Analysis on characteristics of karst water gushing under tunnel spatial distribution in ejective fold structure area of southeast Sichuan
-
摘要: 隔挡式构造区隧道工程涌水特征研究多局限于某个具体隧道工程及对应的特定岩溶水系统，缺乏关于隧道空间展布影响下涌突水问题的系统研究。文章提出以隧道穿越区岩溶发育及岩溶水水平与垂直分带差异作为隧道空间布置类型划分的主要标准，将隧道空间展布区的岩溶水文地质特征分为七类，对不同类型中岩溶含水介质空间结构特征、岩溶发育差异以及岩溶水在此区域流动的特点进行分析，并对八种类型的隧道涌突水的特征进行比较。据此，结合研究区拟建渝万客专铜锣山隧道和明月山隧道案例，分析此两隧道展布区域的岩溶水文地质特征，分别属于补给-垂直入渗型类型及补给径流-水平径流型类型。进一步对此两隧道可能遭遇的岩溶涌突水进行定性评价和涌水量计算，认为铜锣山隧道主要出现雨季涌水现象，水量大小受降雨强度控制，而明月山隧道涌水量较大。Abstract: Currently the study of tunnel water bursting in ejective fold structure area is confined to a specific tunnel engineering and corresponding karst water system. It is lack of systematic study of water gushing problem under tunnel spatial distribution. In this paper, the characteristics of karst water runoff under tunnel spatial distribution is summarized and divided into seven categories according to the difference in horizontal and vertical zoning of karst water. The spatial characteristics of karst water bearing media, differences in karst development and the features of karst water flow in the region have been analyzed. Accordingly, the types and features of karst water gushing were comparatively discussed. This paper also presents typical examples (Tongluoshan and Mingyueshan tunnels of proposed Chongqing-Wanzhou Passenger Line), which analyses the characteristic of the tunnel karst water and associated result show that Tongluoshan tunnel is identified as type one and Mingyueshan tunnel as type four. Combining with the differences in karst development, encountering water inrush is analysed by qualitative evaluation and calculation. Therefore, Tongluoshan tunnel will have a small amount of water gushing occurring only during rainy season, which will be controlled by rainfall intensity, whereas Mingyueshan tunnel will have a larger amount of gushing water.
-
Key words:
- ejective fold structure /
- tunnel /
- zoning of karst water /
- spatial distribution /
- water inflow
-
[1] 漆继红,许模,杨华云,等.川东铜锣山背斜—南温泉背斜温泉水力联系分析［J］.人民长江, 2011, 42(11):5-9. [2] 刘尚忠.川东薄皮构造模式之我见［J］.四川地质学报,1995,15(4): 264-267. [3] 秦昊斌.特长隧道涌突水综合反坡排水施工技术［J］.四川建材, 2015, 41(1):134-135. [4] 任蕊,许模.隔挡式背斜构造区隧道涌突水量的BP网络预测［J］.现代隧道技术,2011, 48(6):47-52. [5] 陈绍林,李茂珠,陈忠恕,等.四川广(安)—渝(重庆)高速公路华蓥山隧道岩溶突水的研究与整治［J］.岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(9):1344-1349. [6] 康小兵,许模,张强,等.模糊聚类分析预测隧道涌水灾害［J］.湖南科技大学学报(自然科版),2007, 22(3):81-84. [7] 李丹,刘涛,杜国平,等.TSP203在重庆铁峰山隧道涌水段超前地质预报中的应用［J］.工程勘查, 2006，(5):71-75. [8] 刘建,刘丹.铜锣山隧道涌水对降水的响应特征研究［J］.工程勘察,2010, 38(2):37-41. [9] 姚德华.成渝高速公路复线巴岳山隧道涌水量预测［J］.资源环境与工程. 2011, 25(3):225-231. [10] 张婉婷,漆继红,许模.西南地区隧道工程条件下岩溶地下水系统变化特征分析［J］.现代地质, 2015, 29(2)：421-427. [11] 蒙彦,雷明堂.岩溶区隧道涌水研究现状及建议［J］.中国岩溶,2003,22(4)：287-292. [12] 韩行瑞.岩溶隧道涌水及其专家评判系统［J］.中国岩溶,2004,23(3)：213-218. [13] 杜毓超,韩行瑞,李兆林.基于AHP的岩溶隧道涌水专家评判系统及其应用［J］.中国岩溶, 2009,28(3)：281-287. [14] 何明亮.川东互层式可溶岩背斜地下水径流特征研究［D］. 成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2013. [15] 章至洁,韩宝平,张月华.水文地质学基础［M］.徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社,2000. [16] 中国科学院地质研究所岩溶研究组.中国岩溶研究［M］. 北京: 科学出版社,1979. [17] 苏贵芬.新建云桂铁路广南段线路比选及地质控制因素研究［D］. 成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2010. [18] 中华人民共和国铁道部．TB10049—2004铁路工程水文地质勘察规程［S］．北京:中国铁道出版社，2004: 1-137. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1939
- HTML浏览量: 421
- PDF下载量: 1022
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
