基于模糊综合评价法的小流域喀斯特石漠化治理综合效益评价——以贵州省普定县陈家寨小流域为例

杜雪莲; 王世杰; 熊强辉; 彭 韬; 程安云; 张 林; 蔡先立

doi:10.11932/karst20160515

基于模糊综合评价法的小流域喀斯特石漠化治理综合效益评价——以贵州省普定县陈家寨小流域为例

doi: 10.11932/karst20160515

1.
贵州财经大学经济学院；中国科学院普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站
2.
中国科学院普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站；中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室
3.
贵州财经大学经济学院

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0502300）；国家自然科学基金项目（41203063）；中国科学院战略性先导科技专项重大课题（XDA05070400）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1419
- HTML浏览量: 370
- PDF下载量: 642
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2016-10-25

Evaluation on effect of small catchment comprehensive control in karst rocky desertification areas based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method: A case study of the Chenjiazhai catchment in Puding county, Guizhou Province

1.
School of Economic, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics；Puding Karst Ecosystem Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2.
Puding Karst Ecosystem Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences；State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3.
School of Economic, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics

摘要

摘要: 通过建立石漠化综合治理效益的评价指标体系，采集研究区治理前后环境、经济、社会等各项指标数据，运用模糊综合评价法对贵州省普定县陈家寨小流域综合治理效益进行了评价。研究结果表明：经过综合治理，研究区社会、经济得到了发展，生态环境明显改善。由于在洼地沟谷地带发展高效山地农业，种植辣椒、秋葵、何首乌、半夏、丹参等经济作物，人均收入和劳动生产率大幅提升，资金产投比和土地生产率提升明显，农产品商品率有所增加。通过对研究区山地坡面开展林分改造，林草覆盖率有所提高，土壤侵蚀模数和石漠化面积比例减少，贫困发生率、农村恩格尔系数和文盲率有所下降。研究区综合治理之后，经济效益评价等级由“差”变成了“中”，生态效益由“差”变成了“良”，社会效益仍然处于“差”，综合效益评价由“差”到“中”，其中经济效益增幅最大，这主要得益于小流域内利用道路积蓄雨水、修建集水池等抗旱设施，有效地解决了研究区的灌溉问题。
- 石漠化 /
- 综合治理 /
- 模糊综合评价 /
- 陈家寨小流域
Abstract: The Chenjiazhai catchment is located on the right bank of the Sancha river, the upper reaches of Wujiang river, northeast of Puding county, Anshun City, Guizhou Province, about 8.5 km to Puding county. Its highest elevation is 1,485 m， and the area is characterised by typical peak-cluster depression landforms in the karst plateau of central Guizhou Province. Based on the Puding karst ecosystem observation and research station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the slope water system facilities including road surface water collection, ditch diversion and water storage pool, which rely on the water conservancy technology and networked micro-irrigation technology, were constructed in the Chenjiazhai catchment. In order to improve the reliability and scientificity of comprehensive control measures, and to provide scientific basis for the government to make macro policy decision for the karst rocky desertification control, the effect of comprehensive control in the Chenjiazhai catchment was evaluated by establishing an index system and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The data of environmental, economic and social indicators before and after the comprehensive control show that the social economy has been developed and the ecological environment improved obviously after comprehensive management in the study area. Due to the development of high-efficiency mountainous agriculture by planting Capsicum annuum, Abelmoschus esculentus L.Moench, Fallopia multiflora (Thunb.) Harald, Pinellia temata (Thunb.) Breit.and Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. in valleys, the per capita income, labor productivity, capital investment ratio and land productivity have been enhanced greatly. The commodity ratio of agricultural products and the coverage of forest and grass increased, with the soil erosion modulus and rocky desertification area decreased through the forest transformation on slopes. Poverty incidence, rural Engel coefficient and illiteracy ratio declined. According to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, after the comprehensive control, the economic benefit level turned from "poor" to "medium", ecological benefit level turned from "poor" to "good", social benefit level remains "poor", and the comprehensive evaluation level turned from "poor" to "medium", which suggests that the comprehensive control of the karst rocky desertification in Chenjiazhai catchment has been to a certain extent successful. The economic benefit increased at the highest rate, which was benefited from the drought-resisting facilities as the use of road surface water and ponding water for irrigation purpose in the study area. The high-efficient usage of water resources and flood storage technology in the study area have played a model role in drought resistance and mountain efficient agriculture development in karst areas. 
- karst rocky desertification /
- comprehensive control /
- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation /
- Chenjiazhai catchment

HTML

参考文献(21)

[1]	王世杰．喀斯特石漠化:中国西南最严重的生态地质环境问题［J］．矿物岩石地球化学通报，2003，22(2)：120-126．
[2]	王世杰．喀斯特石漠化概念演绎及科学内涵的探讨［J］．中国岩溶,2002,21(2)：101-104．
[3]	苏维词，周济祚．贵州喀斯特山地的“石漠化”及防治对策［J］．长江流域资源与环境，1995，4(2)：177-182．
[4]	蔡运龙．中国西南岩溶石山贫困地区的生态重建［J］．地球科学进展，1996，11(3)：602-606．
[5]	张军以，戴明宏，王腊春，等．生态功能优先背景下的西南岩溶区石漠化治理问题［J］．中国岩溶，2014，33(4)：464-472．
[6]	蒋忠诚，李先琨，覃小群，等．论岩溶峰丛洼地石漠化的综合治理技术：以广西平果果化示范区为例［J］．中国岩溶，2008，27(1)：50-55．
[7]	胡宝清，陈振宇，饶映雪．西南喀斯特地区农村特色生态经济模式探讨：以广西都安瑶族自治县为例［J］．山地学报，2008，26(6)： 684-691．
[8]	熊康宁，黎平，周忠发，等．喀斯特石漠化的遥感：GIS 典型研究［M］．北京：地质出版社，2002．
[9]	李先琨，吕仕洪，蒋忠诚，等．喀斯特峰丛区复合农林系统优化与植被恢复试验［J］．自然资源学报，2005，20（1）：92-98．
[10]	戴明宏，张军以，王腊春，等．西南岩溶小流域农业可持续发展优化模式研究［J］．中国岩溶，2015，34(3)：254-259．
[11]	白晓永，熊康宁，杨龙，等．喀斯特石漠化山区的水土流失及防治模式：以贵州省镇宁县为例［J］．贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,23(4)：34-38．
[12]	罗林，王兴明，孟天友，等．喀斯特山区梯田与小型水工程集成配套的优化模式研究［J］．中国水土保持，2009，(3)：41-44．
[13]	曾馥平，王克林．桂西北喀斯特地区6种退耕还林(草)模式的效应［J］．农业生态环境，2005，21(2)：18-22．
[14]	张喜，崔迎春．喀斯特山地退耕还林工程生态分区与适生模式筛选［J］．贵州林业科技，2005，33(2)：46-52．
[15]	张凤太，苏维词．重庆三峡库区岩溶山区乡村生态农业发展模式与对策［J］．农业现代化研究，2007，28(2)：214-217．
[16]	王克林，李文祥，李作威，等．提高异地扶贫开发科技含量促进环境移民区域可持续发展:桂西北喀斯特地区异地扶贫开发与可持续发展研究［J］．农业现代化研究，1998，19(6)：337-341．
[17]	左兴俊，左太安，徐树建．贵州省典型喀斯特石漠化治理模式效益评价研究［J］. 安徽农业科学，2010，38(28)：15792-15795．
[18]	杨洁．喀斯特生态环境治理综合效益评价研究［D］．贵州师范大学，2006．
[19]	王德炉，喻理飞，熊康宁．喀斯特石漠化综合治理效果的初步评价：以花江为例［J］．山地农业生物学，2005，24(3)：233-238．
[20]	苏维词，杨华．典型喀斯特峡谷石漠化地区生态农业模式探析［J］．中国生态农业学报，2005，13(4)：217-220．
[21]	彭韬，杨涛，王世杰，等．喀斯特坡地土壤流失监测结果简报［J］．地球与环境，2009，37(2)：126-130．