土壤与植物根系特征及碳积累探究

贺红早; 周运超; 张春来

doi:10.11932/karst20170406

土壤与植物根系特征及碳积累探究

doi: 10.11932/karst20170406

1.
贵州大学贵州省森林资源与环境研究中心/贵州大学林学院
2.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/国土资源部、广西岩溶动力学重点实验室/联合国教科文组织国际岩溶研究中心

基金项目: 中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所地质调查委托项目（YR-JSHJ-2016-211）；贵州省重大专项（20126011-3-3）；贵州省重大基础研究项目（QKK-JZ-2014-200203）；贵州省“百层次”培养计划（QKHRC-2015-4022）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1330
- HTML浏览量: 241
- PDF下载量: 1305
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2017-08-25

Root characteristics and carbon accumulation in relation to soils

1.
Institute for Forest Resources & Environment of Guizhou, Guizhou University/College of Forestry, Guizhou University
2.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MLR&GZAR/The International Research Center on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO

摘要

摘要: 为研究土壤与植物根系生长及有机碳输入之间的关系，2011年分别将构树（Broussonetia papyrifera）、铁仔（Myrsine africana）、紫花苜蓿（Medicago sativa）、皇竹草（Pennisetum sinese）移栽入贵州大学林学院苗圃基地，采用石灰土（岩溶地区土壤）与硅质黄壤（非岩溶地区土壤）进行培育，然后对根系生长特征和根系对土壤有机碳积累进行了研究。研究结果表明，构树根系在岩溶地区土壤比非岩溶地区土壤发达，即岩溶地区土壤根系碳沉积比非岩溶高。岩溶地区土壤上，紫花苜蓿死亡根系体积最大，其根系对土壤有机碳积累贡献最大。构树根系生长无论在哪种土壤均随土层深度增加而增加，使得森林土壤深层有机碳含量比草地高。因此，可确定土壤有机碳积累与植被生长环境和植被种类密切相关。
- 岩溶地区土壤 /
- 植物根系 /
- 碳积累
Abstract: To study the relationship between the input of soil organic carbon and growth of plant root systems in different soils, four kinds of plants, including Broussonetia papyrifera, Myrsine africana, Medicago sativa and Pennisetum sinese, were shifted and cultivated in calcareous and siliceous yellow soils at the cultivation base of Guizhou University in 2011. This place is of subtropical humid monsoon climate, at an altitude of 1,100 m, with an annual average temperature (MAT) of 14.9 ℃ and the annual average precipitation (MAP) of 1,178.3 mm, respectively. The monitoring system (CI-600) was installed in October 2011. For each experimental unit, a plexiglass tube, with a length of 1 meter and diameter of 0.1 meter, was inserted at an angle of 45° down to the ground, with an insert length 65 cm. During the period from January 2014 to December 2014, the root growth characteristics were observed with a plant root scanning system. The resulting data were analyzed with software WINRHIZO TRON 2009a. The dead roots were dug out for the determination of their bulk density, annual dead volume and root carbon density. The results suggest that the root system of Broussonetia papyrifera cultivated in calcareous soil grew better in comparison than that in siliceous yellow soil. It means that the soil organic carbon concentration in the karst mountainous area is larger than that in non-karst area. However, the annual dead roots volume of Medicago sativa cultivated in calcareous soil was larger than that of vegetation species, and its root has the largest contribution to soil carbon sequestration. As an arbor tree species, the root of Broussonetia papyrifera always increased with depth no matter in what soil it was cultivated with. We consider that this should be one of the key reasons why concentrations of soil organic carbon in forest lands are usually higher than those in grass lands at deeper soils. The root system of Broussonetia papyrifera cultivated in calcareous soil developed better in comparison with that of Broussonetia papyrifera cultivated in the sandy clay loam soil. In karst areas, the contributions of plants to soil carbon accumulation follow the order of Medicago sativa> Myrsine africana > Broussonetia papyrifera > Pennisetum sinese. Therefore, it is concluded that the accumulation of soil organic carbon is closely related with growth environments and species of vegetation.
- soil of karst area /
- vegetation root system /
- carbon accumulation

HTML

参考文献(39)

[1]	Tang H, Qiu J, Ranst E V, et al. Estimations of soil organic carbon storage in cropland of China based on DNDC model［J］. Geoderma, 2006, 134(1/2):200-206.
[2]	严宁珍, 程永毅, 杨剑虹,等. 岩溶山地土壤有机碳的分布特征及表层土壤有机碳的影响因素分析：以重庆市北碚区为例［J］. 中国岩溶, 2013, 32(3):292-298.
[3]	Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Olesen J E. Modelling soil organic carbon in Danish agricultural soils suggests low potential for future carbon sequestration［J］. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 145:83-89.
[4]	廖洪凯, 龙健, 李娟,等. 喀斯特地区不同植被下小生境土壤矿物组成及有机碳含量空间异质性初步研究［J］. 中国岩溶, 2010, 29(4):434-439.
[5]	Torn M S, Trumbore S E, Chadwick O A, et al. Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover［J］. Nature, 1997, 389(6647):170-173.
[6]	刘方, 王世杰, 刘秀明,等. 喀斯特石漠化区不同优势树种根际土壤有机碳及氮磷的变化［J］. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(1):59-65.
[7]	Su X L. Karst rocky desertification and ecology rehabilitation in Guizhou Province ［J］. Earth and Environment,2005,33(4):20-28.
[8]	Martin M P, Orton T G, Lacarce E, et al. Evaluation of modelling approaches for predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks at the national scale［J］. Geoderma, 2014, s 223-225(1):97-107.
[9]	Joslin J D, Wolfe M H, Hanson P J, et al. Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems［J］. New Phytologist, 2000, 147(1):117-129.
[10]	王延平,许坛,朱婉芮,等.杨树人工林细根数量和形态特征的季节动态及代际差异［J］. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2): 395-402.
[11]	许坛,王华田,朱婉芮,等.连作杨树细根根序形态及解剖结构［J］.林业科学, 2015，51(1): 119-126.
[12]	崔晓阳,宋金凤．凋落物源有机酸及其地下生态效应［Ｍ］．科学出版社，2008.
[13]	丁长欢,慈恩,邵景安,等.近30年黔西喀斯特区典型县域农田土壤有机碳动态研究：以贵州普定县为例［J］.中国岩溶,2015, 34(3):281-291.
[14]	王延平,许坛,朱婉芮, 等.杨树细根碳、氮含量的季节动态及代际差异［J］. 应用生态学报，2015, 26(11): 3268-3276.
[15]	Hendrick R L, Pregitzer K S. Applications of minirhizotrons to understand root function in forests and other natural ecosystems［J］. Plant and Soil, 1996, 185(2):293-304.
[16]	Pregitzer K S, Hendrick R L, Fogel R. The demography of fine roots in response to patches of water and nitrogen［J］. New Phytologist, 1993, 125(3):575-580.
[17]	Aerts R, Berendse F, Klerk N M, et al. Root production and root turnover in two dominant species of wet heathlands［J］. Oecologia, 1989, 81(3):374-378.
[18]	Mainiero R, Kazda M. Depthrelated fine root dynamics of Fagus sylvatica during exceptional drought［J］. Forest Ecology & Management, 2007, 237(1-3):135-142.
[19]	Jafari H J. Relationship between root biomass and soil organic carbon: case study of arid shrub lands of Semnan Province［J］. Desert, 2013,18:173-176.
[20]	王树凤,胡韵雪,孙海菁,等．盐胁迫对 2 种栎树苗期生长和根生长发育的影响［J］.生态学报, 2014, 34(4):1021-1029．
[21]	罗东辉,夏婧,袁婧薇,等.我国西南山地喀斯特植被的根系生物量初探［J］.植物生态学报,2010, 34 (5): 611-618.
[22]	姜慧敏,宝音陶格涛.黄花苜蓿根系生长特征研究［J］.中国草地学报,2014,36(1):53-57.
[23]	宋娅丽,韩海荣,康峰峰.山西太岳山不同林龄油松林生物量及碳储量研究［J］.水土保持研究，2016,23(1):29-33.
[24]	Wells C E, Eissenstat D M. Marked Differences in Survivorship among Apple Roots of Different Diameters［J］. Ecology, 2001, 82(3):882-892.
[25]	King J S, Albaugh T J, Allen H L, et al. Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine［J］. New Phytologist, 2002, 154(2):389-398.
[26]	Baddeley J A, Watson C A. Influences of root diameter, tree age, soil depth and season on fine root survivorship in Prunus avium［J］. Plant and Soil, 2005, 276(1):15-22.
[27]	Pregitzer K S, Kubiske M E, Yu C K, et al. Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species［J］. Oecologia, 1997, 111(3):302-308.
[28]	Pregitzer K S. Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth［J］. Tree Physiology, 1998, 18(10):665-670.
[29]	Gill R A, Jackson R B. Global Patterns of Root Turnover for Terrestrial Ecosystems［J］. New Phytologist, 2000, 147(1):13-31.
[30]	朱海燕. 重庆石灰岩地区石漠化过程中水分与氮素对土壤—构树系统氮、磷元素营养的影响［D］. 重庆：西南大学, 2007.
[31]	魏媛, 喻理飞. 不同岩性土壤对构树种子发芽及苗木生长的影响［J］. 林业实用技术, 2011(5):7-9.
[32]	Roy S, Singh J S. Seasonal and spatial dynamics of plantavailable N and P pools and Nmineralization in relation to fine roots in a dry tropical forest habitat.［J］. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1995, 27(1):33-40.
[33]	Nadelhoffer K J. The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine-root production in forest ecosystems［J］. New Phytologist, 2000, 147(1):131-139.
[34]	Vogt K A, Grier C C, Vogt D J. Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests［J］. Advances in Ecological Research,1986,15(15):303-317.
[35]	Burton A J, Pregitzer K S, Hendrick R L. Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests［J］. Oecologia, 2000, 125(3):389-399.
[36]	Yavitt J B, Wright S J. Drought and Irrigation Effects on Fine Root Dynamics in a Tropical Moist Forest, Panama［J］. Biotropica, 2002, 33(3):421-434.
[37]	Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J B, et al. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale［J］. Oecologia, 1996, 108(4):583-595.
[38]	Jackson R B, Schenk H J, Jobbágy E G, et al. Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models［J］. Ecological Applications, 2000, 10(2):470-483.
[39]	Lorenz K, Lal R. The Depth Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon in Relation to Land Use and Management and the Potential of Carbon Sequestration in Subsoil Horizons［J］. Advances in Agronomy, 2005, 88(5):35-66.