济南趵突泉泉域岩溶水硝酸盐污染特征及其来源识别

张海林; 王重; 林广奇; 徐源; 马雪莹; 关琴

doi:10.11932/karst20220611

济南趵突泉泉域岩溶水硝酸盐污染特征及其来源识别

doi: 10.11932/karst20220611

张海林^{1, 2,},
王重^{1, 2},
林广奇^{1, 2},
徐源^{1, 2},
马雪莹^{1, 2},
关琴^{1, 2}

1.
山东省地质矿产勘查开发局八〇一水文地质工程地质大队(山东省地矿工程勘察院), 山东济南 250014
2.
山东省地下水环境保护与修复工程技术研究中心, 山东济南 250014

基金项目: 山东省地质勘查优选“济南岩溶地下水污染机理研究及风险评价”（2015-34）

详细信息

作者简介:
张海林（1980－），女，正高级工程师，主要从事水文地质与环境地质勘查工作。E-mail：hl_z826@sina.com

中图分类号: X523
计量
- 文章访问数: 1298
- HTML浏览量: 923
- PDF下载量: 66
- 被引次数: 13
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-23
- 网络出版日期: 2023-01-06
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-25

Nitrate pollution characteristics and identification of nitrate sources in Baotu Spring area of Jinan

ZHANG Hailin^{1, 2
,},
WANG Zhong^{1, 2},
LIN Guangqi^{1, 2},
XU Yuan^{1, 2},
MA Xueying^{1, 2},
GUAN Qin^{1, 2}

1.
801 Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China
2.
Shandong Engineering Research Center for Environmental Protection and Remediation on Groundwater, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China

摘要

摘要: 为有效防治硝酸盐污染，保障区域饮用水安全，识别硝酸盐的污染来源，在系统分析济南趵突泉水文地质条件的基础上，进行岩溶水取样调查，采用N、O双同位素技术，识别其泉域内硝酸盐的主要污染来源，并利用IsoSource模型定量计算各污染来源的贡献率。结果表明：趵突泉泉域岩溶水中硝酸盐主要污染来源有动物粪便与污水、土壤有机氮、化肥中的NH $_4^{+}$ ；其中动物粪便与污水来源贡献率最大，均值达到51.07%，其次是土壤有机氮和化肥，均值分别为25.21%、23.71%。
- 硝酸盐 /
- 氮氧同位素 /
- 岩溶水 /
- 趵突泉泉域
Abstract: Under the control of the topography and the geologic structure, karst water in Baotu Spring of Jinan City is supplied in the southern mountain area, and flows from south to north along the karst fractures. In front of the northern mountain, karst water runoff is blocked by the hidden igneous rock mass. Therefore, many famous springs have been formed. Karst is developed in the spring area with the aquifer lithology of primary Cambrian and Ordovician limestone. The geological structure of this area is complex with low mountains in the south and the piedmont sloping plain in the north. In recent years, with the rapid development of industry and agriculture, activities such as industrial production, agricultural planting and domestic waste discharge have led to different degrees of pollution of karst water in Jinan. Among these different types of pollution, the surface pollution caused by nitrate, one of the main pollutants in the spring area, is more prominent and related to the safety of water environment and local people's health. In order to effectively identify the sources of nitrate pollution, prevent the pollution, and ensure the safety of local drinking water, we carried out the accurate qualitative and quantitative identification of nitrate pollution sources in this study, according to the traditional water chemical analysis, the values of nitrogen and oxygen isotopes and the quantitative source analysis model. Based on the systematic hydrogeological analysis of Baotu Spring in Jinan, we collected 21 groups of nitrate samples of karst water, 14 groups of nitrogen and oxygen isotope samples, 2 groups of sewage isotope samples and 1 group of isotope samples for atmospheric precipitation from the end of May to the beginning of June, 2016. According to the analysis of test data, the nitrate concentration presents a large degree of dispersion in spatial distribution, with a coefficient of variation of 80%, which shows that the nitrate concentration is greatly affected by hydrogeological conditions and human activities. Because nitrates from different sources have different δ¹⁵N and δ¹⁸O values, combined with the investigation of pollution sources, the main sources of nitrate pollution in karst water in the study area are animal manure and sewage, soil organic nitrogen, and NH $_4^{+}$ in chemical fertilizers. The contribution rate of each pollution source is calculated quantitatively by IsoSource model. Results show that the contribution rate of animal manure and sewage sources is the largest, with an average of 51.07%, followed by soil organic nitrogen and NH $_4^{+}$ in chemical fertilizers, with an average of 25.21% and 23.71% respectively. The study shows that human activities are the main factor of nitrate increase in karst water of this area. The nitrate sources in the east and west of the study area are obviously different. Nitrate in the eastern region mainly comes from animal manure and sewage, with an average of 61.5% occupying more than 50% of the sample. The proportion of NH $_4^{+}$ sources in soil organic nitrogen and chemical fertilizers is relatively small, with an average proportion of 24.33% and 14.16% respectively. The main sources of nitrate in the western region are animal manure and sewage, but the proportion of NH $_4^{+}$ sources in fertilizers is increasing. In southwest mountainous area, the average proportion of soil organic nitrogen is 46%, and the proportion of chemical fertilizer is relatively small. But due to the intensive agricultural cultivation in the piedmont area, more use of chemical fertilizers results in the increasing proportion (an average of 36.2%) of NH $_4^{+}$ sources in fertilizers. From south to north, the source of soil organic nitrogen has been gradually transformed into the source of chemical fertilizers in the piedmont plain.
- nitrate /
- nitrogen and oxygen isotopes /
- karst water /
- Baotu Spring area

HTML

图 1 泉域水文地质略图

Figure 1. Hydrological geological map

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 采样点分布图

Figure 2. Sampling sites in the study area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 岩溶水硝酸盐浓度分区图(mg·L^-1)

Figure 3. Nitrate concentration distribution in the study area(mg·L^-1)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 δ¹⁵N与 ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ 的相关关系图

Figure 4. Relationship between δ¹⁵N- ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ and ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 δ¹⁵N与δ¹⁸O的相关关系图

Figure 5. Relationship between δ¹⁵N- ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ and δ¹⁸O - ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 研究区 ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ 的δ¹⁵N与δ¹⁸O值特征分布图^[5,13]

Figure 6. Distribution of nitrate, nitrogen and oxygen isotope characteristics in study area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 岩溶水 ${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ 浓度测试结果统计（mg·L⁻¹）

Table 1. Test results of nitrate concentration (mg·L⁻¹)

	最大值	最小值	均值	标准差	变异系数
2016年枯水期	215.45	3.47	62.93	50.65	0.80

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 岩溶水硝酸盐氮氧同位素水样测试结果（2016年枯水期）

Table 2. Test results of nitrogen and oxygen isotopes during the dry season of 2016

采样时间	编号	δ¹⁵N‰	δ¹⁸O‰	${\rm{NO}}_3^{-}$ /mg·L⁻¹	DO/mg·L⁻¹
2016.5	JS15	8.38	3.26	65.1	3.51
2016.5	JS10	11.49	2.83	110.15	2.24
2016.5	JS26	10.17	1.64	49.51	4.09
2016.5	JS36	12.76	2.67	105.47	5.02
2016.5	JS09	10.97	0.89	34.22	3.21
2016.5	JS05	10.15	3.45	61.02	3.55
2016.6	JS16	5.14	−2.08	215.45	3.92
2016.5	JS17	9.37	1.35	83.75	4.35
2016.5	JS18	8.13	0.48	40.17	3.57
2016.5	JS19	7.36	3.60	37.92	5.02
2016.5	JS20	9.13	4.03	96.45	3.67
2016.5	JS31	8.76	3.63	42.72	4.36
2016.5	JS33	9.12	3.12	51.70	3.60
2016.5	JS21	7.11	1.29	168.30	3.42

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 研究区硝酸盐污染来源贡献率计算结果一览表

Table 3. Proportions of nitrate pollution sources in the study area

	编号	污水/%	土壤/%	化肥/%
东部	JS15	51	13	36
	JS10	68	22	10
	JS26	55	32	13
	JS36	75	25	0
	JS09	57	41	2
	JS05	63	13	24
西部	JS16	9	63	28
	JS17	49	34	17
	JS18	38	41	21
	JS19	46	8	46
	JS20	59	6	35
	JS31	55	9	36
	JS33	55	15	30
	JS21	35	31	34

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	Kohl D H, Shearer G B, Commoner B. Fertilizer nitrogen contribution to nitrate in surface water in a corn belt watershed[J]. Science, 1971, 174(4016):1331-1334. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4016.1331
[2]	Böttcher J, Strebel O, Voerkelius S, Schmidt H L. Using isotope fractionation of nitrate-nitrogen and nitrate-oxygen for evaluation of microbial denitrification in a sandy aquifer[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1990, 114(3-4):413-424. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90068-9
[3]	Johannsen A, Daehnke K, Emeis K. Isotopic composition of nitrate in five German rivers discharging into the North Sea[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2008, 39(12):1678-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.03.004
[4]	周爱国, 陈银琢, 蔡鹤生, 刘存富, 杨琰. 水环境硝酸盐氮污染研究新方法:¹⁵N和¹⁸O相关法[J]. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2003, 28(2):219-224. ZHOU Aiguo, CHEN Yinzhuo, CAI Hesheng, LIU Cunfu, YANG Yan. New way in NO₃ ⁻-N contamination study of water environment: Correlative method of ¹⁵N & ¹⁸O[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2003, 28(2):219-224.
[5]	卢丽, 李文莉, 裴建国, 王喆. 基于IsoSource的桂林寨底地下河硝酸盐来源定量研究[J]. 地球学报, 2014, 35(2):248-254. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2014.02.18 LU Li, LI Wenli, PEI Jianguo, WANG Zhe. A quantitative study of the sources of nitrate of Zhaidi underground river in Guilin based on IsoSource[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2014, 35(2):248-254. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2014.02.18
[6]	尹玉龙, 王周峰, 王文科, 陈立, 邢萌, 刘卫国. 利用氮氧同位素定量识别地下水中硝酸盐来源[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2015, 26(5):104-108. doi: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2015.05.020 YIN Yulong, WANG Zhoufeng, WANG Wenke, CHEN Li, XING Meng, LIU Weiguo. Quantitative identification of nitrate source in groundwater by using nitrogen and oxygen isotope[J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 2015, 26(5):104-108. doi: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2015.05.020
[7]	寇馨月, 丁军军, 李玉中, 毛丽丽, 李巧珍, 徐春英, 郑欠, 庄姗. 青岛市农区地下水硝态氮污染来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(7):3232-3241. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202010263 KOU Xinyue, DING Junjun, LI Yuzhong, MAO Lili, LI Qiaozhen, XU Chunying, ZHENG Qian, ZHUANG Shan. Identifying the sources of groudwater NO₃ ⁻-N in agricultural region of Qingdao[J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(7):3232-3241. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202010263
[8]	杨延梅, 张田, 郑明霞, 苏婧, 孙源媛, 傅雪梅. 基于水化学及当地稳定同位素的地下水硝酸盐污染空间分布特征及污染源解析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(9):2164-2172. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.05.21 YANG Yanmei, ZHANG Tian, ZHENG Mingxia, SU Jing, SUN Yuanyuan, FU Xuemei. Spatial distribution characteristics and pollution source analysis of nitrate pollution in groundwater based on hydrochemisty and local stable isotopes[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(9):2164-2172. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.05.21
[9]	孙亚乔, 王晓冬, 校康, 段磊, 吕梓昊. 淡水环境中氮污染同位素示踪的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(8):1693-1702. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.08.022 SUN Yaqiao, WANG Xiaodong, XIAO Kang, DUAN Lei, LV Zihao. Research progress of nitrogen pollution isotope tracing in freshwater environment[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(8):1693-1702. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.08.022
[10]	吴锡松, 张强, 姜光辉, 郭芳, 吴华英, 骆俊晖. 桂林甑皮岩岩溶地下水硝酸盐来源与转化[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(2):164-172. WU Xisong, ZHANG Qiang, JIANG Guanghui, GUO Fang, WU Huaying, LUO Junhui. Sources and transformation of nitrate in karst groundwater of Zengpiyan site, Guilin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(2):164-172.
[11]	孙斌, 邢立亭, 彭玉明, 李常锁. 济南十大泉群特征、形成模式及水循环差异性浅析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2021, 40(3):409-419. SUN Bin, XING Liting, PENG Yuming, LI Changsuo. Characteristics, formation models and water cycle differences of ten major spring groups in Jinan City[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2021, 40(3):409-419.
[12]	Heaton T H E. Isotopic studies of nitrogen pollution in the hydrosphere and atmosphere: A review[J]. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 1986, 59:87-102. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(86)90059-X
[13]	刘君, 陈宗宇. 利用稳定同位素追踪石家庄市地下水中的硝酸盐来源[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(6):1602-1607. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2009.06.007 LIU Jun, CHEN Zongyu. Using stable isotope to trace the sources of nitrate in groundwater in Shijiazhuang[J]. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(6):1602-1607. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2009.06.007
[14]	张千千, 缪丽萍, 孙继朝, 刘景涛. 稳定同位素识别水体硝酸盐污染来源的研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(5):742-749. ZHANG Qianqian, MIAO Liping, SUN Jichao, LIU Jingtao. Research advances in identifying nitrate pollution sources of water environment by using stable isotopes[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(5):742-749.
[15]	李瑞, 肖琼, 刘文, 郭芳, 潘谋成, 于奭. 运用硫同位素、氮氧同位素示踪里湖地下河硫酸盐、硝酸盐来源[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(8):2877-2886. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.08.020 LI Rui, XIAO Qiong, LIU Wen, GUO Fang, PAN Moucheng, YU Shi. Using δ³⁴S-SO₄ ²⁻ and δ¹⁵ N-NO₃ ⁻, δ¹⁸O-NO₃ ⁻ to trace the sources of sulfur and nitrate in Lihu lake undergound water, Guangxi, China[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(8):2877-2886. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.08.020
[16]	王松, 裴建国, 梁建宏. 利用氮氧同位素研究桂林寨底地下河硝酸盐来源[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2010, 21(4):54-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2010.04.011 WANG Song, PEI Jianguo, LIANG Jianhong. Using nitrogen and oxygen isotope techniques to identify the sources of nitrate in subterranean stream of Zhaidi, Guilin[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2010, 21(4):54-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2010.04.011
[17]	Gillham R W, Cherry J A. Field evidence of denitrification in shallow groundwater flow systems[J]. Water Quality Research Journal, 1978, 13(1):53-72. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.1978.006
[18]	Desimone, L A, Howes B L. Nitrogen transport and transformations in a shallow aquifer receiving wastewater discharge: A mass balance approach[J]. Water Resources Research, 1998, 34(2):271-285. doi: 10.1029/97WR03040
[19]	吴耀国. 地下水环境中反硝化作用[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2002, 3(3):27-31. WU Yaoguo. Denitrification in groundwater systems[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2002, 3(3):27-31.
[20]	李扬, 杨桢, 康凤新, 刘金勇, 孙彦伟, 黄静波. 东阿水文地质单元地下水硝酸盐污染来源的同位素分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(1):19-27. LI Yang, YANG Zhen, KANG Fengxin, LIU Jinyong, SUN Yanwei, HUANG Jingbo. Isotope analysis on the source of nitrate contamination to groundwater in the Dong'e hydrogeologic unit[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(1):19-27.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(11)

1.	包其刚，许家伟，张健伟. 基于正态云模型-突变理论的富水岩溶隧道突涌水风险评价实验. 实验技术与管理. 2025(01): 114-122 . 百度学术
2.	侯建伟. 特长隧道涌水对环境的影响分析. 运输经理世界. 2024(01): 113-115 . 百度学术
3.	杨彤飞，章爱卫，夏荣辉，任周洪. 基于AHP-熵权法和GIS的矿山深部开采突水危险性等级评价. 山西冶金. 2024(11): 133-137 . 百度学术
4.	韩国锋，马宇. 基于误差信息辨识的隧道涌水段处理效果分析. 甘肃科学学报. 2023(04): 61-67 . 百度学术
5.	刘巧梅，温海燕，李爱春，蔺娅，武昱欣，霍雨雨. 基于博弈论组合赋权-未确知测度理论的隧道突涌水风险评价. 武汉大学学报(工学版). 2023(07): 799-806 . 百度学术
6.	林德鑫. 公路长隧道富水破碎带与炭质粉砂岩地层施工技术. 福建交通科技. 2023(11): 103-106 . 百度学术
7.	茹媛博，苏昭. 某隧道突泥涌水灾害的致灾成因分析及危险性评价. 勘察科学技术. 2022(03): 24-28 . 百度学术
8.	李录，秦本东，郭佳奇，黄鑫，田永超. 基于IAHP-Fuzzy的岩溶隧道突水风险预测. 高压物理学报. 2022(05): 192-204 . 百度学术
9.	孟令举，寇小勇，李芒原，乔海洋，刘翔，郎志军，黄林超，刘楠楠. 富水岩溶特长隧道涌水综合处治技术研究. 建筑结构. 2022(S2): 2696-2700 . 百度学术
10.	付开隆，周羽，韦正雄. 贵南高铁朝阳隧道出口平导6.10突水突泥事件分析. 中国岩溶. 2022(06): 895-904 . 本站查看
11.	王华，孙意，李永志，潘岳，彭桂彬. 玉磨铁路新平隧道区域地质分析及隧址优劣评价体系研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2021(S2): 58-67 . 百度学术