地下水多元示踪试验在岩溶隧道水害预测中的应用——以张吉怀高铁兰花隧道为例

常威; 谭家华; 黄琨; 程烯; 黄镇; 万军伟

doi:10.11932/karst2020y27

地下水多元示踪试验在岩溶隧道水害预测中的应用——以张吉怀高铁兰花隧道为例

doi: 10.11932/karst2020y27

1.
中国地质大学（武汉）环境学院，武汉 430074
2.
中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司，武汉 430063

基金项目: 张吉怀铁路芙蓉镇地区岩溶水文地质监测专项（CT900905K）；宜昌市资源环境承载能力调查评价（DD20190315）

计量
- 文章访问数: 2151
- HTML浏览量: 712
- PDF下载量: 444
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2020-06-25

Application of groundwater multi-element tracing tests to water hazard prediction of karst tunnels: An example of the Lanhua tunnel on the Zhangjiajie-Jishou-Huaihua high-speed railway

1.
School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
2.
China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China

摘要

摘要: 以张家界—吉首—怀化高速铁路兰花隧道为例，在岩溶水文地质调查基础上结合地下水多元示踪技术，查明了兰花隧道隧址区各岩溶地下水系统以及地下暗河管道的空间展布。结果表明：（1）兰花隧道及其附近区域全部为寒武系碳酸盐岩裸露区，以峰丛洼地为主，地表和地下岩溶极为发育；（2）兰花隧道隧址及其附近区域共发育有呆业洞和兰花洞两个独立的地下暗河系统，其中Ⅰ号、Ⅱ号、Ⅲ号三个岩溶水系统属于兰花洞地下暗河系统的子系统；Ⅳ号岩溶水系统属于呆业洞地下暗河系统；（3）Ⅳ号岩溶地下水系统在平面和剖面上都没有与兰花隧道相交，不会对隧道突涌水构成威胁；（4）兰花洞地下暗河系统以中部兰花洞暗河天窗为界分为上游和下游两段，上游段Ⅰ号和Ⅱ号岩溶水系统在平面和剖面上都没有与兰花隧道相交，不会对兰花隧道突涌水构成威胁；下游段Ⅲ号岩溶水系统在平面上与兰花隧道相交（交点里程为DK60+100），可能存在隧道突涌水风险；（5）依据高分辨率降雨-水文动态监测数据，采用降雨入渗系数法预测在极端暴雨情况下兰花隧道揭露Ⅲ号岩溶管道的最大涌水量为7.08×104 m3?d-1。
- 兰花隧道 /
- 多元示踪试验 /
- 水文动态监测 /
- 涌水量预测
Abstract: Tunnel water inrush is a common geological hazard during the tunnel construction in karst areas. Thus, it is of great significance to clarify the spatial relationship between the tunnel and karst groundwater system, especially the spatial relationship with the underground river course, which is the key to prevention and control of water hazard in the karst tunnel. This paper presents an example on this issue, the Lanhua tunnel on the Zhangjiajie-Jishou-Huaihua high-speed railway. On the basis of karst hydrogeological investigation and rainfall-spring discharge dynamic monitoring, groundwater multi-element tracing tests were conducted at the concentrated recharge points of groundwater in the area. The spatial distribution of underground river courses and its relationship with the Lanhua tunnel were clarified, the location of water damage in the tunnel was determined and the maximum water inflow was predicted, which provides a hydrogeological basis for the prevention and control of the tunnel water hazard. The results show that,(1)The Lanhua tunnel and adjacent areas host exposed Cambrian carbonate rocks, which are characterized by peak clusters and depression landforms, with highly developed surface and underground karst. (2) The concentration curves of four groups of groundwater multi-element tracing tests are all single-peak symmetrical forms, the tracer recovery rate is more than 68%, and the largest groundwater flow rate is 387 m·h-1, indicating that the pipeline development in the tunnel site area is unobstructed. (3) There are two independent underground river systems, namely the Lanhua cave system and the Daiye cave system. The three karst water sub-underground river systems of No.1, 2 and 3 belong to the Lanhua cave system, while the No.4 karst water sub-underground river system belongs to the Daiye cave system. (4) The No.4 karst groundwater system will not pose a threat of tunnel inrush water, because it does not intersect with the Lanhua tunnel in plane and section. (5) The Lanhua cave underground water system can be divided into two sections, the upstream section and downstream section, with the karst window in the middle of the Lanhua underground river as the boundary. The No.1 and 2 karst water systems belong to the upstream section, and the No.3 karst water system belongs to the downstream section. The upstream section of the Lanhua cave system does not intersect with the Lanhua tunnel in plane and section, and it will not pose a threat to the inrush water of the Lanhua tunnel.The No.3 karst water system intersects with the tunnel in plane (the intersection mileage is DK60 + 100), which may create a risk of water inrush in the tunnel. (6) Based on the high resolution rainfall-hydrological dynamic monitoring data, the rainfall infiltration coefficient method is used to predict that the maximum water inflow of No.3 karst water system pipeline of the tunnel is 70,800 m3·d-1under extremely heavy rainstorm conditions.
- Lanhua tunnel /
- groundwater multi-element tracing tests /
- high resolution hydrological dynamic monitoring /
- prediction of karst tunnel inrush water

HTML

参考文献(21)

[1]	曹建文,夏日元.西南岩溶石山地区不同类型地下河开发利用模式探讨［J］.中国岩溶, 2017,36(5):609-617.
[2]	陈宏峰, 夏日元, 梁彬. 鄂西齐岳山地区岩溶发育特征及其对隧道涌水的影响［J］. 中国岩溶, 2003, 22(4): 282-286.
[3]	刘招伟, 何满潮, 王树仁. 圆梁山隧道岩溶突水机理及防治对策研究［J］.岩土力学, 2006, 27(2):58-62.
[4]	金新锋,夏日元, 梁彬.宜万铁路马鹿箐隧道岩溶突水来源分析［J］.水文地质工程地质, 2007,34(2):71-74.
[5]	邬立, 万军伟, 陈刚,等.宜万铁路野三关隧道“8.5”突水事故成因分析［J］. 中国岩溶, 2009, 28(2):212-218.
[6]	徐红星, 邓谊明.野三关隧道DK 124+602突水相关水文地质分析［J］. 铁道工程学报, 2010, 27(4):29-34.
[7]	张小华, 刘清文. 武隆隧道暗河突水特点与整治技术分析［J］.现代隧道技术,2005, 42(3):59-64.
[8]	关义涛, 徐宗苏, 张海军,等. 毛坝1号隧道涌水成因机制分析［J］.工程地球物理学报, 2010, 7(4):514-518.
[9]	范威, 王川, 金晓文,等. 吉莲高速公路钟家山隧道涌突水条件分析［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2015, 42(2):38-43.
[10]	罗明明, 黄荷, 尹德超,等. 基于水化学和氢氧同位素的峡口隧道涌水来源识别［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2015, 42(1): 7-13.
[11]	邓谊明, 汪继锋. 八字岭隧道牛鼻子暗河示踪试验成果分析［J］. 铁道勘察, 2007, 33(3):11-14.
[12]	田清朝, 万军伟, 黄琨, 等. 高家坪隧道岩溶水系统识别及涌水量预测［J］. 安全与环境工程, 2016, 23(5):13-19.
[13]	於开炳, 徐蔓, 严竞雄, 等. 地下水示踪试验在岩溶隧道勘察中的应用：以利万高速齐岳山隧道为例［J］. 工程勘察, 2017, 45(10): 46-51.
[14]	陈峰, 杨平恒, 詹兆君, 等. 高分辨率示踪技术和定量计算在岩溶含水介质研究中的应用［J］. 珠江水运, 2018 (10): 38-39.
[15]	徐尚全, 王鹏, 焦杰松, 等. 高精度在线示踪技术在岩溶地下水文调查中的应用［J］. 工程勘察, 2013 (2): 40-44.
[16]	袁伟,王川.贵州盘县乐民河流域三股水岩溶泉水文地质条件分析［J］.地质学刊,2017, 41(4): 655-662.
[17]	王开然,姜光辉,郭芳,等.桂林东区峰林平原岩溶地下水示踪试验与分析［J］.现代地质, 2013, 27(2): 454-459.
[18]	曾莘茹,姜光辉,郭芳,等.桂林甑皮岩洞穴遗址地下水示踪及污染来源分析［J］. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(3): 245-253.
[19]	程烯,万军伟,黄琨,等.荧光示踪剂的干扰实验研究［J］.中国岩溶,2019,38(5): 795-803.
[20]	智刚. 黔张常铁路某隧道工程水文地质勘察分析及涌水量预测［J］. 路基工程, 2016 (5): 202-206.
[21]	贺玉龙, 张光明, 杨立中.铁路岩溶隧道涌水量预测常用方法的比较［J］. 铁道建筑, 2012 (4): 68-71.