Health assessment of karst groundwater ecosystem of Jinci spring area
-
摘要: 文章尝试性地提出岩溶水生态系统的概念,从系统的特征、功能和面临的威胁三方面论述了其内涵,基于驱动力—压力—状态—影响—响应(DPSIR)模型,综合考虑自然因素和人类活动叠加影响,构建了岩溶水生态系统健康评价指标体系;用层次分析法(AHP)确定指标权重,用综合评价法确定岩溶水生态系统所处健康状态,并将其分为很健康、健康、亚健康、不健康和病态五级。并以晋祠泉域为例,采用ArcGIS空间分析技术确定岩溶水生态系统健康评价等级。结果表明: 泉域煤矿开采区处于不健康状态,东部平原区和中部径流区均处于亚健康状态,碳酸盐岩裸露区和汾河周边区域处于健康状态,分别占晋祠泉域总面积的29%、31%和40%。Abstract: The concept of karst groundwater ecosystem was proposed, and its characteristics, functions and threats were discussed in this paper. The karst groundwater ecosystem health assessment index system was constructed under the superposition of natural and human factors based on the driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the index weights. The health status of karst groundwater ecosystem was determined by the comprehensive assessment method, which was divided into five levels, very healthy, healthy, sub-healthy, unhealthy and diseased. Taking the Jinci spring area as an example, the spatial analysis technique of ArcGIS is used to analyse the health assessment grade of karst groundwater ecosystem. The results show that the coal mining area in the spring area is in an unhealthy state, the eastern plain area and the central runoff area are in a sub-healthy state, the carbonate exposed area and the surrounding area of Fenhe river are in a healthy state, accounting for 29%, 31% and 40% of the total area of Jinci spring area, respectively.
-
Key words:
- Jinci spring area /
- karst groundwater ecosystem /
- AHP /
- ArcGIS /
- health assessment
-
[1] 姜光辉. 融合生态学和提升岩溶水数值模拟技术的国际前沿研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(1):1-4. [2] Pipan T, Culver D C. Epikarst communities: biodiversity hotspots and potential water tracers[J]. Environmental Geology, 2007, 53(2):265-269. [3] 刘伟, 周翠英, 袁爱华,等. 岩溶表层带水生动物研究进展[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(6):712-719. [4] 吴夏, 潘谋成, 朱晓燕,等. 表层岩溶带土壤温度和体积含水率对夏季暴雨事件的响应[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(3):274-281. [5] 张佩, 郑秀清, 臧红飞. 基于修正PI模型的晋祠泉域岩溶水脆弱性评价[J]. 人民黄河, 2016, 38(8):47-51. [6] 章程, 蒋勇军, Michèle Lettingue ,等. 岩溶地下水脆弱性评价“二元法”及其在重庆金佛山的应用[J]. 中国岩溶, 2007, 26(4):334-340. [7] 魏兴萍, 蒲俊兵, 赵纯勇. 基于修正RISKE模型的重庆岩溶地区地下水脆弱性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(3):589-596. [8] 邹胜章, 李录娟, 卢海平,等. 岩溶地下水系统防污性能评价方法[J]. 地球学报, 2014(2):262-268. [9] Bonacci O, Pipan T, Culver D C. A framework for karst ecohydrology.[J]. Environmental Geology, 2009, 56(5):891-900. [10] 卢耀如, 张凤娥, 刘长礼,等. 中国典型地区岩溶水资源及其生态水文特性[J]. 地球学报, 2006, 27(5):393-402. [11] Schaeffer D J, Herricks E E, Kerster H W. Ecosystem health: I. Measuring ecosystem health[J]. Environmental Management, 1988, 12(4):445-455. [12] Rapport D J. What Constitutes Ecosystem Health[J]. Perspectives in Biology & Medicine, 1989, 33(1):120-132. [13] Costanza R, Norton B G, Haskell B D. Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management[J]. Ecosystem Hea-lth New Goals for Environmental Management, 1992. [14] Mageau M T, Costanza R, Ulanowicz R E. Quantifying the trends expected in developing ecosystems[J]. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 112(1):1-22. [15] 张淑倩, 孔令阳, 邓绪伟,等. 江汉湖群典型湖泊生态系统健康评价:以梁子湖、洪湖、长湖、斧头湖、武湖为例[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(9):3613-3620. [16] 崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系Ⅰ.理论[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(7):1005-1011. [17] 崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系Ⅱ.方法与案例[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(8):1231-1239. [18] 秦趣, 代稳, 陈志霞. 我国城市生态系统健康评价综述[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2014, 21(4):96-100. [19] 曹宸, 李叙勇. 区县尺度下的河流生态系统健康评价:以北京房山区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12):4296-4306. [20] 孙才志, 杨磊. 基于ArcView-WOE的下辽河平原地下水生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(4):1016-1027. [21] 梁永平, 张发旺, 申豪勇,等. 山西太原晋祠—兰村泉水复流的岩溶水文地质条件新认识[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(1):11-18,34.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1957
- HTML浏览量: 661
- PDF下载量: 404
- 被引次数: 0