灵水岩溶泉浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的指示作用

赵红亮; 郭 芳; 刘绍华

doi:10.11932/karst20170409

灵水岩溶泉浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的指示作用

doi: 10.11932/karst20170409

中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/国土资源部、广西岩溶动力学重点实验室/联合国教科文组织国际岩溶研究中心

基金项目: 中国地质科学院基本科研业务费项目(YYWF201504)；广西自然科学基金(2013GXNSFDA019024)；国家自然科学基金(41172231；41472239)

计量
- 文章访问数: 1431
- HTML浏览量: 306
- PDF下载量: 905
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2017-08-25

Structure of the phytoplankton community at the Lingshui karst spring and its implications for water environment

Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MLR&GZAR/International Research Center on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO

摘要

摘要: 灵水湖内沉水植物自2010年逐渐消亡，至2013年已基本消失，为探究岩溶水生态系统退化的原因，于2016年4、7、10月对灵水和罗波潭两个水环境相似的岩溶泉进行浮游植物调查和水环境监测。结果显示：灵水优势种共3门16种，罗波潭优势种共3门13种，两者的浮游植物相似性为60%。3次调查种类数基本不变，丰度均表现为4月>7月>10月。生物多样性指数和叶绿素水质评价均显示罗波潭优于灵水，说明沉水植物消亡会引发水环境退化。浮游植物与环境因子的RDA和相关性分析显示，总氮(TN)是浮游植物群落的决定性因子，而浮游植物对氮营养盐更强的摄食能力可能是灵水沉水植物消亡的原因之一。岩溶水环境的HCO-3 和Ca2+浓度可以指示浮游植物的生长状态。
- 浮游植物 /
- 水生生态系统 /
- 水环境 /
- 岩溶地下水 /
- 灵水
Abstract: The submerged plants in the Lingshui lake has gradually reduced since 2010, and largely disappeared in 2013. In order to explore the causes of degradation of karst water ecosystem at this place, phytoplankton investigation and monitorin to the water environment have been conducted at the Lingshui and Luobotan karst springs in April, July and October of 2016, respectively. The results show dominant phytoplankton of 16 species belonging to 3 phyla at Lingshui and 13 phytoplankton species belonging to 3 phyla at Luobotan. The phytoplankton similarity reached 60% for both places. The basic types of phytoplankton species did not change during the three survey times, and the abundance was characterized by an order of April, July, and October from high to low. Water quality evaluation based on biodiversity indexes and chlorophyll shows that Luobotan was better than Lingshui, indicating that the water environment might degenerate after submerged plants died. RDA and correlation analysis between phytoplankton and environment shows that total nitrogen (TN) was the decisive factor for phytoplankton community. That phytoplankton has stronger absorptive capacity to nitrogen nutrient might be one of the reasons that submerged plants died in the Lingshui lake. The concentrations of HCO3- and Ca2+in the karst water environment can indicate the growth state of phytoplankton.
- phytoplankton /
- aquatic ecosystem /
- water environment /
- karst groundwater /
- Lingshui

HTML

参考文献(25)

[1]	Zalewski M. Ecohydrology-the scientific background to use ecosystem properties as management tools toward sustainability of water resources ［J］. Ecological Engineering, 2000, 16(1):1-8.
[2]	Misra S M, Pani S, Bajpai A, et al. Assessment of tropic status by using Nygaard index with reference to Bhoj wetland［J］.Poll. Res,2001, 20(2): 147-153.
[3]	刘建康. 高级水生生物学［M］. 北京：科学出版社，1999.
[4]	王立新, 吴国荣, 王建安,等. 黑藻(Hydrilla verticillata)对铜绿微囊藻(Microcystis aeruginosa)抑制作用［J］. 湖泊科学, 2004, 16(4):337-342.
[5]	Moss B. Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication of shallow lakes in which aquatic plant communities are important components［M］// Biomanipulation Tool for Water Management. Springer Netherlands, 1990:367-377.
[6]	李思阳, 张娟, 姚玲爱,等. 西枝江流域浮游植物群落结构特征与主要环境因子的关系研究［J］. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(6):1939-1947.
[7]	王震, 邹华, 杨桂军,等. 贡湖浮游植物时空分布特征及其与环境因子的关系［J］. 食品与生物技术学报, 2016,35(4):399-407.
[8]	张清明, 张娜, 洪佳,等. 浙江5座水源水库浮游动物调查及水质评价［J］. 水资源与水工程学报, 2016, 27(3):61-65.
[9]	Udovi M G, Cvetkoska A, utinic P, et al. Defining centric diatoms of most relevant phytoplankton functional groups in deep karst lakes［J］. Hydrobiologia, 2016, 788(1):169-191.
[10]	刘伟, 周翠英, 袁爱华,等. 岩溶表层带水生动物研究进展［J］. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(6):712-719.
[11]	陶琦. 武鸣灵水湖·岩溶盆地中的“三恒”泉［J］. 南方国土资源, 2016(4):54-57.
[12]	郭芳, 王文科, 姜光辉,等. 岩溶泉口沉积物有机碳的来源及环境指示意义［J］. 地球与环境, 2016, 44(5):485-491.
[13]	广西壮族自治区地质局，广西水文地质队普查分队.中华人民共和国区域水文地质普查报告：南宁幅（F49
[14]	)［R］.1979.
[15]	广西壮族自治区地质局.广西重点岩溶地区水文地质及环境地质调查报告（武鸣岩溶盆地）［R］，［2010］02-07-03.
[16]	国家环保局. 水和废水监测分析方法［M］. 北京：中国环境科学出版社, 1997.
[17]	林少君, 贺立静, 黄沛生,等. 浮游植物中叶绿素a提取方法的比较与改进［J］. 生态科学, 2005, 24(1):9-11.
[18]	马千里, 胡芳, 虢清伟,等. 六都寨水库夏季富营养化状况与浮游植物分布特征研究［J］. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(6):1497-1504.
[19]	孔凡洲, 于仁成, 徐子钧,等. 应用Excel软件计算生物多样性指数［J］. 海洋科学, 2012, 36(4):57-62.
[20]	王崇, 憨雪莹, 常秀岭,等. 红水河流域梯级水库夏季浮游植物群落结构特征［J］. 水生态学杂志, 2014, 35(6):75-80.
[21]	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Eutrophication of waters monitoring, assessment and control［R］. Paris, 1982.
[22]	李夜光, 李中奎, 耿亚红,等. 富营养化水体中N、P浓度对浮游植物生长繁殖速率和生物量的影响［J］. 生态学报, 2006, 26(2):317-325.
[23]	黎慧娟. 富营养水体中光照、营养及浮游植物对沉水植物生长和生理影响的研究［D］. 中国科学院水生生物研究所, 2006:20-25
[24]	Justic D, Rabalais N N, Turner R E, et al. Changes in nutrient structure of river-dominated coastal waters: stoichiometric nutrient balance and its consequences ［J］. Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science, 1995, 40(3):339-356.
[25]	陈家长,孟顺龙,尤洋,等. 太湖五里湖浮游植物群落结构特征分析［J］. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(4):1358-1367.