Analysis of dynamic change and reason of water resource security in karst areas using the set pair method: An example of Guizhou Province
-
摘要: 根据中国西南喀斯特地区特殊的水文水资源特点,从水资源赋存、供水状况、用水状况、水资源利用效率、水资源管理等五个方面构建了水资源安全评价指标体系,选择SPA(集对分析法)对贵州省2001-2015年水资源安全状况进行了动态评价。结果表明:贵州省2001-2007年水资源处于临界安全状态,2008-2015年水资源整体处于安全和较安全等级(除2009干旱年份外)。从影响水资源安全的5大要素类的变化看,水资源赋存受自然环境因素影响显著,H2值较不稳定;供水状况因受水利工程建设的影响,2001-2015年H2值由0.53上升到0.90;用水状况因生产用水和生态环境用水的提高,H3值由2001年的0.87下降为2015年0.20;水资源利用效率因万元GDP用水量以及农田亩均灌溉用水量的显著下降,H2值由2001年的0.26增加到2015年的0.88,向安全和较安全等级转变明显;水资源管理受生活污水处理率、森林覆盖率显著提高的影响,H2值由2001年的0.09增加到2015年的0.58,由原先的极不安全等级提升到临界安全等级,但在某些方面,如万元GDP污染物减排率等仍有较大的提升空间;供水状况、水资源利用效率、水资源管理这几个方面均表明人类行为对水资源安全影响显著。Abstract: According to the features of hydrology and water resource in karst areas of southwestern China, an index system of evaluating water resource security is established involving five parts, water resource occurrence, water supply quo, water consumption situation, water resource utilization efficiency, and water resource management. With the SPA(set pair analysis), this paper dynamically evaluates the water resource security status of Guizhou Province from 2001 to 2015. The results show that the water resource in Guizhou Province from 2001 to 2007 was in a critical state, while from 2008 to 2015 it was generally safe and relatively safe (except 2009 a draught year). In terms of the change of five factors effecting water resource security, the water resource location depends on the natural environmental factors remarkably, so the H2 value was relatively instable; water supply status was influenced by water conservancy project construction, so the H2 value from 2001 to 2015 rose from 0.53 to 0.90; for water consumption status, as water consumption in production and ecological environmental purpose raised, H3 value declined from 0.87 in 2001 to 0.20 in 2015. In terms of water resource efficiency, it was drew down largely by the water using in Wanyuan GDP and farm land average irrigation, so the H2 value grew from 0.26 in 2001 to 0.88 in 2015, turning into secure and relatively secure ranks obviously. The water resource management was under the impact of increasing municipal sewage treatment rate and raising forest coverage rate, so the H2 value went up from 0.09 in 2001 to 0.58 in 2015, improving the original extremely unsecure rank into critical secure rank. But for some aspects, such as Wanyuan GDP pollution abatement rate, they still have a long way to go; the aspects of water supply, resource utilized efficiency, and resource management all indicate that human behavior has great influence on the water resource security.
-
Key words:
- set pair analysis /
- karst area /
- water resource security
-
[1] 刘丽颖,官冬杰,杨清伟.基于人工神经网络的喀斯特地区水资源安全评价[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):207-214. [2] 杨振华,周秋文,郭跃,等.基于SPA-MC模型的岩溶地区水资源安全动态评价:以贵阳市为例[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(4):1589-1600. [3] Proclamation of the Minister-class Conference on the 2nd World Water of Man of the United Nations. The Water Security in the 21st Century [R]. Proclamation of the Minister-class conference in Hague, 2000. [4] David Grey , Claudia W Sadoff . Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development [J]. Water Policy, 2007,9:545-571. [5] LIOTTA P H. Boomerang effect: The convergence of national and human security[J]. Security Dialogue,2002,33(4):473-488. [6] 畅明琦,刘俊萍.水资源安全基本概念与研究进展[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(8):12-21. [7] 代稳,谌洪星.水资源安全评价指标体系研究[J].节水灌溉,2012,3:40-45. [8] 张凤太,王腊春,苏维词,等.基于熵权集对耦合模型的表层岩溶带“二元”水资源安全评价[J].水利发电学报,2012,31(6):70-77. [9] 闵庆文. 论西北地区的水资源安全:问题与对策[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2004,14(1):97-103. [10] 贾绍凤,张士锋.海河流域水资源安全评价[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(4):379-389. [11] 杨志峰,赵彦伟,崔保山,等.面向生态城市的水资源供需平衡分析[J].中国环境科学,2004,24(5):636-640. [12] 刘布春,梅旭荣,李玉中,等.农业水资源安全的定义及其内涵和外延[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(5):947-951. [13] 张军以,苏维词,张凤太.基于PSR模型的三峡库区生态经济区土地生态安全评价[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(6):1039-1044. [14] 邹胜章,朱明秋,唐建生,等.西南喀斯特区水资源安全与对策[J].地质学报,2006,80(10):1637-1642. [15] 曹琦,陈兴鹏,师满江.基于DPSIR概念的城市水资源安全评价及调控[J].资源科学,2012,34(8):1591-1600. [16] 高媛媛,王红瑞,许新宜,等.水资源安全评价模型构建与应用:以福建省泉州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(2):204-213. [17] 张凤太,张军以,苏维词.基于熵权和主成分分析的岩溶区水资源安全评价:以毕节为例[J].环境工程,2016,10:174-180. [18] 张戈丽,王立本,丁世刚.基于AHP的济南市水安全评价研究[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(3):94-98. [19] 安鑫,周维博,马艳,等.基于熵权的模糊综合评价法在水安全中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2010,21(6):137-140. [20] 宇鹏.基于系统动力学的水资源承载力评价研究[J].工业安全与环保,2013,39(2):38-42. [21] 吴开亚,金菊良.基于变权重和信息熵的区域水资源安全投影寻踪评价模型[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(9):1085-1090. [22] 苏敏杰,白栩嘉.NBA-MEPP模型在区域水资源安全评价中的应用[J].人民长江,2017,48(13):36-43. [23] 畅明琦,刘俊萍,马惟.基于支持向量机的水资源安全评价[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(6):167-171. [24] 绍骏,欧应均,陈金凤,等.基于水贫乏指数的长江流域水资源安全评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(6):889-894. [25] 宋培争,汪嘉杨,刘伟,等.基于PSO优化逻辑斯蒂曲线的水资源安全评价模型[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(5):886-813. [26] 张凤太,王腊春,苏维词.基于DPSIRM概念框架模型的岩溶区水资源安全评价[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(11):3511-3520.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1779
- HTML浏览量: 599
- PDF下载量: 355
- 被引次数: 0