Differences in soil nutrient and carbon pool management index under different land management and utilization modes in karst slope region
-
摘要: 文章选择环江喀斯特农业生态试验站坡地，设计封育、种植玉米、种植牧草、火烧、刈割和刈割除根6种处理方式，测定了不同处理下坡地土壤养分含量、有机碳、易氧化碳含量和碳库管理指数。结果表明，不同处理下土壤养分含量、有机碳含量和碳库管理指数均存在明显差异。土壤全氮、全磷、碱解氮、速效钾、有机碳和易氧化碳含量随土壤人为干扰的增大而减小，种植玉米、种植牧草和刈割除根处理由于人为干扰较大，上述指标显著低于封育和火烧处理。土壤全钾和速效磷含量均以种植玉米处理最高，而刈割处理最低。土壤缓效钾含量以封育最高，种植玉米和种植牧草处理次之，而刈割处理最低。与封育相比，各处理土壤碳库管理指数均显著降低，其中种植玉米和火烧处理最低，并显著低于其他各处理。此外，土壤全氮、全磷、全钾、碱解氮和有机碳含量随坡位的升高而降低。在喀斯特生态脆弱地区，自然封育有利于土壤养分和碳库管理指数的保持和提高。随着土壤人为干扰的增大，土壤养分含量和碳库管理指数下降。Abstract: The study area, located at Huanjiang karst eco-system station of Chinese Academy of Sciences, falls into typical karst peak cluster depression landscape unit. In order to provide scientific basis for determining reasonable method of land management and utilization and further improving land quality under different slope land use conditions in karst region, the differences in soil nutrient and carbon pool management indexes in different land management and utilization conditions were investigated in this study. Six types of land use were implemented on the karst slope, via the measures of natural afforestation, maize planting, pasture planting, vegetation burning, tree/grass mowing and mowing plus root removal. Afterwards, the soil samples in 0 to 20 cm depth were collected at 5 localities respectively in the upper, middle and lower slope of each land treatment, from which the soil nutrient content, organic carbon, active organic carbon and carbon pool management indexes were measure, respectively. The results showed that the contents of soil nutrient and organic carbon and carbon pool management indexes were significantly different at different treated lands. The contents of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, available nitrogen, available potassium, organic carbon and active organic carbon in soils decreased with the increase of human interference on soils, and the above mentioned indexes under maize planting, pasture planting and mowing plus root removal treatments were significantly lower than those of natural afforestation and burning treatments, because of much more human interference on the soils. The lowest contents of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and available nitrogen occurred on maize planting lands, while the lowest content of available potassium on both maize planting and mowing plus root removal ones. The contents of total potassium and available phosphorus in the soils reached the highest on the land after maize planting treatment, but their lowest values occurred along with the tree/grass mowing treatment. The highest content of slowly available potassium in the soils occurred on the land with afforestation treatment, followed by that of maize and pasture planting treatments, while the lowest was on tree/grass mowing treatment. The lowest contents of soil organic carbon and active organic carbon were on those associated with maize planting treatment, decreased by 37.04% and 41.14%, respectively, comparing with the contents related to afforestation treatment. Except for the afforestation, the lands with the other treatments had a significant decrease in the carbon pool management index, of which the lowest occurred on those with maize planting and burning treatments. In addition, the contents of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, available nitrogen and organic carbon in soils decreased along with the slope altitude. From this study, it is understood that in ecological vulnerable karst region, natural afforestation is the most beneficial to the maintenance and improvement of soil nutrient and carbon pool management index. On contrary, by the increase of human interference on soils, the soil nutrient content and the carbon pool management index can be significantly reduced.
-
[1] Turner B L II,Meyer W B.Global land-use and land-cover change:An overview ［C］ // William B M,B L Turner II.Changes in land use and land cover:A Global Perspective.Cambridge,1994. [2] 孔祥斌,张凤荣,齐伟,等.集约化农区土地利用变化对土壤养分的影响：以河北省曲周县为例［J］.地理学报,2003,58(3):333-342. [3] 沙丽清,邱学忠,甘建民,等.云南保山西庄山地流域土地利用方式与土壤肥力关系研究 ［J］.生态学杂志,2003,22(4):9-11. [4] 刘文,张强,贾亚男.夏季不同土地利用方式下的溶蚀作用研究：以重庆青木关岩溶槽谷区为例［J］.中国岩溶,2012,31(1):1-6. [5] 李先琨,何成新,蒋忠诚.岩溶脆弱生态区生态恢复、重建的原理与方法［J］.中国岩溶,2003,22(1):12-17. [6] 龙健,李娟,汪境仁,等.典型喀斯特地区石漠化演变过程对土壤质量性状的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2006,20 (2):77- 81. [7] 严宁珍,白仲才,徐卫红,等.喀斯特山地土地利用方式对土壤团粒的影响：以重庆黔江为例［J］.中国岩溶,2011,30(1):72-77. [8] 彭晚霞,王克林,宋同清,等.喀斯特脆弱生态系统复合退化控制与重建模式［J］.生态学报,2008,28(2):811-820. [9] Powers J S.Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen after contrasting land use transitions in northeastern Costa Rica［J］.Ecosystems,2004,7(2):134-146. [10] 严宁珍,杨剑虹,屈明,等.渝东南岩溶山地土地利用方式对土壤有机碳时空分布特征的影响［J］.中国岩溶,2012,31(1):36-39. [11] Gemma D,Giovanni P,Maria G.Land use change effects on abandoned terraced soils in a Mediterranean catchment,NE Spain ［J］.Catena,2003,52(4):23-37. [12] Pamela H,Peter M,Alex S,et al.Land use change and soil nutrient transformations in the Los Haitises region of the Dominican Republic ［J］.USA Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2004,37(2):215-225. [13] 郑华,苏以荣,何寻阳,等.土地利用方式对喀斯特峰林谷地土壤养分的影响：以广西环江县大才村为例［J］.中国岩溶,2008,27(2) :177-181. [14] 马群,赵庚星.集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响 ［J］.自然资源学报,2010,25(11):1834-1844. [15] 陈春瑜,和树庄,胡斌,等.土地利用方式对滇池流域土壤养分时空分布的影响［J］.应用生态学报,2012,23(10):2677-2684. [16] Lefroy R D,Blair G J,Strong W M.Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and 13C natural isotope abundance［J］.Plant & Soil,1993,155(1):399-402. [17] 徐明岗,于荣,孙小凤,等.长期施肥对我国典型土壤活性有机质及碳库管理指数的影响［J］.植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(4):459-465. [18] 唐国勇,李昆,孙永玉,等.土地利用方式对土壤有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响［J］.林业科学研究,2011,24(6):754-759. [19] 徐鹏,江长胜,郝庆菊,等.缙云山土地利用方式对土壤活性有机质及其碳库管理指数的影响［J］.环境科学,2013,34(10):4009-4016. [20] 兰安军,张百平,熊康宁.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析［J］.地理研究,2003,22(6):733-742. [21] 贾红杰,傅瓦利,甄晓君,等.岩溶山区不同利用方式下土地蓄水能力研究：以重庆市中梁山为例［J］.中国岩溶,2007,26(4):305-309. [22] 王月容,卢琦,周金星,等.喀斯特山区不同石漠化等级下土壤养分贮量与价值评估：以乌箐、偏岩等岩溶小流域为例［J］.中国岩溶,2012,31(1):40-45. [23] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析［M］.北京:中国农业出版社,2000. [24] 邱莉萍,张兴昌,程积民.土地利用方式对土壤有机质及其碳库管理指数的影响［J］.中国环境科学,2009,29（1）:84-89. [25] 徐波,朱雪梅,刘倩,等.川中丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分特征研究：以中国科学院盐亭紫色土农业生态试验站小流域为例［J］.西南农业学报,2011,24(2):663-668. [26] 李新爱,肖和艾,吴金水,等.喀斯特地区不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳、全氮以及微生物生物量碳和氮的影响［J］.应用生态学报,2006,17(10):1827-1831. [27] 张静,高云华,张池,等.不同土地利用方式下赤红壤生物学性状及其与土壤肥力的关系［J］.应用生态学报,2013,24（12）:3423-3430. [28] 蓝家程,傅瓦利,袁波,等.岩溶山区土地利用方式对土壤活性有机碳及其分布的影响［J］.中国岩溶,2011,30(2):175-180. [29] 杨慧,张连凯,曹建华,等.桂林毛村岩溶区不同土地利用方式土壤有机碳矿化及土壤碳结构比较［J］.中国岩溶,2011,30(4):410-416. [30] 吴士章,朱文孝,苏维词,等.喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀及养分流失定位试验研究:以贵阳市修文县久长镇为例［J］.中国岩溶,2005,24(3):202-205. [31] 傅伯杰,郭旭东,陈利顶,等.土地利用变化与土壤养分的变化：以河北省遵化县为例［J］.生态学报,2001,21(6):926-931. [32] 杨敏,陈国建,韦杰,等.坡改梯地区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分的影响：以重庆市巫山县为例［J］.重庆师范大学学报（自然科学版）,2012,29（6）:43-46. [33] 文菀玉,王凯荣,谢小立.红壤稻田不同施肥制度对土壤钾平衡和水稻产量的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报,2007,15(3):41-44. [34] 盛海君,夏小燕,杨丽琴,等.施磷对土壤速效磷含量及径流磷组成的影响［J］.生态学报,2004,24(12):2837-2840. [35] 宋希娟,王克林,刘淑娟,等.桂西北喀斯特地区不同土地利用方式土壤的有机碳含量及养分特征［J］.湖南农业大学学报（自然科学版）,2013,39（6）:655-659. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2576
- HTML浏览量: 359
- PDF下载量: 1419
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
