酸雨溶蚀碳酸盐岩的源汇效应分析——以广西典型岩溶区为例

孙平安; 李秀存; 于 奭; 原雅琼; 何师意; 王艳雪

doi:10.11932/karst20170113

酸雨溶蚀碳酸盐岩的源汇效应分析——以广西典型岩溶区为例

doi: 10.11932/karst20170113

1.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/国土资源部、广西岩溶动力学重点实验室
2.
广西壮族自治区气象局
3.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所/国土资源部、广西岩溶动力学重点实验室/西南大学地理科学学院

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41402238, 41402324）；地质调查项目（12120113005100）

计量
- 文章访问数: 2277
- HTML浏览量: 359
- PDF下载量: 980
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2017-02-25

Study on source-sink effect in the process of carbonate rock dissolved by acid rain：An example of typical karst regions in Guangxi

1.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MLR&GZAR
2.
Meteorological Service of Guangxi
3.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MLR&GZAR/School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University

摘要

摘要: 选取广西的桂林、柳州、河池、百色、玉林、南宁、钦州7个酸雨监测点进行了为期一年（2014年5月至2015年5月）的监测，结合各站点溶蚀试片和降雨降雨量、降雨时间、pH值和电导率等，分析了试片溶蚀量的主要影响因素及酸雨的源汇效应。结果表明，试片溶蚀量与累计降雨时间，即溶蚀作用发生的时间关系密切。单场酸雨对碳酸盐岩的溶蚀过程可分为两个阶段，即：前期强酸溶蚀碳酸盐岩，释放CO2，为碳源；后期碳酸溶蚀碳酸盐岩，吸收大气CO2，为碳汇。而就整年而言，碳汇过程占绝对优势，酸雨减汇量仅占总溶蚀量的0.27%～3.52%，平均为1.96%，但酸雨减汇比例随酸雨pH值的降低而呈指数增加。酸雨对岩溶碳汇有着显著影响，在岩溶碳汇的研究中不应忽视。
- 酸雨 /
- 岩溶作用 /
- 源汇效应 /
- 广西
Abstract: It is well acknowledged that the reaction between strong acids and carbonate rocks can release CO2, and then reduce the karst carbon sink. Acid rain is one of the sources of these strong acids. Carbonate rocks are widely distributed in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Meanwhile, acid rain pollution is also common there, so that the reaction between acid rain and carbonate rocks is pervasive in this area. Seven acid rain monitoring sites in Guilin, Liuzhou, Hechi, Baise, Yulin, Nanning and Qinzhou represent the whole situation of Guangxi, where temperature, rainfall, and the degree of acid rain were studied in this work. The method of the carbonate-rock-tablet test is used to assess the intensity of the karst process at all sites. Precipitation parameters at these sites are collected at the same time.Based on the dissolution quantity of test blocks and precipitation parameters such as rainfall, rainfall duration, pH value and conductivity in a whole year(2014.5-2015.5), the factors of carbonate dissolution and source-sink effect of acid rain were analyzed. The results show that the dissolution quantity of test blocks is in accordance with the accumulative rainfall time which represents the dissolution time duration of rainfall to the test blocks. For a single acid rain, dissolution of the carbonate rock can be divided into two stages，(1) dissolution by strong acid with CO2 releasing； (2) dissolution by carbonic acid due to CO2 absorbing. The reaction between carbonate rocks and strong acid which is related to acid rain is a fast reaction. The result shows that the dissolution quantity of test blocks dissolved by strong acid is quite low, that is also the reason for the low correlation between dissolution quantity and the degree of acid rain such as pH and the rate of acid rain. Calculation results show that carbonate rocks dissolved by carbonic acid is the main process at all the sites. About 0.27% to 3.52% with the average of 1.96% of dissolution quantity should be deducted because of the acid rain in a whole year. It is lower than 10% to 30% which is calculated by river water chemistry. This is because of additional sources of the acid, such as weathering of sulfide deposits, and agricultural and industrial activities. The proportion carbonate rock dissolution is small in the study area, but it will increase exponentially while the pH value decreases as shown in computational formula. Therefore, the acid rain has a significant effect on karst carbon sink, which cannot be ignored.
- acid rain /
- karst processes /
- source-sink effect /
- Guangxi

HTML

参考文献(28)

[1]	WMO. Greenhouse gas bulletin: the state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere using global observations up to December 2004 ［M］. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization, 2006.
[2]	IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ［M］. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
[3]	IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ［M］. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014.
[4]	蒲俊兵, 蒋忠诚, 袁道先, 等. 岩石风化碳汇研究进展: 基于 IPCC第五次气候变化评估报告的分析［J］. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(10): 1081-1090.
[5]	袁道先.碳循环与全球岩溶［J］.第四纪研究,1993, 1(1):1-6.
[6]	刘再华. 碳酸盐岩岩溶作用对大气CO2沉降的贡献［J］. 中国岩溶, 2000,19(4):293-300.
[7]	何师意, 康志强, 李清艳, 等. 高分辨率实时监测技术在岩溶碳汇估算中的应用：以板寨地下河监测站为例［J］. 气候变化研究进展, 2011, 7(3): 157-161.
[8]	Yuan D X, Zhang C. Karst processes and the carbon cycle: Final report of IGCP379 ［M］. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2002.
[9]	Liu Z H, Dreybrodt W, Wang H J. A possible important CO2 sink by the global water cycle ［J］. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008, 53(3): 402-407.
[10]	蒋忠诚, 覃小群, 曹建华, 等. 中国岩溶作用产生的大气CO2碳汇的分区计算［J］. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(4): 363-367.
[11]	Gaillardet J, Millot R, Dupré B. Chemical denudation rates of the western Canadian orogenic belt: the Stikine terrane ［J］. Chemical Geology, 2003, 201(3-4): 257-279.
[12]	韩贵琳, 刘丛强. 贵州喀斯特地区河流的研究:碳酸盐岩溶解控制的水文地球化学特征［J］. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4): 394-406.
[13]	Li S L, Calmel, Han G L, et al. Sulfuric acid as an agent of carbonate weathering constrained by δ13CDIC:Examples from Southwest China ［J］. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008, 270(3): 189-199.
[14]	刘丛强, 蒋颖魁, 陶发祥, 等. 西南喀斯特流域碳酸盐岩的硫酸侵蚀与碳循环［J］. 地球化学, 2008, 37(4): 404-414.
[15]	于奭,孙平安,杜文越,等.人类活动影响下水化学特征的影响：以西江中上游流域为例［J］.环境科学,2015,36(1):72-79.
[16]	陈锐章.我国及广西的酸雨［J］.广西科学院学报,1987,3(2):1-7.
[17]	程爱珍, 韦华红. 广西酸雨时空分布和季节性变化特征分析［J］. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(9): 4683-4685.
[18]	梁宏温, 温远光, 何斌, 等. 柳州市中心酸雨化学特征与成因分析［J］. 广西农业生物科学, 2002, 21(4): 261-265.
[19]	张红波, 于奭, 何师意, 等. 桂林岩溶区大气降水的化学特征分析［J］. 中国岩溶, 2012, 31(3): 289-295.
[20]	覃小群, 蒋忠诚, 张连凯, 等. 珠江流域碳酸盐岩与硅酸盐岩风化对大气CO2汇的效应［J］. 地质通报, 2015, 34(9): 1749-1757.
[21]	于奭, 严毅萍, 张春来, 等. 酸雨对碳酸盐岩溶蚀速率影响的试验研究［J］. 桂林理工大学学报, 2011, 31(4): 539-544.
[22]	李春龙, 赵家梅, 龙偲, 等. 模拟酸雨条件下石灰土―碳酸盐岩体系的碳汇效应［J］. 中国岩溶, 2014, 33(1): 51-56.
[23]	于奭, 何师意, 杨慧, 等. 酸雨对广西典型碳酸盐岩地区碳源效应研究［J］.地球与环境, 2012, 40(1): 44-49.
[24]	原雅琼, 何师意, 于奭, 等. 柳江流域柳州断面水化学特征及无机碳汇通量分析［J］. 环境科学, 2015, 36(7): 2437-2445.
[25]	孙平安, 于奭, 莫付珍, 等. 不同地质背景下河流水化学特征及影响因素研究：以广西大溶江、灵渠流域为例［J］. 环境科学, 2016, 37(1): 123-131.
[26]	蒲俊兵, 袁道先, 扈志勇, 等. 高分辨率监测岩溶地下水NO3-的动态变化及对外界环境的响应［J］. 环境科学, 2011, 32(3): 680-686.
[27]	黄芬, 肖琼, 尹伟璐, 等. 岩溶系统中土壤氮肥施用对岩溶碳汇的影响［J］. 中国岩溶, 2014, 33(4): 405-411.
[28]	曾思博, 蒋勇军. 土地利用对岩溶作用碳汇的影响研究综述［J］. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(2): 153-163.