Transformation evaluation and differences evolution analysis of cultivated land functional in Guizhou Province in recent 40 years
-
摘要: 梳理1978年之后贵州省农业政策及农业农户概况,构建耕地功能评价指标体系,并运用熵权法计算指标权重与其功能值,对耕地多功能进行分类和评价,对比全省及各个州市耕地在不同社会经济条件下所承载的功能,分析差异及原因,研究表明:(1)贵州省耕地功能呈下降趋势,功能转型从2006年前后开始,各州市存在一定差异,经济发展较快的地区在2004年前后已提前转型,经济发展较慢的地区在2012年前后转型;(2)耕地功能存在空间分布差异,主要与地区耕地压力和经济发达程度组合状况有关,低耕低压力高GDP(如遵义、六盘水)耕地功能值最高,高耕低压力高GDP(如贵阳市)则次之,高压力低GDP(如安顺等地区)再次之,低压力低GDP(如黔南等地)最低;(3)耕地数量减少,耕地化学品负荷加剧,建议注重耕地生态保护,减少以过度化学品的投入换取粮食产出等不合理做法;从当地实际出发选择适合的农业发展方式,协调粮经作物、种养业发展的关系,推动农业结构优化升级。Abstract: Guizhou Province is located in the southeastern part of southwest China, and the capital city is Guiyang City. Terrain of the province is high in the west and low in the east. There are many plateau karst mountainous areas with large population living on the limited land resources where the quality of the cultivated land is extremely poor and the reserve resources are seriously insufficient. It is of significance to evaluate the function of cultivated lands in the area and to understand the status of the land functional transformation, in order to have a better management of the cultivated lands, and to make rational use of the land resources in a sustainable manner. This paper sorts out the agricultural polices and general farming situations in farmers of Guizhou Province since 1978. We constructed an evaluation index system, and calculated the index weigh and its function value by using entropy weight method ,to classify and evaluate the multi-function of the cultivated lands. This paper also studied the functions of cultivated lands on provincial, autonomous prefecture and local municipal scales, under different social and economic conditions. The research shows that, (1)The function of cultivated land in Guizhou Province showed a downward trend, with major changes occurred in 2000 to 2008 and in 2014 to 2015 respectively , with minor changes in the other years. The functional transformation started around 2006, and there were certain differences among the autonomous prefectures and various cities. The regions with rapid economic development were transformed in advance around 2004, while the regions with slower economic development were transformed in around 2012; (2)There were differences in spatial distribution of cultivated land function , which was mainly related to the combination of regional cultivated land pressure and economic development level. The regions with low tillage and low pressure and high GDP, such as Zunyi and Liupanshui cities, have the highest cultivated land functional value; the regions with high tillage and low pressure and high GDP, such as Guiyang City; the regions with high pressure and low GDP, such as Anshun, or the regions with low pressure and low GDP, such as Qiannan, have the lowest value; (3)As the quantity of cultivated land decreases, the population increases and the chemical load of cultivated land intensifies, it is suggested that we should pay more attention to the ecological protection of cultivated land, through reducing unreasonable practices such as exchanging excessive chemical inputs for food products, improving the basic land productivity of cultivated land, easing the pressure on cultivated land and food security crisis, and promoting sustainable agriculture development; (4) According to local conditions, it is suggested to choose appropriate agricultural development modes that may fit the local conditions, coordinate the relationship between the development of grain crops and planting and breeding industries so as to improve agricultural structures.
-
[1] Benjamin K, G Domon, A Bouchard. Vegetation Composition and Succession of Abandoned Farmland: Effects of Ecological, Historical and Spatial Factors.[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2005, 20(6): 627-647. [2] 刘彦随.中国土地可持续利用论[M].北京:科学出版社,2008. [3] 刘卫东. 耕地多功能保护问题研究[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2008, 25(1): 1-5. [4] 宋小青, 吴志峰. 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 435-447. [5] 宋小青,吴志峰,欧阳竹.耕地转型的研究路径探讨[J].地理研究,2014,33(3):403-413. [6] 龙花楼, 李秀彬.中国耕地转型与土地整理:研究进展与框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(5): 67-76. [7] 姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等. 耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(8): 42-47. [8] 杨雪, 谈明洪. 近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 733-743. [9] 施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等. 北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释[J].资源科学,2015, 37(2): 247-257. [10] 张凤荣,安萍莉,孔祥辉.北京市土地利用总体规划中的耕地和基本农田保护之我见[J].中国土地科学,2005,19(1):10-16. [11] 赵华甫, 张凤荣. 耕地保护方向待转:从单一功能到多功能的演变交替[J]. 中国土地, 2010(10):19-20. [12] 孔祥辉,张凤荣,姜广辉,等. 国外农用地保护对北京市耕地保护的启示[J]. 中国土地科学, 2005, 19(5): 50-54. [13] 叶晓琪,宋小青,谭子安,等.大都市镇域耕地功能格局及其成因:以广州市为例[J].热带地理,2017,37(6):862-873. [14] Brown L R. London England Earthscan Publications[M]. London: Who will feed China? Wake-up call for a small planet,1995. [15] 卢良恕. 中国农业新发展与食物安全[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2003, 7(11): 11-14. [16] 卢良恕. 中国区域农业资源合理配置、环境综合治理和农业区域协调发展战略研究:农业功能分区与食物安全研究[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2008. [17] 胡志军, 欧向军. 基于泰尔指数的江苏省区域差异多指标测度[J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(5): 719-724. [18] 杨志新. 北京郊区农田生态系统正负效应价值的综合评价研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2006. [19] 宋小青,麻战洪,曾毅,等.基于综合集成赋权法的建设用地集约利用时空评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2007,24(3):55-59. [20] 郭显光.改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998(12):98-102. [21] 李阳兵,罗光杰,黄娟.茂兰喀斯特自然保护区撂荒地时空演变、机制及其植被恢复[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(4):447-453. [22] 王帅,邓佳,邓富玲,等.岩溶地区休闲农业旅游对土壤环境的影响[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(3):377-386. [23] 刘成武,李秀彬.对中国农地边际化现象的诊断:以三大粮食作物生产的平均状况为例[J].地理研究,2006,25(5):145-154. [24] 宋小青, 欧阳竹. 1999-2007年中国粮食安全的关键影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(6): 793-803. [25] 田玉军,李秀彬,辛良杰,等. 农业劳动力机会成本上升对农地利用的影响:以宁夏回族自治区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(3): 369-377. [26] 宋小青, 欧阳竹, 柏林川. 中国耕地资源开发强度及其演化阶段[R]. 开封:中国地理学会2012年学术年会, 2012. [27] 李广平. 我省休闲农业与乡村旅游业步入发展快车道[N]. 贵州日报, 2012年12月30(006). [28] 孙华臣. 城镇化进程中的城乡收入差距演变及其对经济增长的门限效应[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2012.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1848
- HTML浏览量: 567
- PDF下载量: 632
- 被引次数: 0