长江流域不同地质生态环境土壤碳酸酐酶活性、有机碳含量及其相关性

潘伟志; Sila Onesmus Nzung’a; 申泰铭; 李 为; 王晨玮; 余龙江

doi:10.11932/karst20160206

长江流域不同地质生态环境土壤碳酸酐酶活性、有机碳含量及其相关性

doi: 10.11932/karst20160206

华中科技大学生命科学与技术学院生物技术系/资源生物学与生物技术研究所

基金项目: 中国地质调查局地质调查工作项目子项目（12120113005200）子课题

计量
- 文章访问数: 1811
- HTML浏览量: 356
- PDF下载量: 1033
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2016-04-25

Soil carbonic anhydrase activity, soil organic carbon and their relationships in different geological eco-environments of the Changjiang River basin

Institute of Resource Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Technology,Huazhong University of Science and Technology

摘要

摘要: 为了探讨流域岩溶生态系统土壤碳酸酐酶（CA）活性、有机碳含量及CA固碳之间的潜在关系，选取长江流域干流及支流沿岸不同地质生态环境下的10个样地，比较长江流域不同地质生态环境下表层土壤（0~20 cm）中的碳酸酐酶（CA）活性与土壤有机碳（SOC）含量，并分析二者之间的关系。结果表明：（1）长江流域岩溶区的表层土壤CA活性要高于非岩溶区（P<0.01），土壤CA活性的差异与样地的地质类型及植被类型不同有关;（2）位于岩溶区高场(GC)样地的年平均SOC含量最高（1.09%），而位于非岩溶区外洲（WZ）样地的年平均SOC含量最低（0.29%），而且总体比较而言，长江流域冬季表层土壤的平均SOC含量显著高于夏季（P<0.01）;（3）相关性分析结果显示，不同季节长江流域岩溶区表层土壤CA活性与SOC含量呈一定的正相关。研究结果为进一步研究流域岩溶生态系统土壤CA与土壤固碳能力之间的关系奠定了基础。
- 长江流域 /
- 不同地质生态环境 /
- 碳酸酐酶(CA) /
- 土壤有机碳(SOC) /
- 岩溶区
Abstract: Ten sampling plots in different geological eco-environments were selected along the main stream and tributaries of the Changjiang River basin. Carbonic Anhydrase (CA) activity and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) content in surface soils (0~20 cm) were studied and relationships between CA activity and SOC content were discussed. The results were as follows. (1) The CA activities in surface soils of karst areas were higher than those in non-karst areas (P<0.01). Different geological types and vegetation types resulted in different CA activities. (2) The plot GC in karst areas had the highest annual average SOC content (1.09%) while the plot WZ in non-karst area had the lowest annual average SOC content (0.29%). Moreover, the average surface SOC content in winter was significantly higher than that in summer (P<0.01). (3) Correlation analysis showed that CA activities in karst surface soils correlated positively with SOC contents in all seasons. The result of this paper lays a foundation for further studies on the role of soil CA in carbon sequestration in karst ecosystems of river basins.
- Changjiang River basin /
- different geological eco-environment /
- carbonic anhydrase(CA) /
- soil organic carbon(SOC) /
- karst area

HTML

参考文献(20)

[1]	Malte M, Nicolai M, William H, et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2℃［J］. Nature, 2009,458(7242):1158-1163.
[2]	曹建华, 袁道先, 潘根兴. 岩溶生态系统中的土壤［J］. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(1): 37-44.
[3]	袁道先. 新形势下我国岩溶研究面临的机遇和挑战［J］. 中国岩溶, 2009, 28(4): 329-331.
[4]	Jiang Z C, Yuan D X. CO2 source-sink in karst processes in karst areas of China［J］. Episodes, 1999, 22(1): 33-35.
[5]	潘根兴, 曹建华. 表层带岩溶作用：以土壤为媒介的地球表层生态系统过程:以桂林峰丛洼地岩溶系统为例［J］. 中国岩溶, 1999, 18(4): 287-296.
[6]	Tripp B C, Smith K, Ferry J G. Carbonic anhydrase: New insights for an ancient enzyme［J］. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001, 276(52):48615-48618.
[7]	Li W, Yu L J, He Q F, et al. Effects of microbes and their carbonic anhydrase on Ca2+ and Mg2+migration in column-built leached soil-limestone karst systems ［J］. Applied Soil Ecology, 2005,29(3):274-281.
[8]	Li W, Yu L J, Wu Y, et al. Enhancement of Ca2+ release from limestone by microbial extracellular carbonic anhydrase ［J］. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(4):950-953.
[9]	Li W, Zhou P P, Jia L P, et al. Limestone dissolution induced by fungal mycelia, acidic materials, and carbonic anhydrase from fungi ［J］. Mycopathologia,2009,167(1):37-46.
[10]	Zhang Z C, Lian B, Hou W G, et al. Bacillus mucilaginosus can capture atmospheric CO2 by carbonic anhydrase ［J］. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2011, 5(2): 106-112.
[11]	Liu Z H. Role of carbonic anhydrase as an activator in carbonate rock dissolution and its implication for atmospheric CO2 sink ［J］. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2001,75(3):275-278.
[12]	Li W, Yu L J, Yuan D X, et al. A study of the activity and ecological significance of carbonic anhydrase from soil and its microbes from different karst ecosystems of Southwest China［J］. Plant and Soil, 2005, 272(1-2):133-141.
[13]	Dean W E. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods ［J］. Journal of Sedimentary Research,1974,44(1): 242-248.
[14]	关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法［M］. 北京：农业出版社, 1986.
[15]	Pancholy S K, Rice E L. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease［J］. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1973,37(1):47-50.
[16]	张俊华, 李国栋, 南忠仁, 等.黑河中游不同土地利用类型下土壤碳储量及其空间变化［J］. 地理科学, 2011, 31(8): 982-987.
[17]	周莉, 李保国, 周广胜. 土壤有机碳的主导影响因子及其研究进展［J］. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(1): 99-105.
[18]	靳振江, 李强, 黄静云,等.典型岩溶生态系统土壤酶活性、微生物数量、有机碳含量及其相关性: 以丫吉岩溶试验场为例［J］. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(2): 307-313.
[19]	吴沿友, 邢德科, 刘莹. 植物利用碳酸氢根离子的特征分析［J］. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(2): 273-277.
[20]	Liu Y, Liu Z H, Zhang J L, et al. Experimental study on the utilization of DIC by Oocystis solitaria Wittr and its influence on the precipitation of calcium carbonate in karst and non karst waters［J］. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2010,25(1):21-26.