西南某岩溶区地下水系统示踪试验与解析

张浪; 李俊; 潘晓东; 黄晓荣; 彭聪

doi:10.11932/karst2019y36

西南某岩溶区地下水系统示踪试验与解析

doi: 10.11932/karst2019y36

1.
四川大学水利水电学院，成都 610065
2.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/自然资源部、广西岩溶动力学重点实验室，广西桂林 541004

计量
- 文章访问数: 2063
- HTML浏览量: 648
- PDF下载量: 487
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2020-02-25

Tracer test and analysis of groundwater system in a karst area of southwest China

1.
College of Water Resources and Hydrology，Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065，China
2.
Institute of Karst Geology， CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR, Guilin, Guangxi 541004,China

摘要

摘要: 以西南某典型岩溶区为例，解析示踪试验在岩溶管道连通性以及获取水文地质参数中的应用。选择落水洞为投放点，分别从落水洞西侧和东侧寻找地下水出露点作为接收点，判别落水洞地下径流的实际去向以及落水洞与接收点之间的水力联系。结合Qtracer2软件对示踪试验成果进行定量解析,确定示踪剂回收率、地下水平均流速、最快流速，估算出岩溶管道结构特征和水文地质参数。结果表明：落水洞与接收点JS01、JS03之间不存在直接水力联系；落水洞与接收点JS02存在水力联系且岩溶管道极为发育，含水介质不均匀，地下水运移路径较为通畅，为典型的紊流流态；落水洞地下径流的主要方向是由西向东，但在丰水期雨量较大期间，接收点JS04能够接收到荧光素钠，说明丰水期水位上涨后两者间会有水力联系,导致部分水量向落水洞西侧排泄。
- 岩溶区 /
- 示踪试验 /
- 连通性 /
- 地下径流 /
- 管道特征 /
- 水文地质参数
Abstract: The study area is located in a karst area of Sichuan Province in southwest China. It hosts intense karst development and complex hydrogeological conditions, where underground karst forms include caves, fissures and conduits. Taking this typical karst area as an example, this paper analyzes the application of tracer tests in karst conduit connectivity and acquisition of hydrogeological parameters, analyzes the karst groundwater runoff regular pattern, and estimates the structural characteristics and hydrogeological parameters of karst underground aquifers. These data will facilitate rapid and accurate determination of the scope of groundwater recharge, analyzing the causes of spring discharge cutoff and pollution, and providing a basis for spring protection. First, a sinkhole is selected as the release point, and the groundwater dew point is taken as the receiving point to judge the actual direction of the underground runoff and the hydraulic relation from the west side and the east side of sinkhole respectively. A quantitative analysis of breakthrough curves of the tracers is carried out by Qtracer2, and the tracer recovery rate, average groundwater velocity, maximum velocity, structural characteristics and hydrogeological parameters of the karst conduit are determined. The results show that there is no direct hydraulic relation between the sinkhole and the receiving points JS01 and JS03. While there is a hydraulic link between the sinkhole and the receiving point JS02, where the karst conduit extremely developed, the aquifer medium is uneven, and the groundwater movement path is relatively smooth, which is a typical turbulent flow state. The main direction of the underground runoff of the sinkhole is from west to east. In the period of heavy rainfall during the wet season, the point JS04 can receive sodium fluorescein, indicating that the underground water level increases during the wet season, which will lead to discharge of partial water volume to the west side of the sinkhole.
- karst area /
- tracer test /
- connectivity /
- underground runoff /
- conduit characteristics /
- hydrogeological parameters

HTML

参考文献(22)

[1]	郭纯青.中国岩溶生态水文学［M］.北京：地质出版社，2007：100-101.
[2]	Goldscheider N, Drew D. 编；陈宏峰等译. 岩溶水文地质学方法［M］.北京：科学出版社，2015：1-4.
[3]	赵良杰,夏日元,易连兴,等.基于流量衰减曲线的岩溶含水层水文地质参数推求方法［J］.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(6):1817-1821.
[4]	郑健,陈喜,张志才.抽水试验法推求南方岩溶地区双重介质水文地质参数［J］.工程勘察,2014,42(1):42-46，58.
[5]	张江华,梁永平,王维泰,等.硫同位素技术在北方岩溶水资源调查中的应用实例［J］.中国岩溶,2009,28(3):235-241.
[6]	姜光辉,郭芳,于奭.岩溶水系统的水化学曲线及其在水文地质研究中的应用［J］.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(3):899-907.
[7]	武毅,孙银行,李凤哲.西南岩溶地区不同含水介质地球物理勘查技术［J］.中国岩溶,2011,30(3):278-284.
[8]	赵一,李衍青,覃星铭,等.南洞地下河岩溶管道展布及结构特征的示踪试验解析［J］.中国岩溶,2017,36(2):226-233.
[9]	张勤军,张亚年,贝为昶.广西布泉地下河发育特征及连通性分析［J］.中国地质调查,2019,6(2):100-105.
[10]	袁伟,王川.贵州盘县乐民河流域三股水岩溶泉水文地质条件分析［J］.地质学刊,2017,41(4):655-662.
[11]	陈雪彬,周军,蓝家程,等.基于在线示踪技术的岩溶地下河流场反演与水文地质参数估算［J］.中国岩溶,2013,32(2):148-152.
[12]	谢国文,杨平恒,卢丙清,等.基于高分辨率示踪技术的岩溶隧道涌水来源识别及含水介质研究［J］.中国岩溶,2018,37(6):892-899.
[13]	王开然,姜光辉,郭芳,等.桂林东区峰林平原岩溶地下水示踪试验与分析［J］.现代地质,2013,27(2):454-459.
[14]	徐尚全,王鹏,焦杰松,等.高精度在线示踪技术在岩溶地下水文调查中的应用［J］.工程勘察,2013,41(2):40-44.
[15]	常勇,吴吉春,刘玲,等.岩溶泉流量衰减曲线分析［J］.水文,2016,36(1):15-21.
[16]	易连兴,赵良杰,卢海平,等.两种常用染色剂管道及淤泥条件下示踪及对比：以丁旗地下河连通试验为例［J］.中国岩溶,2017,36(5):721-726.
[17]	Field MS. The QTRACER2 Program for Tracer Breakthrough Curve Analysis for Tracer Tests in Karstic Aquifer and Other Hydrologic Systems［R］. US:EPA,2002.
[18]	杨平恒,袁道先,蓝家程,等.基于在线高分辨率监测和定量计算的岩溶地下水示踪试验［J］.西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(2):103-108.
[19]	Gold Scheider N，Meiman J，Pronk M，et al．Tracer tests in karst hydrogeology and speleology［J］.International Journal of Speleology，2008，37(1) : 27-40．
[20]	鲁程鹏,束龙仓,苑利波,等.基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数［J］.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(4):717-721.
[21]	杨立铮,刘俊业.试用示踪剂浓度-时间曲线分析岩溶管道的结构特征［J］.成都地质学院学报,1979(4):44-49.
[22]	Smart C. Artificial tracer techniques for the determination of the structure of conduit aquifers ［J］． Ground Water，1988，26 (4) : 445-453．