is mostly elliptical and circular on the plane, appearing in groups, and the section is jar-shaped and funnel-shaped. In terms of space, the collapse is mainly located near the groundwater runoff zone, river bed, gully and terraces on both banks where geological structures are developed. The covering soil thickness of collapse point is mostly between 10-15 m. In order to provide a scientific basis for the future rational planning of groundwater exploitation and monitoring and early warning of karst collapse, and provide a geological basis for the prevention of karst collapse, we have further analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution, the development characteristics, process and triggering factors of karst collapse in the study area to better understand the development mode and evolution law of karst collapse in Jiaodong Peninsula. In this paper, the development characteristics, process and triggering factors of karst collapse are studied from the aspects of mechanics, structural geology and hydrogeology. The research shows that among the many factors of collapse, stratum lithology is the basic condition; the geological structure is the dominant factor; and the hydrodynamic condition is the decisive factor. From the perspective of geomorphology, the karst development is more intense within 300 m from the river, and karst collapse occurs in the V-shaped area between the two rivers. In terms of cap rock and structure, karst collapse is mostly developed in the fragile area of karst area where the thickness of overburden is 10-15 m and the hanging wall of fault is less than 1 km. Given the basic conditions of karst collapse, collapse trigger factors, such as heavy rainfall, excessive exploitation and drainage of groundwater and continuous drought, especially the continuous fluctuation of water level 0-2 m above limestone surface for more than 5 days, are more likely to trigger collapse. In the prevention and control of karst collapse, we must first rationally plan the groundwater mining and drainage scheme, then establish a groundwater monitoring and early warning network in the area, and build a water-stopping curtain around the mine.
- karst collapse /
- development characteristics /
- geological hazards /
- prevention and control countermeasures

HTML

图 1 研究区水文地质略图

Figure 1. Regional hydrogeology sketch in the study area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 塌陷区地层剖面图

Figure 2. Section of the surrounding strata of the subsidence area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 岩溶塌陷与断裂构造的位置关系

Figure 3. Location relationship between karst collapse and fault structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 岩溶区覆盖层厚度及土层结构分布图

Figure 4. Thickness of overburden and distribution of soil layer structure in karst area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 J6观测孔水位变化、降水量与岩溶塌陷关系图（2000-2020年）

Figure 5. Relationship between water level change, precipitation and karst collapse in observation hole J6 (2000-2020)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 部分岩溶塌陷与相关条件关系一览表

Table 1. List of relative relations between karst collapse points and structures

塌陷编号	与断裂构造相对位置					与河流位置关系		与土层结构关系
塌陷编号	F1	F2	F3	F7	上盘	<300 m	>300 m	粉质黏土单层结构	粉质黏土、碎石土双层结构	砂土、黏性土、碎石土多层结构
TX1	−	−	−	√	−	√		−	−	√
TX2	−	−	−	√	−	√		√	−	−
TX3	−	−	√	−	√		√	−	−	√
TX4	√	−	−	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX5	−	−	√	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX6	−	−	√	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX7	−	√	−	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX8	√	−	−	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX9	√	−	−	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX10	−	−	√	−	√		√	−	−	√
TX11	−	√	−	−	√	√		−	−	√
TX12	−	−	√	−	√		√	−	−	√

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(16)

[1]	雷明堂, 蒋小珍. 岩溶塌陷研究现状、发展趋势及其支撑技术方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1998, 9(3): 1-6. LEI Mingtang, JIANG Xiaozhen. Research on the present situation and developing tendency of karst collapse and techniques for its supporting[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1998, 9 (3): 1-6.
[2]	冯亚伟. 山东省岩溶塌陷分布规律及成因机制[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(2):205-214. FENG Yawei. Distribution and genesis of karst collapse in Shandong Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(2):205-214.
[3]	罗小杰. 也论覆盖型岩溶地面塌陷机理[J]. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(5): 886-896. LUO Xiaojie. Further discussion on mechanism of covered karst ground collapse[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2015, 23(5): 886-896.
[4]	王建秀, 杨立中, 刘丹. 覆盖型岩溶区土体塌陷典型数学模型的研究[J]. 中国地质灾害防治学报, 1998, 9(3):54-59. WANG Jianxiu, YANG Lizhong, LIU Dan. Study of the cap soil at the covered karst area by the typical collapse mathematical models[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1998, 9(3):54-59.
[5]	冯亚伟, 陈洪年, 贾德旺. 山东省岩溶地下水系统划分及构造模式[J]. 水文, 2020, 40(6):83-88, 39. doi: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.20200044 FENG Yawei, CHEN Hongnian, JIA Dewang. Division and structural pattern of karst groundwater system in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2020, 40(6):83-88, 39. doi: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.20200044
[6]	姜伏伟. 岩溶塌陷发育机理模式研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):759-763. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y37 JIANG Fuwei. Study on the developing model of karst collapse[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):759-763. doi: 10.11932/karst2017y37
[7]	张杰, 毕攀, 魏爱华, 陶志斌, 朱慧超. 基于模糊综合法的烟台市栖霞中桥岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(2):215-220. ZHANG Jie, BI Pan, WEI Aihua, TAO Zhibing, ZHU Huichao. Assessment of susceptibility to karst collapse in the Qixia Zhongqiao district of Yantai based on fuzzy comprehensive method[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(2):215-220.
[8]	高培德, 王林峰. 覆盖型岩溶塌陷的塌陷机制分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):770-776. doi: 10.11932/karst20170602 GAO Peide, WANG Linfeng. Analysis of collapse mechanism for mantled karst collapse[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):770-776. doi: 10.11932/karst20170602
[9]	邱连贵, 任凤楼, 曹忠祥, 张岳桥. 胶东地区晚中生代岩浆活动及对大地构造的制约[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2008, 32(1):117-123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2008.01.015 QIU Liangui, REN Fenglou, CAO Zhongxiang, ZHANG Yueqiao. Late mesozoic magmatic activities and their constraints on geotectonics of Jiaodong region[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2008, 32(1):117-123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2008.01.015
[10]	张治伟, 朱章雄. 中国南方不同岩溶类型区土地利用的问题与对策[J]. 中国土地科学, 2012, 26(12):64-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2012.12.010 ZHANG Zhiwei, ZHU Zhangxiong. Problems and countermeasures for land use in various karst regions in South China[J]. China Land Sciences, 2012, 26(12):64-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2012.12.010
[11]	李保方, 李占军, 王俊杰, 于景宗, 赵海阔. 大藤峡水利枢纽工程岩溶发育特点及规律分析[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(S1):177-181. doi: 10.13393/j.cnki.issn.1672-948X.2019.S1.041 LI Baofang, LI Zhanjun, WANG Junjie, YU Jingzong, ZHAO Haikuo. Karst development characteristics and regularity analysis of Datengxia hydro project[J]. Journal of Three Gorges University (Natural Science), 2019, 41(S1):177-181. doi: 10.13393/j.cnki.issn.1672-948X.2019.S1.041
[12]	万佳威, 张勤军, 石树静. 岩溶塌陷不确定性预测评价综述[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):764-769. doi: 10.11932/karst20170601 WAN Jiawei, ZHANG Qinjun, SHI Shujing. Overview of uncertainty assessment on karst collapse prediction[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):764-769. doi: 10.11932/karst20170601
[13]	张晓斌. 福建省大田县桃源镇前厝村岩溶塌陷发育特征及成因分析[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2018, 29(4):15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2018.04.003 ZHANG Xiaobin. Development characteristics and causes analysis of karst collapse in Qiancuo village, Taoyuan town, Datian of Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environmental Protection, 2018, 29(4):15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2018.04.003
[14]	蒋小珍, 雷明堂. 岩溶塌陷灾害的岩溶地下水气压力监测技术及应用[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(5):786-791. JIANG Xiaozhen, LEI Mingtang. Monitoring technique and its application of karst groundwater-air pressure in karst collapse[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(5):786-791.
[15]	刘思秀. 杭州市西部岩溶山区地面塌陷及地下水资源开发初步研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2000, 11(1):11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2000.01.003 LIU Sixiu. A preliminary study on the karst collapse and underground water utilization in the western hills, Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environmental Protection, 2000, 11(1):11-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2000.01.003
[16]	孙佑光, 崔煜烽. 山东烟台市栖霞中桥岩溶塌陷机理及防治措施[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2017, 29(9):5-7. SUN Youguang, CUI Yufeng. Karst collapse mechanism and prevention measures of Qixia Zhongqiao, Yantai City, Shandong Province[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2017, 29(9):5-7.