贵州印江朗溪岩溶槽谷龙洞湾泉流量衰减分析

梁日胜; 曾 成; 闫志为; 石 彪; 何师意; 樊宇虹; 灌 瑾

doi:10.11932/karst20190102

贵州印江朗溪岩溶槽谷龙洞湾泉流量衰减分析

doi: 10.11932/karst20190102

1.
中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室，贵阳 550081/桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院，广西桂林 541004
2.
中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室，贵阳 550081
3.
桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院，广西桂林 541004
4.
印江土家族苗族自治县水务局，贵州印江 555200
5.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所，广西桂林 541004

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划“喀斯特槽谷区土地石漠化过程及综合治理技术研发与示范”（2016YFC0502300）；广西高等学校高水平创新团队及卓越学者计划项目(002401013001)

计量
- 文章访问数: 1919
- HTML浏览量: 579
- PDF下载量: 594
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2019-02-25

Recession flow analysis for Longdongwan spring at Langxi karst valley in Yinjiang county, Guizhou Province

1.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081,China/College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081,China
3.
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
4.
Water Affairs Bureau of Yinjiang Tujia and Miao Minority Autonomous County, Yinjiang, Guizhou 555200, China
5.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

摘要

摘要: 文章对贵州省印江县朗溪隔槽式向斜岩溶槽谷轴面南东侧的龙洞湾岩溶泉流量衰减规律进行了分析，通过在泉口设置复合堰、安放水文气象自动监测仪，获取了该泉降雨量和相对水位的高时间分辨率监测数据，并采用水力学公式计算了泉流量，分析了降雨过后岩溶泉流量的动态特征，再利用分区间指数函数衰减方程确定了该泉所在含水介质的结构特征及亚储水量，结果发现：（1）龙洞湾泉流量峰值滞后时间受降雨过程特征影响较大，当降雨量大或前期有降雨影响时，滞后时间短；当降雨量小或前期无降雨影响时，滞后时间长；（2）强降雨后，龙洞湾泉流量的衰减可分为三个亚动态，且衰减系数的差异较大，第I亚动态和第II亚动态的衰减系数分别是第III亚动态的11倍和3倍，这表明其三重岩溶含水介质的特征明显；（3）龙洞湾泉的含水介质具有不均匀性，以管道流和裂隙流为主，岩溶发育强烈。
- 隔槽式向斜 /
- 岩溶槽谷 /
- 岩溶泉 /
- 流量衰减 /
- 亚动态
Abstract: Longdongwan karst spring is situated in Langxi town, Yinjiang Tujia and Miao Autonomous county, Tongren City, Northeastern Guizhou Province, China. The karst spring occurs on the south-east side of the axis of Langxi trough-like syncline valley, which is a fault spring formed by partial water-resisting section of compressive-torsional faults to prevent groundwater from overflowing. The objective of this study is to understand the aquifer structure of high-level karst springs in the upper part of the mountain in karst valley area, so as to provide scientific basis for management and rational utilization of high-level karst springs in karst valley area. The high-resolution automatically recorded rainfall and water level data from the spring have been collected by using compound weir and automatic hydro-meteorological monitor. The spring flow rate is calculated by hydraulic equations. The characteristics of the flow regime of the karst spring are analyzed. The karst aquifer structure and sub-water storage are estimated by recession flow analysis based on interval exponential function. It is found that, (1) The time lag between peaks of rainfall intensity and flood is strongly affected by the curve shape of the rainfall intensity. The time lag will be short if there is heavy rainfall or previous rainfall influence. Inversely, it will be long if there is small rainfall or little previous rainfall influence.(2) After heavy rainfall event, the natural recession flow of the Longdongwan karst spring has 3 sub-regimes, and the recession coefficients are distinctly different. The recession coefficient of Stage I and Stage II is 11 times and 3 times as large as that of Stage III respectively, indicating that the characteristics of triple carbonate rock medium are obvious.(3) The aquifer medium of the Longdongwan karst spring is heterogeneous due to strong karst processes. The groundwater is dominated by conduit and fissure flows.
- trough-like syncline /
- karst valley /
- karst spring /
- recession flow /
- groundwater subregime

HTML

参考文献(20)

[1]	蒋忠诚，袁道先，曹建华，等. 中国岩溶碳汇潜力研究［J］. 地球学报, 2012, 33(2): 129-134.
[2]	蒋忠诚，覃小群，曹建华，等. 中国岩溶作用产生的大气CO2碳汇的分区计算［J］. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(4): 363-367.
[3]	王世杰, 张信宝, 白晓永. 中国南方喀斯特地貌分区纲要［J］. 山地学报, 2015, 33(6): 641-648.
[4]	吴协保, 孙继霖, 林琼等. 我国西南岩溶石漠化土地生态建设分区治理思路与途径探讨［J］. 中国岩溶, 2009, 28(4): 391-396.
[5]	姜光辉, 郭芳. 我国西南岩溶区表层岩溶带的水文动态分析［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2009, 26(5): 89-93.
[6]	田娟, 董贵明, 束龙仓. 孔隙管道型西南岩溶地下河系统参数与流量衰减系数关系的数值试验研究［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2013, 40(2): 13-18.
[7]	Kovács A, Perrochet P, Király L, et al. A quantitative method for the characterisation of karst aquifers based on spring hydrograph analysis ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 303(1-4): 152-164.
[8]	常勇, 吴吉春, 刘玲,等. 岩溶泉流量衰减曲线分析［J］. 水文, 2016, 36(1): 15-21.
[9]	Eisenlohr L, Király L, Bouzelboudjen M, et al. Numerical simulation as a tool for checking the interpretation of karst spring hydrographs ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 1997, 193(1-4):306-315.
[10]	Kovacs A, Perrochet P. A quantitative approach to spring hydrograph decomposition ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 352(1-2):16-29.
[11]	中国地质总局岩溶地质考察组. 赴南斯拉夫岩溶地质考察技术报告［R］. 1978.
[12]	洛塔岩溶地质研究组. 洛塔岩溶及其水资源评价与利用的研究［M］. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984:161-177.
[13]	束龙仓, 陶玉飞, 董贵明,等. 岩溶多重介质泉水流量衰减过程的室内模拟及分析［J］. 工程勘察, 2008(9)：32-35.
[14]	林敏, 陈崇希. 岩溶含水层中地下水向泉口流动的解析模型［J］. 中国岩溶, 1988, 7(3): 247-252.
[15]	赵良杰, 夏日元, 易连兴,等. 基于流量衰减曲线的岩溶含水层水文地质参数推求方法［J］. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1817-1821.
[16]	尹德超, 罗明明, 周宏,等. 鄂西岩溶槽谷区地下河系统水资源构成及其结构特征［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2015, 42(3): 13-18,26.
[17]	杨平恒, 张宇, 田萍,等. 川东平行岭谷典型岩溶含水介质特征的识别方法探讨:以重庆青木关地下水系统为例［J］. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(2): 90-97.
[18]	https://baike.baidu.com/item/印江土家族苗族自治县/10537498?fr=Aladdin
[19]	吴持恭. 水力学［M］. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1982: 364-420.
[20]	邹成杰.岩溶地区地下水位动态分析［J］.中国岩溶,1995,14(3):261-269.