湖南郴州地区岩溶塌陷分布规律及其影响因素浅析

潘宗源; 陈学军; 杨鑫; 宋宇; 张铭致

doi:10.11932/karst20210203

湖南郴州地区岩溶塌陷分布规律及其影响因素浅析

doi: 10.11932/karst20210203

1.
桂林理工大学土木与建筑工程学院/中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/自然资源部、广西岩溶动力学重点实验室/中国地质调查局岩溶塌陷防治重点实验室
2.
桂林理工大学土木与建筑工程学院

基金项目: 广西自然科学基金项目（2018GXNSFAA294020）；国家自然科学基金项目（41967037；41877300；41402284）；中国地质调查局地质调查项目（DD20190266）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1888
- HTML浏览量: 707
- PDF下载量: 168
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2021-04-25

Distribution and influence factors of sinkholes in the Chenzhou area, Hunan Province

1.
College of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Guilin University of Technology/Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/ Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamic, MNR&GZAR/ Key Laboratory of Karst Collapse CGS Prevention
2.
College of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Guilin University of Technology

摘要

摘要: 通过地质环境调查，分析湖南郴州地区岩溶塌陷分布规律及其影响因素，结果表明：（1）1980-1983年为岩溶塌陷盛发期，平均8.5个年-1；2012-2020年塌陷发生频率增加，平均5.88个/年；岩溶塌陷主要发生在3-7月份雨季；（2）低丘冲沟中发生塌陷54个，占塌陷总数的55.67%；岩溶平原中发生塌陷40个，占41.24%。97个岩溶塌陷主要发生在石炭系壶天群及泥盆系中统棋梓桥组下段地层；塌陷区域多为断裂构造带及褶皱轴部；（3）冲洪积成因土层共发生岩溶塌陷58个，占塌陷总数的59.79%，而残坡积成因土层发生塌陷39个，占40.21%。粉质黏土层发生塌陷数量多于黏土层，而粉质黏土与卵石土，粉质黏土、淤泥质黏土和砂土等组合土层分布面积较小，发生数量偏少。单层结构土体发生岩溶塌陷63个，占总数的64.94%；双层结构与多层结构土体发生塌陷数量占比35.06%。土层厚度小于10 m的区域发生岩溶塌陷48个，占总数的49.48%；土层厚度为10~15 m的区域发生塌陷49个，占总数的50.52%；（4）本地区浅部岩溶强发育，覆盖层薄且力学性能较弱，满足发生岩溶塌陷的基本条件；城市供水和采矿开采地下水是岩溶塌陷的主要触发因素。
- 郴州 /
- 岩溶塌陷 /
- 时空分布特征 /
- 岩溶地下水开采
Abstract: The Chenzhou area is characterized by widely distributed carbonate rocks and thin overburden soil. The sinkholes occur frequently due to long-term dewatering of mines. Based on geological investigations, this paper analyzes the distribution and influencing factors of sinkholes in this area. Results show that， (1) most sinkholes took place from 1980 to 1983, with 8.5 sinkholes per year on average. But severe sinkholes occurred since 2012, with 5.88 sinkholes per year. Sinkholes tended to occur during rainy seasons between March and July. (2) Fifty-four sinkholes (55.67% of the total) are distributed in low hilly gullies, and 40 sinkholes (41.24% of the total) are distributed in karst plain. Ninety-seven sinkholes took place in Carboniferous Hutian Group strata and Lower Qiziqiao Formation of Middle Devonian strata. Many sinkholes appeared in fault zones and fold zones. (3) 40.21% of sinkholes are distributed in alluvium layer, and 59.79% of sinkholes are distributed in diluvial beds. Collapse sinkholes were more likely to occur in silty clay because of its large distribution and more prone to subsoil erosion than other types of overburden materials. There are 63 sinkholes distributed in single-layer soil structure areas, and 34 sinkholes occurred in double-layer and multilayer soil structure. Double-layer soil consists of silty clay and pebble soil, whereas multilayer soil is form of silty clay, mud clay and sandy soil. 49.48% of sinkholes occurred in the overburden soil with thickness less than 10 m, and 50.52% of sinkholes took place in the overburden soil with thickness 10 m to 15 m. (4) The basic conditions of sinkholes include well developed karst in the shallow subsurface, and thin and weak overburden soil. The primary triggering factor is pumping karst groundwater for urban water supply and mining.
- Chenzhou /
- sinkhole /
- characteristics of spatio-temporal distribution /
- karst groundwater pumping

HTML

参考文献(23)

[1]	Shishay T K， Neil L A， David R. Using Gis-based spatial analysis to determine factors influencing the formation of sinkholes in Greene county， Missouri ［J］. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience， 2018， 24（3）：251-261.
[2]	Adnan O. Sinkhole susceptibility mapping using a frequency ratio method and GIS technology near Karapinar， Konya-Turkey ［J］. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science， 2015，15： 502-506.
[3]	Jesus G， Francisco G， Jaime B， et al. A sinkhole susceptibility zonation based on paleokarst analysis along a stretch of the Madrid-Barcelona high-speed railway built over gypsum and salt bearing evaporates （NE Spain）［J］. Engineering Geoloy， 2008， 102（1-2）：62-73.
[4]	Zhou W F， Lei M T， James W L， et al. Pre-glacial and post-glacial sinkholes in Silurian carbonate rocks in the James bay lowland， Cananda ［C］. Proceedings of 16th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst， Puerto Rico， 2020：299-306.
[5]	戴建玲，罗伟权，吴远斌，等.广西来宾市良江镇吉利村岩溶塌陷成因机制分析［J］.中国岩溶，2017，36（6）：808-818.
[6]	魏永耀，孙树林，黄敬军，等.徐州岩溶塌陷时空分布规律及成因分析［J］.中国岩溶，2015，34（1）：52-57.
[7]	谢晓彤，李少荣，廖云平，等.重庆市铜锣山地区岩溶塌陷分布规律及成因分析［J］.南水北调与水利科技，2015，13（4）：751-756.
[8]	陈亮晶，孙锡良，皮景，等.湖南宁乡大成桥地区岩溶地面塌陷分布特征及影响因素分析［J］.中国岩溶，2014，33（4）：490-498.
[9]	花修权，黄敬军，缪世贤，等.徐州市地质灾害分布特征及成因分析［J］.地质灾害与环境保护，2015，26（2）：72-79.
[10]	杨云丽，杨荣康，孟凡涛，等.黔中高原台面浅覆盖型岩溶塌陷分布及影响因素浅析［J］.中国岩溶，2017，36（6）：801-807.
[11]	查甫生，刘从民，苏晶文，等.铜陵市朝山地区岩溶塌陷形成条件与地面稳定性评价分析［J］.地质论评，2020，66（1）：246-254.
[12]	刘铁山，刘立明，刘会钟，等.湖南省郴州市北湖区1：5万地质灾害详细调查成果报告［R］.2013.
[13]	李守贤，陈荣华，申俊.郴州华塘煤矿采空区地面塌陷的影响因素及防治措施探讨［J］.地质灾害与环境保护，2007，18（3）：19-23.
[14]	吴孝航，罗照华.以塌陷范围为约束的岩溶水水源地安全开采量评价［J］.水电能源科学，2013，31（8）：34-38.
[15]	Gutiérrez F， Parise M， Waele J D， et al. A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst ［J］. Earth Science Reviews， 2014 ，138： 61-88.
[16]	张伟，甘伏平，魏巍，等.综合物探方法在淮河滨河浅滩岩溶塌陷调查中的应用研究［J］.地球物理学进展，2019，34（2）：832-839.
[17]	汪庆玖，叶小华，孟艨，等.安徽省沿江地区典型岩溶塌陷区盖层—岩溶组合特征［J］.中国岩溶，2017，36（6）：859-866.
[18]	罗小杰.也论覆盖型岩溶地面塌陷机理［J］.工程地质学报，2015，23（5）：886-896.
[19]	陈明晓.岩溶覆盖层塌陷的原因分析及其半定量预测［J］.岩石力学与工程学报，2002，21（2）：285-289.
[20]	Pan Z Y， Jiang X J， Lei M T， et al. Mechanism of sinkhole formation during groundwater-level recovery in karst mining area， Dachengqiao， Hunan province， China ［J］. Environmental Earth Sciences， 2018，77：799.
[21]	Zhou W F， Lei M T. Conceptual site models for sinkhole formation and remediation ［J］. Environmental Earth Sciences， 2017，76：818.
[22]	袁杰，高宗军，马海会.论岩溶地下水位对岩溶塌陷形成的控制作用：以山东枣庄市岩溶地面塌陷区为例［J］.中国地质灾害与防治学报，2010，21（4）：95-99.
[23]	Meng Y， Li Z J， Jia L. An analysis of allowable groundwater drawdown and pumpage from a karst aquifer to prevent sinkhole collapses in the Pearl River Delta， China. ［J］. Water Resources， 2020， 47 （4）： 530-536.