TDR测定喀斯特地区石灰土含水量的标定研究

杨 静; 陈洪松; 王 升; 王 发; 傅 伟

doi:10.11932/karst20170109

TDR测定喀斯特地区石灰土含水量的标定研究

doi: 10.11932/karst20170109

杨静¹,
陈洪松²,
王升¹,
王发¹,
傅伟²

1.
中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所/亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室/中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站/中国科学院大学
2.
中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所/亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室/中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目“西南岩溶山区坡地水文过程及其影响机制”（51379205）；国家自然科学基金项目“西南喀斯特地区坡面壤中流过程及其驱动机制”（41301300）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1738
- HTML浏览量: 346
- PDF下载量: 1204
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2017-02-25

Calibration of soil water content of calcareous soil using Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) method in karst regions

1.
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences/University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2.
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences

摘要

摘要: 土壤含水量是气候、水文、土壤侵蚀等研究中的一个重要参数。TDR法因具有方便、快速、精确且不扰动土壤等优点而得到广泛应用，但因受土壤质地、容重、温度等物理因素的影响而必须对其进行标定。本研究采用室内标定(壤土)和田间标定(粗、中、细质土以及三者的组合)相结合的方式，对用TDR法测定的喀斯特地区不同质地石灰土含水量进行了标定。结果表明：（1)TDR法测定的土壤含水量比烘干法测定值要小，两者最大绝对偏差在室内标定条件下为10.6%，田间标定为12.2%；相应的相对偏差最高分别可达60.3%和32.8%。因此，必须在使用前对TDR进行标定。（2)标定后TDR法测定的土壤含水量精度明显提高，平均绝对偏差低至1.4%~3.1%；室内标定曲线精度略低于田间标定曲线。（3)不同质地组合的TDR法土壤含水量标定曲线的标定精度较高(平均绝对偏差为1.5% ~ 2.6%)，可用于不同质地土壤含水量标定。本研究结果可用于修订校正研究区及类似区域TDR法测定土壤含水量的结果。
- 土壤含水量 /
- TDR /
- 喀斯特 /
- 石灰土
Abstract: Soil water content is an important parameter in studying climate, hydrology and soil erosion. Among many soil moisture measurement methods, Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) technology has been widely used because of its unique advantages. For example, it is convenient, fast, accurate, and does not need to disturb the soil. Under low accuracy requirement, this method is not affected by soil physical factors, such as soil texture, bulk density and temperature. However, these soil physical factors affect the measured results under high requirement. Thus, calibration of TDR measurement is necessary. In this study, the soil water content of calcareous soil with different textures was measured by TDR in karst regions, combining laboratory and field calibrations. In laboratory, we used loam soil as the calibration medium. Soil pillars with volumetric water content from 6.3% (water content of air dried soil) to 60% with a gradient of 5%. Oven dry and TDR methods were used to measure the soil water content under each gradient. In the field, three types of soil, coarse-, medium- and fine-grained soils, were calibrated accordingly. Five calibration curves, including one obtained from laboratory, three from different types of soil and one from combination of the three types of soil in field calibration, were established. The accuracies of different calibration curves were evaluated by a model of effective coefficients. The results show that, (1) Soil water content measured with TDR is smaller than that measured with the oven dry method. The largest absolute errors between soil water content measured by the two methods are 10.6% in laboratory calibration and 12.2% in field calibration, respectively. The corresponding relative errors are 60.3% and 32.8%, respectively. Therefore, calibration is necessary before using TDR for soil water content measurement in the study area. (2) After calibration, the accuracy of TDR measurement is obviously improved with mean absolute errors reduced to 1.4%-3.1%. The accuracy of calibration curve obtained in laboratory is a little lower than that in the field. (3) The calibration curve obtained from the calibration of combination of different types of soil shows a high accuracy with mean absolute errors of 1.5% to 2.6%, which could be used to calibrate the TDR measurement of different types of soil. In sum, the most suitable calibration curve for the soil water content measured with TDR in the study area is that obtained from the calibration of the combination of three types of soil. The results in this study could be employed to calibrate the TDR measurement in other similar areas.
- soil water content /
- TDR /
- karst /
- calcareous soil

HTML

参考文献(16)

[1]	雷志栋,胡和平,杨诗秀.土壤水研究进展与评述［J］.水科学进展,1999,10(3):311-318.
[2]	张学礼,胡振琪,初士立.土壤含水量测定方法研究进展［J］. 土壤通报,2005,36(1): 118-123.
[3]	尹志芳,刘恩民,陈炳新,等.时域反射仪与中子仪测定土壤含水量标定试验研究［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(6):161-165.
[4]	李道西,彭世彰,丁加丽,等. TDR在测量农田土壤水分中的室内标定［J］. 干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(1):249-252.
[5]	杨鹏举,伍靖伟,黄介生.时域反射仪测定高含盐土壤盐分研究［J］.灌溉排水学报,2012,31(6):71-74.
[6]	刘亮,路炳军,符素华,等.东北黑土区TDR测定农田土壤含水量的室内标定［J］. 中国水土保持科学,2013,11(6):15-22.
[7]	康洁,张维江,李娟. TRIME-T3管式TDR土壤水分测定系统在宁夏泾源地区的标定研究［J］.宁夏工程技术,2015,14(2): 146-148.
[8]	吴华山,陈明,杭天文,等. 扬州地区TDR法田间测定不同土壤含水量的标定［J］. 灌溉排水学报,2009,28(4):104-107.
[9]	Stangl R, Buchan G D, Loiskandl W．Field use and calibration of a TDR-based probe for monitoring water content in a high-clay landslide soil in Austria ［J］. Geoderma, 2009, 150(1): 23-31.
[10]	Topp G C, Davis J L, Annan A P. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines ［J］. Water Resources Research, 1980, 16(3): 574-582.
[11]	Gong Yuanshi, Cao Qiaohong, Sun Zongjia. The effects of soil bulk density, clay content and temperature on soil water measurement using time domain reflectometry ［J］. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(18): 3601-3614.
[12]	苏都,红梅,陈有君,等. TDR测定淡栗钙土水分的标定［J］. 内蒙古农业大学学报,2012,33(1): 88-92.
[13]	陈洪松,王克林. 西南喀斯特山区土壤水分研究［J］. 农业现代化研究,2008,29(6):734-738.
[14]	张志才,陈喜,石朋,等. 岩石对喀斯特峰丛山体土壤水分布特征的影响［J］. 水土保持通报,2008,28(6):41-44.
[15]	张川,张伟,陈洪松,等. 喀斯特典型坡地旱季表层土壤水分时空变异性［J］. 生态学报,2015,35(19):6326-6334.
[16]	Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I -a discussion of principles ［J］. Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10(3): 282-290.