粤北岩溶峰林植物钙吸收、转运、返还能力及适应性分析

魏兴琥; 雷 俐; 刘淑娟; 关共凑

doi:10.11932/karst20170311

粤北岩溶峰林植物钙吸收、转运、返还能力及适应性分析

doi: 10.11932/karst20170311

1.
佛山科学技术学院/广东省西江北江流域生态文明建设与可持续发展研究中心
2.
华南师范大学地理科学学院

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41571091)；中国科学院科技服务网络计划(STS计划)项目(KFJ-EW-STS-092)

计量
- 文章访问数: 1701
- HTML浏览量: 335
- PDF下载量: 971
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2017-06-25

Analysis on the absorbing, transfer, restoration and adaptation mechanism of calcium in different peak forest plants in northern Guangdong Province，China

1.
Foshan University, Research Center of Ecological Civilization Construction and Sustainable Development in the Xijiang and Beijiang River Basin
2.
School of Geography, South China Normal University

摘要

摘要: 选择粤北岩溶峰林30种典型植物种，系统测定了不同植物的根际土、根、茎干、叶片、枯落物全钙含量，采用吸收系数、转运率、返还率指标分析了不同植物对钙利用、储存及返还土壤的特征，并以各样本全钙含量为指标进行不同植物钙适应性的聚类分析，结果表明：（1）峰林植物对岩溶土壤富钙环境具有良好的适应性，其全钙含量与土壤根际全钙含量之间呈显著的正相关关系，但不同植物的钙吸收系数差异较大，攀援灌木的钙吸收系数分别是乔木、小灌木和草本植物的1.21倍、1.22倍和1.30倍；（2）不同生活型植物的叶片、茎干、根系全钙含量差异较大，各类灌木的叶片、茎干、根系全钙含量平均值分别是乔木全钙含量的1.08倍、1.07倍、1.17倍，是草本植物叶片和根系全钙含量的1.39倍、1.82倍，全钙含量总体上呈现：根系＞叶片＞茎干的趋势；（3）30种峰林植物的钙返还率在22.06%～103.84%之间，草本植物钙返还率最大，为67.18%，其次为乔木的58.72%，灌木最小，为55.90%，但3种生活型类型之间无显著性差异；(4)根据聚类分析结果可以将30种峰林植物对富钙环境的适应性分为富钙高吸收低返还型、少钙低吸收高返还型、多钙高吸收中返还型、多钙中吸收中返还型4种类型，30种植物中有26种属于多钙中吸收中返还型，这证明岩溶峰林植物对土壤富钙环境有良好适应性。
- 岩溶 /
- 植物 /
- 钙 /
- 粤北
Abstract: Thirty kinds of karst peak forest plants in the Shijiao village，Jiulong town，Yingde City， Guangdong Province（N24°08.113′,E112°51.855′, altitude, 121 m,height of hill 80 m）were selected as the object of quantitative analysis to reveal their adaptation to the karst soil environment rich in calcium. The measured variable included the total calcium content of rhizosphere soil, and root, stem, leaf and litter in different plants. The characteristics of utilization, store, and returning soil of calcium in different plants were analyzed based on the absorption coefficient, transfer rate, and return rates. In addition, adaptation mechanism for karst soil in different plants was classified based on the result of cluster analysis. The results show that,（1）The significant positive correlation between the total calcium content in plants and in rhizosphere soil shows the plants in karst peak forest have a good adaptation to karst soil. But the absorption coefficients have large differences among the different plants. The total calcium absorption coefficient of climbing plants is 1.21 times,1.22 times, and 1.30 times of trees, small shrubs and herbs, respectively. It means the climbing plants have a better adaptability to the karst environment.（2）There are large differences of total calcium in different living types of plants in the leaf, stem, and root, of which the average total calcium content are 1.08 times,1.07 times 1.17 times of trees, respectively, and 1.39 times and 1.82 times of herbs in leaf and root, respectively. The total calcium content has a tendency of root＞leaf＞stem.（3）The litter is the main way through which calcium in plants returns to the soil. The rates of 30 kinds of karst peak forest plants are between 22.06%-103.84%, among which herbs has the biggest rate, and tree has the second, and shrubs has the smallest, which are 67.18%,58.72%, 55.90%, respectively. (4)The results of cluster analysis based on the total calcium content of rhizosphere soil, root, stem, leaf, and litter show different adaptation ways of plants to karst soil, which are classified into four categories, abundant calcium-high absorption-low restoration, few calcium-low absorption-high restoration, more calcium-high absorption-medium restoration, and more calcium-medium absorption-medium restoration. There are 26 kinds of plants belong to the last one, implying that the most of plants in karst peak forests have a good adaptation to the karst high-calcium environment through continual absorption, steady accumulation and high-rate restoration.
- karst /
- plant /
- calcium /
- northern of Guangdong Province

HTML

参考文献(23)

[1]	曹建华,朱敏洁,黄芬,等.不同地质条件下植物叶片中钙形态对比研究：以贵州茂兰为例［J］.矿物岩石地球化学通报,2011,30（3）：251-260.
[2]	李小方.岩溶环境中土壤-植物系统钙元素形态分析及生态意义［D］.桂林：广西师范大学,2006.
[3]	王程媛,王世杰,容丽,等.茂兰喀斯特地区常见蕨类植物的钙含量特征及高钙适应方式分析［J］,植物生态学报,2011, 35 (10): 1061-1069.
[4]	谢丽萍,王世杰,肖德安.喀斯特小流域植被-土壤系统钙的协变关系研究［J］,地球与环境,2007,35（1）:26-32.
[5]	邓艳,蒋忠诚,覃星铭,等.岩溶生态系统中不同植被枯落物对土壤理化性质的影响及岩溶效应［J］.生态学报,2009,29（6）:3307-3314.
[6]	侯学煜.贵州省南部植物群落［J］.植物学报,1952,1(1):65-106.
[7]	屠玉麟.贵州喀斯特灌丛区系与生态特征分析［J］.贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995，13（3）：1-8.
[8]	周运超.贵州喀斯特植被主要营养元素含量分析［J］,贵州农学院学报,1997, 16(1): 11-16.
[9]	姬飞腾,李楠,邓馨.喀斯特地区植物钙含量特征与高钙适应方式分析［J］.植物生态学报,2009,33(5):926-935.
[10]	唐宇宏,潘鸿.贵州马岭河瀑布钙华藻类群落特征及生物岩溶作用［J］.中国岩溶,2013,32(3):280-286.
[11]	朱丹尼,邹胜章,周长松,等.岩溶区典型土壤对Cd2+的吸附特性［J］.中国岩溶,2015,34(4):402-409.
[12]	广东省科学院丘陵山区综合科学考察队.广东山区地貌［M］.广州：广东科技出版社，1991.
[13]	广东省科学院丘陵山区综合科学考察队.广东山区植被［M］.广州：广东科技出版社，1991.
[14]	宋永昌.植被生态学［M］.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001:234-237.
[15]	王明月,刘邵雄,熊志，等.石漠化地区豆科植物根瘤菌降解碳酸钙、镁能力研究［J］.生态环境学报,2014,23（10）:1581-1585.
[16]	周健民,沈仁芳.土壤学大辞典［M］.北京：科学出版社，2013.
[17]	周卫,林葆.苹果幼果组织钙运输途径与激素调控［J］.植物营养与肥料学报, 2000,6(2): 214-219.
[18]	井大炜,邢尚军,马丙尧,等.土壤与植物中钙营养研究进展［J］.生物灾害科学,2012,35(4): 447-451.
[19]	蒋廷惠, 占新华, 徐阳春, 等.钙对植物抗逆能力的影响及其生态学意义［J］.应用生态学报,2005,16(5)∶971-976.
[20]	印莉萍,黄勤妮,吴平.植物营养分子生物学及信号传导(第二版)［M］.北京:科学出版社,2006.
[21]	罗绪强,王程媛,杨鸿雁,等.喀斯特优势物种干旱和高钙适应性机制研究进展［J］.中国农学通报,2012,28（16）：1-5.
[22]	杨吉华,张永涛,李红云,等.不同林分枯落物的持水性能及对表层土壤理化性质的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2003,17(2):141-144.
[23]	陈灵芝,黄建辉,严昌荣.中国森林生态系统养分循环［M］.北京：气象出版社, 1997.