Response characteristics of karst groundwater to rainstorm and the multiple regression prediction model in Dachengqiao, Ningxiang county, Hunan Province
-
摘要: 通过降雨、水位监测等方法，研究湖南宁乡大成桥岩溶地下水位动态及对暴雨的响应过程，探讨地下水内在联系特征并建立回归预测模型。结果表明：雨季地下水位对降雨响应程度高，水位变幅大，而枯季则相反；在暴雨条件下，接受快速管道流补给的地下水位动态响应为陡升—陡降，水位变幅在13.6~42.8 m；接受裂隙、孔隙水补给的地下水位动态表现为缓升—缓降，年变幅为1.1 m；雨季地下水位对暴雨响应的滞后时间为1.2~4 h，较相同条件下的水位响应滞后时间缩短了1/2~2/3，水位变幅增大1.7~4.7倍；枯季地下水位对暴雨响应的滞后时间为4.2~13.2 h，水位响应滞后时间延长了3~8 h，水位变幅缩减了5~11倍；包气带厚度和含水饱和度对水位动态起着决定作用，包气带厚度与水位响应滞后时间负相关，含水饱和度与水位变幅正相关；通过相关性分析、拟合优度检验、显著性检验和残差分析等，确定最优回归预测模型，模型检验结果与实际水位动态过程吻合度较高。Abstract: The groundwater activity in the karst mining area can cause serious geological hazards. It is the key to solve the problem of frequent disastersto understand the response characteristics of groundwater to extreme climate conditions. The Dachengqiao area was selected as the study area, which is about 2 km away from the Meitanba coal mine.The stratigraphic lithology in Dachengqiao is mainly the calcareous conglomerate of Cretaceous Baihuating formation, followed by limestone of Permian Qixia formation and Maokou formation.Affecting by the mining drainage karst aquifer,the maximum water level of Dachengqiao is more than 90 m deep.The main runoff direction of groundwater flows from south to north, and is discharged to the mine. In this paper,through the on-site monitoring methods such as the high frequency monitoring of karst groundwater level and rainfall,the dynamics of karst groundwater level and itsresponse process to heavy rainfall are studied,and the characteristics of ground water internal relationship are discussed and a regression predition model is established. The results indicated that karst groundwater level responded quicker to rainfall in rainy season, and the amplitude of groundwater level is larger compared with that in the dry season. Under the rainstorm condition, the dynamic response of karst groundwater level to the rapid pipeline flow is a steep rise-steepfall,with the variation range of 13.6 to 42.8 m.Whereas the dynamic characteristics of groundwater level supplied by fracture and pore water are slow rise-slow fall,withan annual variation of 1.1 m. The lag time of groundwater level response to rainstrom in therainy season ranged from 1.2 to 4 h, which is 1/2 to 2/3 shorter than that under the same conditions,and groundwater level variation increased by 1.7 to 4.7 times. In dry season,the lagtime of groundwater level response to rainstorm ranged from 4.2 to 13.2 h, which is extended by 3 to 8 h, and groundwater level variation is reduced by 5 to 11 times. According to the research, groundwater level dynamic characteristic was controlled by thickness and water saturation of vadose zone, which indicated thickness of vadose zone presented a negative relationship with response lag of groundwater level, and water saturation of aeration zone presented a positive relationship with groundwater level variation. The optimum regression prediction model is established through correlation analysis, fitting optimization, variance and residual analysis, and regression coefficientt test, which indicates as Hi=14.149+0.308y1+0.379y2-0.023Pi+0.051Ti. It is proved that the model can effectively predict the water level change process of monitoring sites under the condition of rainstorm.
-
Key words:
- rainstorm /
- groundwater level dynamic /
- aeration zone /
- multiple regression model
-
[1] 袁道先.对南方岩溶石山地区地下水资源及生态环境地质调查的一些意见 ［J］.中国岩溶, 2000, 19(2): 103-107. [2] 杨平恒, 罗鉴银, 袁道先, 等.降雨条件下岩溶槽谷泉水的水文地球化学特征 ［J］.水利学报, 2009, 40(1): 67-75. [3] 郝永红，王玮，王国卿，等.气候变化及人类活动对中国北方岩溶泉的影响 ［J］.地质学报，2009,83(1): 138-144. [4] Ghasemizadeh R, Hellweger F, Butscher C, et al. Review: groundwater flow and transport modeling of karst aquifers, with particular reference to the North coast limestone aquifer system of Puerto Rico ［J］. Hydrogeology Journal， 2012,20(8): 1441-1461. [5] Pan Z Y, Jiang X Z, Lei M T, et al. Mechanism of sinkhole formation during groundwater-level recovery in karst mining area, Dachengqiao, Hunan province, China ［J］. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018(77): 799. [6] Lei M T, Gao Y L, Jiang X Z, et al.Mechanism analysis of sinkhole formation at Maohe village,Liuzhou city,Guangxi province,China［J］.Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016(75):542. [7] Delbart C, Valdes D, Barbecot F, et al. Spatial organization of the impulse response in a karst aquifer ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2016(537): 18-26. [8] 王朋辉，姜光辉，袁道先，等.岩溶地下水位对降雨响应的时空变异特征及成因探讨［J］.水科学进展，2019,30(1): 56-65. [9] Chen Z, Grasby S E, Osadetz K G. Relation between climate variability and groundwater levels in the upper carbonate aquifer, southern Manitoba, Canada ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 290(1): 43-62. [10] 刘瑞国，王文.地下水位变化与降水的关系分析 ［J］.地下水，2009, 31(5): 42-44. [11] 苟鹏飞，蒋勇军，扈志勇，等.典型岩溶地下河系统暴雨条件下水文水化学动态变化研究 ［J］.水文地质工程地质，2010, 37(5): 20-26. [12] 郑洁，李林立，曹敏，等.典型岩溶槽谷区降雨条件下地下河水质短时间尺度变化过程研究：以重庆南山老龙洞地下河为例 ［J］.西南大学学报(自然科学版),2012, 34(12): 130-137. [13] 姚军，吴礼舟.降雨诱发双层土坡地下水上升及稳定性分析 ［J］.科学技术与工程，2014, 14(33): 158-163. [14] 张光辉，费宇红，田言亮，等.暴雨洪水对地下水超采缓解特征与资源增量 ［J］.水利学报，2015, 46(5): 594-602. [15] 唐春雷，王桃良，王维泰，等.极端降水条件下北京西山黑龙关泉响应研究［J］.水文，2016, 36(6): 70-76. [16] 赵文智，周宏，刘鹄.干旱区包气带土壤水分运移及其对地下水补给研究进展［J］.地球科学进展，2017, 32(9): 908-918. [17] 王桂智，唐德善.基于SPSS模型的黑河正义峡断面径流量变化分析［J］.水电能源科学，2011,29（9）：24-28. [18] Guo X J, Jiang G H, Gong X P, et al. Recharge processes on typical karst slopes implied by isotopic and hydrochemical indexes in Xiaoyan Cave, Guilin, China ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2015(530): 612-622. [19] 杨静，陈洪松，聂云鹏，等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地降雨特性及浅层地下水埋深变化特征［J］.水土保持学报，2012,26(5): 239-244. [20] 郭小娇，龚晓萍，袁道先，等.典型岩溶包气带洞穴滴水水文过程研究：以桂林硝盐洞为例 ［J］.地球学报，2017,38(4): 537-548. [21] 李雪峰，李亚峰，樊福来.降水入渗补给过程的实验研究 ［J］.南水北调与水利科技，2004, 2(3): 33-35. [22] 陈宏峰，朱明秋，夏日元，等.湖南洛塔干河猪场表层岩溶泉BP人工神经网络分析 ［J］.中国岩溶，2005, 24(4): 300-305. [23] 宗路平，角媛梅，李石华，等.哈尼梯田景观水源区土壤水分时空变异性［J］.生态学杂志，2015, 34(6): 1650-1659. [24] 郭小娇，姜光辉，汤庆佳，等.典型岩溶石山包气带洞穴水流的水文过程浅析［J］.中国岩溶，2014，33（2）：176-184. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1421
- HTML浏览量: 572
- PDF下载量: 178
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
