地下含水层水资源赋存条件及其水化学特征—以贵州省安龙县幅为例

屈秋楠; 宋小庆; 唐娱杰; 杨振华

doi:10.11932/karst20190307

地下含水层水资源赋存条件及其水化学特征—以贵州省安龙县幅为例

doi: 10.11932/karst20190307

1.
贵州地质工程勘察设计研究院，贵阳 550008/贵州省地质矿产勘查开发局111地质大队，贵阳 550008
2.
贵州省山地资源研究所，贵阳 550001

基金项目: 国家科技支撑计划（2014BAB03B03）；黔地矿科合[2017]17号；贵州省地质勘查基金项目（黔国土资地环函[2014]23）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1766
- HTML浏览量: 636
- PDF下载量: 450
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2019-06-25

Groundwater occurrence condition and hydrochemical characteristics：A case study of Anlong county map sheet in Guizhou Province

1.
Guizhou Geological Engineering Investigation Design and Research Institute, Guiyang, Guizhou 550008,China/111 Geological Brigade, Guizhou Geological and Mineral Exploration and Development Bureau, Guiyang, Guizhou 550008,China
2.
Guizhou Institute of Mountain Resources Research, Guiyang, Guizhou 550001, China

摘要

摘要: 以贵州省安龙县1∶50 000水文地质图幅为例，采用含水层探采井的水质、水量监测数据，分析不同含水层水资源赋存特征及其与水化学的相关性。研究结果表明：（1）研究区含水层可分为纯碳酸盐岩管道含水层、非纯碳酸盐岩裂隙含水层、碎屑岩裂隙含水层、松散岩类孔隙含水层4种类型，各含水层中地下水水化学类型均以HCO-Ca?Mg型为主；（2）除非纯碳酸盐岩含水层探采井的降深与水体中Mg2+、HCO-3浓度呈现出显著的负相关性（R2=-0.77/-0.74）外，其余离子浓度与钻井单位涌水量、降深的相关性均不显著，相关系数(R2)均小于0.3；（3）非纯碳酸盐岩含水层和松散岩类含水层的总矿化度（TDS）、总硬度（TH）含量均比纯碳酸盐岩含水层低5 mg?L-1以上，TDS、TH的高值区均集中于纯碳酸盐岩含水层中，而低值区则分布于松散岩类含水层。
- 含水层 /
- 赋存条件 /
- 水化学特征 /
- 离子浓度
Abstract: The development of fissures and karst caves in soluble rock strata in karst mountainous areas leads to a complex condition for groundwater occurrence, and affects the ability of water to dissolve solid substances. To have a better understanding of the relationship between groundwater occurrence and hyrochemical field in karst area, a case study was conducted in Anlong county of Guizhou Province, based on the data derived from the 1/50，000 hydrogeological mapping of Anlong country map sheet. The area is located in the transition zone between the Yangtze land mass and Youjiang orogenic belt, with a fairly complex condition in geological structure, strata and lithology. The strata of the whole area are mainly those the middle to lower Triassic, with occasional exposures of the Quaternary clay, sub-clay and the Permian clastic sedimentary rocks, which belong to typical special karst hydrogeological and geomorphic areas. Through exploration well water test and groundwater hole pumping test, we obtained the data of aquifer flow rate, drawdown, water chemical index values, then established the relationship between groundwater occurrence and the the hydrochemical characteristics, in order to explore the influence of the resource occurrence conditions on hydrochemical characteristics of the aquifer studied. Results show that the aquifers in the study area can be divided into four types, i.e. pure carbonate rock, chert-rich fractured carbonate rock, fractured clastic rock and loose primary aquifers. Hydrochemical type of the aquifers is dominated by HCO-Ca?Mg type. Except for the negative correlation between the depth of the exploration and production wells in the chert-rich carbonate rock aquifer and the concentration of Mg2+and HCO-3 ions in water (R2=-0.77/-0.74), the correlations between other ion concentrations and hydrogeological parameters (unit water inflow, drawdown) are not significant, and the coefficient R2 is less than 0.3. The total dissolved solids (TDS) and total hardness (TH) contents of the chert-rich carbonate rock aquifers and primary aquifers are lower than that of the pure carbonate rock aquifer by more than 5 mg?L-1, respectively. Furthermore, the total salinity and total hardness both with high values are concentrated in areas of the pure carbonate rock aquifers, while the low value areas are distributed in primary aquifers.
- aquifer /
- occurrence condition /
- hydrochemical characteristics /
- ion concentration

HTML

参考文献(19)

[1]	韩至钧, 金占省. 贵州省水文地质志［M］. 北京：地震出版社, 1996.
[2]	Hess J W. Methods in Karst Hydrogeology［J］. Groundwater, 2008, 46(2):172.
[3]	常勇, 吴吉春, 姜光辉,等. 峰丛洼地岩溶泉流量和水化学变化过程中地面径流的作用［J］. 水利学报, 2012, 43(9):1050-1057.
[4]	王明章. 贵州省水文地质工作思考［J］. 贵州地质, 2012, 29(2):81-85.
[5]	杨建, 李少剑, 王改平. 盐池地区地下水赋存规律与水化学特征研究［J］. 宁夏工程技术, 2006, 5(4):328-331.
[6]	Chen L, Wang G C, Hu F S, et al. Groundwater hydrochemistry and isotope geochemistry in the Turpan Basin, northwestern China［J］. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(4):378-388.
[7]	李营刚. 岩溶地下水质动态变化和影响因素研究［D］. 重庆：西南大学, 2009.
[8]	于正良, 袁道先, 杨平恒,等. 基于PCA和在线监测技术研究旅游活动对岩溶地下水水化学的影响［J］. 地球学报, 2016, 37(2):232-240.
[9]	杨平恒, 袁道先, 叶许春,等. 降雨期间岩溶地下水化学组分的来源及运移路径［J］. 科学通报, 2013, 58(18):1755-1763.
[10]	饶懿. 岩溶地区不同土地利用方式对地下水质的影响：以重庆市金佛山为例［D］. 重庆：西南师范大学, 2005.
[11]	肖可. 金佛山地区地下水与地表水水文地球化学及氢氧同位素特征分析［D］.重庆：西南大学, 2015.
[12]	陈陆望, 殷晓曦, 桂和荣，等. 矿区深部含水层水-岩作用的同位素与水化学示踪分析［J］. 地质学报, 2013, 87(7):1021-1030.
[13]	张洪信, 罗阳乔, 丁俊,等. 贵州省安龙县地质灾害发育特征及成因分析［J］. 地球与环境, 2012, 40(3): 430-437.
[14]	李剑,王勃,邵龙义,等.水文地质分区及其控气作用：以鄂东气田保德区块为例［J］.中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(4):869-876.
[15]	Jeannin P Y, Eichenberger U, Sinreich M, et al. KARSYS: a pragmatic approach to karst hydrogeological system conceptualisation. Assessment of groundwater reserves and resources in Switzerland［J］. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 69(3):999-1013.
[16]	张伟杰, 李术才, 魏久传,等. 岩溶泉域煤矿奥灰顶部相对隔水性及水文地质特征研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(2):349-357.
[17]	Eisinga R, Mt G, Pelzer B. The reliability of a twoitem scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or SpearmanBrown?［J］. International Journal of Public Health, 2013, 58(4):637-642.
[18]	范维, 罗开平, 范明,等.优质白云岩储层形成的重要机制——差异溶蚀作用［J］.科学技术与工程,2017,17(1):15-20.
[19]	王长申, 武强, 马国平,等. 复杂条件下矿井水文地质类型划分方法［J］. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(3):696-702.