Spatiotemporal variations of soil physical characteristics in rocky desertification areas of Guizhou karst-cluster depression
-
摘要: 喀斯特峰丛洼地在全国8个石漠化治理区中面积（310万hm2）居第二位，贵州是全国石漠化最严重的地区。喀斯特生境的高度异质性、土被不连续性，导致土壤物理特性的差异，使持水保水能力有较大差异。为了弄清喀斯特峰丛地石漠化区土壤物理特征时空分异，利用环刀法对贵州喀斯特峰丛洼地石漠化实验区不同季节、不同地貌部位的土壤取样，用SPSS19.0数学统计方法对样品进行统计分析，结果表明：①土壤物理特征存在较大的时空分异，除了少部分为弱变异外，其它均表现为中等变异程度，这与生境类型复杂多样、生境高度异质性有关。②不同坡度土壤物理特征变化不显著，但土壤物理特征在不同地貌部位（上、中、下坡）随季节（春、夏、秋、冬）变化而变化。③不同植被类型下，除了非毛管孔隙度外，土壤自然含水量等物理特征变化极显著。以灌木林、人工林（经果林）分布区域土壤较为疏松、透气性好，而以针叶林或荒草地分布区，土壤粘重，透气性相对较差。Abstract: The karst peak cluster depression is ranked as the second place of eight rocky desertification control areas in our country, which is of 3.1 million hm2. Guizhou province is the region with most serious rocky desertification nationwide. In combination of field investigation with laboratory analysis and using SPSS19.0 statistics method, this work focused on the change of soil physical characteristics in different seasons and different landform parts of this region. The results show that，(1) There is big spatial and temporal differentiations. Besides a few loci with weak variation, others are characterized by medium degrees of variation related to complex and varied habitat types and heterogeneity of habitat height. (2) Soil physical characteristics do not change significantly with slopes, while showing prominent variations in different landforms (upper, middle and lower slopes) and different seasons (spring, summer, autumn, winter). (3) For different vegetation types, in addition to the non-capillary porosity, soil physical characteristics such as natural water content change significantly. In the areas with shrubbery and secondary woodland (economic fruit woods), the soil is relatively loose and the permeability is good, while in the coniferous forests or grassland areas, the soil is viscous and heavy, and the permeability is relatively poor.
-
[1] 李安定.喀斯特石漠化区植物群落结构配置评价及优化配置［D］.贵阳：贵州大学, 2010. [2] 朱丹尼,邹胜章,周长松,等.岩溶区典型土壤对Cd2+的吸附特性［J］. 中国岩溶,2015, 34(4):402-409. [3] 戴明宏,张军以,王腊春,等.西南岩溶小流域农业可持续发展优化模式研究［J］. 中国岩溶,2015,34(3):54-59. [4] 祁乐,高明,杨来淑,等.土地整理对岩溶区土壤微生物生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响：以重庆丰都县三坝乡为例［J］.中国岩溶,2015,34(1):86-94. [5] 丁长欢,慈恩,邵景安,等.近30年黔西喀斯特区典型县域农田土壤有机碳动态研究：以贵州普定县为例［J］.中国岩溶,2015,34(3):281-291. [6] 王小艳，冯跃华，李云,等.黔中喀斯特山区村域稻田土壤理化特性的空间变异特征及空间自相关性［J］.生态学报, 2015,35(9): 2926-2936. [7] 李安定,卢永飞,韦小丽, 等.花江喀斯特峡谷地区不同小生境土壤水分的动态研究［J］.中国岩溶,2008,27(1):56-62. [8] 朱生亮,张建利,吴克华,等.岩溶工程性缺水区农村饮用储存水净化方法［J］.长江科学院学报, 2013,30(11):20-23,27. [9] 车家骧,李安定,彭熙,等.欧李在贵州喀斯特石漠化区的引种观察［J］.贵州农业科学,2012,40(8):32-34. [10] 吴迪,龙秀琴,唐金刚,等.干旱胁迫对3种藤本植物抗旱生理特性的影响［J］.贵州农业科学,2013,41(6):69-71. [11] 杨奇勇,蒋忠诚,袁道先,等.广西典型岩溶区土壤水分含量空间自相关分析［J］.中国岩溶,2015,34(3):60-65. [12] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析［M］.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978:62-136,466,511. [13] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,1999:229-291. [14] 刘淑娟,张伟,王克林,等. 桂西北喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤物理性质的时空分异及成因［J］.应用生态学报,2010,21(9):2249-2256. [15] 高雪松,邓良基,张世熔.不同利用方式与坡位土壤物理性质及养分特征分析［J］. 水土保持学报,2005,19(2):53-60,79. [16] 刘玉,李林立,赵柯,等.岩溶山地石漠化地区不同土地利用方式下的土壤物理性状分析［J］.水土保持学报,2004,18(5):142-145. [17] 刘攀峰.退化喀斯特森林恢复过程中优势植物种群格局与生境异质性研究［D］.贵阳：贵州大学, 2009. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1673
- HTML浏览量: 307
- PDF下载量: 1032
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
