Characteristics and the hazard-inducing effect of groundwater systems in Zongling high-level landslide areas
-
摘要: 本文以贵州省纳雍县鬃岭崩塌滑坡带两个滑坡区为例,通过水文地质调查、水动力场分析、水化学和流量动态对比分析,得出结论(1)天然条件下,崩塌滑坡带存在3个相对独立的地下水系统,采煤活动改变了局部地下水径流排泄方向,使上部基岩裂隙水、中部岩溶水补给到下部基岩裂隙水中,最后从坑道或泉排泄出地表。(2)流量动态和钙离子含量变化表明,雨季中部岩溶水灌入式补给到了采空区坑道中,同时也表明老鬃岭镇滑坡区山体浅部垂直裂缝发育,左家寨滑坡区山体浅部至深部垂直裂缝均有发育。(3)鬃岭崩塌滑坡体内部地下水以非饱和水下渗运动为主,不存在饱和地下水流场,故而不存在水动力驱动滑坡影响作用。(4)在鬃岭崩塌滑坡孕灾或灾害触发过程中,地下水对垂直裂缝、滑动结构面的发展和岩体破坏、失稳主要起到加速和促进作用。本文对岩溶石山地区类似滑坡机理研究有一定意义。Abstract: Taking two landslide areas of the Zongling collapse-landslide zone in Nayong county, Guizhou province as examples, this work conducted hydrogeological surveys, hydrodynamic field analysis, hydrochemistry research and flow dynamic comparative analysis to examine the hazard-inducing effect of groundwater. Results show that, (1) under natural conditions, there are three relatively independent groundwater systems in the collapse-landslide zone, while coal mining activities have changed the groundwater runoff-discharge direction, making the upper bedrock fissure water and middle karst water recharge into the lower bedrock fissure water, finally discharging to the surface from the pit or spring; (2) Flow dynamics and the variation of calcium ion content indicate that middle karst water in the rainy season recharges into the goaf tunnel in a injection form. They also show that vertical fractures developed in the shallow part of the slope body in the old Zongling town landslide area, as well as in the shallow to deep part of the slope body in the Zuojiazhai landslide area; (3) The groundwater flow in the Zongling landslide body is dominated by unsaturated groundwater seepage movement, no saturated groundwater flow field, thus no effect of the hydrodynamic driving landslides; (4) In the process of hazard initiation or triggering of the collapses and landslides in the Zongling area, groundwater plays a major role in accelerating and promoting development of vertical fractures and sliding structural plane, rock mass failure and instability. These research results are of certain significance to studies of the mechanism of collapses-landslides in the Zongling area and other karst mountainous areas with similar conditions in southwest China.
-
[1] 王尚彦,王纯厚,张慧,等. 贵州省纳雍县岩脚寨基岩顺层滑坡特征及研究意义[J]. 贵州地质,2003,20(4):239-241,252. [2] 刘传正,郭强,陈红旗. 贵州省纳雍县岩脚寨危岩崩塌灾害成因初步分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(4):120-121. [3] 吴彩燕,乔建平,王成华. 贵州省纳雍县鬃岭镇“12.3”大型崩塌灾害分析[J]. 水土保持研究,2006,13(6):100-102. [4] 陈泽富,孔纪名,王成华. 贵州纳雍崩塌式滑坡成灾特征及其避灾警示作用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2006,17(3):32-35. [5] 申太奇,李嘉雨. 贵州鬃岭镇崩塌形成机理研究[J].科技创 新,2015(35):19-20. [6] 谭宁. 纳雍县鬃岭镇煤矿开采诱发地质灾害特征分析[J].内蒙古煤炭经济,2013(3): 41-43. [7] 杨乐. 基于纳雍县中岭镇中岭危岩崩塌灾害成因的初步分析与防治[J]. 黑龙江科技信息,2014(31):157-159 [8] 程宇,张健,陈进,龙举.贵州纳雍骔岭镇危岩带稳定性及危害范围分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(4):9-15. [9] 徐一帆,何涛,雷勇. 纳雍骔岭片区高位崩塌(危岩)带形成机制研究[J]. 贵州工程应用技术学院学报,2019,37(3):37-42. [10] 石元帅. 乡村崩塌地质灾害风险评价与管控研究[D].成都理工大学,2019. [11] 龚兴祥,赵弦.纳雍县地质灾害隐患的类型、成因及预防措施[J].贵州地质,2009,26(3):235-237. [12] 黄家琰,杨绍章.贵州矿山环境问题及防治对策的思考[J].能源与环境,2011(6):75-77. [13] 邵林,李军.贵州矿山地质灾害类型及其基本特征[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2011,22(3):56-60. [14] 杨胜元.贵州矿山地质环境[M].北京:地质出版社,2012:1-214. [15] 罗炳佳,沈诚.贵州矿山地质环境影响评估[J].水文地质工程地质,2013(1):134-138. [16] 郑光,许强,巨袁臻,等.2017年8月28日贵州纳雍县张湾镇普洒村崩塌特征与成因机理研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2018, 26(1):223-240. [17] 殷跃平.斜倾厚层山体滑坡视向滑动机制研究_以重庆武隆鸡尾山滑坡为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(2):217-226. [18] 程鹏翔,李宗发.贵州武陵山区中二叠统崩塌地质灾害形成机理研究[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(4):565-572. [19] 何潇,陈洪凯,赵鹏,等.长江巫峡岸坡座滑式危岩稳定性研究:以望霞座滑式危岩为例[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(4):411-418. [20] 刘康祥,李景阳,朱东平,等.贵阳蟠桃宫滑坡的稳定性分析和治理[J].中国岩溶,2001,20(4):284-289. [21] 王志兵,申林方,徐则民. 头寨滑坡地下水化学特征及其反映的水-岩(土)相互作用[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2016,43(1):111-116,123. [22] 黄润秋, 徐则民, 许模.地下水的致灾效应及异常地下水流诱发地质灾害[J]. 地球与环境,2005,33(3):1-9. [23] 杜常见,易庆林,张明玉,等.后缘裂缝充水对裂口山滑坡稳定性的影响[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2017,28(1):13-21. [24] 周家文,陈明亮,李海波,等. 水动力型滑坡形成运动机理与防控减灾技术[J]. 工程地质学报,2019,27(5) : 1131-1145.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1502
- HTML浏览量: 598
- PDF下载量: 131
- 被引次数: 0