喀斯特峰丛节齿藓类生态分布及其环境因子影响研究

李 芳; 王智慧

doi:10.11932/karst20190209

喀斯特峰丛节齿藓类生态分布及其环境因子影响研究

doi: 10.11932/karst20190209

李芳,
王智慧

贵州师范大学生命科学学院，贵阳 550025

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(31760043,31360035)；贵州省科技计划项目（黔科合平台人才[2017]5726）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1823
- HTML浏览量: 561
- PDF下载量: 460
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2019-04-25

Study on ecological distribution of Arthrodontae mosses and their environmental factors in karst peak-cluster area

School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang,Guizhou 550025,China

摘要

摘要: 为探寻喀斯特峰丛节齿藓类（Arthrodontae mosses）的生态分布规律及环境因子的影响，选择贵阳市思雅河3座典型喀斯特峰丛为研究对象，利用藓类综合优势比、Sorenson相似性指数及RDA对节齿藓类的生态分布及环境因子影响进行分析。结果表明：3座喀斯特峰丛上共发现节齿藓类植物11科、26属、74种，其中顶蒴单齿藓26种，顶蒴双齿藓21种，侧蒴双齿藓27种。Ⅰ号峰丛以侧蒴双齿藓为主，综合优势比为100%，Ⅱ号、Ⅲ号峰丛则以顶蒴单齿藓为主，综合优势比分别为81.80%、69.75%。节齿藓类在喀斯特峰丛上的分布在坡底以侧蒴双齿藓为主，其综合优势比为97.06%，坡中、坡顶以顶蒴单齿藓为主，其综合优势比分别为86.23%、90.76%。坡中和坡顶的顶蒴单齿藓物种相似性指数最高，为27.91%；坡中和坡顶的侧蒴双齿藓物种相似性指数最低，为11.63%。光照强度和环境温度是影响顶蒴单齿藓类分布的主要因子，侧蒴双齿藓类的分布则主要受到相对湿度的强烈影响；而顶蒴双齿藓类的分布主要受海拔影响。
- 节齿藓类 /
- 生态分布 /
- 环境因子 /
- 喀斯特峰丛
Abstract: In order to explore the ecological distribution of Arthrodontae mosses in karst peak-cluster area and their environmental influencing factors, three typical karst peak-clusters with different vegetation coverage in Siya river basin of Guiyang were selected for the research, where each peak-cluster was divided into lower slope, middle slope and upper slope according to relative height difference. The mosses were collected by the S-shape sampling method, and they were classified by the peristome teeth types of mosses. The Summed Dominance Ratio(SDR), Sorenson similarity index and RDA were used to analyse the ecological distribution on Arthrodontae and the effect of environmental factors. The results show that 74 species from 26 genera in 11 families were identified in the three karst peak-clusters, including 26 species of acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses (SDR:97.73%), 21 species of acrocarpi-diplolepideae mosses (SDR:53.35%) and 27 species of pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses (SDR:93.01%). The No.1 peak-cluster is dominated by the pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses with their SDR value of 100%, while the No.2 and No.3 peak-clusters are dominated by acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses, and their SDR are 81.80% and 69.75%, respectively. The pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses mainly distribute at the bottom of the karst peak-cluster, with SDR of 97.06%, and the middle and top of the peak-cluster is dominated by theacrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses, with SDR of 86.23% and 90.76%, respectively. Furthermore, Sorenson similarity analysis shows that the similarity coefficient of the species of the acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses is the highest in the middle and top of the peak-cluster, of which the Sorenson similarity is 27.91%; and that of pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses in the middle and top of the peak-cluster is the lowest, which is 11.63%. The RDA analysis shows that the distribution of the acrocarpi-haplolepideae mosses is mainly influenced by light intensity and environmental temperature. The extension of the pleurocarpi-diplolepideae mosses is mainly influenced by the relative humidity; while the distribution of the acrocarpi-diplolepideae mosses is mainly affected by the altitude.
- Arthrodontae mosses /
- ecological distribution /
- environmental factors /
- karst peak-clusters

HTML

参考文献(37)

[1]	胡人亮.苔藓植物学［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,1987.
[2]	吴鹏程.苔藓植物生物学［M］.北京:科学出版社,1998.
[3]	Goebel K.Ueber die Sporenausstreuung bei den Laubmoosen［J］. Flora,1895, 80(1):459-486.
[4]	Vitt D H.Adaptive modes of the moss sporophyte［J］.The Bryologist,1981,84(2):166-186.
[5]	Maier Eva,Michelle J Price.In the Footsteps of Lantzius-Beninga:Investigating the Peristome Characters of Mosses［J］.The Bryologist,2005,108(1):36-46.
[6]	Wang QH,Jia Y.A taxonomic revision of Ulota mohr (Orthotrichaceae)in South and Central America［J］.Plant Diversity,2016,38(2):82-109.
[7]	高谦,曹同,付星.藓类植物传孢类型及其系统演化关系［J］.云南植物研究,2000,22(3):268-276.
[8]	李冰,张朝晖.喀斯特石漠结皮层藓类物种多样性及在石漠化治理中的作用研究［J］.中国岩溶,2009,28(1):55-60.
[9]	刘荣相,王智慧,张朝晖.贵州贞丰喀斯特石漠峰丛苔藓植物群落生态特征［J］.植物研究,2009,29(6):734-741.
[10]	张天汉,王智慧,张朝晖.贵州思雅河河谷地区喀斯特峰丛石漠苔藓植物群落研究［J］.西北植物学报,2013,33(10):2104-2112.
[11]	王晓静,王智慧,张朝晖.喀斯特地区贵州铝厂周边植物对金属元素的监测能力［J］.环境监测管理与技术,2017,29(1):21-24.
[12]	张朝晖,王智慧.黄果树喀斯特洞穴群苔藓植物岩溶的初步研究［J］.中国岩溶,1996,15(3):224-232.
[13]	李晓娜,龙明忠,刘洋,等.贵州施秉喀斯特世界自然遗产提名地苔藓植物区系特征［J］.植物分类与资源学报,2014,36(3):271-278.
[14]	张天汉,代玉,王智慧,等.贵州关岭县喀斯特峰丛石漠区苔藓群落生态特征［J］.中国岩溶,2014,33(2):192-200.
[15]	殷声锋,王智慧,张朝晖.贵州喀斯特铝土矿具芽孢苔藓种类特征：以贵州省清镇市林歹铝土矿区为例［J］.中国岩溶,2014,33(4):449-455.
[16]	庞嘉鹏,王智慧,张朝晖.喀斯特白云岩石漠化区域不同生境条件下苔藓植物群落特征及演替模式研究［J］.生态科学,2018,37(3):59-66.
[17]	申家琛,张朝晖,王智慧,等.苔藓植物对石灰岩的溶蚀作用及环境相关性研究［J］.中国岩溶,2018,37(2):175-184.
[18]	郭云,王智慧,张朝晖.白云岩洞穴洞口弱光带的苔藓群落特征：以绥阳水洞为例［J］.中国岩溶,2018,37(3):388-399.
[19]	Lazarenko A S.On some cases of singular behavior of the moss peristome［J］.The Bryologist,1957,60(1):14-17.
[20]	Steinbrinck O.Der hygroscopische Mechanismus des Laubmoosperistoms［J］.Flora,1897,84:131-158.
[21]	Ingold C T.Peristome teeth and spore discharge in mosses［J］.Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh,1959,38(1-4):76-88.
[22]	Crum H.The Relationship of Tetraplodon pennsylvanicus［J］. Bryologist,1966,69(2):205-207.
[23]	Brent D M.The phylogenetic relationships of Tortula:an SEM survey and a preliminary cladistic analysis［J］.The Bryologist,1985,88(4):388-403.
[24]	李利博,赵建成.真藓属(Bryum Hedw.)蒴齿形态特征及其分类学意义［J］.植物研究,2009,29(6):651-658.
[25]	王晓蕊,王立宝,李敏,等.16种丛藓科( Pottiaceae)植物蒴齿形态特征及其系统学意义［J］.植物研究,2013,33(2):129-133.
[26]	李泽科,吴启美,张朝晖,等.岩溶城市背景下贵阳市峰丛苔藓植物多样性分布及其生态特征［J］.植物研究,2018,38(3):433-443.
[27]	Huang W,Deng C,Day M.Differentiating tower karst (fenglin) and cockpit karst (fengcong) using DEM contour, slope, and centroid［J］. Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,72(2):407-416.
[28]	Zhang C, Pei J, Xie Y,et al.Impact of land use covers upon karst processes in a typical Fengcong depression system of Nongla, Guangxi, China［J］. Environmental Geology,2008,55(8):1621-1626.
[29]	L?bel S,Mair L, L?nnell N,et al.Biological traits explain bryophyte species distributions and responses to forest fragmentation and climatic variation［J］. Journal of Ecology, 2018,106(4):1700-1713.
[30]	Karlin E F,Bates J W,Farmer A M.Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment［J］.The Bryolodist,1993,96(3):510.
[31]	De Oliveira S M, Ter Steege H,Zotz G.Bryophyte communities in the Amazon forest are regulated by height on the host tree and site elevation［J］.Journal of Ecology,2015,103(2):441-450.
[32]	García E L,Rosenstiel T N,Graves C,et al.Distribution drivers and physiological responses in geothermal bryophyte communities［J］. American Journal of Botany,2016,103(4):625-634.
[33]	Liu Y,Pi C Y,Tian S.Relationships between characteristics of ground bryophyte communities and environmental factors in urban area of Chongqing, China［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(10):3145-3152.
[34]	黄雅丹,谢强.桂林喀斯特石山苔藓植物生态分布初探［J］.中国岩溶,2003,22(4):299-305.
[35]	刘艳,皮春燕,田尚.重庆主城区地面苔藓植物群落特征及其与环境的关系［J］.应用生态学报,2015, 26(10): 3145-3152.
[36]	李承义,吴金,张朝晖,等.天坑洞穴群苔类群落分布规律与环境因子关系：以贵州猴耳天坑为例［J］,生态学杂志,2019,38(3):744-752.
[37]	Patterson P M. The aberrant behavior of the peristome teeth of certain mosses［J］.Bryologist,1953,56(3):157-159.