Study on the monthly dynamic change of soil respiration rate of plum trees with different planting ages in rocky desertification area
-
摘要: 选取桂林恭城县国家可持续发展试验示范区石漠化治理过程中不同种植年限李树样地土壤为研究对象，对土壤呼吸进行以月为周期的监测，结果表明：（1）不同种植年限李树土壤呼吸速率的变化趋势随月份变化基本保持一致，呈现多峰形，而从季节尺度上看，随着春夏秋冬四季的交替，土壤呼吸速率逐渐下降；（2）李树种植年限在不同程度上对土壤呼吸速率均有影响，2 a，5 a和20 a的土壤呼吸速率年均值分别为48.56 mgC·（m2·h）-1、45.63 mgC·（m2·h）-1、41.64 mgC·（m2·h）-1，其中幼龄期（2 a）和盛果期（5 a）土壤呼吸速率较高，高的土壤呼吸速率反映了较快的有机代谢和物质循环，是为了满足植物在生长初期所需的碳源及养分，而20 a李树处于生长老龄期，其已维持了一个较稳定的地下生态系统，土壤呼吸作用降低；（3）在雨热同期（4-8月）时，土壤温度和土壤含水量之间呈极显著负相关关系（P<0.01），土壤温度和土壤呼吸速率之间呈极显著负相关关系（P<0.01），而土壤含水量与土壤呼吸速率呈极显著正相关关系（P<0.01），这主要是由于土壤呼吸在时间尺度上存在滞后效应。Abstract: Soil respiration is the main process of soil carbon emission and an important factor affecting the dynamic change of soil carbon pool and atmospheric carbon pool. The amount of soil respiration determines the source and sink of soil carbon pool to a certain extent. It is of great significance to understand the mechanism of soil organic carbon accumulation, via studying the dynamic changes of soil respiration in fruit trees with different planting ages in karst areas. In this study, the soils samples of plum trees with different planting ages (i.e. 2 a, 5 a and 20 a, respectively) in the process of rocky desertification control in Gongcheng county, Guilin were selected as the research objects. The soil respiration rates were monitored on a monthly basis by using alkali absorption method from which the influencing factors were investigated and the data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) method. The results show that， (1) In a year time, the soil temperature and soil water content show a completely opposite seasonal trend, the change of soil respiration rate of the plum trees with different ages is basically consistent with the change of month, showing a multi-peak shape. On a seasonal scale, the soil respiration rate decreased gradually with the alternation of spring, summer, autumn and winter; (2) The planting ages of the plum trees have influence on soil respiration rate to different extents. The soil respiration rates of 2 a, 5 a and 20 a are 48.56 mgC·(m2·h)-1,45.63 mgC·(m2·h)-1 and 41.64 mgC·(m2·h)-1, respectively. This may be attributed to the higher soil respiration rate of the trees in their young stages (2 a) and full fruiting period (5 a), who require more carbon sources and nutrients for plant growth than the older ones（20 a）. The higher respiration rate reflects higher organic metabolism and material circulation. Compared the plum trees of 2 a and 5 a, the underground ecosystem of the 20 a tree is relatively stable; and the soil respiration rate of the latter slightly decreases； (3) In the same period of high soil heat and high rainfall from April to August, there is a significant negative correlation between soil temperature and soil water content (P < 0.01), a significant negative correlation between soil temperature and soil respiration rate (P < 0.01), and a significant positive correlation between soil water content and soil respiration rate (P < 0.01), which are mainly caused by the lag effect of soil respiration on time scale.
-
Key words:
- karst areas /
- rocky desertification ecosystem /
- soil respiration /
- planting ages /
- plum trees
-
[1] 邓翠，吕茂奎，曾敏，等. 红壤侵蚀区植被恢复对土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性的影响［J］. 土壤学报，2019，56（1）：135-145. [2] 郑威，何峰，谭一波，等. 两种石漠化区退耕林型的土壤呼吸机模型模拟［J］. 生态科学，2017，36（5）：138-143. [3] Raich J W， Tufekciogul A. Vegetation and soil respiration： correlations and controls［J］. Biogeochemistry， 2000， 48（1）：71-90. [4] Raich J W， Schlesinger W H. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate［J］. Tellus B， 1992， 44（2）：81-99. [5] Wenhua L. Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China［J］. Forest Ecology and Management， 2004， 201（1）：33-41. [6] 万军. 贵州省喀斯特地区土地退化与生态重建研究进展［J］. 地球科学进展，2003，18（3）：447-453. [7] 苏维词，朱文考. 贵州喀斯特地区生态农业发展模式与对策［J］. 农业系统科学与综合研究，2000（1）：40-44. [8] Yang H， Mo B， Zhou M， et al. Effects of Plum Plantation Ages on Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization in the Karst Rocky Desertification Ecosystem of Southwest China［J］. Forests， 2019，10（12）：1107. [9] 申文辉，郑威，何琴飞，等. 桂西南石漠化区蚬木林土壤呼吸空间变异研究［J］. 生态科学，2017，36（2）：82-86. [10] 吴夏，潘谋成，曹建华，等. 典型岩溶区土壤呼吸作用的昼夜变化特征及其影响因素［J］. 中国岩溶，2019，38（2）：157-163. [11] Davidson E A， Verchot L V， Cattanio J H， et al. Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia［J］. Biogeochemistry， 2000， 48（1）：53-69. [12] Chen Q， Li L， Han GX， et al. Responses of soil respiration to temperature in eleven communities in Xilingol Grassland， Inner Mongolia［J］. Acta Phytoecological Sinica， 2003， 27（4）：441-447. [13] Luo Y， Wan S， Hui D， et al. Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie［J］. Nature， 2001， 413（6856）：622-625. [14] 潘根兴，曹建华，何师意，等. 岩溶土壤系统对空气CO2的吸收及其对陆地系统碳汇的意义：以桂林丫吉村岩溶试验场的野外观测和模拟实验为例［J］. 地学前缘，2000（4）：580-587. [15] 胡智勇，陈孝杨，陈敏，等. 一种简易的土壤呼吸速率原位测定方法［J］. 水土保持通报，2018，38（2）：258-261. [16] Davidson E A， Belk E， Boone R D. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest［J］. Global Change Biology， 1998， 4（2）：217-227. [17] 赵龙飞，李德生，滕达，等. 城市绿化景观土壤呼吸变化规律及影响因素［J］. 生态与农村环境学报，2019，35（7）：885-891. [18] 姚辉，胡雪洋，朱江玲，等. 北京东灵山3种温带森林土壤呼吸及其20年的变化［J］. 植物生态学报，2015，39（9）：849-856. [19] 马和平，郭其强，李江荣，等. 色季拉山4种林型土壤呼吸及其影响因子［J］. 土壤学报，2016，53（1）：253-260. [20] Gomez‐Casanovas N， Anderson‐Teixeira K， Zeri M， et al. Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration［J］. Global Change Biology， 2013， 19（6）：1941-1952. [21] 陈全胜，李凌浩，韩兴国，等. 水分对土壤呼吸的影响及机理［J］. 生态学报，2003 （5）：972-978. [22] 陈骥，曹军骥，魏永林，等. 青海湖北岸高寒草甸草原非生长季土壤呼吸对温度和湿度的响应［J］. 草业学报，2014，23（6）：78-86. [23] 杨庆朋，徐明，刘洪升，等. 土壤呼吸温度敏感性的影响因素和不确定性［J］. 生态学报，2011，31（8）：2301-2311. [24] 吴亚华，肖荣波，王刚，等. 城市绿地土壤呼吸速率的变化特征及其影响因子［J］. 生态学报，2016，36（22）：7462-7471. [25] 周运超，周习会，熊志斌，等. 岩溶系统不同植被下土壤碳排放的温度效应［J］. 贵州科学，2004，22（4）：21-26，40. [26] Trumbore S E， Davidson E A， Barbosa de Camargo P， et al. Belowground cycling of carbon in forests and pastures of Eastern Amazonia［J］. Global Biogeochemical Cycles， 1995，9（4）：515-528. [27] 王小国，朱波，王艳强，等.不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性［J］. 生态学报，2007，27（5）：1960-1968. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1594
- HTML浏览量: 610
- PDF下载量: 184
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
