Microclimate effects of different land use types in demonstration areas for combating karst rocky desertification
-
摘要: 研究小气候变化对植被恢复的响应机制可为喀斯特地区石漠化综合防治提供理论依据。文章选取喀斯特高原山地和高原峡谷石漠化综合防治示范区4种土地利用类型为研究对象，通过常规的小气候监测方法，在雨季前(4月)、雨季(8月)、雨季后(12月)对4种土地利用类型的大气温度、光照强度、相对湿度、土壤温度日变化进行监测和对比分析。结果表明：（1）4种土地利用方式中，大气温度、光照强度和土壤温度均表现为石漠化裸地>农耕地>灌木林>林地，而相对湿度的变化规律则反之：林地>灌木林>农耕地>石漠化裸地，说明林地的小气候调节作用最优，而石漠化裸地最差，与其石漠化治理和植被恢复效果相对应；（2）高原峡谷的大气温度、光照强度和相对湿度在不同的季节和不同土地利用方式下都显著高于高原山地，不同土层的土壤温度是高原山地显著低于高原峡谷；（3）各土地利用方式的小气候季节差异明显，大气温度、土壤温度均为：雨季(8月)>雨季前(4月)>雨季后(12月)，而光照强度、相对湿度为：雨季(8月)>雨季后(12月)>雨季前（4月)，8月各小气候指标值最高，且不同土地利用方式和治理区间的差异亦最大，因此，选取8月进行小气候监测以比较各土地利用方式和治理区之间的差异要优于其他两个月份。Abstract: Different land use types on two typical geomorphological units of karst, plateau mountain and plateau valley, were studied, which can help to reveal the relationship between vegetation restoration and microclimate change by different land use types, and to provide the theoretical basis for in tegrated control of rocky desertification in karst region. Data were collected by regular microclimate monitoring. Daily variation of atmospheric temperature, light intensity, relative humidity and soil temperature on four land use types were analyzed before the rainy season (April), during the rainy season (August) and after the rainy season (December) in the two study areas. The results showed that,（1）Among the four land use types, atmospheric temperature, light intensity and soil temperature were in the order of rocky desertification bare land > farmland > shrubbery > forest land, while the relative humidity was on the contrary,i.e. forest land > shrubbery > farmland > rocky desertification bare land. This indicated that the forest land performs the best in microclimate regulation, and the rocky desertification bare land performs the worst, which corresponds to the rocky desertification control and vegetation restoration. （2）In the plateau mountain, atmospheric temperature, light intensity and relative humidity were significantly higher than the plateau valley in all seasons and land use types, while soil temperature of different soil layers in the plateau mountain was significantly lower than the plateau valley.（3）Seasonal differences on microclimate of different land use types was clear. Atmospheric temperature and soil temperature were in the order of rainy season (August) > before the rainy season (April) > after the rainy season (December), while the light intensity and relative humidity were in the order of the rainy season (August) > after the rainy season (December) > before the rainy season (April). Each index of microclimate reached to the highest value in August. The discrepancy of these values among the different land use types and different control areas was also the most significant in August. Therefore, microclimate monitoring in August to compare the difference among the different land use types and different control areas is more effective than the other two months,i.e. April and December.
-
Key words:
- karst /
- atmospheric temperature /
- light intensity /
- relative humidity /
- soil temperature
-
[1] 张璐,林伟强.森林小气候观测研究概述［J］.广东林业科技,2002,18(4):52-56. [2] 熊康宁,陈永毕,陈起伟.点石成金：贵州石漠化防治技术与模式［M］.贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2011:2-7. [3] 李阳兵,王世杰,容丽.西南岩溶山地石漠化及生态恢复研究展望［J］.生态学杂志,2004,23(6):84-88. [4] 李阳兵,王世杰,容丽.不同石漠化程度岩溶峰丛洼地系统景观格局的比较［J］.地理研究,2005,24(3):371-378. [5] 李阳兵,邵景安,王世杰,等.岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究［J］.地理科学进展,2006,25(5):1-9. [6] 熊康宁,陈起伟.基于生态综合治理的石漠化演变规律与趋势讨论［J］.中国岩溶,2010,29(3):267-273. [7] 欧阳旭,李跃林,张倩媚.鼎湖山针阔叶混交林小气候调节效应［J］.生态学杂志,2014,33(3):575-582. [8] Zhang J T, Ru W M, Li B. Relationships between vegetation and climate on the Loess Plateau in China［J］. Folia Geobotanica,2006,41(2):151-163. [9] Norris C, Hobson P, Ibisch P L. Microclimate and vegetation function as indicators of forest thermodynamic efficiency［J］. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49(3):562-570. [10] Martin D, Jordan B. Secondary edge effects in regenerating forest landscapes: vegetation and microclimate patterns and their implications for management and conservation［J］. New Forests,2014,45(5):733-744. [11] Baker T P, Jordan G J, Steel E A, et al. Microclimate through space and time: Microclimatic variation at the edge of regeneration forests over daily, yearly and decadal time scales［J］. Forest Ecology & Management, 2014, 334:174-184. [12] Vanwalleghem T, Meentemeyer R K. Predicting Forest Microclimate in Heterogeneous Landscapes［J］. Ecosystems,2009,12(7):1158-1172. [13] Ewers R M, Banksleite C. Fragmentation impairs the microclimate buffering effect of tropical forests.［J］. Plos One, 2013, 8(3):4052-4060. [14] Otterman J, Brakke T W, Susskind J. A model for inferring canopy and underlying soil temperatures from multi-directional measurements［J］. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1992, 61(1-2):81-97. [15] Paul K I, Polglase P J, Smethurst P J, et al. Soil temperature under forests: a simple model for predicting soil temperature under a range of forest types［J］. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 2004,121(3-4):167-182. [16] 张邦琨,张萍,赵云龙.喀斯特地貌不同演替阶段植被小气候特征研究［J］.贵州气象,2000,24(3):17-21. [17] 龙翠玲,穆彪,李援越,等.喀斯特不同演替阶段群落的太阳辐射能特征［J］.贵州气象,1998,22(5):22-25. [18] 李援越,穆彪,祝小科,等.喀斯特森林不同演替阶段群落的小气候特征［J］.山地农业生物学报,1998,17(6): 364-367. [19] 卢永飞,喻理飞,勾伟.喀斯特高原峡谷区不同植被恢复阶段小气候变化特征［J］.林业实用技术,2014(7): 14-17. [20] 张邦琨,韦小丽,曾信波.喀斯特森林不同小生境的小气候特征［J］.贵州农学院学报,1996,15(1):7-10. [21] 李安定,贾申,喻理飞.贵州花江喀斯特峡谷区不同小生境的小气候环境［J］.浙江林学院学报,2010,27(3):374-378. [22] 俞国松,王世杰,容丽.茂兰喀斯特森林演替阶段不同小生境的小气候特征［J］.地球与环境,2011,39(4):469-477. [23] 熊华,于飞.喀斯特中度石漠化地区不同小生境小气候变化特征［J］.贵州农业科学,2013,41(8):103-105. [24] 崔高仰,熊康宁.喀斯特地区不同程度石漠化综合治理的小气候效应［J］.广东农业科学,2015(1):143-149. [25] 吴克华,熊康宁,李坡,等.不同等级石漠化综合治理的小气候效应：以贵州省花江峡谷为例［J］.地球与环境,2009,37(4):411-418. [26] 容丽,王世杰,杜雪莲.喀斯特低热河谷石漠化区环境梯度的小气候效应:以贵州花江峡谷区小流域为例［J］.生态学杂志,2006,25(9):1038-1043. [27] 李生,任华东,姚小华,等.土地利用方式对喀斯特地区环境小气候日动态的影响［J］.应用生态学报,2009,20(2):387-395. [28] 王平平.黄土高原几种典型退耕模式小气候效应研究［D］.西安:西北农林科技大学,2010. [29] 刘云.贵州典型小流域石漠化综合治理生态效益研究［D］.贵阳:贵州师范大学,2009. [30] 刘永金,谭绍满.两种湿地松群落的小气候特点及其与林分结构的关系［J］.生态学杂志,1991,10(3):5-9. [31] 高贵龙,邓自民,熊康宁,等.喀斯特的呼唤与希望：贵州喀斯特生态环境建设与可持续发展［M］.贵阳：贵州科技出版社,2003. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1331
- HTML浏览量: 347
- PDF下载量: 589
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
