济南十大泉群特征、形成模式及水循环差异性浅析
Characteristics, formation models and water cycle differences of ten major spring groups in Jinan City
-
摘要: 为了全面系统地认识济南十大泉群,文章采用对比分析法揭示十大泉群分布、流量、景观及水质特征,通过水文地质结构精细刻画与泉水排泄条件分析,进一步明确十大泉群成因差异性,归纳泉水形成模式,揭示十大泉群水循环的差异性。结果表明:十大泉群基本特征可大致分为两类,即排泄区6个泉群均为上升泉、南部补给区4个泉群均为下降泉;十大泉群形成模式可划分为五类,即构造凸起—灰岩“天窗”成泉、构造凸起—裂隙连通成泉、浅埋多层砂层与高渗透黏土导通成泉、断裂切割成泉和侵蚀溢流成泉模式;宏观上济南十大泉群水循环受北倾单斜构造控制,其输入条件、输导系统和输出方式差异较小;微观上6个承压型泉群泉水输出方式差异性明显,其灰岩覆盖层类型、厚度、渗透性及灰岩顶板埋深差别较大,导致泉水出流形态、流量及水质不同,形成各自独特的景观。岩溶泉水微观成因的详细研究可为济南十大泉群分类保护提供重要地质依据。Abstract: The purpose of this work is to systematically and comprehensively understand the ten major spring groups in Jinan City. By comparison, characteristics of the distribution,flow,landscape and water quality of these spring groups are revealed. Through fine description of hydrogeological structure and analysis of spring discharge conditions,the genetic differences of the spring groups are further clarified,the formation modes of spring water are summarized,and the differences of water cycles are clarified. The results show that the ten spring groups can be roughly divided into two categories,six ascending spring groups in the drainage area and four descending spring groups in the southern supply area. Their formation models can be divided into five types:structural uplift and limestone "sky light",structural uplift and crack connection,shallow multi-layer sand layer and high permeability clay conduction, crack cutting and erosion overflow. Macroscopically,the water circulation of the ten spring groups in Jinan is controlled by the northward inclined monocline structure,in which the input conditions,transport systems and output modes have small differences. On a micro scale,there are obvious differences in the way of spring water output among the six pressure spring groups, of which the type,thickness,permeability of limestone overburden and burial depth of limestone roof vary greatly,resulting in different spring water outflow forms,flow and water quality,forming their own unique landscapes. The detailed study on the micro genesis of karst springs can provide an important geological basis for the classified protection of the ten spring groups in Jinan.
-
Key words:
- ten spring groups /
- spring water /
- characteristics /
- formation model /
- water cycle
-
[1] 方鸿慈. 济南地下水调查及其涌泉机构之判断[J].地质论评, 1948,13(2):231-238. [2] 郭玉文, 王飞龙.山东岩溶泉[J].山东地质,1986,2(2):76-85. [3] 相华, 封得华, 蒋国民. 济南四大泉群泉水出流量分析[J]. 山东水利, 2017 (12): 49-50. [4] 徐光瑜, 刘福臣, 张道震. 济南市四大泉群泉流量衰减规律研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2010, 32(12): 87-89. [5] 祁晓凡, 李文鹏, 李海涛, 等. 济南岩溶泉域地下水位, 降水, 气温与大尺度气象模式的遥相关[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2015 (6): 18-28. [6] 祁晓凡, 李文鹏, 杨丽芝, 等. 济南白泉泉域地下水位动态对降水响应的年内时滞分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2015, 43(6): 619-627. [7] 于翠翠, 陈瑞恒, 胡思敬, 等. 应用 SPSS 分析降水年际年内变化对泉水动态影响:以济南明水泉域百脉泉群为例[J]. 山东国土资源, 2017, 33(3): 52-58. [8] 黄薛, 曾纯品, 何瑞, 等. 济南名泉舜井成因探讨[J]. 山东国土资源, 2013, 29(9): 34-36. [9] 张兰新, 徐扬, 张慧. 济南白泉泉群形成机理研究[J]. 山东国土资源, 2017, 33(8): 58-62. [10] 付东叶, 高明波, 朱国庆. 洪范池镇泉水的地质成因探析[J]. 资源与产业, 2007, 9(6): 109-111. [11] 孙斌, 彭玉明. 济南泉域边界条件, 水循环特征及水环境问题[J]. 中国岩溶, 2014, 33(3): 272-279. [12] 孟庆斌, 邢立亭, 滕朝霞. 济南泉域 “三水” 转化与泉水恢复关系研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (工学版), 2008, 38(5): 82-87. [13] 侯新文, 邢立亭, 孙蓓蓓,等. 济南市岩溶水系统分级及市区与东西郊的水力联系[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014.28(4):300-305. [14] 高赞东, 段秀铭, 王庆兵, 等. 济南岩溶泉域地下水水质监测[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2008, 35(2): 10-17. [15] 殷秀兰, 王庆兵, 凤蔚. 济南岩溶泉域泉群区水化学与环境同位素研究[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(7): 1651-1660. [16] 秦品瑞. 济南岩溶水系统数值模拟与保泉供水开采方案[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(3): 30-36. [17] 邢立亭. 济南泉域岩溶地下水开发布局研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2007, 29(2): 46-47. [18] 邢立亭. 济南泉域岩溶水环境保护[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2006, 12(9): 601-604. [19] 徐军祥, 邢立亭, 佟光玉, 等. 济南泉域地下水环境演化与保护[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2004, 31(6): 69-73. [20] 孙斌,彭玉明,李常锁,等.济南岩溶水系统划分及典型泉域水力联系[J] .山东国土资源, 2016,32(10):31-34. [21] 济南市史志办公室.济南泉水志[M].济南:济南出版社,2013 :19-27. [22] 薛翊国, 李术才, 滕德宾, 等. 济南地下泉域水资源研究进展与建议[J]. 黑龙江水专学报, 2009 (3): 97-99. [23] 奚德荫, 孙斌, 秦品瑞. 济南泉水研究[M].济南:济南出版社,2017:57-58. [24] 黄薛, 曾纯品, 雷炳霄,等. 济南富水孔隙黏性土地层渗透性试验研究[J]. 地质学报, 2019,93(S1):87-92.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1366
- HTML浏览量: 551
- PDF下载量: 216
- 被引次数: 0