基于SPA的喀斯特地区水安全评价——以贵州省为例

苏 印; 官冬杰; 苏维词

doi:10.11932/karst20150604

基于SPA的喀斯特地区水安全评价——以贵州省为例

doi: 10.11932/karst20150604

1.
重庆交通大学建筑与城市规划学院
2.
重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院/贵州科学院山地资源研究所

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（41201546，41261038）；重庆市自然科学基金（cstc2012jjA20010）；黔科合JZ字\[2014\]200206；国家重大科技水环境污染与控制治理专项（2009ZX07528-003）（2012ZX07503-002）；重庆研究生科研创新项目（CYS14159）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1807
- HTML浏览量: 361
- PDF下载量: 1142
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 发布日期: 2015-12-25

The assessment of water security in karst region by SPA model:A case study of Guizhou Province

1.
School of Architecture and Urban Planning，Chongqing Jiaotong University
2.
College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University/Institute of Mountain Resources, Guizhou Academy of Sciences

摘要

摘要: 根据目前公认的水安全内涵，将水安全分为三个子系统。水资源子系统、水环境子系统和水灾害子系统。三者相互联系、相互作用，形成了复杂、时变的水安全系统。基于水安全的基本原理和喀斯特区域特有的水循环机理，依据 “驱动力（D）—压力（P）—状态（S）—影响（I）—响应（R）”模型建立了贵州省喀斯特区域水安全评价指标体系。基于集对分析理论，引入能够体现系统确定性和不确定性的同异反联系度计算公式，建立了城市水安全的评价模型。将集对分析法运用到水安全的评价中, 可以先通过计算评价样本与评价指标之间的联系度对样本作初步的排序, 再对样本作进一步的同一、差异、对立的集对分析，以判断出评价样本的等级。研究结果表明：（1）在水资源安全状态方面，贵州省9个州市中4个处于安全状态，2个处于基本安全状态，2个处于不安全状态，1个处于危机状态；（2）在水环境安全状态方面，2个处于安全状态，4个处于基本安全，3个处于不安全；（3）在水灾害安全状态方面，1个处于非常安全，4个处于安全，1个处于基本安全，2个处于不安全，1个处于危机；（4）在水安全综合状态下，有3个处于安全状态，有4个处于基本安全状态，有2个处于不安全状态，没有处于非常安全和危机状态。
- 水安全 /
- 集对分析（SPA） /
- 指标体系 /
- 贵州省
Abstract: Water resource is irreplaceable in natural ecosystem and socio-economic system. Its safety is of great importance. According to the concept of water security, the water security system is divided into three parts, i.e. water resource sub-system, water environment sub-system and water disaster sub-system. The three sub-systems are interrelated and interacted, forming the complex and dynamic water security system. Based on the basic principle of water security and the specific water circulation mechanism in karst area, this paper improved the “DPSIR" model to establish the evaluation index system of water security in Guizhou karst area. The five types of indicators fully describe the comprehensive situation of water security. Using set pair analysis theory, the hierarchies of water safety status in Guizhou were divided into five grades: very safe, safe, acceptable, unsafe and very unsafe. The results demonstrate that: (1) in terms of water resource, four cities are “safe”; two are “acceptable”; two are ”unsafe”; one is “very unsafe”. (2) In terms of water environment, two cities are ”safe”; four are “acceptable”; three are ”unsafe”. (3) in terms of water disaster , four cities are “safe”; two are “unsafe”; one is “acceptable” and one is “very safe”; one in crisis. (4) In terms of comprehensive water security, three cities are “safe”; four are “acceptable”; two are “unsafe”. The status of water security is closely related to the social and economic development.
- water security /
- set pair analysis /
- index system /
- Guizhou Province

HTML

参考文献(33)

[1]	郭永龙,武强,王焰新,等.中国的水安全及其对策探讨［J］.安全与环境工程,2004,11(1):42-46.
[2]	龚静怡.水安全的研究进展及中国水安全问题［J］.江苏水利, 2005，(1):28-32.
[3]	成建国,杨小柳,魏传江,等.论水安全［J］.中国水利,2004，(1):21-23.
[4]	张翔,夏军,贾绍凤.水安全定义及其评价指数的应用［J］.资源科学,2005,27(3):145-149.
[5]	陈绍金,施国庆,顾琦仪.水安全系统的理论框架［J］.水资源保护,2005，(3):9-11.
[6]	邱德华.区域水安全战略的研究进展［J］.水科学进展,2005,16(2):306-312.
[7]	魏雅丽,王立国.水资源对人类的负面影响［J］.北方环境,2005,30(1): 42-44.
[8]	谢崔娜,许世远,王军，等.城市水资源综合风险评价指标体系与模型构建［J］.环境科学与管理,2008,33(5):163-168.
[9]	王瑞芳,秦大庸,张占庞.层次分析法在山西省水资源安全评价中的应用［J］.人民黄河,2008,30(9): 40-42.
[10]	杨全明,王浩,赵先进.贵州水资源安全问题初探［J］.生态学杂志, 2005,24(11):1347-1350.
[11]	曾畅云,李贵宝,傅桦.水环境安全的研究进展［J］.水利发展研究,2004，(4):20-22.
[12]	畅明奇,黄强.水资源安全理论与方法［M］.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006．
[13]	Rijiberman, Fhmw ven.et al. Different approaches to assessment of design and management of sustainable urban water systems［J］. Environment inpact Assessment Review, 2000,20(3):333-345.
[14]	李滨勇,史正涛,董铭等.水资源承载力研究现状与发展趋势［J］.水利发展研究,2007，(1):36-39.
[15]	张勇,王东宇,杨凯.美国饮用水源突发污染事件应急管理及其借鉴［J］.中国给水排水,2006，(16):7-11.
[16]	Martijnvanden Hurk, Ellen Mastenbroek, Sander Meijerink. Water safety and spatial development:an institutional comparison between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands［J］. Land Use Policy, 2014, 36(1):416-426.
[17]	F. Bassi, A. Crivellini, V,et al. Dossena. Investigation of flow phenomena in airwater safety relief valves by means of a discontinuous Galerkin solver［J］. Computers&Fluids, 2014, 90 (10):57-64.
[18]	A.N. Yakimenko. Estimation of water quality of the Kiev reservoir by indices of radiation safety［J］. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 35(4):189-193.
[19]	Jishi Zhang,Yongqiu Zhang,Ruifeng Pu, et al. Safety analysis of water resources and eco-environment in Shiyang River Basin［J］. Chinese Geographical Science, 2005, 15(3):238-244.
[20]	V.N. Shchedrin, Y.M. Kosichenko. Safety problems of water-development works designed for land reclamation［J］. Power Technology and Engineering, 2011, 45 (4):264-269.
[21]	Haifeng Jia, Shidong Liang, Yansong Zhang. Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach［J］. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 1(1):84-95.
[22]	龙祥瑜,赵剑,唐辉.沈阳市水资源承载力研究［J］.沈阳农业大学学报,2004,35(1):48-51.
[23]	姚治君,刘宝勤,高迎春.基于区域发展目标下的水资源承载能力研究［J］.水科学进展,2005,16(1): 109-113.
[24]	夏军,张永勇,王中根等.城市化地区水资源承载力研究［J］.水利学报,2006,37(12):1482-1488.
[25]	王超,王沛芳.城市水生态系统建设与管理［M］.北京:科学出版社,2004.
[26]	李万莲.沿淮城市水环境演变与水生态安全的研究——以蚌埠为例［D］.上海:华东师范大学,2005.
[27]	曹琦,陈兴鹏,师满江.基于DPSIR概念的城市水资源安全评价及调控［J］.资源科学,2012,34(8):1591-1599.
[28]	董四方,董增川,陈康宁等.基于DPSIR概念模型的水资源系统脆弱性分析［J］.水资源保护,2010,26(4):1-3.
[29]	赵克勤.试论集对分析与模糊数学的关系［C］//中国中南地区模糊数学与系统分会模糊数学和系统成果会论文集，1991.
[30]	史德明.长江流域水土流失与洪涝灾害关系剖析［J］.水土保持学报,1999,5(3):1-7.
[31]	郑长统，梁虹.基于人工神经网络的喀斯特地区水资源载力综合评价：以贵州省为例［J］.中国岩溶，2010，29（2）：170-175.
[32]	易武英，苏维词.典型喀斯特城市水资源与社会经济发展耦合度评价：以贵阳市为例［J］.中国岩溶，2012，32（4）：402-408.
[33]	王宇.西南地区岩溶水源地类型及开发技术条件［J］.中国岩溶，2009，28（4）：370-374.