Characteristics of the Longjian spring karst water system
-
摘要: 文章以地下水系统理论为指导,对龙涧泉岩溶水系统的边界条件、人工干预条件下地下水动力场演化特征等方面进行了系统的研究。根据区域地质、构造、地形地貌和水文地质条件,探究了龙涧泉岩溶水系统,圈定了系统的范围、边界性质、流动系统内部及其与外部系统之间的关系,确定龙涧泉为系统的唯一天然排泄口,龙涧泉岩溶水系统与白浪岩溶水系统无直接水力联系。龙涧泉岩溶水系统岩溶水补给来源主要是大气降水、河流入渗及侧向径流补给,现状条件下总补给量为864.42万m3/a,多年平均补给量为836.81万m3/a;排泄主要是水源地开采和矿山排水,现状开采量为4 117.2万m3/a。由于开采量大于允许开采量,并超过了总补给量,区内岩溶水一直处于超采状态。2004—2008年矿区岩溶水实测年均下降1.61 m/a,多年(1984—2008)水位平均降幅为5.68 m/a,最大降幅17.42 m/a。此外还讨论了岩溶水系统的补给、排泄条件,提出了龙涧泉岩溶水开发、保护、复泉与管理龙涧泉岩溶水系统的建议。Abstract: The research area is located in the eastward extension of Xiao mountain in the Qinling Mountain range, with undulating terrain of low mountains and hills. Longjian spring exposes in the Longjian valley near Longjian village in Xin’an county, Luoyang. In order to provide technical support for sustainable development of karst water resources,boundary conditions and hydrodynamic field evolution under manual intervention were systematically studied, taking groundwater systems theory as a guide. According to the regional geology, structure, topography and hydrogeological conditions, this paper analyzed the karst water system, and delimited the range of the system, boundary features and the relationship between the internal and external flow systems. Finally, the Longjian spring was determined to be the only natural drainage. There is no direct hydraulic connection between Longjian spring karst water system and Bailang karst water system. The main recharge sources of the Longjian spring karst water system are precipitation, river infiltration and lateral runoff recharge. The total recharge is 864.42×104 m3/a,and the average annual recharge is 836.81×104 m3/a. The main discharge sources are water resource exploitation and mine drainage. The exploited quantity is 4,117.2×104 m3/a . Because the exploited quantity is greater than the total recharge, the karst water in the research area has been in a state of over-exploitation. The measured annual average decline from 2004 to 2008 was 1.61 m/a. The water level decline was 5.68 m/a in several years (1984 to 2008), and the biggest decline was 17.42 m/a. In addition, the recharge and discharge conditions of the karst water system are discussed, and suggestions for exploitation, conservation, recovery and management of the Longjian spring karst water system are given.
-
Key words:
- Longjian spring /
- karst water /
- system /
- environmental evolution /
- protection
-
[1] 王大纯,张人权,史毅虹,等.水文地质学基础[M].北京:地质出版社,1995:50-86. [2] 沈照理,朱宛华,钟佐燊,等.水文地球化学基础[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:30-52. [3] 董兆祥,王彦祺,张明义,等.矿区环境地质问题的预测与防治[M].北京:地质出版社,1997:81-93. [4] 景可,卢金发,樊季阳,等. 黄河中游侵蚀环境特征和变化趋势[M]. 郑州:黄河水利出版社,1997: 61-93. [5] 王现国.豫西黄河流域土壤侵蚀现状研究[J]. 人民黄河,2005,27(3):40-41. [6] 许文峰,王现国,刘记成,等.洛阳盆地地下水动力场环境演化研究[J]. 人民黄河,2007,29(2):54-55. [7] 王现国,吴东民,陈峰,等.三门峡市地质灾害发育特征与防治对策研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(3):32-38. [8] 杨现国.泉水信息在研究水文地质条件中的应用[J].河南地质,2000,18(2):131-134. [9] 王现国,刘丕新,董永志,等.浅层孔隙地下水水质演化机理研究[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2005. [10] 程东,赵志怀.山西煤矿开采对水环境的影响[J].华北地质矿产杂志,1996,11(2):182-188. [11] 邵改群.山西煤矿开采对地下水影响评价[J].中国煤田地质,2001,13(1):41-43. [12] 范立民.论保水采煤问题[J].煤田地质与勘探,2005,33(5):50-53. [13] 杨丽.煤炭开发引发的水问题及对策[J].洁净煤技术,2008,14(4):5-7. [14] 王晓宇.山西煤炭开采对水资源的影响分析及对策研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2003,13(12):107-109. [15] 张丹青.古交市地下水污染评价分析与防治对策[J].人民黄河,2008,30(12):72-75.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1901
- HTML浏览量: 345
- PDF下载量: 1504
- 被引次数: 0