Stability assessment of the spoil ground on the Liupanshui-Weining expressway in Guizhou Province
-
摘要: 以贵州省六盘水至威宁高速公路K89+250右侧140 m弃土场为研究对象,通过现场调查和计算分析对弃土场的排水能力、拦渣墙和边坡的稳定性进行了复核和验算,综合评估了弃土场的稳定性。结果表明:弃土场的洪峰流量为0.874 m3· s-1,小于截排水沟的最大泄水能力1.95 m3· s-1;弃土边坡在正常运用条件下的局部稳定性系数为1.404,整体稳定性系数为1.360,在非常运用工况条件下局部稳定性系数为1.303,整体稳定性系数为1.172;拦渣墙的抗滑稳定性大于1.3、抗倾覆稳定性大于1.5,基底应力小于地基承载力250 kPa。因此,弃土场的截排水沟尺寸能够满足弃土场排水要求,不同工况条件下弃土场边坡是稳定的,拦渣墙的抗滑移、抗倾覆及地基承载力均能满足稳定安全要求,建议对覆土边坡进行植草绿化,完善弃土场截排水,以减小坡面水土流失。Abstract: Taking the 140m spoil ground on the right side of K89+250 from Liupanshui to Weining expressway in Guizhou Province as research object, the drainage capacity, the stability of retaining wall and slope are evaluated by site investigation and calculation and the stability of the spoil ground is evaluated. The results show that the peak discharge of the spoil ground is 0.874 m3· s-1, which is less than the maximum discharge capacity of 1.95 m3· s-1of the drainage ditch. The local stability coefficient of the spoil ground slope is 1.404 and the overall stability coefficient is 1.360 under normal operating conditions. The local stability coefficient is 1.303 and the overall stability coefficient is 1.172 under abnormal operating conditions. Anti-sliding stability of the retaining wall is greater than 1.3, anti-overturning stability is greater than 1.5, and the base stress is less than 250 kPa of foundation bearing capacity. Consequently, dimensions of drainage ditches can meet the drainage requirements of the spoil ground. The overall and local stability of the spoil ground slope under different working conditions can meet the requirements of stability and safety, and the anti-sliding stability, anti-overturning stability and bearing capacity of retaining wall also can meet the requirements of stability and safety. It is recommended to plant grass on the slope to improve the interception and drainage of the spoil ground and reduce the soil erosion on the slope.
-
Key words:
- expressway /
- spoil ground /
- drainage system /
- retaining wall /
- stability assessment
-
[1] 中华人民共和国水利部.GB 50433—2008 《开发建设项目水土保持技术规范》[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2008. [2] 刘传正. 深圳红坳弃土场滑坡灾难成因分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2016,27(1):1-5. [3] 许有飞,张兴来. 山区高速公路弃土场设计原则与思路探讨[J]. 公路交通技术,2010(5):20-23. [4] 肖鸿, 王开洋. 基于专家调查法的高速公路弃土场安全风险评价[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版), 2017, 13(12):294-296. [5] 彭立,黄伟伟,徐希武,等.山区高速公路弃土场选址分类方法及其稳定性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2011, 8(6):75-79. [6] 蒋成海, 彭立, 李宏泉,等. 高速公路建设弃土场存在的问题及处治措施探讨[J].公路工程, 2011,36(5):47-50. [7] 张华明, 彭冬水, 奚同行. 高速公路弃土弃渣防治技术探讨[J].水土保持研究,2005(4):235-236. [8] 张华,游宏,黄晚清.山区高速公路高填斜坡弃土场工后稳定性评估的实例分析[J].成都大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(3):307-310. [9] 中华人民共和国水利部.GB 51018-2014 《水土保持工程设计规范》[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2015. [10] 中华人民共和国交通运输部.JTG/T D33-2012 《公路排水设计规范》[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2012. [11] 中华人民共和国交通运输部.JTG B02-2013 《公路工程抗震规范》[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2013. [12] 中华人民共和国交通运输部.JTG D30-2015《公路路基设计规范》[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2015.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1812
- HTML浏览量: 528
- PDF下载量: 503
- 被引次数: 0