Analysis of karst collapse susceptibility in Guang-Fo-Zhao regions
-
摘要: 广州、佛山和肇庆市(广佛肇地区)作为经济发达地区,岩溶塌陷时有发生,给当地人民群众和经济发展带来较大威胁。依托区域地质调查成果,根据岩溶地质条件情况,选择岩溶塌陷分布特征、岩溶发育条件、覆盖层特征、地质构造、水文地质条件和土地利用类型6个因素,系统研究各个因素对岩溶塌陷形成的作用和各个因素之间的权重关系。在此基础上,运用地理信息系统技术和多元统计方法(层次分析法),建立岩溶塌陷发育的多因素判别模型,进而对广佛肇地区划分出高、中等和低易发区域,并根据岩溶塌陷易发区划,编制广佛肇地区重大基础设施岩溶塌陷易发区划应用图集,统计出重大基础设施所在易发区范围。Abstract: With the rapid development of social economy, the problems associated with karst environment and geology in China are becoming more and more prominent. Karst collapse is one of the main geologic hazards in the southern covered karst areas in China. The karst collapse frequently occurred in Guangdong Province, especially in Guangzhou, Foshan and Zhaoqing City (Guang-Fo-Zhao regions), where covered karst is widely distributed. The karst collapse history in the Guang-Fo-Zhao regions is closely related to the social and economic development, which can be divided into three stages, the first stage is from 1970s to 1980s, with shallow groundwater intensive extraction. During the period, a large number of karst groundwater was extracted, which induces karst collapse in many water sources. The second stage is from the 1990s to the beginning of this century, with a large number of limestone mines mined in the open pit. The balance of groundwater is severely damaged by excessive drainage in limestone mining, which leads to the frequent occurrence of ground collapse. The third stage is from 2003 to the present, with the leap-forward development of urban construction. The constructions of underground space and building foundation have been carried out in an all-round way. In view of the great threat of karst collapse to the lives and property of the local people, it is necessary to evaluate the susceptibility of karst collapse in Guang-fo-Zhao regions, so as to provide support for land planning and disaster prevention, then so as to avoid casualties and economic losses caused by karst collapse. Based on the results of regional geological survey, according to the geological conditions of karst collapse, 9 evaluation factors are selected including density of karst collapse, karst rock stratum type, the average rate of karst, soil thickness, soil structure, groundwater type, hydrous quality, fault density and land utilization, and the susceptibility evaluation prediction model is established. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to establish the weight of the evaluation factors. The evaluation factors are classified according to influence on karst collapse. Furthermore, the susceptibility of karst collapse in Guang-Fo-Zhao regions is evaluated. The results show that the high susceptibility areas are mainly distributed in Guanghua basin, Sanshui basin and Zhaoqing area karst area, which is 1,231.96 km2, accounting for 54.48% of the total area of karst. Human engineering activity is intense in this area. Medium susceptibility areas are accounting for 15.04% of the total karst area; low susceptibility areas are accounting for 30.48% of the total karst area. According to the karst collapse zoning susceptibility areas, the karst collapse susceptibility zoning atlas of major infrastructure has been compiled. The distribution of the highway, high speed railway, the oil pipeline, the gas line and other important infrastructure in the high susceptibility areas are counted.
-
Key words:
- covered karst /
- karst collapse /
- susceptibility /
- geological hazard
-
[1] 袁道先.新形势下我国岩溶研究面临的机遇和挑战[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(4):4-6. [2] 雷明堂,蒋小珍.岩溶塌陷研究现状、发展趋势及其支撑技术方法[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,1998,9(3):1-6. [3] Cascini L.Risk assessment of fast landslide-from theory to practice[C]//General Report:Proceedings of the International Conference on"Fast Slope Movements-Prediction and Prevention for Risk Mitigation",2005(2):33-52. [4] Beck B F.On calculating the risk of sinkhole collapse.In:Kastning,E H,Kastning,K M(Eds.),Appalachian karst.Proceedings of the Appalachian Karst Symposium.National Speleological Society,Radford,Virginia,USA,1991:231-236. [5] Gutiérrez F,Guerrero J,Lucha P.Quantitative sinkhole hazard assessment.A case study from the Ebro Valley evaporite alluvial karst (NE Spain)[J].Natural Hazards,2008,45(2):211-233. [6] 雷明堂,蒋小珍,李瑜.地理信息系统(GIS)技术在地质灾害信息管理系统中的应用:以桂林市岩溶塌陷信息系统为例[J].中国岩溶,1998,17(2):36-43. [7] 戴建玲,雷明堂,蒋小珍.线性工程岩溶塌陷危险性评价研究[J].中国岩溶,2012,31(3):296-302. [8] 蒙彦,雷明堂,贾龙.珠江三角洲地区岩溶塌陷地质灾害调查报告[R].桂林:中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所,2016. [9] 王忠忠.珠三角地区岩溶塌陷形成机理及易发性评价:以肇庆为例[J].土工基础,2015,29(4):90-93. [10] 王恒恒,张发旺,郭纯青,等.基于层次分析法的城市岩溶塌陷危险性评价:以武汉市南部为例[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(6):667-673. [11] 潘宗源,贾龙,刘宝臣.基于AHP和ArcGIS技术的岩溶塌陷风险评价:以遵义永乐镇为例[J].桂林理工大学学报,2016,36(3):464-470. [12] 黄文龙.基于AHP—模糊综合评判的岩溶塌陷风险评价[J].地下水,2016,38(4):114-116. [13] 蒋小珍,雷明堂,管振德.岩溶塌陷灾害的水动力条件危险性评价指标:以广西贵港青云村为例[J].地下空间与工程学报,2012,8(6):1316-1321. [14] 潘健,周森,林培源,等.广州市白云区岩溶塌陷风险初探[J].岩土力学,2013,34(9):2589-2600. [15] 徐贵来.武汉市覆盖层岩溶地面塌陷形成机理与危险性评价[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2016. [16] 尹欧.大成桥岩溶塌陷成灾机制及易发性评价[D].长沙:中南大学,2014. [17] 崔霖峰,陈邦松,涂婧,等.湖北武汉市典型地段岩溶塌陷风险评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2017,28(2):59-68. [18] 杨荣康,杨元丽,蒋镇涛,等.基于两级模糊数学综合评判法的岩溶塌陷危险性评价:以安顺市中心城市规划区为例[J].贵州地质,2017,34(2):109-115. [19] 武运泊,王运生,曹文正.基于AHP-模糊综合评判的岩溶塌陷危险性评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2015,26(1):43-48. [20] 吴丽清,廖婧,王威,等.基于AHP-信息量法的武汉地区岩溶地面塌陷危险性评价[J/OL].长江科学院院报,2017,34(4):43-47. [21] 贾龙,蒙彦,管振德.岩溶土洞演化及其数值模拟分析[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(3):294-298. [22] 蒋小珍,雷明堂,管振德.单层土体结构岩溶土洞的形成机理[J].中国岩溶,2012,31(4):426-432. [23] 袁道先.岩溶环境学[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1988:233-234. [24] 陈国亮.岩溶地面塌陷的成因与防治[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1994:62-68.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2353
- HTML浏览量: 804
- PDF下载量: 730
- 被引次数: 0