Synergetic evaluation of landscape conservation and development in karst gorge and cave scenic area, with a case in Jiuxiang gorge and cave scenic area, Yunnan Province, China
-
摘要: 建立自然保护、恢复与社会经济发展相协调的保护地评价指标体系,以达到评估景观保育情况,分析在社会经济发展中的作用,获取景观保育持续提升的方向和对策是本文目标。以云南九乡峡谷洞穴景区为例,设计了景区景观的自然性、功能性和属地性指数评价体系。九乡景区景观自然性指数为7.004,属次生景观类;景区功能性指数是7.58,属发展型景区;属地性指数6.8,属景区产业向服务社区与居民就业方向转型的过渡产业型景区。根据九乡景区景观格局和保护利用状态,提出四个景观保育区,分别是乡土植物廊道和文化景观保育区、峡谷河道景观保育区、峡谷洞穴景观与地表植被保育区、植被管护与石漠化治理区等。景观保育措施主要是自然保育与恢复,以实现管理景观自然化,同时发展景区社区主导的旅游服务业与开发民特产品,增强景观保护的社会经济基础。Abstract: The objective of the paper is to set up an evaluation index for coordinating natural conservation with socio-economic development through assessing landscape conservation and analyzing effect of landscape utilization on the social sustainable development for the improvement of landscape protection. With the case study area located in Jiuxiang gorge and cave scenic area of Yunnan Province, the assessing index system for the landscape naturality, functionality and locality was designed. Analytical results show that,(1) The naturality index of the Jiuxiang scenic area is 7.004 which falls in the index range of secondary landscapes; (2) Its functionality index is 7.58 representing a type of scenic landscape under development; (3) The locality index is 6.8 which indicates that the area is currently at a transformation stage with its industrial type shifting from scenic industry to services for local communities and local employment. According to the landscape patterns of the scenic area, four sub-areas for the landscape conservation were proposed in this study. They are respectively local plant corridor and cultural landscape conservation sub-area, gorge river landscape protection sub-area, gorge cave landscape protection and associated vegetation conservation sub-area, and sub-area of plant vegetation protection and rocky desertification control. It is suggested that the scenic area be preserved in a natural manner. Meanwhile, the local communities’ leading tourist service industry and local special products should be further developed for consolidating the socio-economic base of the communities and residents.
-
Key words:
- assessing index /
- landscape conservation /
- ecological restoration /
- karst /
- geopark park
-
[1] IUCN-UNEP-WWP. World Conservation Strategy:Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development[J].1980. [2] Willemen L, Verburg P H, Hein L, et al. Spatial characterization of landscape functions[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 88(1): 34-43. [3] Kienast F, Bolliger J, Potschin M, et al. Verburg P H,Heller I, Wascher D, Haines-Young R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe[J]. Environmental Management, 2009,44(6): 1099-1120. [4] Donald Harker,Gary Libby, Kay Harker,et al. Landscape Restoration Handbook(second edition)[M].LEWIS Publishers.2000,chapter 1. [5] Wang S J,Li Y B.Problems and Development Trends about Researches on Karst Rocky Desertif- ication[J].Advances in Earth Science,2007,22(6):573-581. [6] 李玉辉. 意大利东北部喀斯特环境变化过程的分析[J].生态学杂志 2003,22(1):79-83. [7] 李玉辉,冯正清,俞筱押,等.云南石林公园植被重大变化与意义[J].中国岩溶,2005,24(3):212-219. [8] Duan J, Li Y, Huang J. An assessment of conservation effects in Shilin Karst of South China Karst. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2013, 68(3): 821-832. [9] UNESCO.Guidelines and Criteria for National Geoparks seeking UNESCO's assistance to join the Global Geoparks Network (GGN)[Z\]. 2011. [10] PHILIP VAN BEYNEN,KAYA TOWNSEND. A Disturbance Index for Karst Environments[J]. Environmental Management,2005,36(1):101-116. [11] Leslie North,Kaya Townsend.Application of a Karst Disturbance Index in Hillsborough County, Florida[J]. Environ Manage ,2007,39:261-277. [12] World Heritage Center.Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention[Z\].WHC.15/018 July 2015. [13] LeGrand H. E. Hydrological and Ecological Problems of Karst Regions: Hydrological actions on limestone regions cause distinctive ecological problems[J]. Science, 1973, 179(4076):859-864. [14] IUCN WCPW. Guideline for karst and cave protection[Z\]. IUCN Publications,Cambridge. 1997. [15] Vakanjac V R, Stevanovi? Z, Stevanovi? A M, et al. An example of karst catchment delineation for prioritizing the protection of an intact natural area[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences December 2015,74(12):7643-7653. [16] 宋林华,杨京蓉,林钧枢,等.浙江瑶琳洞风化碳酸钙景观复生试验[J].地理研究,1999,12(2):297. [17] 王静,宋林华,向昌国,等.不同植被类型覆盖下土壤CO2浓度对洞穴景观的影响[J].地理研究,2004,23(1):71-77. [18] 王静,向昌国,宋林华. 旅游洞穴碳酸钙景观恢复的水文地球化学试验:以云南弥勒白龙洞为例[J].中山大学学报( 自然科学版) ,2004, 43(Suppl):208-211. [19] 李玉辉,杨艳华,张绍云. 云南九乡峡谷洞穴地质遗迹的初步研究[A]//全国洞穴学术会议论文选集2[C].北京:地质出版2014,278-288. [20] 王 静.旅游活动对溶洞碳酸钙沉积景观影响及保护性研究[J].资源科学,2006,28(5):140-144. [21] 朱文孝,李坡.旅游洞穴次生CaCO3沉积景观风化剥蚀、变色机理及其改善与保护[J].贵州科学,2002,18(1-2):134-138. [22] 王静,宋林华. 土一岩系统对洞穴景观风化的影响: 以云南弥勒白龙洞为例[J].资源科学,2005,27(3):161-166. [23] LI Bin , YUAN Daoxian , QIN Jiaming, et al. Oxygen and carbon isotopic characteristics of rainwater, drip water and Present speleothems in a cave in Guilin area, and their environmental meanings[J]. SCIENCE IN CHIN A (Series D), 2000, 43(3): 277-285. [24] 李红春,顾得隆,陈文寄,等. 分辨率洞穴石笋中稳定同位素应用:北京元大都建立后对森林资源的破坏[J]. 地质论评,1998,44(5):456-463. [25] F M R van Breukelen, H B Vonhof, J C Hellstrom, et al. Kroonossil dripwater in stalagmites reveals Holocene temperature and rainfall variation in Amazonia[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2008,275:54-60.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1768
- HTML浏览量: 326
- PDF下载量: 1028
- 被引次数: 0