• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库收录期刊
  • 世界期刊影响力指数(WJCI)报告来源期刊
  • Scopus, CA, DOAJ, EBSCO, JST等数据库收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

西南某水电站断裂构造和层间溶蚀带组合岩溶渗漏研究

冯志刚 韦国建 张汉猛 许国

冯志刚,韦国建,张汉猛,等. 西南某水电站断裂构造和层间溶蚀带组合岩溶渗漏研究[J]. 中国岩溶,2022,41(5):728-735 doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33
引用本文: 冯志刚,韦国建,张汉猛,等. 西南某水电站断裂构造和层间溶蚀带组合岩溶渗漏研究[J]. 中国岩溶,2022,41(5):728-735 doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33
FENG Zhigang, WEI Guojian, ZHANG Hanmeng, XU Guo. Study on karst leakage caused by the combination of fault structure and interlayer corrosion zone of a hydropower station in southwest China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 728-735. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33
Citation: FENG Zhigang, WEI Guojian, ZHANG Hanmeng, XU Guo. Study on karst leakage caused by the combination of fault structure and interlayer corrosion zone of a hydropower station in southwest China[J]. CARSOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 41(5): 728-735. doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33

西南某水电站断裂构造和层间溶蚀带组合岩溶渗漏研究

doi: 10.11932/karst2021y33
基金项目: 南宁市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(ZC20211003);南宁市创新创业领军人才“邕江计划”资助项目(2020016)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    冯志刚(1979-),男,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程和特殊性土工程特性研究。E-mail:fengzhigang@foxmail.com

  • 中图分类号: TV738;P642.25

Study on karst leakage caused by the combination of fault structure and interlayer corrosion zone of a hydropower station in southwest China

  • 摘要: 西南某水电站坝址基岩为碳酸盐岩,坝区断层构造和岩溶较发育。水库蓄水后,坝址右岸抗力体1 315 m排水洞出现持续渗漏。随库区水位升高,涌水量逐渐加大至约1.9 m3·s−1,水库无法正常蓄水。为查明库水渗漏途径,有针对性地采取措施减少渗漏量,开展了岩溶渗漏研究。通过工程地质测绘、岩溶水文地质调查、钻探、压水试验、孔内电视、孔内电磁波CT等勘察手段,结合前期平硐、基坑开挖和物探等勘查成果,并利用灌浆孔灌浆过程试验数据,最终查明库水渗漏通道:在水压力作用下,库水沿断裂构造F12下渗,在深部沿层间溶蚀带绕过防渗帷幕,呈30°倾角向下游逐步抬升,最终通过竖向岩溶发育带,从1 315 m排水洞地质薄弱点涌出。通过对灌浆帷幕采取补强措施,封堵了主要渗漏通道,库水渗漏得到有效控制,达到了设计要求。

     

  • 图  1  近坝区综合地质平面图

    Figure  1.  Comprehensive geological plan near the dam area

    图  2  R1U55孔深部岩溶裂隙发育情况

    Figure  2.  Development of deep karst fissures in borehole R1U55

    图  3  RBQ-5孔内电视陡倾角裂隙涌水点

    Figure  3.  Water inrush point of steep dip fissure in RBQ-5 borehole television

    图  4  1 315 m排水洞和1 340 m灌浆排水洞平面示意图

    Figure  4.  Plane schematic diagram of 1,315 m drainage tunnel and 1,340 m grouting drainage tunnel

    图  5  坝轴线处右岸岩体透水性分布示意图

    Figure  5.  Permeability distribution in the right rock body along dam axis

    图  6  ZPR1渗水通道剖面示意图

    Figure  6.  Schematic diagram of ZPR1 seepage channel

    表  1  右岸坝基帷幕以下压水试验结果统计表

    Table  1.   Statistical result of water pressure tests under the right dam grouting curtain

    序号 吕荣值q/Lu 试验段数 占比/%
    1 ≥3 28 23.1
    2 1~3 79 65.3
    3 ≤1 14 11.6
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李大通, 罗雁. 中国碳酸盐岩分布面积测量[J]. 中国岩溶, 1983, 2(2):147-150.

    LI Datong, LUO Yan. Measurement of carbonate rocks distribution area in China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1983, 2(2):147-150.
    [2] 曾中磊. 滇中地区岩溶水文地质特征[J]. 人民珠江, 2016, 37(8):39-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2016.08.009

    ZENG Zhonglei. Karst hydrogeological characteristics in central Yunnan[J]. Pearl River, 2016, 37(8):39-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2016.08.009
    [3] 刘鹏瑞, 刘长宪, 姜超, 王芳, 陈钰, 贾龙. 武汉市工程施工引发岩溶塌陷机理分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(6):830-835. doi: 10.11932/karst20170605

    LIU Pengrui, LIU Changxian, JIANG Chao, WANG Fang,CHEN Yu,JIA Long. Mechanism of karst collapse caused by engineering construction in Wuhan City[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(6):830-835. doi: 10.11932/karst20170605
    [4] 肖明贵. 桂林市岩溶塌陷形成机制与危险性预测[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2005

    XIAO Minggui. The forming mechanism and forecast of fatalness about karst subsidence in Guilin City[D]. Changchun: Jinlin University, 2005.
    [5] Fares M Howari, Raed Aldouri, Abdulali Sadiq. Gravity investigations of recent sinkholes and karst pits of Dahal Al-Hamam, State of Qatar[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5):440. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5298-x
    [6] Zhanfei Gu, Qi Liu, Yaoru Lu, Zhengning Shi,Gaoyu Su,Dexiang Luan. Analysis and prevention of sinkhole collapses during the reconstruction and extension of Guang-Qiing freeway, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5):788.
    [7] 冯志刚, 刘谢伶. 构造条件对水库岩溶渗漏的影响研究[J]. 红水河, 2018, 37(5):69-71,75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-408X.2018.05.021

    FENG Zhigang, LIU Xieling. Study on influence of tectonic conditions on karst leakage of reservoirs[J]. Hongshui River, 2018, 37(5):69-71,75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-408X.2018.05.021
    [8] 吕耀成, 李钰强, 张富荣, 巨广宏. 莲花台水电站岩溶发育特征及工程意义[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(4):502-507.

    LYV Yaocheng, LI Yuqiang, ZHANG Furong, JU Guanghong. Karst features of the Lianhuatai hydropower station and engineering significance[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(4):502-507.
    [9] 赵博超, 朱蓓, 王弘元, 赖柄霖. 浅谈岩溶塌陷的影响因素与模型研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(5):515-521. doi: 10.11932/karst201505y04

    ZHAO Bochao, ZHU Bei, WANG Hongyuan, LAI Binglin. Influence factors and mathematical models of karst collapses[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(5):515-521. doi: 10.11932/karst201505y04
    [10] 万伟锋, 王泉伟, 邹剑锋, 苗旺. 东庄水库岩溶渗漏几个关键问题的探讨[J]. 人民黄河, 2015, 37(2):99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.02.026

    WAN Weifeng, WANG Quanwei, ZOU Jianfeng, MIAO Wanf. Discussion on several key problems about karst leakage of Dongzhuang reservoir[J]. Yellow River, 2015, 37(2):99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.02.026
    [11] 余波, 徐光祥, 郭维祥, 等. 岩溶水库防渗处理关键技术[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2020

    YU Bo, XU Guangxiang, GUO Weixiang, et al. Key technology of anti-seepage treatment of karst reservoirs[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2020.
    [12] 沈春勇. 水利水电工程岩溶勘察与处理[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2015

    SHEN Chunyong. Investigation and treatment of karst in water conservancy and hydropower project[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2015.
    [13] 刘浩, 田茂中. 贵州冗赖水库岩溶成库条件分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2019, 38(4):515-523.

    LIU Hao, TIAN Maozhong. Karst geological conditions of the planned Ronglai reservoir in Guizhou Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019, 38(4):515-523.
    [14] 龚大庆, 向能武, 曾剑华. 构皮滩坝址5、6号岩溶系统的发育特征及处理[J]. 人民长江, 2007, 38(9):103-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2007.09.038

    GONG Daqing, XIANG Nengwu, ZENG Jianhua. Development characteristics and treatment of No. 5 and No. 6 karst systems at Goupitan dam site[J]. Yangtze River, 2007, 38(9):103-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2007.09.038
    [15] 卢晓鹏, 谭光明. 清华洞暗河堵洞成库与防渗技术[J]. 中国岩溶, 2012, 31(2):179-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.011

    LU Xiaopeng, TAN Guangming. Reservoir building by cave-plugging and the seepage-proofing technique in the Qinghuadong underground river[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2012, 31(2):179-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2012.02.011
    [16] 李元奇. 马洞水库岩溶渗漏处理方案[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2014, 20(2):97-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2014.02.038

    LI Yuanqi. Treatment scheme of karst leakage in Madong reservoir[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2014, 20(2):97-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2014.02.038
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1865
  • HTML浏览量:  1092
  • PDF下载量:  81
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-01-01
  • 刊出日期:  2022-12-02

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回