Characteristics and value of geological relics in the Bijie Jiming Sansheng•Guizhou geopark
-
摘要: 为了探讨毕节鸡鸣三省?贵州地质公园地质遗迹发育特征及旅游开发价值，本文在实地调查基础上，系统分析了公园内地质遗迹的类型与发育特征，根据地质遗迹景观的评价体系和方法对地质遗迹景观进行定性和定量研究。结果表明：（1）公园地处云贵高原向四川盆地过渡的斜坡地带，是斜坡带岩溶地貌的典型代表；（2）从分水岭到赤水河谷，岩溶地貌表现为由峰丛洼地→溶丘洼地→岩溶峡谷的系列变化，具有显著的地带分异性，展现了岩溶地貌在水文单元系统中的发育规律；（3）资源景观类型互补性强，具有极高的科研、观赏和旅游开发价值；（4）园区地质遗迹类型共分为6大类10类10亚类，以岩溶峡谷、洞穴、天生桥、天坑、峰丛、溶丘、石林、象形山等岩溶地貌为主，以水体景观、地质剖面、古生物、环境地质遗迹和地质构造遗迹为辅。园区内有国家级地质遗迹3处，省级地质遗迹11处。Abstract: This paper explores the characteristics and value of geological relics in the Bijie Jiming Sansheng ? Guizhou geopark. Based on field investigations, we study the types and development characteristics of the geological relics in the park, and make qualitative and quantitative evaluation to its landscape. Our research suggests that， (1) The Bijie Jiming Sansheng ? Guizhou geopark is a typical representative of karst in the slope of the transition from the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau to the Sichuan basin； (2) From the watershed to the Chishui River valley, the karst landform changes are expressed by peak cluster depressions e karst doom depressions kkarst canyons with significant zoning, showing the development of karst landforms in the hydrological unit system； (3) The resource landscape types are complementary and have high values for research, ornamental and tourism development；(4) The types of geological relics in the park are divided into six big categories, ten small categories and ten sub-categories, dominated by karst gorges, caves, natural bridges, Tiankeng, peak clusters, karst dooms, stone forests and pictographic mountains, with waterscapes, geological sections, paleontology, environmental geological relics and geological structure relics as complements. Our work determines 3 national-level geogoical relics and 11 provincial-level geological relics in the park, which provides a basis for rational development and protection of geological relics in the park and advancing local tourism industry.
-
Key words:
- Bijie Jiming Sansheng /
- geopark /
- geological relics /
- value of research /
- morphology of karst
-
[1] 罗书文,杨桃,邓亚东,等.云贵川鸡鸣三省峡谷景观特征及形成机理研究［J］.西南师范大学学报（自然科学版）,2018,43(2): 49-56. [2] 姚维岭,陈建强.基于空间分异视角的国家地质公园区域协同发展研究［J］.资源与产业,2011,13(4):93-98. [3] 方世明,李江风,赵来时. 地质遗迹资源评价指标体系［J］. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2008,33(2):285-288. [4] 杨朝丽.旅游资源综合评价模型及其应用研究［J］.昆明大学学报，2001,12(1):16-21. [5] 覃建雄.四川旅游资源评价内容、指标及规范初探［J］.成都理工学院学报,2002,29 (1):113-118. [6] 余珍风,刘元鹏.房山世界地质公园地质遗迹景观资源特征及评价［J］.资源与产业，2009,11(2):46-50. [7] 方幼君，程玉申,周敏.基于模糊聚类的区域旅游资源条件评价：以杭州市为例［J］.经济地理，2007,27(6):1034-1036,1041. [8] 齐文涛,吴天伟,木合塔尔?扎日,等. 新疆富蕴县五彩湾地质遗迹景观资源评价［J］.干旱区资源与环境,2013，27(4):160-164. [9] 齐翠姗,何元庆,王世金,等. 玉龙雪山国家地质公园地质遗迹资源类型划分及其综合评价［J］.冰川冻土,2018,40(1):186-196. [10] 罗书文,邓亚东,覃星铭,等. 地质遗迹功能属性区分及保护状况评价方法：以乐业-凤山世界地质公园凤山园区为例［J］. 国土资源科技管理,2014,31(5):91-98. [11] 郭金玉，张忠彬，孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用［J］.中国安全科学学报，2008,18(5):148-153. [12] 常建娥，蒋太立.层次分析法确定权重的研究［J］.武汉理工大学学报:信息与管理工程版，2007,27(1);153-156. [13] 耿金花，高齐圣，张嗣赢.基于层次分析法和因子分析的社区满意度评价体系［J］.系统管理学报，2007,16(6): 673-677. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2423
- HTML浏览量: 608
- PDF下载量: 481
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
