Risk assessment of karst collapse in the Tailai basin based on the synthetic index method
-
摘要: 泰莱盆地岩溶地面塌陷始发于20世纪60年代,至今岩溶塌陷地质灾害仍不断发生,造成了日趋严重的经济损失和社会影响。本文将泰莱盆地作为整体研究对象,在对工作区地质环境条件进行充分分析的基础上,选取了包括岩溶塌陷影响因子及能反应社会影响的易损因子(包括灾损敏感因子和抗损强度因子)在内的共计12项指标作为岩溶塌陷评价要素,建立了研究区风险性评价体系;然后,利用层次分析法(AHP)计算各评价要素的权重,结合已有资料绘制各指标分级图并分别赋值;最后,利用MAPGIS软件叠加计算风险性指标,依据风险性分级标准进行研究区岩溶塌陷风险性评价分级区划。结果表明:高风险区主要分布在泰安市城区火车站、訾家灌庄、东羊娄—旧县一带;莱芜市大王庄镇孤山—后枯河及铁矿区孟公清、泉河一带,这些区域多位于水源地周边或矿山企业排水区,高强度的抽排地下水是岩溶塌陷发生的最主要的致塌因素。Abstract: The karst collapse in the Tailai basin began in the 1960s, which has caused increasingly serious economic losses and social impacts. Based on the analysis of the geological conditions, 12 indexes were selected as the assessment factors, including karst collapse influencing factors and social vulnerability factors, thus to establish a risk evaluation system. Then, the weight of each assessment element was calculated using the AHP method, and the classification diagram of each index was drawn and assigned separately. Finally, the risk index was calculated using MAPGIS software, and the risk classification of karst collapse was made according to the criteria. The results show that high-risk areas are mainly distributed in the following areas, (1) Taian City,urban railway station, Zijiaguanzhuang, Dongyang-Jiuxian; (2) Laiwu City, Gushan-Kuhe area of Dawangzhuang Town, and Menggongqing-Quanhe of the iron mining area. These areas are mostly around the water source area or the drainage areas of mining enterprises, where high-intensity pumping groundwater is the most important factor causing karst collapse.
-
Key words:
- karst collapse /
- risk evaluation /
- synthetic index method /
- Tailai basin
-
[1] 康彦仁.岩溶地面塌陷的形成条件[J].中国岩溶,1988,7(7):9-17. [2] 张丽芬,曾夏生,姚运生,等.我国岩溶塌陷研究综述[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2007,18(3):126-130. [3] 罗小杰, 沈建.我国岩溶地面塌陷研究进展与展望[J].中国岩溶,2018,37(1):101-111. [4] 吴亚楠. 国内外岩溶塌陷监测方法综述[J].山东国土资源, 2018, 34(12):1-6. [5] 吴亚楠.泰安市城区-旧县水源地岩溶塌陷演化过程分析[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(1) : 94-100. [6] 雷明堂, 项式钧.近20年来中国岩溶塌陷研究回顾[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1997(S1):9-13. [7] 雷明堂, 蒋小珍, 李瑜. 岩溶塌陷综合预测评价的理论与方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1997, 8(S1):38-42. [8] 王淑彦.泰安路基塌陷机理的探讨[J].铁道工程学报,1985, (1):93-95. [9] 高宗军,张富中,鲁峰.山东泰安岩溶地面塌陷前兆及其预测预报[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(3):149-150. [10] 高宗军.岩溶地面塌陷形成机理与成因模式研究:以山东泰安-莱芜为例[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(4):38-43. [11] 王滨,李治广,董昕,等.岩溶塌陷的致塌力学模型研究:以泰安市东羊娄岩溶塌陷为例[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(4):119-125. [12] 焦玉国,陈伟清,程凤.山东泰安市岩溶塌陷易发性评估与防治对策[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2014,25(1):38-43. [13] 王延岭, 陈伟清, 蒋小珍,等.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷发育特征及形成机理[J].中国岩溶, 2015, 34(5):495-506. [14] 王延岭. 山东省泰莱盆地岩溶地面塌陷影响因素分析[J].中国岩溶, 2016, 35(1):60-66. [15] 山东省第五地质矿产勘查院.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷地质灾害机理研究与风险区预测报告[R].2013. [16] 山东省第五地质矿产勘查院.山东省泰莱盆地岩溶塌陷地质灾害调查与防治[R].2013. [17] 山东省第五地质矿产勘查院.泰安市泰山区上高办事处訾家灌庄村岩溶塌陷区地质调查与评价报告[R].2002. [18] 泰安地质环境监测站.山东省泰安市地下水动态监测报告[R].1981-2014. [19] 贾龙,蒙彦,戴建玲.广佛肇地区岩溶塌陷易发性分析[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(6):819-829. [20] 武鑫,黄敬军,缪世贤.基于层次分析-模糊综合评价法的徐州市岩溶塌陷易发性评价[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(6):836-841. [21] 罗小杰,罗程. 覆盖型岩溶地面塌陷综合地质预测与危险性评估[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(1):51-59.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2092
- HTML浏览量: 701
- PDF下载量: 367
- 被引次数: 0