Optimum modes of sustainable agricultural development in karst small watersheds of southwestern China
-
摘要: 以贵州为代表的西南岩溶地区,农业人口众多,水土资源匹配程度低,人地矛盾突出,农业发展环境先天不足,农业发展缓慢。文章通过野外实地考察并结合相关理论分析认为,水土资源匹配问题并不是限制农业发展的关键,其关键在于现行农业发展模式收益普遍较低,农业生产要素外流,导致农业生产模式缺乏创新。现行传统农业发展模式下农户收益低,且农业生产机会成本高,导致农户对农业投入减少,农业生产要素外流严重。而提高农业生产收益就成为促进农业可持续发展的关键。因此,根据因地制宜突出特色、农户生计与环境保护兼顾和“外驱”与“内生”农业创新模式相结合的农业建设和发展原则,发展以商品化有机生态农业的发展模式、乡村旅游及农业生产复合发展模式和区域标准化农业联合生产模式为代表的,以保障提高农户收益为核心的新农业发展模式,从根本上促进生产要素回流农业生产,是实现农业生产创新和持续发展的根本所在。Abstract: In karst areas of southwestern China, represented by Guizhou Province, there exist a series problems limiting agricultural development, such as large agricultural population, the low match degree of land and water resources, obvious contradiction between human and land. And the agricultural development environment in these regions is inherently short, resulting in slow agricultural development. Field investigations and theoretical analysis reveal that soil and water resources matching problem is not the key factor to limit agricultural development. The real reason lies in generally low income under the current modes of agricultural development. The agricultural production elements flow out, resulting in a lack of innovation. Under the existing agricultural development mode, the farmers, which only provide raw materials, are in the bottom of the industrial chain of agricultural products. They are affected by the capital competition for profits in the processing and sales, so their income and capacity to withstand changes in the market are low. Thus, according to local conditions, highlighting the characteristics, considering both household livelihood and environmental protection, combining the "outer drive" and the "endogenous" innovative agriculture, three agricultural development modes are proposed, commercial organic ecological agriculture mode, rural tourism and agricultural production mode, and regional standardized agricultural mode. The purpose of these modes is to protect the farmers’ income, promote agricultural production factors reflux fundamentally, which are vital to achieve sustainable development of agricultural production.
-
Key words:
- karst areas /
- small watershed /
- agricultural development mode /
- Guizhou Province
-
[1] 蒋忠诚,裴建国, 夏日元, 等.我国“十一五”期间的岩溶研究进展与重要活动[J].中国岩溶, 2010, 29(4): 349-354. [2] 王克林.生态脆弱区域农业与环境协调发展策略[J].中国生态农业学报, 2001, 9(2): 86-88. [3] 张军以,戴明宏,王腊春,等.基于农户视角的岩溶石漠化小流域农业发展模式研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1): 126-132. [4] 国家林业局. 2012年中国石漠化检测公报[R].国家林业局, 2012. [5] 苏维词,张贵平.地表起伏对区域发展成本影响浅析:以贵州为例[J].经济研究导刊,2012(6):144-146,156. [6] 国土资源部中国地质调查局.西南岩溶石山地区地下水勘查与生态环境地质调查评价报告[R].国土资源部中国地质调查局,2012. [7] 苏维词.滇桂黔石漠化集中连片特困区开发式扶贫的模式与长效机制[J].贵州科学, 2012, 30(4): 1-5. [8] 贵州省统计局.贵州统计年鉴2012[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2012. [9] 朱青,王兆骞,尹迪信.贵州坡耕地水土保持措施效益研究[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(2):119-230. [10] 张军以.贵州典型喀斯特峰丛洼地水土资源匹配结构及其利用模式研究[D].重庆师范大学, 2011. [11] 张军连,周灵霞,谢俊奇,等.我国西部地区水土资源匹配模式与政策研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,23(6):647-656. [12] 蔡秋, 陈梅琳. 农业资源高效集约利用是贵州喀斯特地区农业持续发展的根本途径[J]. 经济地理, 2000, 20(4): 81-84. [13] 蒋忠诚, 李先琨, 覃小群, 等. 论岩溶峰丛洼地石漠化的综合治理技术:以广西平果果化示范区为例[J].中国岩溶, 2008, 27(1): 50-55. [14] 苏维词,杨华.典型喀斯特峡谷石漠化地区生态农业模式探析:以贵州省花江大峡谷顶坛片区为例[J].中国生态农业学报, 2006, 13(4): 217-220. [15] 李先琨, 吕仕洪, 蒋忠诚, 等. 喀斯特峰丛区复合农林系统优化与植被恢复试验[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 92-98. [16] 周玮, 熊康宁, 高渐飞. 喀斯特小流域石漠化耕地治理方式研究:以贵州毕节石桥小流域、 关岭木工小流域为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2010, 29(4): 419-424. [17] 左太安.贵州喀斯特石漠化治理模式类型及典型治理模式对比研究[D].重庆师范大学,2010. [18] 张军以,戴明宏,王腊春,等. 生态功能优先背景下的西南岩溶区石漠化治理问题[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(4): 77-85. [19] 马世铭, Sauerborn J. 世界有机农业发展的历史回顾与发展动态[J].中国农业科学, 2004, 37(10): 1510-1516. [20] 韩占兵.消费者对有机农产品的认知水平及购买行为研究:基于北京、武汉市城镇消费者的调查分析[J].农村经济与科技,2013,24(2):5-8. [21] 蒋忠诚.广西弄拉峰丛石山生态重建经验及生态农业结构优化[J].广西科学, 2001,8(4):308-312. [22] 傅迎春.2012“抢抓机遇、提速转型,扎实推动全省旅游业创新发展”. [EB/OL]. (2012-02-16)[2013-01-20]. http://www.gztour.gov.cn/typenews.asp?id=6352.html,2012-02-16. [23] 蒋焕洲.贵州旅游资源深度开发对策研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2012(2):66-68.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1844
- HTML浏览量: 319
- PDF下载量: 1522
- 被引次数: 0